Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 11:12 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The best resolution to a situation like this is simply to fix the > problem that's causing images to fail to build in the first place. I should note for the record that both the images missing from RC-1.4 were present in RC-1.5, which

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On Tue, 2017-07-11 at 11:24 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 01:10:52PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > > But we can't "just ignore the compose tools", because we want the > > > metadata to actually be correct and consistent. If we dump an ISO into > > > a compose link this,

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On Tue, Jul 11, 2017 at 01:10:52PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > But we can't "just ignore the compose tools", because we want the > > metadata to actually be correct and consistent. If we dump an ISO into > > a compose link this, it won't be. > > Real users don't care about metadata that you

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

Adam Williamson wrote: > But we can't "just ignore the compose tools", because we want the > metadata to actually be correct and consistent. If we dump an ISO into > a compose link this, it won't be. Real users don't care about metadata that you upload to some obscure server like pdc.fp.o that

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On Thu, 2017-07-06 at 10:05 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 02:33:01PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > With Pungi 4 we really can't do that any more. Composes have a much > > more solid identity as an actual thing. 'A compose' has a compose ID, > > production composes have

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On Mon, 2017-07-10 at 00:05 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > Note that for dumb reasons that I hate we actually strip the metadata > > from the final compose when it's actually approved and shipped out to > > mirrors, but when a compose completes, the metadata related to

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

Adam Williamson wrote: > Note that for dumb reasons that I hate we actually strip the metadata > from the final compose when it's actually approved and shipped out to > mirrors, but when a compose completes, the metadata related to that > compose is uploaded to PDC: https://pdc.fedoraproject.org/

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 02:33:01PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > With Pungi 4 we really can't do that any more. Composes have a much > more solid identity as an actual thing. 'A compose' has a compose ID, > production composes have a label, and these can't really be duplicated. > There is a

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On Wed, Jul 05, 2017 at 03:04:36PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > Nope. This came up last cycle or two where compose had a weird bug > preventing umount of the installation root fs image file, resulting in > a corrupt file system and ensuing boot failure of the ISO. And > actually there were some

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 15:04 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > So... this prompts a question in my head. I understand we don't block > > release for non-blocking spins. That is obvious. > > > > What is not obvious to

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On Wed, 2017-07-05 at 14:50 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 07/04/2017 03:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 09:32 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > > > > Looks like one compose failed *again* for some

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > So... this prompts a question in my head. I understand we don't block > release for non-blocking spins. That is obvious. > > What is not obvious to me is if we would go back and do a compose > later for those spins

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 6:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 07/04/2017 03:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 09:32 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: >>> Looks like one compose failed *again* for some mirror issue… This time >>> it is Robotic [1] , but i've seen these

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On Tue, Jul 4, 2017 at 11:41 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 07/04/2017 03:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 09:32 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: >>> Looks like one compose failed *again* for some mirror issue… This time >>> it is Robotic [1] , but i've seen

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On 07/04/2017 03:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 09:32 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: >> Looks like one compose failed *again* for some mirror issue… This time >> it is Robotic [1] , but i've seen these random failures several times, >> also for Astronomy for example. So a

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

On Tue, 2017-07-04 at 09:32 +0200, Christian Dersch wrote: > Looks like one compose failed *again* for some mirror issue… This time > it is Robotic [1] , but i've seen these random failures several times, > also for Astronomy for example. So a new compose should be done here to > ensure the Spin

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 26 Candidate RC-1.4 Available Now!

Looks like one compose failed *again* for some mirror issue… This time it is Robotic [1] , but i've seen these random failures several times, also for Astronomy for example. So a new compose should be done here to ensure the Spin gets in properly, it is not an issue with the Spin here but an issue