On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 05:09:17PM -0400, James Antill wrote:
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 09:56 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
Then the curious minds ask ... why clean_requirements_on_remove = 1
isn't a default?
The main two main reasons we didn't just turn it on when written are:
1. New code in
Le Ven 22 juin 2012 15:22, Reindl Harald a écrit :
Am 22.06.2012 15:17, schrieb Zdenek Pavlas:
From: Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
can we get a package downloader that sends the correct
cache-control http headers to refresh data automatically
instead of complaining metadata
Am 22.06.2012 15:17, schrieb Zdenek Pavlas:
From: Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
can we get a package downloader that sends the correct
cache-control http headers to refresh data automatically
instead of complaining metadata is wrong and aborting
(for people behind a caching
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 10:02 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 21/06/12 16:54, Michal Schmidt wrote:
http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/orphaned-dep-cleanup-in-yum/
Is there some post-processing tool which would should me all packages
for which there is no reason? Brief look at the source of
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 09:56 +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 21/06/12 16:54, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 06/21/2012 04:27 PM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com writes:
We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in yum.conf
in which version that is supported?
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 10:10 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 21 juin 2012 14:23, Matej Cepl a écrit :
On 19/06/12 15:33, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. I considered history a candidate for
dropping because I didn't realize people had usecases for it. It is not
On 25/06/12 23:04, James Antill wrote:
yumdb unset reason '*'
Thanks ... results are interesting.
Matěj
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 21/06/12 16:54, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 06/21/2012 04:27 PM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com writes:
We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in yum.conf
in which version that is supported?
Since 3.2.28-13
On 21/06/12 16:54, Michal Schmidt wrote:
http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/orphaned-dep-cleanup-in-yum/
Is there some post-processing tool which would should me all packages
for which there is no reason? Brief look at the source of
packages-cleanup shows that --orphans isn't the one.
Le Jeu 21 juin 2012 14:23, Matej Cepl a écrit :
On 19/06/12 15:33, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. I considered history a candidate for
dropping because I didn't realize people had usecases for it. It is not
present in the early versions of DNF but I will make sure to put
2012/6/22 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com:
On 21/06/12 16:54, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 06/21/2012 04:27 PM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com writes:
We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in yum.conf
in which version that is supported?
Since
Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com writes:
2012/6/22 Matej Cepl mc...@redhat.com:
On 21/06/12 16:54, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 06/21/2012 04:27 PM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com writes:
We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in yum.conf
in
From: Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net
can we get a package downloader that sends the correct
cache-control http headers to refresh data automatically
instead of complaining metadata is wrong and aborting
(for people behind a caching proxy)?
Have you tried changing http_caching
On 19/06/12 15:33, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
Thanks for pointing this out. I considered history a candidate for
dropping because I didn't realize people had usecases for it. It is not
present in the early versions of DNF but I will make sure to put it back
in later.
Especially in the situation we
On 06/21/2012 02:23 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
we don't have quality uninstall á la aptitude (remove
this package and all packages which were installed just to satisfy its
requirements recursively)
We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in yum.conf
Michal
--
devel mailing list
Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com writes:
On 06/21/2012 02:23 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
we don't have quality uninstall á la aptitude (remove
this package and all packages which were installed just to satisfy its
requirements recursively)
We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1
On 06/21/2012 04:27 PM, Nikola Pajkovsky wrote:
Michal Schmidt mschm...@redhat.com writes:
We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in yum.conf
in which version that is supported?
Since 3.2.28-13
http://skvidal.wordpress.com/2010/11/09/orphaned-dep-cleanup-in-yum/
--
devel
On 21/06/12 16:07, Michal Schmidt wrote:
On 06/21/2012 02:23 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
we don't have quality uninstall á la aptitude (remove
this package and all packages which were installed just to satisfy its
requirements recursively)
We do now. You can set clean_requirements_on_remove=1 in
On 06/19/2012 08:23 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
Would it be helpful, if there was a list of extensively used options
so that DNF knew what high notes it needed to hit sooner rather than
later?
Absolutely, I created a wiki page for it:
https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-backlog
Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com writes:
On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are there any
2012/6/20 Nikola Pajkovsky npajk...@redhat.com:
Angus Salkeld asalk...@redhat.com writes:
On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 08:28 +1000, Angus Salkeld wrote:
On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
On 19 June 2012 14:44, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
According to what is written here
https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-Considered-for-Dropping
history function will likely be dropped.
From my POV history feature is very useful. Is there a plan to provide
history
On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 8:44 AM, Michał Piotrowski mkkp...@gmail.com wrote:
Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
I imagine (and this is pure speculation) that in some perfect future,
when dnf is considered mature, that it will probably be renamed to
yum. In other words, I
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
According to what is written here
https://github.com/akozumpl/dnf/wiki/Features-Considered-for-Dropping
2012/6/19 Ales Kozumplik akozu...@redhat.com:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
According to what is written here
On 06/19/2012 10:33 AM, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
According to what is written here
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
According to what is written here
On 19 June 2012 11:51, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are there any plans to replace yum
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are there any plans to replace yum with
On Tue, 19 Jun 2012, Adam Miller wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are
On 19/06/12 10:51 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2012-06-19 at 15:33 +0200, Ales Kozumplik wrote:
On 06/19/2012 02:44 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
I have a question about DNF https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DNF
Are there any plans to replace yum with dnf in the future?
32 matches
Mail list logo
