> wrote:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > > From: Alec Leamas [mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com]
>> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 09:39
>> > > > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > > > Subject: Re: F25 System Wide Change:
mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 09:39
> > > > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > > Subject: Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as
> > > > default
> > > > reposdir
> > > >
>
Hi,
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 11:10 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 15:19 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> >
> >
> > +1
> >
> > The Change Page did not even try to weight pros and cons. IMHO cons
> > (as
> > described above) are worse that living with original name, which is
> >
Hey guys,
I'm working with Jan & Honza on the RHEL side of the house. Currently we're
slated to keep yum as the primary name/command for package management in RHEL.
It may or may not be backed by dnf at some point; we're still looking at the
pros & cons and how to bring better compatibility if
On 19/05/16 21:26, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:42 AM, John Florian <john.flor...@dart.biz> wrote:
From: Alec Leamas [mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 09:39
To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.r
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 11:42 AM, John Florian <john.flor...@dart.biz> wrote:
>> From: Alec Leamas [mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 09:39
>> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> Subject: Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.
> From: Alec Leamas [mailto:leamas.a...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 19, 2016 09:39
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Subject: Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default
> reposdir
>
>
>
> On 19/05/16 15:16, John Florian wrote:
> >>
On 05/18/2016 09:38 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 15:02 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:10:57AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 15:19 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
+1
The Change Page did not even try to weight pros and cons. IMHO
On 19/05/16 15:16, John Florian wrote:
From: Jonathan Wakely [mailto:jwak...@fedoraproject.org]
Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 15:15
Another +1 here. There are plenty of software vendors (e.g. Google and
Adobe, to name two people might have heard of) that provide the option of
installing their
> From: Jonathan Wakely [mailto:jwak...@fedoraproject.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 18, 2016 15:15
>
> Another +1 here. There are plenty of software vendors (e.g. Google and
> Adobe, to name two people might have heard of) that provide the option of
> installing their software via an RPM, which
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 12:38:37PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 15:02 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> > On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:10:57AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 15:19 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > The
On Wed, 2016-05-18 at 15:02 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:10:57AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 15:19 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> > >
> > > +1
> > >
> > > The Change Page did not even try to weight pros and cons. IMHO cons (as
> > > described
On Wed, May 18, 2016, at 03:06 PM, Subhendu Ghosh wrote:
> Is ostree remotes in scope?
ostree has /etc/ostree/remotes.d today...the only thing I can think of
here is that there are certainly use cases for having some common
configuration between yum repos and ostree remotes - things like TLS
On 18/05/16 15:02 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:10:57AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 15:19 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
>
> +1
>
> The Change Page did not even try to weight pros and cons. IMHO cons (as
> described above) are worse that living with
On 18/05/16 11:10 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 15:19 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
+1
The Change Page did not even try to weight pros and cons. IMHO cons (as
described above) are worse that living with original name, which is
well-known, well-documented, and relied on.
Is ostree remotes in scope?
On May 12, 2016 03:37, "Jan Kurik" wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir
> =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Neal Gompa
> * Jan Silhan
>
>
> ==
On Wed, May 18, 2016 at 11:10:57AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 15:19 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> > The Change Page did not even try to weight pros and cons. IMHO cons (as
> > described above) are worse that living with original name, which is
> >
On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 15:19 +0200, Petr Spacek wrote:
>
> +1
>
> The Change Page did not even try to weight pros and cons. IMHO cons (as
> described above) are worse that living with original name, which is
> well-known, well-documented, and relied on.
Another +1 here. I think the name should
On 05/17/2016 04:48 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
> Sure. I always find annoying when there are two entities:
>
> something.conf
> something.d/
>
> so in order to expend the directory, I need to tab twice. I hope there
> will be no repos.conf :-)
Right.
Wouldn't have been better to go with the
On 05/17/2016 04:32 PM, Till Maas wrote:
Your argument sounds like yum.repos.d would be the best name for the
repo definitions that are recognised by the yum parser and other
implementations for this format.
More accurate and more distro agnostic would be system like rpm or npm etc >.repos.d
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 12:32 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:58:18PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On 05/12/2016 07:46 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>
>> > Nothing says that in the future, we couldn't handle other kinds.
>> > Fundamentally, libsolv can
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 08:58:18PM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 05/12/2016 07:46 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > Nothing says that in the future, we couldn't handle other kinds.
> > Fundamentally, libsolv can process rpm-md/yum, susetags/yast2, hdlist2
> > (mdk), and helix repos. And those are
On 05/17/2016 02:48 PM, Lukas Zapletal wrote:
With a symlink /etc/yum.repos.d to it.
And for other type repository's
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> >> /etc/repos.d is less typing.
Yes, please!
With a symlink /etc/yum.repos.d to it.
> The .d suffix is a meaningful distinction. It denotes a drop-in directory
> (where
> anything placed in it is meant to be automatically picked up and used,
> assuming
> it is in the correct format).
Sure.
On 05/17/2016 02:14 PM, Honza Šilhan wrote:
there are a lot of good suggestions about the path name in the discussion.
`/etc/distro.repos.d` probably wasn't the best chosen path so we've changed
it to `/etc/repos.d` in the proposal. Moreover I've mentioned there possible
path name
d use .repos.d for consistency
`/etc/rpm.repos.d` - indicate it's a directory with configuration files to
rpm package so `/etc/rpm-md.repos.d` would be IMO preferable.
> From: "Remi Collet" <fed...@famillecollet.com>
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Friday, May 1
I'll jump on the /etc/repos.d bandwagon. It follows a convention
commonly found in lots of other configuration directories and I feel
it's much more concise and clear than /etc/distro.repos.d.
I'm not sure I fully understand the rationale behind using
distros.repos.d as the directory name in
Dne 12.5.2016 v 17:51 Mike Chambers napsal(a):
> Hell, if really want to make it simple, why not just /etc/repos.d?
+1
--
Miroslav Suchy, RHCA
Red Hat, Senior Software Engineer, #brno, #devexp, #fedora-buildsys
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 13.5.2016 15:01, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
>> Le 12/05/2016 à 09:36, Jan Kurik a écrit :
>>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir =
>>>
On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 7:00 AM, Remi Collet wrote:
> Le 12/05/2016 à 09:36, Jan Kurik a écrit :
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD
>
>
> Perhaps the 1st goal
Le 12/05/2016 à 09:36, Jan Kurik a écrit :
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD
Perhaps the 1st goal should be
"have compatible configuration files for yum and dnf".
For memory this is not
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:25 PM, Bernardo Sulzbach
wrote:
> On 05/12/2016 09:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>>
>>
>> Even if we could, I don't think it would be a good idea to have a single
>> drop-directory for all of them. That's introducing too much complexity on
On 05/12/2016 09:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Even if we could, I don't think it would be a good idea to have a single
drop-directory for all of them. That's introducing too much complexity on the
behalf of the tools that have to parse them.
I believe that this is the best point against a
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 8:58 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 05/12/2016 07:46 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>>> On 05/12/2016 07:14 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
I will suggest /etc/package.repos.d
On 05/12/2016 07:46 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
>> On 05/12/2016 07:14 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
>>>
>>> I will suggest /etc/package.repos.d that way we can be more neutral in
>>> having repos directory using various different
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 05/12/2016 07:14 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
>>
>> I will suggest /etc/package.repos.d that way we can be more neutral in
>> having repos directory using various different packaging formats.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Parag.
>
>
On 05/12/2016 07:14 AM, Parag Nemade wrote:
>
> I will suggest /etc/package.repos.d that way we can be more neutral in
> having repos directory using various different packaging formats.
>
> Regards,
> Parag.
But we're not neutral, are we? These tools currently only handle "yum" style
Tomasz Torcz writes:
> Shouldn't that be /usr/lib/distro.repos.d (for distribution-provided
-1
Having such a small amount of information spread all over the filesystem
only makes things harder to manage. Keeping it in one place means the
whole "where am I getting stuff"
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 8:47 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
>
>
> On 05/12/2016 08:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
>> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 09:36:32AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
>>
>>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default
>>> reposdir =
>>>
On 05/12/2016 11:52 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 13:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> /etc/repos.d is less typing.
>
> +1
>
> Or better yet, just /etc/repos?
>
The .d suffix is a meaningful distinction. It denotes a drop-in directory (where
anything placed in it is
On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 13:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> /etc/repos.d is less typing.
+1
Or better yet, just /etc/repos?
--
Mike Chambers
Madisonville, KY
"Best lil town on Earth!"
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 16:27 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 05/12/2016 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >
> > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 09:36:32AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> > >
> > > = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default
> > > reposdir =
> > >
On 05/12/2016 11:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 09:36:32AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD
Change owner(s):
* Neal Gompa
* Jan Silhan
==
Hi,
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Neal Gompa
> * Jan Silhan
>
>
> == Detailed
On Thursday, May 12, 2016 9:36:32 AM CDT Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Neal Gompa
> * Jan Silhan
>
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> For
/etc/repos.d is less typing.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and
On 05/12/2016 08:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 09:36:32AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD
Change owner(s):
* Neal Gompa
* Jan Silhan
==
After re-thinking proposal It's very cool idea!
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 10:07 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 09:36:32AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir =
>>
On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 20:54 +1000, Dan Callaghan wrote:
> Excerpts from Tom Hughes's message of 2016-05-12 09:15 +01:00:
> >
> > On 12/05/16 09:07, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > >
> > > Shouldn't that be /usr/lib/distro.repos.d (for
> > > distribution-provided
> > > data) with usual rules for
Excerpts from Tom Hughes's message of 2016-05-12 09:15 +01:00:
> On 12/05/16 09:07, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> >Shouldn't that be /usr/lib/distro.repos.d (for
> >distribution-provided
> > data) with usual rules for overriding/masking in /etc/distro.repos.d (for
> > local administrator)?
>
>
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 4:27 AM, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote on 12.05.2016 10:11:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir
=
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD
Change
Peter Robinson wrote on 12.05.2016 10:11:
>>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir =
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD
>>>
>>> Change owner(s):
>>> * Neal Gompa
>>> * Jan Silhan
>>>
>>>
>>> == Detailed Description ==
>>> For
Dne 12.5.2016 v 10:11 Peter Robinson napsal(a):
>>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir =
>>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD
>>>
>>> Change owner(s):
>>> * Neal Gompa
>>> * Jan Silhan
>>>
>>>
>>> == Detailed Description ==
On 12/05/16 09:07, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 09:36:32AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
For DNF 2.0 in Fedora 25, the DNF team would like to make the default
repository configuration directory /etc/distro.repos.d. In contrast to
/etc/yum.repos.d (current default path),
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD
>>
>> Change owner(s):
>> * Neal Gompa
>> * Jan Silhan
>>
>>
>> == Detailed Description ==
>> For DNF 2.0 in Fedora 25, the DNF team would like to make
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 09:36:32AM +0200, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReposInEtcDistroReposD
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Neal Gompa
> * Jan Silhan
>
>
> == Detailed Description ==
> For
56 matches
Mail list logo