On Tue, 25 Aug 2015 14:51:29 +0530
Parag Nemade panem...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I kind of miss the overview of supported releases that was
available in old version.
It would be nice if this overview was part of the landing page with
links to the release detail pages:
On 08/20/2015 05:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that
bodhi2 is now live in production at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
or
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/
The web interface should be available and working
Hi,
On Tue, Aug 25, 2015 at 2:21 PM, Richard Marko rma...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On 08/20/2015 05:45 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that
bodhi2 is now live in production at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
or
On 23/08/15 18:41 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
On 23/08/15 16:36 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
No, sorry, but that is not true. I wrote those update notes in the
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 11:03 AM, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 08/21/2015 06:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 05:27:37 +0200
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Upstreams, yes, but not Fedora. Fedora should be self-hosted.
Can you please define
Mathieu Bridon wrote:
In the case of Kevin's update, the problem is that markdown lists must
have an empty new line before them, like so:
A paragraph of text:
* first item
* second item
Kevin, you used the following, which indeed the Markdown parser turns
into a single paragraph:
A
Hi
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
No, sorry, but that is not true. I wrote those update notes in the Bodhi 1
web interface, so of course I looked at the resulting formatting. Bodhi 1
interpreted that syntax as a list, not as a single paragraph. This is a
change in Bodhi
Michael Catanzaro wrote:
not sure about Apper
Apper shows the raw text, it has no Markdown parser.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 23/08/15 16:36 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
No, sorry, but that is not true. I wrote those update notes in the Bodhi 1
web interface, so of course I looked at the resulting formatting. Bodhi 1
interpreted that syntax as a list, not as
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 6:32 PM, Jonathan Wakely jwak...@redhat.com wrote:
On 23/08/15 16:36 -0400, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 4:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
No, sorry, but that is not true. I wrote those update notes in the Bodhi 1
web interface, so of course I looked
On Sun, 2015-08-23 at 22:23 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Mathieu Bridon wrote:
In the case of Kevin's update, the problem is that markdown lists
must
have an empty new line before them, like so:
A paragraph of text:
* first item
* second item
Kevin, you used the following,
2015-08-22 4:46 GMT+02:00 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me:
Occupying the moral high ground doesn't help as well.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
If you want your bugs to be fixed, posting them on a list and
ignoring the bug tracker doesn't work.
And for people who don't want to go
Am 22.08.2015 um 10:48 schrieb Haïkel:
2015-08-22 4:46 GMT+02:00 Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me:
Occupying the moral high ground doesn't help as well.
If you want your bugs to be fixed, posting them on a list and
ignoring the bug tracker doesn't work.
come on the bugtracker also don't
2015-08-22 12:07 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
come on the bugtracker also don't work
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226509#c5
Thanks for definitively killing this thread by posting something unrelated.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Am 22.08.2015 um 12:20 schrieb Haïkel:
2015-08-22 12:07 GMT+02:00 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net:
come on the bugtracker also don't work
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1226509#c5
Thanks for definitively killing this thread by posting something unrelated
like your
--
Mathieu
On Sat, 2015-08-22 at 19:27 -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
FWIW I think the new version looks much nicer than the old one.
Hopefully the issues will be ironed out.
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 17:48 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
* The formatting of the update notes has changed in some
On 08/21/2015 06:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 05:27:37 +0200
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Upstreams, yes, but not Fedora. Fedora should be self-hosted.
Can you please define Fedora and self-hosted as you use them above?
A domain 100 operated and owned by
On Saturday, August 22, 2015, Haïkel hgue...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
If you want your bugs to be fixed, posting them on a list and
ignoring the bug tracker doesn't work.
I didn't ignore it, I've reported several bugs against various component
since years ago.
--
Yours sincerely,
FWIW I think the new version looks much nicer than the old one.
Hopefully the issues will be ironed out.
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 17:48 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
* The formatting of the update notes has changed in some ways (line
breaks
gone missing?), breaking my nicely formatted notes, e.g.:
On Fri, 21 Aug, 2015 at 05:20:32 GMT, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Unlike yesterday, I am now seeing green push to stable buttons for
packages which have been in testing for longer times (weeks, months).
However, I am not seeing these buttons for packages, which I had
submitted in recent past and
On 8/22/15, Haïkel hgue...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Sometimes, I wonder if you're not doing this on purpose.
Rather than preventing our infrastructure team to fix the actual issues
with useless squabbles, just open tickets to let them know.
Forget the ridiculous github excuse, fedorahosted
On Sat, 2015-08-22 at 10:46 +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
On 8/22/15, Haïkel hgue...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Sometimes, I wonder if you're not doing this on purpose.
Rather than preventing our infrastructure team to fix the actual
issues
with useless squabbles, just open tickets to
On Wed, 19 Aug 2015 21:45:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that
bodhi2 is now live in production at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
or
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/
The web interface should be
On 08/20/2015 07:40 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 19 August 2015 at 22:24, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 08/20/2015 06:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version.
This
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:00:29 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/21/2015 08:34 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I
could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation
notification. Also, instead of the Revoke button, there
On Thursday, August 20, 2015 07:02:51 PM Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/20/2015 06:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:55:01 +0200
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I share this view. I refuse to create a github account and do not
consider
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:08:18 +0100
Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote:
On 21/08/15 08:46, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 08/21/2015 09:00 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Anywas, this time bodhi offered me a push to testing and push to
stable (!) button (Note: push to stable)
I used pushed to
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 01:56:02 +0200
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Theres a bunch of tools out there to export issues from github
They can turn this off at any moment, leaving you with no way to get
your data out.
Yep. This is the case for any project using
On 08/21/2015 04:03 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 09:00:29 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/21/2015 08:34 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I
could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation
notification.
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 05:27:37 +0200
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
Upstreams, yes, but not Fedora. Fedora should be self-hosted.
Can you please define Fedora and self-hosted as you use them above?
Fedora is part of the larger open source community.
Fedora Infrastructure uses 100%
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 12:39:40 +0200
Michael Schwendt mschwe...@gmail.com wrote:
Documentation, please!
How to enter well-formatted comments? Is anything like BB-Code
supported? Or Wiki syntax? Or other formatting hints?
I hope the comments field is not only for 2-3 words in twitter-style.
And another annoyance: The search box appears not to work in KHTML
(Return/Enter does nothing) nor even in KWebKitPart/QtWebKit (I get sent to
a URL with the search term in it, but it just displays the same front page
as before).
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
Sometimes, I wonder if you're not doing this on purpose.
Rather than preventing our infrastructure team to fix the actual issues
with useless squabbles, just open tickets to let them know.
Forget the ridiculous github excuse, fedorahosted trac instance still
accepts tickets.
Out of respect of
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
No. While we could roll back, it would be a great deal of pain and
outage, and IMHO things are not completely and utterly broken. There
are bugs, we are fixing them, and much faster than we would be using
the old codebase.
Given how we are dealing with data CORRUPTED by the
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
It's markdown.
But it eats all line breaks and so breaks basic Markdown formatting such as
enumerations that worked fine in Bodhi 1.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable
now if the maintainer wishes
2 days ago, 2015-08-18 07:00:53
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/libdom-0.1.2-1.fc23
Still can't push.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
--
devel mailing list
On 08/20/2015 07:39 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Well, I don't know if there was a Big Philosophical Discussion, but in
practice all kinds of Fedora-ish stuff has its upstream in github these
days, so yes, clearly times have changed.
That's not the point. I am talking about separating Fedora
On 08/21/2015 08:47 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 08/21/2015 08:34 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I
could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation
notification. Also, instead of the Revoke button, there is now a Push
to
Why can I push to testing for updates submitted by other people, and
where the update is already stable? [1]
Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I
could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation
notification. Also, instead of the Revoke button, there is
On 08/21/2015 08:34 AM, Till Hofmann wrote:
Also, it seems like I can revoke other people's updates. At least I
could press the 'Revoke' button and I received a confirmation
notification. Also, instead of the Revoke button, there is now a Push
to Testing and a Push to Stable button. But
Am 21.08.2015 um 10:40 schrieb Charles-Antoine Couret:
and somebody again didn't care about fedora-easy-karma which in 2015 is long
broken than working with several issues - no, i don't want to log into a
webinterface and seek packages for karma by hand while verify it's the same
build running
On 21/08/15 08:46, Till Hofmann wrote:
On 08/21/2015 09:00 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Anywas, this time bodhi offered me a push to testing and push to
stable (!) button (Note: push to stable)
I used pushed to testing to re-push it.
I just tested push to stable on an unpushed update:
On 08/21/2015 09:00 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Anywas, this time bodhi offered me a push to testing and push to
stable (!) button (Note: push to stable)
I used pushed to testing to re-push it.
I just tested push to stable on an unpushed update: Despite the name,
it pushes to testing:
Am 20.08.2015 um 05:45 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
Greetings.
After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that
bodhi2 is now live in production at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
or
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/
The web interface should be available and working for
and somebody again didn't care about fedora-easy-karma which in 2015 is long
broken than working with several issues - no, i don't want to log into a
webinterface and seek packages for karma by hand while verify it's the same
build running on my machine...
Getting list of installed
On 08/20/2015 06:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:55:01 +0200
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I share this view. I refuse to create a github account and do not
consider using any external account resources for Fedora to be
acceptable.
While I
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 21:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that
bodhi2 is now live in production at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
or
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/
I see in the thread that people seem to
On 08/20/2015 09:51 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 21:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There will likely be oddities and bugs. Please file them in github so
we can prioritize them and get them fixed up.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues
Hi,
I do not have a github
On 20/08/15 10:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/20/2015 09:51 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 21:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There will likely be oddities and bugs. Please file them in github so
we can prioritize them and get them fixed up.
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 21:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There will likely be oddities and bugs. Please file them in github so
we can prioritize them and get them fixed up.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues
Hi,
I do not have a github account, and I'm currently not going to
On 08/20/2015 07:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:33:37 -0500
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
On 08/20/2015 12:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
To me any non fedora/redhat supplied account system is inacceptable,
This applies to github, sourceforge, farcebook, nitter,
On 08/20/2015 12:00 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
On 20/08/15 10:28, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/20/2015 09:51 AM, Milan Crha wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 21:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There will likely be oddities and bugs. Please file them in github so
we can prioritize them and get them fixed
On Fri, 21 Aug 2015 00:39:20 +0200
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Paul W. Frields wrote:
This is correct. The infra team discussed this some time ago and
since Github does nothing to lock up the resources we care about,
So you'd only see lock-in to proprietary infrastructure
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Theres a bunch of tools out there to export issues from github
They can turn this off at any moment, leaving you with no way to get your
data out.
and exposes our code to a much wider (*1000 at least) group of
developers,
If a developer wants to contribute to Fedora
On Friday, August 21, 2015, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
vs.
1'. clone the upstream repository,
2'. commit your change(s) to the clone,
3'. export your patch(es) with git format-patch,
4'. open an issue through a web interface,
5'. attach the patch(es) to the issue
(except of
On 19 August 2015 at 22:24, Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 08/20/2015 06:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version.
This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 12:33 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 08/20/2015 12:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
To me any non fedora/redhat supplied account system is
inacceptable,
This applies to github, sourceforge, farcebook, nitter, goggle, or
else - period.
The last time a
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 12:33:37 -0500
Michael Cronenworth m...@cchtml.com wrote:
On 08/20/2015 12:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
To me any non fedora/redhat supplied account system is inacceptable,
This applies to github, sourceforge, farcebook, nitter, goggle, or
else - period.
The last
On 08/20/2015 12:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
To me any non fedora/redhat supplied account system is inacceptable,
This applies to github, sourceforge, farcebook, nitter, goggle, or else -
period.
The last time a non-Fedora hosted / closed source service was suggested it was shot
down.
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 12:33 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 08/20/2015 12:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
To me any non fedora/redhat supplied account system is
inacceptable,
This applies to github, sourceforge, farcebook, nitter, goggle, or
else - period.
The last time a
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 11:00 +0100, Paul Howarth wrote:
Looks like you need to hit enter after typing/pasting in the
package NVR into the Candidate Builds field, which was not at all
obvious to me.
Hi,
thanks for the hint. That made it work, the package name is repeated
below the
On 08/20/2015 06:24 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 08/20/2015 06:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version.
This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable
now if the
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that
bodhi2 is now live in production at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
or
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/
Unfortunately, there are several things that have become worse:
* The front page is much
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 11:19:10AM -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-19 at 21:45 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings.
After a longer than expected outage window, I'm happy to report that
bodhi2 is now live in production at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
IMHO, I think projects should be free to choose whatever tools they
wish to build their project. You are of course free to choose to not
use that application/project based on that or other factors.
Closed source applications are not something we ever want to run in
Fedora
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:24:18 +0200
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
But this is a project where Fedora *is* upstream!
I assume you mean bodhi by this.
The primary bodhi developers are heavily involved in Fedora, but are
also involved in other communities. When is a project Fedora ?
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:40:40AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2015-08-20 at 12:33 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 08/20/2015 12:02 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
To me any non fedora/redhat supplied account system is
inacceptable,
This applies to github,
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 02:40:10PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 22:24:18 +0200
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
But this is a project where Fedora *is* upstream!
I assume you mean bodhi by this.
The primary bodhi developers are heavily involved in Fedora,
On 08/20/2015 06:05 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:02:44AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Are things like redhat bugzilla, koji and fedocal also slow?
Bugzilla is always slow, it's not a good reference ;-)
Definitely. But bodhi2 seemed worse :-)
What might have
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 17:55:01 +0200
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I share this view. I refuse to create a github account and do not
consider using any external account resources for Fedora to be
acceptable.
While I do have a GitHub account (no way for
On Thu, Aug 20, 2015 at 10:02:44AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Are things like redhat bugzilla, koji and fedocal also slow?
Bugzilla is always slow, it's not a good reference ;-)
--
Tomasz TorczTo co nierealne -- tutaj jest normalne.
xmpp: zdzich...@chrome.pl
Ralf Corsepius wrote:
I share this view. I refuse to create a github account and do not
consider using any external account resources for Fedora to be acceptable.
While I do have a GitHub account (no way for me to eschew it, sadly), I also
do not understand why (and am sad that) Bodhi
On Thu, 20 Aug 2015 06:24:57 +0200
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de wrote:
On 08/20/2015 06:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version.
This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be
I wrote:
Unfortunately, there are several things that have become worse:
PS: Some more:
* The nice colored and unique icons were replaced with text-only with a
color scheme that is the same for all fields (e.g., orange for both
testing and bugfix), or even blackwhite text (in the list of my
Paul W. Frields wrote:
This is correct. The infra team discussed this some time ago and
since Github does nothing to lock up the resources we care about,
So you'd only see lock-in to proprietary infrastructure as a problem if they
were actively locking things up?
Even if now, everything can
On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version.
This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable
now if the maintainer wishes
This update has reached 14 days in testing and can be pushed to
stable now if the
On 08/19/2015 10:45 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
There will likely be oddities and bugs. Please file them in github so
we can prioritize them and get them fixed up.
https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/issues
Beware: Editing an update with a newer build will wipe out the update.
Filed:
On 08/20/2015 06:08 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
On 8/20/15, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
Thanks for your patience as we roll out this new bodhi version.
This update has reached 3 days in testing and can be pushed to stable
now if the maintainer wishes
This update has reached 14 days in
78 matches
Mail list logo
