Re: Strange koji failures

2017-01-02 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 13:59:25 + (UTC) Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2016-12-24, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:30:12 + (UTC) > > Petr Pisar wrote: > >> No. This is a generic problem that the ExclusiveArch hack as > >>

Re: Strange koji failures

2017-01-02 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 12/24/2016 06:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Packager can override channel manually when needed. When submitting >> build, you can choose which channel to use. For example, when you want >> the build to be ran on x86_64 you can select "livecd" channel [2], >> which contains only x86_64 hosts. In

Re: Strange koji failures

2017-01-02 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2016-12-24, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:30:12 + (UTC) > Petr Pisar wrote: >> No. This is a generic problem that the ExclusiveArch hack as >> documents in packaging guidelines (i.e. noarch package with >> ExclusiveArch including noarch)

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-25 Thread Peter Robinson
>> >>> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was: >> >>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004112 >> >>> >> >>> Re-submitting it 4 minutes later passed just fine: >> >>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004125 >> >> These builds were ran on different

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 10:15:57 +0100 Mikolaj Izdebski wrote: > On 12/22/2016 09:50 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > > > Dne 22.12.2016 v 09:27 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a): > >> On 12/22/2016 05:06 AM, Christopher wrote: > >>> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-24 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:30:12 + (UTC) Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2016-12-23, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > On Friday, December 23, 2016 10:42:33 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >> On Friday, December 23, 2016 9:33:31 AM CET Petr Pisar wrote: > >> > >>

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-23 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2016-12-23, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Friday, December 23, 2016 10:42:33 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> On Friday, December 23, 2016 9:33:31 AM CET Petr Pisar wrote: >> > >> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary >> > >> arch builders for example? >>

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-23 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 12/23/2016 10:42 AM, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Friday, December 23, 2016 9:33:31 AM CET Petr Pisar wrote: Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary arch builders for example? >>> >>> Those arches are all primary .. but ExclusiveArch could help. >>> >> No, it does

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-23 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Friday, December 23, 2016 10:42:33 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Friday, December 23, 2016 9:33:31 AM CET Petr Pisar wrote: > > >> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary arch > > >> builders > > >> for example? > > > > > > Those arches are all primary .. but

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-23 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Friday, December 23, 2016 9:33:31 AM CET Petr Pisar wrote: > >> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary arch builders > >> for example? > > > > Those arches are all primary .. but ExclusiveArch could help. > > > No, it does not. I have noarch perl-Alien-ROOT with

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-23 Thread Petr Pisar
On 2016-12-22, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > On Thursday, December 22, 2016 9:50:12 AM CET Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >> Dne 22.12.2016 v 09:27 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a): >> > On 12/22/2016 05:06 AM, Christopher wrote: >> >> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was: >> >>

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-22 Thread Josh Boyer
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 22.12.2016 v 10:12 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a): >> On Thursday, December 22, 2016 9:50:12 AM CET Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >>> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary arch builders >>> for example? >>

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-22 Thread Florian Weimer
On 12/22/2016 10:59 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: In my specific case, rubygem-mongo is MongoDB client and it needs MondoDB server (which does not support BE architectures) to execute its test suite. But otherwise it can run on all platforms and connect to remote server just fine. Hasn't this

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-22 Thread Peter Robinson
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 10:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 22.12.2016 v 10:12 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a): >> On Thursday, December 22, 2016 9:50:12 AM CET Vít Ondruch wrote: >> >>> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary arch builders >>> for example?

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-22 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 22.12.2016 v 10:12 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a): > On Thursday, December 22, 2016 9:50:12 AM CET Vít Ondruch wrote: > >> Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary arch builders >> for example? > Those arches are all primary .. but ExclusiveArch could help. No, not all arches

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-22 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 22.12.2016 v 10:23 Tom Hughes napsal(a): > On 22/12/16 09:19, Michal Schorm wrote: >>> Honestly this is annoying misbehavior. How we can tell Koji to avoid >>> certain builders for certain noarch packages? Wouldn't be possible to >>> build noarch packages just on primary arch builders for

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-22 Thread Jonny Heggheim
Hi Vít Ondruch: > Honestly this is annoying misbehavior. How we can tell Koji to avoid > certain builders for certain noarch packages? Wouldn't be possible to > build noarch packages just on primary arch builders for example? Will ExclusiveArch: %{nodejs_arches} noarch help?

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-22 Thread Tom Hughes
On 22/12/16 09:19, Michal Schorm wrote: Honestly this is annoying misbehavior. How we can tell Koji to avoid certain builders for certain noarch packages? Wouldn't be possible to build noarch packages just on primary arch builders for example? You can. (make it arch specific) It doesn't make

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-22 Thread Michal Schorm
> Honestly this is annoying misbehavior. How we can tell Koji to avoid > certain builders for certain noarch packages? Wouldn't be possible to > build noarch packages just on primary arch builders for example? You can. (make it arch specific) It doesn't make any sense to me - you want noarch

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-22 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 12/22/2016 09:50 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 22.12.2016 v 09:27 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a): >> On 12/22/2016 05:06 AM, Christopher wrote: >>> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was: >>> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004112 >>> >>> Re-submitting it 4

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-22 Thread Pavel Raiskup
On Thursday, December 22, 2016 9:50:12 AM CET Vít Ondruch wrote: > > Dne 22.12.2016 v 09:27 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a): > > On 12/22/2016 05:06 AM, Christopher wrote: > >> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was: > >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004112 > >> > >>

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-22 Thread Pavel Raiskup
I understand this was not the cause to FTBFS, but FTR: On Thursday, December 22, 2016 3:03:56 AM CET Christopher wrote: > sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1243292 > warning: Could not canonicalize hostname: buildvm-14.phx2.fedoraproject.org

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-22 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 22.12.2016 v 09:27 Mikolaj Izdebski napsal(a): > On 12/22/2016 05:06 AM, Christopher wrote: >> The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was: >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004112 >> >> Re-submitting it 4 minutes later passed just fine: >>

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-22 Thread Mikolaj Izdebski
On 12/22/2016 05:06 AM, Christopher wrote: > The failure yesterday that I was thinking of was: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004112 > > Re-submitting it 4 minutes later passed just fine: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17004125 These builds were

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-21 Thread Christopher
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 10:14 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:03:56 + > Christopher wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > I occasionally get this strange failure in koji. Sometimes this > > happens with a good package build, and I can just

Re: Strange koji failures

2016-12-21 Thread Kevin Fenzi
On Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:03:56 + Christopher wrote: > Hi, > > I occasionally get this strange failure in koji. Sometimes this > happens with a good package build, and I can just re-submit it > without changing anything, and it works fine. Is this a known issue? >

Strange koji failures

2016-12-21 Thread Christopher
Hi, I occasionally get this strange failure in koji. Sometimes this happens with a good package build, and I can just re-submit it without changing anything, and it works fine. Is this a known issue? For example, from https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1330/17021330/build.log: sh:

Strange koji failures

2016-12-21 Thread Christopher
Hi, I occasionally get this strange failure in koji. Sometimes this happens with a good package build, and I can just re-submit it without changing anything, and it works fine. Is this a known issue? For example, from https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/1330/17021330/build.log: sh: