Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide soon

efl should be fixed in rawhide now. ~spot On Wed, Jan 31, 2024 at 7:32 AM Michael J Gruber wrote: > Am Mi., 31. Jan. 2024 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Marek Kasik >: > > > > Hi, > > > > On 1/30/24 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > > Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34: > > >> Hi, > >

Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide soon

Am Mi., 31. Jan. 2024 um 11:15 Uhr schrieb Marek Kasik : > > Hi, > > On 1/30/24 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be > >> probably released this week and I

Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide soon

Hi, On 1/30/24 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote: Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34: Hi, I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide before the branching together with rebuilds of dependent

Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide soon

I'm looking in to efl FTBFS. It seems to be issues on  s390x and ppc64le related to more strict requirements, checks in gcc 14. I'm investigating them now and if I will not be able to fix them promptly I will submit a PR with a workaround( at first look disable altivec on ppc64le and for s390x

Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide soon

Sandro wrote on 2024/01/30 22:02: On 30-01-2024 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote: Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34: Hi, I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide before the branching

Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide soon

Also, at least efl is FTBFS now, so it can't be rebuilt, and you'll have to make a poppler-compat package before merging this, if efl isn't fixed by then. On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 2:03 PM Sandro wrote: > On 30-01-2024 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote: > > Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30

Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide soon

On 30-01-2024 12:15, Michael J Gruber wrote: Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34: Hi, I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide before the branching together with rebuilds of dependent

Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide soon

Marek Kasik venit, vidit, dixit 2024-01-30 12:02:34: > Hi, > > I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be > probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide before > the branching together with rebuilds of dependent packages. > > I'll prepare the build

poppler soname bump in Rawhide soon

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler to 24.02.0 once it is released. It will be probably released this week and I would like to get it to rawhide before the branching together with rebuilds of dependent packages. I'll prepare the build in a side tag and will message relevant maintainers to rebuild

poppler soname bump in Rawhide

Hi, I've prepared rebase of poppler to 23.08.0, which was released today, in the side tag "f39-build-side-70931". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in it and I will merge it to the main buildroot at Monday (7th of August) just before the branching. There are several API

Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide

> Packages which need to be rebuilt: > calligra > gambas3 > gdal > gdcm > inkscape > kf5-kitinerary > libreoffice > pdf2djvu > scribus Poppler update almost always results in rebuilding TeXLive (due to pdfTeX) too. I was wondering how the ‘bootstrap’ build is done when that

poppler soname bump in Rawhide

Hi, I've prepared rebase of poppler to 23.02.0, which was released yesterday, in the side tag "f38-build-side-62722". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in it and I will merge it to the main buildroot at Monday (6th of February) just before the branching. There are several API

Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide

On 8/1/22 18:13, Marek Kasik wrote: Hi, I plan to rebase poppler to 22.08.0 once it is available. The release usually happens at the beginning of month so I'm waiting for it now. Once it is ready, I'll build it in a side tag and will post it here. I plan to merge the side tag with buildroot

Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide

On Mon, 2022-08-01 at 18:13 +0200, Marek Kasik wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to rebase poppler to 22.08.0 once it is available. The release > usually happens at the beginning of month so I'm waiting for it now. > Once it is ready, I'll build it in a side tag and will post it here. >   libreoffice

Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide

Marek Kasik wrote: > I plan to rebase poppler to 22.08.0 once it is available. The release > usually happens at the beginning of month so I'm waiting for it now. > Once it is ready, I'll build it in a side tag and will post it here. I > plan to merge the side tag with buildroot next week before

poppler soname bump in Rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler to 22.08.0 once it is available. The release usually happens at the beginning of month so I'm waiting for it now. Once it is ready, I'll build it in a side tag and will post it here. I plan to merge the side tag with buildroot next week before branching.

poppler soname bump in Rawhide

Hi, I've prepared rebase of poppler to 22.01.0 in the side tag "f36-build-side-49530". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in it and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Tuesday (18th of January) just before the mass rebuild. There are several API changes and soname bump

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, On 7/26/21 10:41 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 18:06, Marek Kasik wrote: Hi, I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.07.0 in the side tag "f35-build-side-43960". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in it and I will ask to merge it to main

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Mon, Jul 26, 2021 18:06:28 +0200, Marek Kasik wrote: > Hi, Hello, > I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.07.0 in the side tag > "f35-build-side-43960". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in > it and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Monday (2nd of August). > > There

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

cups-filters's been rebuilt in side tag as cups-filters-1.28.9-5.fc35. I removed the build requirement for poppler-devel, since it is no longer needed (all stuff is now covered by poppler-cpp-devel). On 7/26/21 6:06 PM, Marek Kasik wrote: Hi, I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.07.0 in

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Monday, 26 July 2021 at 18:06, Marek Kasik wrote: > Hi, > > I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.07.0 in the side tag > "f35-build-side-43960". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in > it and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Monday (2nd of August). Shouldn't you wait

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.07.0 in the side tag "f35-build-side-43960". I'm asking you to build your dependent packages in it and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Monday (2nd of August). There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

Marek Kasik wrote: > Thanks for pointing me to this fork, I was not aware of it. I've > prepared my own pull request already: > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/diffpdf/pull-request/1 > > Looking at it now, it seems that CI failed for it. I'm going to have a > look at that. You probably don't

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On 1/11/21 9:31 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Marek Kasik wrote: I've also removed the Qt4 frontend which we've maintained for compatibility. Relevant package maintainers were contacted and some of them already switched to Qt5. For diffpdf, it looks like it needs to be upgraded to this

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, On 1/11/21 6:44 PM, Marek Kasik wrote: Hi, I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.01.0 in the side tag "f34-build-side-35737". I ask you to build your dependent packages in it and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Tuesday (19th of January). Let me know if you won't have time for

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 18:44:47 +0100, Marek Kasik wrote: > Hi, Hi Marek, > I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.01.0 in the side tag > "f34-build-side-35737". I ask you to build your dependent packages in it and > I will ask to merge it to main branch next Tuesday (19th of January). > Let me

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

Marek Kasik wrote: > I've also removed the Qt4 frontend which we've maintained for > compatibility. Relevant package maintainers were contacted and some of > them already switched to Qt5. For diffpdf, it looks like it needs to be upgraded to this fork: https://gitlab.com/eang/diffpdf (The

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: I didn't realize sip5 provided the python bindings, but it does. The build still fails: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6643/59456643/build.log Looks like you're still using sip4? /usr/bin/sip is sip4. sip5 is

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

I didn't realize sip5 provided the python bindings, but it does. The build still fails: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6643/59456643/build.log --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Mon, 11 Jan 2021, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote: python3-sip-4.19.24 seems too old for python3-poppler-qt5 21.1.0, and sip5 seems to lack python bindings. What's the best plan to resolve this? What do you mean by "sip5 seems to lack python bindings?" Scott

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

python3-sip-4.19.24 seems too old for python3-poppler-qt5 21.1.0, and sip5 seems to lack python bindings. What's the best plan to resolve this? --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 12:45 PM Marek Kasik wrote: > > Hi, > > I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.01.0 in the side tag > "f34-build-side-35737". I ask you to build your dependent packages in it > and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Tuesday (19th of January). > Let me know if you

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I've prepared rebase of poppler to 21.01.0 in the side tag "f34-build-side-35737". I ask you to build your dependent packages in it and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Tuesday (19th of January). Let me know if you won't have time for that or there will be some other

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I've prepared rebase of poppler to 0.90.0 in the side tag "f33-build-side-25167". I ask you to build your dependent packages in it and I will ask to merge it to main branch next Friday (17th of July). There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*.

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.84.0 at the beginning of next week. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. Here is scratch-build of poppler-0.84.0: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=40194709 Btw, if your

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.73.0 at the end of next week. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. Here is scratch-build of poppler-0.73.0: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32108492 Btw, if your

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

Il giorno mar 14 ago 2018 alle 2:31, Marek Kasik ha scritto: Hi, I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. I've checked all packages which depend on the libpoppler.so.* and have

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On 21.8.2018 02:01, Amit Saha wrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 8:19 PM Christian Dersch mailto:lupinix.fed...@gmail.com>> wrote: Am Di., 14. Aug. 2018 um 15:41 Uhr schrieb Marek Kasik mailto:mka...@redhat.com>>: On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Sat, Aug 18, 2018 at 8:19 PM Christian Dersch wrote: > Am Di., 14. Aug. 2018 um 15:41 Uhr schrieb Marek Kasik >: > >> >> >> On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik wrote: >> > >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> I'm going to rebase poppler in

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Mon, 2018-08-20 at 11:17 -0600, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 02:31 +0200, Marek Kasik wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now. > > Just in case you weren't aware.. They release 0.68 yesterday with > some > security fixes. Not

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Tue, 2018-08-14 at 02:31 +0200, Marek Kasik wrote: > Hi, > > I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now. Just in case you weren't aware.. They release 0.68 yesterday with some security fixes. Not sure if the API changed or anything like that as their changelog is pretty

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On 14.8.2018 14:53, Marek Kasik wrote: On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik wrote: Hi, I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*.

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

Am Di., 14. Aug. 2018 um 15:41 Uhr schrieb Marek Kasik : > > > On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now. > >> > >> There are several API changes and

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Tue, Aug 14, 2018 at 8:53 AM Marek Kasik wrote: > > > On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now. > >> > >> There are several API changes and

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On 08/14/2018 01:29 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik wrote: Hi, I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. I've checked all packages which depend

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 8:32 PM Marek Kasik wrote: > Hi, > > I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now. > > There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library > libpoppler.so.*. > > I've checked all packages which depend on the libpoppler.so.* and have >

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I'm going to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.67.0 now. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. I've checked all packages which depend on the libpoppler.so.* and have backported/prepared fixes to reflect poppler's API changes.

Re: [HEADS-UP] poppler soname bump

Hi all, On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 01:13:15PM +0100, David Tardon wrote: > Hi all, > > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname > bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: > > boomaga > cups-filters > gambas3 > gdcm > inkscape > kf5-kfilemetadata >

Re: [HEADS-UP] poppler soname bump

On 2017-11-07 02:24, David Tardon wrote: > On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 01:10:15PM -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> On 2017-11-06 06:13, David Tardon wrote: >>> poppler-sharp >> >> Are you sure this is necessary? Only libpoppler-glib is mentioned in >> the .dll.config, and libpoppler doesn't have a C

Re: [HEADS-UP] poppler soname bump

Hi, On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 01:10:15PM -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2017-11-06 06:13, David Tardon wrote: > > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname > > bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: > > While ultimately it would be nice to

Re: [HEADS-UP] poppler soname bump

Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> kf5-kfilemetadata >> okular > > These are cases of overlinking, as they only use symbols from > libpoppler-qt5. This can be seen in Ubuntu (which links with > -Wl,--as-needed and -Wl,--no-undefined) and Cygwin (which as a PE > platform acts similarly automatically),

Re: [HEADS-UP] poppler soname bump

On 2017-11-06 06:13, David Tardon wrote: > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname > bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: While ultimately it would be nice to have everything use one of the bindings as intended, but in the meantime perhaps we

[HEADS-UP] poppler soname bump

Hi all, I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: boomaga calligra cups-filters gambas3 gdcm inkscape kf5-kfilemetadata libreoffice okular pdf2djvu poppler poppler-sharp texlive texworks Note that packages

[HEADS-UP] poppler soname bump

Hi, I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: boomaga calligra cups-filters evas-generic-loaders gambas3 gdal gdcm inkscape kf5-kfilemetadata libreoffice okular pdf2djvu poppler-sharp texlive texworks Note

Proven packager required Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On Fri, 2017-09-15 at 23:30 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 13:55 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > > Gwyn Ciesla wrote: > > > > > > I've had issues with texlive and gdal not installing on Rawhide > > > > because > > > > of poppler: > > > > > > > > > DEBUG util.py:450:- nothing

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On Mon, 2017-09-11 at 13:55 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Gwyn Ciesla wrote: > > > > I've had issues with texlive and gdal not installing on Rawhide > > > because > > > of poppler: > > > > > > > DEBUG util.py:450:- nothing provides > > > > libpoppler.so.68()(64bit) > > > > needed by > > > > >

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

Gwyn Ciesla wrote: >> I've had issues with texlive and gdal not installing on Rawhide because >> of poppler: >> >>> DEBUG util.py:450:- nothing provides libpoppler.so.68()(64bit) >>> needed by >> texlive-pdftex-bin-6:svn40987-36.20160520.fc27.5.x86_64 >>> DEBUG util.py:450:- nothing

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On 09/11/2017 12:49 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: > On mercredi 2 août 2017 13:19:56 CEST David Tardon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname >> bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: >> >> boomaga >> calligra >>

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On mercredi 2 août 2017 13:19:56 CEST David Tardon wrote: > Hi, > > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname > bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: > > boomaga > calligra > cups-filters > evas-generic-loaders > gambas3 > gdal > gdcm > inkscape

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On Fri, 8 Sep 2017 13:45:42 +0200 David Tardon wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 04:08:55PM +0200, David Tardon wrote: > > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes > > soname bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: > > Done.

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

Hi, On Mon, Sep 04, 2017 at 04:08:55PM +0200, David Tardon wrote: > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname > bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: Done. The status is as follows: > boomaga > cups-filters > evas-generic-loaders > gambas3 >

heads up: poppler soname bump

Hi, I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: boomaga calligra cups-filters evas-generic-loaders gambas3 gdal gdcm inkscape kf5-kfilemetadata libreoffice okular pdf2djvu poppler-sharp texlive texworks Note

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On 08/05/2017 06:15 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> On 08/05/2017 11:45 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: >> >>> From #fedora-releng: >>> 18:11 <+nirik> sharkcz: can you clean up space on s390 koji? its very close >>> to full...

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 3:05 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 08/05/2017 11:45 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > >> From #fedora-releng: >> 18:11 <+nirik> sharkcz: can you clean up space on s390 koji? its very close >> to full... >> 18:22 < sharkcz> nirik: done, thanks for the

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

Am 05.08.2017 um 21:05 schrieb Kevin Fenzi: On 08/05/2017 11:45 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: From #fedora-releng: 18:11 <+nirik> sharkcz: can you clean up space on s390 koji? its very close to full... 18:22 < sharkcz> nirik: done, thanks for the notice Maybe you should try again?

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On 08/05/2017 11:45 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > From #fedora-releng: > 18:11 <+nirik> sharkcz: can you clean up space on s390 koji? its very close > to full... > 18:22 < sharkcz> nirik: done, thanks for the notice > > Maybe you should try again? That is the old secondary arch s390

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

Am 05.08.2017 um 20:45 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 08:36:22PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: Am 05.08.2017 um 18:14 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Am 05.08.2017 um 18:08 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:00:55PM -0700, Adam

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 08:36:22PM +0200, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote: > Am 05.08.2017 um 18:14 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > >Am 05.08.2017 um 18:08 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: > >>On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:00:55PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >>>On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

Am 05.08.2017 um 18:14 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: Am 05.08.2017 um 18:08 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:00:55PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote: Hi, I will build a new release of poppler this week,

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 11:32:23AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > wrote: > >> >Perhaps next time, you could test rebuilds of at least major things > >> >like texlive against the new poppler *before* you land the new

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

Am 05.08.2017 um 18:08 schrieb Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek: On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:00:55PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote: Hi, I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname bump. I will take care of rebuilding

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

Am 05.08.2017 um 17:51 schrieb Adam Williamson: On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 16:15 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Adam Williamson wrote on 08/05/2017 05:00 AM: On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote: Hi, I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname bump. I will

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 01:00:55PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname > > bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: > > > > boomaga > >

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 11:32 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote: > > This is garbage. How the heck are we supposed to do crap like this > when Koji itself isn't built to support this kind of thing freely? It's really not that difficult. You do a scratch build or build in mock, then test building the

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On Sat, 2017-08-05 at 16:15 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote on 08/05/2017 05:00 AM: > > On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname > > > bump. I will take care of

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On Sat, Aug 5, 2017 at 10:49 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 04:15:24PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: >> Adam Williamson wrote on 08/05/2017 05:00 AM: >> >On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote: >> >>Hi, >> >> >> >>I will build a

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 04:15:24PM +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote on 08/05/2017 05:00 AM: > >On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > >>Hi, > >> > >>I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname > >>bump. I will take care of rebuilding

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

Adam Williamson wrote on 08/05/2017 05:00 AM: On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote: Hi, I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: boomaga calligra cups-filters evas-generic-loaders

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote: > Hi, > > I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname > bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: > > boomaga > calligra > cups-filters > evas-generic-loaders > gambas3 > gdal > gdcm > inkscape >

heads up: poppler soname bump

Hi, I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: boomaga calligra cups-filters evas-generic-loaders gambas3 gdal gdcm inkscape kf5-kfilemetadata libreoffice okular pdf2djvu poppler-sharp texlive texworks Note

poppler soname bump

Hi, I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: boomaga calligra cups-filters evas-generic-loaders gambas3 gdal gdcm inkscape libreoffice okular pdf2djvu texlive texworks Note that packages that only use one

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.48.0 at Friday. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.48.0 against which you can test your packages. You can find the build here:

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

Looks like LibreOffice is still broken in rawhide... On Tue, Jul 12, 2016 at 2:30 PM, Marek Kasik wrote: > Hi, > > I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.45.0 next week. > > There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library > libpoppler.so.*. > > I've

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.45.0 next week. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.45.0 against which you can test your packages. You can find the build here:

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.42.0 next week. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.42.0 against which you can test your packages. You can find the build here:

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.40.0 this Friday. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.40.0 against which you can test your packages. You can find the build here:

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.38.0 during the next week. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.38.0 against which you can test your packages. You can find the build here:

poppler soname bump in rawhide and F23

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide and Fedora 23 to poppler-0.34.0 during the next week. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.34.0 against which you can test your packages. You can find the build here:

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.33.0 during the next week. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.33.0 against which you can test your packages. You can find the build here:

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.33.0 during the next week. There are several API changes and soname bump of the base library libpoppler.so.*. I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.33.0 against which you can test your packages. You can find the build here:

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.28.1 at the end of the next week. There are several API changes. I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.28.1 against which you can test your packages. You can find the build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8143004

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.28.1 at the end of the next week. There are several API changes. I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.28.1 against which you can test your packages. You can find the build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=8143004

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.26.0 at 12th of May. There are several API changes. I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.26.0 against which you can test your packages. You can find the build here: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=6798518 and here:

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On 08/08/2013 05:12 PM, Marek Kasik wrote: I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.24.0 at 19th of August. There are several changes and 1 soname bump (libpoppler.so.37 to libpoppler.so.43). It also adds support for Qt5. If you already have everything prepared, perhaps it's worth

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.24.0 at 19th of August. There are several changes and 1 soname bump (libpoppler.so.37 to libpoppler.so.43). It also adds support for Qt5. I've prepared a scratch build of poppler-0.24.0 against which you can test your packages. You can find

poppler soname bump in rawhide

Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.22.4 at the beginning of the next week (24th of June). There are several changes (new parameters of some functions and new private members of some classes (Stream, Gfx, DCTStream and TextWord)) and 1 soname bump (libpoppler.so.34 to

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

On 06/23/2012 11:15 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Ven 22 juin 2012 14:04, Marek Kasik a écrit : Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.20.1 at the end of next week. There are several API changes (new functions + 1 move of a private function to public section) and 1 soname

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

Le Mer 27 juin 2012 10:02, Marek Kasik a écrit : On 06/23/2012 11:15 AM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Ven 22 juin 2012 14:04, Marek Kasik a écrit : Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.20.1 at the end of next week. There are several API changes (new functions + 1 move of a

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

Le Ven 22 juin 2012 14:04, Marek Kasik a écrit : Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.20.1 at the end of next week. There are several API changes (new functions + 1 move of a private function to public section) and 1 soname bump (libpoppler.so.25 to libpoppler.so.26). Will

Re: poppler soname bump in rawhide

Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le Ven 22 juin 2012 14:04, Marek Kasik a écrit : Hi, I plan to rebase poppler in rawhide to poppler-0.20.1 at the end of next week. There are several API changes (new functions + 1 move of a private function to public section) and 1 soname bump (libpoppler.so.25 to

  1   2   >