On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 08:48:42PM -0700, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> I just hit an issue when scratch building embree on either rawhide and F26:
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18532546
>
> Does anyone encounter similar problem?
This is a bug in the spec file, the options
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Fedora 26 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting - 2nd round on 2017-03-23 from 17:00:00 to
19:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to
determine if
I just hit an issue when scratch building embree on either rawhide and F26:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18532546
Does anyone encounter similar problem?
--
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: l...@fedoraproject.org
W: http://www.coolest-storm.net
_
Hello,
I wanted to mention to people that kontact is very broken and dangerous to
use. I have filed 5 or 6 upstream bugs about the many ways its broken. It
constantly aborts, akonadi constantly segfaults, you have to reboot your
system because it dies holding a video driver mutex, it deletes em
Thanks Martin!
A push to testing repo would also be highly appreciated. :-)
--
Bojan
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Failed openQA tests: 12/107 (x86_64), 2/18 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20170321.n.0):
ID: 68896 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/68896
ID: 68901
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Server boot i386
Failed openQA tests: 14/108 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26-20170321.n.0):
ID: 69029 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_realmd_join_kickstart
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/69029
ID: 6903
On 03/17/2017 10:07 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> It's GNOME 3.24.0 release next week. As usual, we have a f26-gnome side
> tag / build target for Fedora 26 to make it easier to prepare the update
> on the side. If you are helping with builds, please use 'fedpkg build
> --target f26-gnome'
On 22-03-17 19:18, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 04:22:08PM +0100, Patrick Laimbock wrote:
Thanks for compiling that list. The Tito link gave a 404 so I edited
it to point to https://github.com/dgoodwin/tito and also added
centpkg which is used by CentOS.
Does centpkg fit in th
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 12:59:07 -0600
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> For f25 and before there's 2 keys per release: a primary key and a
> secondary key. For f26 and later there are still two keys, but only
> s390 is signed by the secondary one now.
>
> i686 and x86_64 have always been signed by the same key.
On 03/21/2017 10:35 AM, Jeremy Linton wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 03/21/2017 07:33 AM, Jerry James wrote:
>> On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 2:05 PM, Jerry James
>> wrote:
>>> I'm really not sure what to check next. If an aarch64 box for
>>> packagers will be available in the not too distant future, I will try
On 03/22/2017 06:29 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:22:23PM -0700, stan wrote:
>> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:21:25 +
>> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
...snip...
>> Maybe you should try installing the i686 key package?
>
> Oh right, well spotted.
>
> Yes, I wanted to co
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 2:21 AM, Martin Stransky
wrote:
> Sorry I overlooked this one. Builds are in koji now, firefox-52.0-6.
Thanks, installed. Works great!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to de
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 07:22:58PM +0100, Marcus Karlsson wrote:
> I know of several sites that use Ubuntu with the universe component
> disabled and only use packages from main specifically because they are
> well-supported by the security team. That does not necessarily make up a
> majority of th
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:59:51AM +0100, Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> Greg Evenden píše v St 22. 03. 2017 v 02:26 +:
> > might as well use Google-Chrome , Least one doesnt have to WAIT a
> > year or so for a Update to a security Bug thats pretty serious, an ya
> > wonder why more users use UBUNTU
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 04:22:08PM +0100, Patrick Laimbock wrote:
> Thanks for compiling that list. The Tito link gave a 404 so I edited
> it to point to https://github.com/dgoodwin/tito and also added
> centpkg which is used by CentOS.
Does centpkg fit in this category? Isn't it basically just th
.webm
* when it's done encoding — VP9 is... apparently not speedy.
Slides:
--
https://langdon.fedorapeople.org/fedora-modularity-one-goal.pdf
https://langdon.fedorapeople.org/fedora-council-modularity-update-20170322.pdf
Docs site:
-
https://docs.pagure.org/modularit
I hit something like kparal's but didn't get a screenshot of the vm
console. I've had several additional freezes of the VM but there was
no call trace, just a hang, and since it's before root is mounted rw,
there's nothing in the journal. Interestingly, it never happens when I
connect with virsh co
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 4:09 AM Jiri Eischmann wrote:
> I'd like to point out that the last build was done on Sept 20. Yes, 7
> months ago. So it has probably its own fair share of unfixed CVEs and
> thus it should really not be recommended to use.
>
> If you'd like to have the latest Firefox imm
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 09:48 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I could have sworn FESCo discussed and approved this plan, but I
> cannot
> seem to find it. I guess it might have been discussed, but didn't
> have a
> ticket. If needed we could discuss it at the next meeting.
I never created a ticket, and
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 11:00 +0100, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> Hi,
> For several packages it is possible to automate build, test and
> package updating on multiple fedora releases (+epel) in a single
> keypress using the cockpituous (sic) tools [0]. These tools hide quirks
> and requirements
On 03/22/2017 09:40 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
>
> You have to make a request to releng, as Neal says. I hope that releng
> will not approve such a request without a decision on the matter from
> FESCo, since this would entail reintroducing a security-critical
> package to the distribution that
On Wed, 2017-03-22 at 18:28 +0300, Pete Walter wrote:
> I would like to unretire webkitgtk3 as removing it breaks one of my
> packages (bijiben). My intention is to keep maintaining the
> webkitgtk3 package until bijiben gets ported to something else.
I recommend publishing a git snapshot of bijib
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:28 AM, Pete Walter wrote:
> Looks like this was done without involving FESCo and without going through a
> proper Change process. I don't think it's a proper way to approach it like
> this as it breaks a large part of the distro.
>
> I would like to unretire webkitgtk3
Looks like this was done without involving FESCo and without going through a
proper Change process. I don't think it's a proper way to approach it like this
as it breaks a large part of the distro.
I would like to unretire webkitgtk3 as removing it breaks one of my packages
(bijiben). My intent
On 22-03-17 16:02, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017, at 06:00 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
Hi,
For several packages it is possible to automate build, test and
package updating on multiple fedora releases (+epel) in a single
keypress using the cockpituous (sic) tools [0]. These
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017, at 06:00 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote:
> Hi,
> For several packages it is possible to automate build, test and
> package updating on multiple fedora releases (+epel) in a single
> keypress using the cockpituous (sic) tools [0]. These tools hide quirks
> and requirement
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 7:28 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:02:19PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Well, first time it did that. Second time, I got this, and the boot
>> hung:
>>
>> [0.937752] EXT4-fs (sda1): mounting ext2 file system using the ext4
>> subsystem
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 05:22:23PM -0700, stan wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Mar 2017 21:21:25 +
> "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote:
>
> > Obviously this could be worked around using --nogpgcheck,
> > but what does it mean?
>
> [snip]
>
> > 00:01
> > warning:
> > /var/cache/dnf/fedora-6dbd63560daef6bf/pac
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 04:02:19PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Well, first time it did that. Second time, I got this, and the boot
> hung:
>
> [0.937752] EXT4-fs (sda1): mounting ext2 file system using the ext4
> subsystem
> [0.938362] general protection fault: [#1] SMP
> [0.
2017-03-22 0:39 GMT+01:00 Adam Williamson :
> It'd be good if folks can reply to one of the lists if they're also
> running into something that sounds like this, with some details of your
> experience - does it happen every time, or only sometimes? Do you
> always get the same traceback, or differe
Hi Tim,
thanks for all the great work on yumex and yumex-dnf!
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Missing expected images:
Server dvd i386
Server boot i386
Failed openQA tests: 8/107 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in 26 Alpha 1.1):
ID: 68625 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/68625
ID:
Pavel Valena píše v St 22. 03. 2017 v 04:36 -0400:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Greg Evenden"
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 3:26:48 AM
> > Subject: Re: Firefox 52.0.1: CVE-2017-5428
> >
> > > Does anyone know whether the fix for this proble
Greg Evenden píše v St 22. 03. 2017 v 02:26 +:
> might as well use Google-Chrome , Least one doesnt have to WAIT a
> year or so for a Update to a security Bug thats pretty serious, an ya
> wonder why more users use UBUNTU
Sure, someone who can't wait a couple of days for a fix (I'm not saying
Thanks a lot, Neal
I have transfered the repository to Conan-Kudo.
Tim
On Wed, 22 Mar 2017 at 11:33 Neal Gompa wrote:
> Hey Tim,
>
> I'm able to take on dnfdaemon. My GitHub user is Conan-Kudo. You can
> transfer the repository to my GitHub user in the repository settings:
> https://github.com
Hi Tim,
thanks for all your work on these tools!
Greetings,
Christian
On 03/22/2017 11:28 AM, Tim Lauridsen wrote:
Hi Guys
Because of work and personal life, I have not been able to find time
for taking care of my Fedora packages, so I have decided to orhan them.
dnfdaemon -- DBus daemon
Greg Evenden wrote:
> might as well use Google-Chrome , Least one doesnt have to WAIT a year or
> so for a Update to a security Bug thats pretty serious, an ya wonder why
> more users use UBUNTU
"A year or so"??? The bug report is only 3 days old!
Kevin Kofler
Dne 22.3.2017 v 11:00 Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos napsal(a):
> Hi,
> For several packages it is possible to automate build, test and
> package updating on multiple fedora releases (+epel) in a single
> keypress using the cockpituous (sic) tools [0]. These tools hide quirks
> and requirements of the fe
Hi Guys
Because of work and personal life, I have not been able to find time for
taking care of my Fedora packages, so I have decided to orhan them.
dnfdaemon -- DBus daemon for dnf package actions ( master f26 f25 f24 )
postr -- Flickr uploader ( el6 el5 )
python-iniparse -- Python Module for Ac
Hi,
For several packages it is possible to automate build, test and
package updating on multiple fedora releases (+epel) in a single
keypress using the cockpituous (sic) tools [0]. These tools hide quirks
and requirements of the fedora tooling, and allow a very efficient
orchestration of package r
On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 11:39 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hi folks! Just wanted to let everyone know where we're at with the F26
> Alpha.
>
> An Alpha RC2 compose request is in, and RC2 should be building at
> present. The main change between RC1 and RC2 is a fix for the problems
> with gnome-ini
On 03/22/2017 01:22 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
Does anyone know whether the fix for this problem is already in F25
builds of FF or should a new build be prepared and pushed to fix this?
See: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1433819
Sorry I overlooked this one. Builds are in koji now,
- Original Message -
> From: "Greg Evenden"
> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2017 3:26:48 AM
> Subject: Re: Firefox 52.0.1: CVE-2017-5428
>
> > Does anyone know whether the fix for this problem is already in F25
> > builds of FF or should a new build be pre
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 26 Candidate Alpha-1.2 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the c
45 matches
Mail list logo
