Re: xindy, texlive, and concurrency

2019-05-16 Thread Jerry James
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 5:55 AM Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > I want to say ++ to this. I have found every one of Mr James articles > explaining all the things he has done to work on, debug, dead-ends, etc to be > insightful and incredibly useful to track down in other software. If you have >

Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190516.0

2019-05-16 Thread noreply
A new Fedora Atomic Host update is available via an OSTree update: Version: 29.20190516.0 Commit(x86_64): 7f719bf60b865ca96aacd0e8ae3e6074c7eb5783d8ceb9003dbba5dfd5a29ba3 Commit(aarch64): 3930a03b8ffcce1aa66f17b8811e2a4da80aedb8234a1f47b62d603986b580ec Commit(ppc64le):

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

2019-05-16 Thread Orcan Ogetbil
On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 13:42, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for > sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper > reason: > > Orphaned

Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Disable Root Password Login in SSH

2019-05-16 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 16/05/19 14:53 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisableRootPasswordLoginInSshd == Summary == The upstream OpenSSH disabled password logins for root back in 2015. The Fedora should follow to keep security expectation and avoid users surprises with this

Re: sign_and_send_pubkey: signing failed: agent refused operation

2019-05-16 Thread Steve Dickson
On 5/16/19 5:11 AM, Jakub Jelen wrote: > On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 17:09 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: >> Hello, >> >> I'm getting the following error when I'm access the fedora git trees. >> >> sign_and_send_pubkey: signing failed: agent refused operation >> ste...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission

Re: s390x: hanging koji build

2019-05-16 Thread Jerry James
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:37 PM Felix Schwarz wrote: > I'd like to thank everyone who contributed time + provided guidance on this > issue. I just build a working version of borgbackup and which is on its way to > the F30 testing repository. Great news! I really like the spirit of helpfulness

Self Introduction: Jordan Ogas

2019-05-16 Thread Ogas, Jordan Andrew via devel
Greetings, My name is Jordan, I'm a member of the Programming and Runtime Environment team for the High Performance Computing Division (HPC) at the Los Alamos National Laboratory (LANL). I have been encouraged by my package reviewer, Dave Love, to introduce myself to the community in an effort to

Re: Self Introduction: Jordan Ogas

2019-05-16 Thread Daniel Walsh
On 5/16/19 3:17 PM, Ogas, Jordan Andrew via devel wrote: > > Greetings, > >   > > My name is Jordan, I'm a member of the Programming and Runtime Environment > > team for the High Performance Computing Division (HPC) at the Los Alamos > > National Laboratory (LANL). I have been encouraged by my

Re: Orphaned packages need new maintainers (will be retired in 3 weeks)

2019-05-16 Thread Sérgio Basto
On Thu, 2019-05-16 at 22:23 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote: > On Fri, 30 Nov 2018 at 13:42, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know > > for > > sure that the package should be

arm03-packager00: wrong Rawhide mock config

2019-05-16 Thread Jerry James
Where should problem reports with the test machines be directed? I can't build for Rawhide in mock on arm03-packager00 because /etc/mock/fedora-rawhide-armhfp.cfg refers to Fedora 30. The correct config is in /etc/mock/fedora-rawhide-armhfp.cfg.rpmnew. Can somebody with admin privileges fix

Re: xindy, texlive, and concurrency

2019-05-16 Thread Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
On Thursday, 16 May 2019 at 07:51, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dear Jerry, > > Although I have no idea what xindy is, I enjoyed reading your analysis. > Thx for your insightful post. +1, great analysis and write-up! Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion

Fedora GPG keys

2019-05-16 Thread Miroslav Suchý
Can someone enlighten me what happened to: https://getfedora.org/keys/ ? There used to be GPG keys of Fedora, but now it just return 404. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red Hat, Associate Manager ABRT/Copr, #brno, #fedora-buildsys ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Removal of krb5-devel from "stable" F29 buidroot broke my package

2019-05-16 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 16. 05. 19 v 7:58 Samuel Sieb napsal(a): > On 5/15/19 10:50 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: >> Dne 15. 05. 19 v 17:29 Dominique Martinet napsal(a): >>> Yeah, it used to come with openssl-devel, but got removed very >>> recently: >>>

Re: Fedora 30 Elections: Nomination period open

2019-05-16 Thread Ben Cotton
This is your reminder that elections nominations are open through Wednesday 2019-05-22 at 23:59:59 UTC. On Wed, May 8, 2019 at 9:08 AM Ben Cotton wrote: > > Today we are starting the Nomination & Campaign period during which we > accept nominations to the "steering bodies" of the following

Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: perl 5.30

2019-05-16 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.30 == Summary == A new ''perl 5.30'' version brings a lot of changes done over a year of development. Perl 5.30 should be released at the end of May 2019. See [https://metacpan.org/pod/release/XSAWYERX/perl-5.30.0-RC1/pod/perldelta.pod 5.30.0

Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Disable Root Password Login in SSH

2019-05-16 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisableRootPasswordLoginInSshd == Summary == The upstream OpenSSH disabled password logins for root back in 2015. The Fedora should follow to keep security expectation and avoid users surprises with this configuration. == Owner == * Name: [[User:jjelen|

Fedora and the MDS CVEs

2019-05-16 Thread Justin Forbes
For those of you wondering the Fedora status of the MDS CVEs that went public on Tuesday. Here is where we stand: kernel-5.0.16 and microcode_ctl-2.1-29 contain the initial mitigations for kernel/microcode, and are in stable updates for F29 and F30, The kernel is still in updates-testing for F28

Re: Packages retirement as part of OpenStack clients updates in Rawhide

2019-05-16 Thread Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 12:10 PM Alfredo Moralejo Alonso < amora...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 11:49 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 16. 05. 19 11:38, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > OpenStack client packages have been updated in Fedora Rawhide to the >>

Re: Where are armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le Container tar.xz files?

2019-05-16 Thread Jun Aruga
> > ``` > > $ docker run --rm -t arm64v8/fedora:30 uname -m > > standard_init_linux.go:207: exec user process caused "no such file or > > directory" > > ``` > > you should just run > $ docker run --rm -t fedora:30 uname -m > on all arches, we push manifest listed containers to dockerhub so that >

Re: how to create Makefile

2019-05-16 Thread Martin Gansser
Thanks for your feedback, i switched from qmake to cmake. A review [1] in rpmfusion already exists. [1] https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5163 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: xindy, texlive, and concurrency

2019-05-16 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 01:51, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dear Jerry, > > Although I have no idea what xindy is, I enjoyed reading your analysis. > Thx for your insightful post. > > > I want to say ++ to this. I have found every one of Mr James articles explaining all the things he has done to work on,

Re: Packages retirement as part of OpenStack clients updates in Rawhide

2019-05-16 Thread Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 11:49 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 16. 05. 19 11:38, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote: > > Hi, > > > > OpenStack client packages have been updated in Fedora Rawhide to the > latest > > releases included in recently published Stein version. > > > > As part of this update some

Re: xindy, texlive, and concurrency

2019-05-16 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 9:41 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 09:11:21AM +0200, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > Let me also add my +1 to the write-up itself, a very nice story. > > Zbyszek I may have accidentally skipped the +1 step and jumped straight to suggestions

Re: Removal of krb5-devel from "stable" F29 buidroot broke my package

2019-05-16 Thread Vít Ondruch
Dne 16. 05. 19 v 9:20 Dominique Martinet napsal(a): > Vít Ondruch wrote on Thu, May 16, 2019 at 08:28:45AM +0200: This was removed on my request, triggered by this PR [1]. Nevertheless I concur that this should happen just in Rawhide and never be backported into stable releases.

[heads-up] soname version bump for evolution-data-server in rawhide

2019-05-16 Thread Milan Crha
Hello, next week's 3.33.2 release of evolution-data-server, on 2019-05-20, will contain soname version bumps in libecal, libedata-cal, libebook and libedata-book. At least unless anything bad happens. The main change on the calendar part is that there will be used libical-glib instead of

Re: Packages retirement as part of OpenStack clients updates in Rawhide

2019-05-16 Thread Miro Hrončok
On 16. 05. 19 11:38, Alfredo Moralejo Alonso wrote: Hi, OpenStack client packages have been updated in Fedora Rawhide to the latest releases included in recently published Stein version. As part of this update some packages which were required in the past are not longer needed, so i plan to

Fedora Rawhide-20190515.n.1 compose check report

2019-05-16 Thread Fedora compose checker
Missing expected images: Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 5 of 47 required tests failed, 4 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 10/146 (x86_64), 1/24

Re: Removal of krb5-devel from "stable" F29 buidroot broke my package

2019-05-16 Thread Dominique Martinet
Vít Ondruch wrote on Thu, May 16, 2019 at 08:28:45AM +0200: > >> This was removed on my request, triggered by this PR [1]. Nevertheless I > >> concur that this should happen just in Rawhide and never be backported > >> into stable releases. > > > > I don't see why this is a problem.  Removing an

Re: xindy, texlive, and concurrency

2019-05-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 09:11:21AM +0200, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:46 AM Jerry James wrote: > > > > I finally found some time to look at the xindy failure to build. > > First, let me say that I've got a workaround for the problem, which > > resulted in the beautiful

how to create Makefile

2019-05-16 Thread Martin Gansser
Hi, I'm trying to compile the program olive with the help of a spec file [1], which unfortunately fails when creating the Makefile. Have somebody a idea or solution ? [1] https://martinkg.fedorapeople.org/Packages/olive/olive.spec Regars Martin ___

Re: Removal of krb5-devel from "stable" F29 buidroot broke my package

2019-05-16 Thread Igor Gnatenko
In meson we automatically set all "auto" features to be "enabled". So people have to disable things they don't want manually. On Thu, May 16, 2019, 10:00 Dridi Boukelmoune wrote: > > configure with feature autodetection is a PITA :/ > > The PITA doesn't come from auto-detection, rather

Packages retirement as part of OpenStack clients updates in Rawhide

2019-05-16 Thread Alfredo Moralejo Alonso
Hi, OpenStack client packages have been updated in Fedora Rawhide to the latest releases included in recently published Stein version. As part of this update some packages which were required in the past are not longer needed, so i plan to retire them from Fedora: python-automaton

Re: Fedora GPG keys

2019-05-16 Thread Samuel Sieb
On 5/15/19 11:33 PM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Can someone enlighten me what happened to: https://getfedora.org/keys/ ? There used to be GPG keys of Fedora, but now it just return 404. This was just brought up on the users list as well. It's being corrected.

Re: Removal of krb5-devel from "stable" F29 buidroot broke my package

2019-05-16 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
> configure with feature autodetection is a PITA :/ The PITA doesn't come from auto-detection, rather auto-selection of (optional) dependencies. I tend to prefer explicit --with-* or --enable-* flags for anything optional and fixed defaults. It would be worse if we had to tell a configure script

Re: Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-05-16 16:00 UTC)

2019-05-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 05:52:15PM -0400, James Antill wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC > meeting Thursday at 2019-05-16 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on > irc.freenode.net. > > Local time information (via. uitime): > > = Day: Thursday

Re: how to create Makefile

2019-05-16 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 9:49 AM Martin Gansser wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to compile the program olive with the help of a spec file [1], > which unfortunately fails when creating the Makefile. > Have somebody a idea or solution ? > > [1]

Re: how to create Makefile

2019-05-16 Thread J. Scheurich
I'm trying to compile the program olive with the help of a spec file [1], which unfortunately fails when creating the Makefile. Have somebody a idea or solution ? qt projects usally uses "qmake" if you have a .pro project file. https://doc.qt.io/archives/3.3/qmake-manual-3.html so long

planning on taking python-urwid

2019-05-16 Thread Tomas Tomecek
Hey, this is just a heads-up that I'm planning on taking python-urwid since it's a dep of 2 of my packages. It's orphaned and I want it to find a new home. Rel-eng ticket will follow. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: sign_and_send_pubkey: signing failed: agent refused operation

2019-05-16 Thread Jakub Jelen
On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 17:09 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > I'm getting the following error when I'm access the fedora git trees. > > sign_and_send_pubkey: signing failed: agent refused operation > ste...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey). > fatal: Could not read

Re: sign_and_send_pubkey: signing failed: agent refused operation

2019-05-16 Thread Dan Horák
On Thu, 16 May 2019 11:11:52 +0200 Jakub Jelen wrote: > On Wed, 2019-05-15 at 17:09 -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm getting the following error when I'm access the fedora git > > trees. > > > > sign_and_send_pubkey: signing failed: agent refused operation > >

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190515.n.1 changes

2019-05-16 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190514.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190515.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 6 Added packages: 7 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 162 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 10.00 MiB Size of dropped packages:

Re: xindy, texlive, and concurrency

2019-05-16 Thread Dridi Boukelmoune
On Thu, May 16, 2019 at 3:46 AM Jerry James wrote: > > I finally found some time to look at the xindy failure to build. > First, let me say that I've got a workaround for the problem, which > resulted in the beautiful green colors in this xindy-enabled scratch > build of texlive-base: > >

Re: Where are armv7hl, i686 and ppc64le Container tar.xz files?

2019-05-16 Thread Jun Aruga
> > you should just run > > $ docker run --rm -t fedora:30 uname -m > > on all arches, we push manifest listed containers to dockerhub so that > > command will work everywhere. > > Alright, I did not know the kind of alias feature. Thanks for the info. But my motivation is not like * Running

is anyone using /usr/sbin/halt.local?

2019-05-16 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
There's a proposal to drop the support for this pre-systemd compat feature, but if it's actually used, we'll keep it. C.f. https://github.com/systemd/systemd/pull/12571. Zbyszek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: sign_and_send_pubkey: signing failed: agent refused operation

2019-05-16 Thread Brian C. Lane
On Wed, May 15, 2019 at 05:09:41PM -0400, Steve Dickson wrote: > Hello, > > I'm getting the following error when I'm access the fedora git trees. > > sign_and_send_pubkey: signing failed: agent refused operation > ste...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey). > fatal: Could not

[Bug 1711066] New: perl-Net-HTTP-6.19 is available

2019-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711066 Bug ID: 1711066 Summary: perl-Net-HTTP-6.19 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Net-HTTP Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1710529] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16 is available

2019-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710529 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[389-devel] Re: Logging future direction and ideas.

2019-05-16 Thread William Brown
> On 17 May 2019, at 00:16, Ludwig Krispenz wrote: > > > On 05/16/2019 02:56 AM, William Brown wrote: >> Replying to both Simon and Ludwig in the one mail ... >> >> To just comment to one point from Ludwig: >> >>> This may sound too negative, I agree that logging deserves attention and >>>

[389-devel] Re: Advice on a memory issue

2019-05-16 Thread William Brown
> On 16 May 2019, at 17:18, thierry bordaz wrote: > > Hi William, > > It looks to me that attr_syntax_create overwrite the allocated asi with one > it allocates itself based on provided params. > In short I think attr_syntax_creates allocates for you the syntaxinfo, you do > not need to

[Bug 1711098] New: Segmentation Fault in UUlib.so (ScanData) used in perl-Convert-UUlib

2019-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1711098 Bug ID: 1711098 Summary: Segmentation Fault in UUlib.so (ScanData) used in perl-Convert-UUlib Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel7 Hardware: x86_64 OS:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Project plans for EL-8 (2019-05-15 good til 2019-05-22)

2019-05-16 Thread Chris Adams
Once upon a time, Stephen John Smoogen said: > RHEL-8 was built with various packages which are not shipped in > BaseOS/AppStream/CRB. Some like screen are in the buildroot for the > packages which depend on them but were decided not to be shipped. Huh, that's... weird. As someone that's been

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

2019-05-16 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-c1577dae55 singularity-3.1.1-1.1.el6 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-2f5f6c5ba9 libmediainfo-19.04-1.el6 mediainfo-19.04-1.el6

[Bug 1710529] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16 is available

2019-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710529 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See

[389-devel] Advice on a memory issue

2019-05-16 Thread William Brown
https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/50379 This code is not yet ready to be merged. I'm currently having a problem with freeing the attrsyntaxinfo struct as part of the test. If the code is as is I get: = ==98363==ERROR:

[Bug 1710529] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16 is available

2019-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710529 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 1710529] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16 is available

2019-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710529 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-633578dacc -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[Bug 1710529] perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16 is available

2019-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710529 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-re-engine-PCRE2-0.16-1.fc29 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 29. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-31203b5866 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2019-05-16 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 275 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d condor-8.6.11-1.el7 83 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-f8311ec8a2 tor-0.3.5.8-1.el7 51

Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Disable Root Password Login in SSH

2019-05-16 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/DisableRootPasswordLoginInSshd == Summary == The upstream OpenSSH disabled password logins for root back in 2015. The Fedora should follow to keep security expectation and avoid users surprises with this configuration. == Owner == * Name: [[User:jjelen|

Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: perl 5.30

2019-05-16 Thread Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.30 == Summary == A new ''perl 5.30'' version brings a lot of changes done over a year of development. Perl 5.30 should be released at the end of May 2019. See [https://metacpan.org/pod/release/XSAWYERX/perl-5.30.0-RC1/pod/perldelta.pod 5.30.0

[EPEL-devel] Re: Project plans for EL-8 (2019-05-15 good til 2019-05-22)

2019-05-16 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
NOTICE: I have been informed that various parts of the document have major errors. I will be updating and fixing today. Problems include the mentioning various javapackages which were shipped and not spelling out that one of the differences between internal and external is usra-major On Wed, 15

[EPEL-devel] Re: Project plans for EL-8 (2019-05-15 good til 2019-05-22)

2019-05-16 Thread Chris Adams
So, I don't have a handle on the whole modularity thing... still trying to understand what's what with that. But this caught my eye in your "Open Questions": - Some normally leaf packages like screen are inside of the Red Hat hidden buildroot package set. Having them built in EPEL is likely to

[EPEL-devel] Re: Project plans for EL-8 (2019-05-15 good til 2019-05-22)

2019-05-16 Thread Dan Horák
On Wed, 15 May 2019 18:06:21 -0400 Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > In trying to get resources allocated, I have been working on the > project plans for 8. The original one was at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_2020/EPEL-8 > > As of today an updated one is at > >

[389-devel] Re: Logging future direction and ideas.

2019-05-16 Thread Ludwig Krispenz
On 05/16/2019 02:56 AM, William Brown wrote: Replying to both Simon and Ludwig in the one mail ... To just comment to one point from Ludwig: This may sound too negative, I agree that logging deserves attention and improvement, but we need to agree on what we want to achieve. I don't think

[389-devel] Re: Advice on a memory issue

2019-05-16 Thread thierry bordaz
Hi William, |It looks to me that attr_syntax_create overwrite the allocated asi with one it allocates itself based on provided params. In short I think attr_syntax_creates allocates for you the syntaxinfo, you do not need to provide one. best regards thierry | On 5/16/19 8:17 AM, William

[EPEL-devel] Re: Project plans for EL-8 (2019-05-15 good til 2019-05-22)

2019-05-16 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 09:59, Chris Adams wrote: > So, I don't have a handle on the whole modularity thing... still trying > to understand what's what with that. But this caught my eye in your > "Open Questions": > > - Some normally leaf packages like screen are inside of the Red Hat > hidden

[Bug 1710933] New: Invalid DocumentLocator object passed to

2019-05-16 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1710933 Bug ID: 1710933 Summary: Invalid DocumentLocator object passed to Product: Fedora Version: 30 Hardware: x86_64 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Project plans for EL-8 (2019-05-15 good til 2019-05-22)

2019-05-16 Thread Stephen John Smoogen
On Thu, 16 May 2019 at 09:48, Dan Horák wrote: > On Wed, 15 May 2019 18:06:21 -0400 > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > In trying to get resources allocated, I have been working on the > > project plans for 8. The original one was at > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure_2020/EPEL-8