Maybe Something from the sigs,sigs often require blogs setup etc.That
could be a easy starter issue.Jekyll is pretty easy.
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 8:30 PM Adam Samalik wrote:
>
> What about the Feedback Pipeline service [1] I'm working on for minimization?
> The code [2] is on GitHub and I even
I did test some of these desktops in the past. From my experience LXDT should
be just fine. Anyway, thanks for reminding me, because I was so used to
standard Fedora desktop that completely forgot about such alternatives.
___
devel mailing list --
Hi
Here's my output (I am running F30):
Problem 1: problem with installed package eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch
- eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- nothing provides jgit = 5.3.0-5.fc31 needed by
eclipse-jgit-5.3.0-5.fc31.noarch
Problem 2:
According to the schedule [1], Fedora 31 Candidate Beta-1.1 is now
available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation_test_plan
Test coverage information for the
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 9:01 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
> and try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
>
Error:
Problem 1: package
On 9/9/19 12:17, Kalev Lember wrote:
Hi all,
Last week was 3.33.92, and this week is the final 3.34.0 release. I'm
wrangling the Fedora side of the release this time around as well. Same
as last week, we have a koji side tag to prepare the update, and then
I'll submit all of the builds
I rebase on silverblue, flawless..
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List
Yes, that's understandable. But this is beating of a dead horse.
But what matters now is that by doing some small investigation i686 users can
still get support for their bugs which are common for both platforms. This
doesn't require any formalities like SIG or commitments which they can't make
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/MariaDB_10.4
= MariaDB 10.4 =
== Summary ==
Update of MariaDB ('mariadb' package) in Fedora from 10.3 to 10.4 version.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:mschorm| Michal Schorm]]
* Email: msch...@redhat.com
== Detailed Description ==
Update of MariaDB package in
Hi Neil,
Neil Horman writes:
> Hey all-
> I was starting to setup CI for one of my packages in Fedora (cscope),
> which requires that I have access to the sources to run my test (cscope uses
> its
> own source tree to search for various symbols to confirm that its working
> properly).
On Wednesday, September 11, 2019 8:57:37 AM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel
wrote:
> On 9/11/19 2:18 AM, John M. Harris Jr. wrote:
> > Feel free to ignore any such wording that you disagree with. We don't need
> > to agree in order to discuss such things, and it's alright if we disagree
> > on
On Tuesday, 30 July 2019 22:45:09 CEST Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> I'll update youtube-dl.
>
>
> --
> Gwyn Ciesla
> she/her/hers
>
> in your fear, seek only peace
> in your fear, seek only love
> -d. bowie
>
> Sent with ProtonMail Secure
On 11 Sep 2019, at 16:12, vvs vvs wrote:
>
> Even better. That means that you can still get support for x86 but it will
> require some more work on the user's side. They should just check if that bug
> is indeed i686 specific.
>
> I believe that all that argument for the lats three days was
On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at 9:33 PM Robbie Harwood wrote:
>
> Hi Fedora,
>
> I'm trying to contact Alex Chernyakhovsky and Othman Madjoudj, who are
> the maintainers of mosh as far as I can tell. I have started the
> nonresponsive maintainer process due to lack of contact through bugzilla
> mail;
Here's the error I run into on my desktop:
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch
- eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.fc30.noarch does not belong to a distupgrade repository
- nothing provides jgit = 5.3.0-5.fc31 needed by
eclipse-jgit-5.3.0-5.fc31.noarch
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 448775 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso modularity_tests
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/448775
ID: 448810 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_background
URL:
Hello Robbie,
I'm responsive, it just I'm prioritizing important bug since I was off for a
period of time.
Regarding mosh, I'm just watching the pkg, I don't have commit privileges.
Most of the current bugs are related to py2 retirement, I'm still sorting out
the pkg (some need fixes, other
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2019-09-12 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2019-09-12 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2019-09-12
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 14:54:45 +0200
Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
> ...
# dnf
On Wed, 11 Sep 2019 at 11:53, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
>
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:48:51AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:16:28PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> > > > time and try to
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 6:55 AM Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run [*]:
No errors for me, but 3 downgrades:
Downgrading:
gap-pkg-edim x86_64 1.3.3-6.fc31fedora78 k
gap-pkg-genss
* on the Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 02:54:45PM +0200, Miroslav Such? was commenting:
| Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run [*]:
|
| sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
--enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
|
| If
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/31 (x86_64)
ID: 448908 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso desktop_notifications_live
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/448908
ID: 448910 Test: x86_64 KDE-live-iso release_identification
URL:
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
A variant:
# dnf --releasever=31
On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 12:41:14 PM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel
wrote:
> On 9/10/19 7:55 AM, vvs vvs wrote:
>
> > Did I? I thought that I've said that I'm using x86_64 kernel right now and
> > that I have my memory stretched to the limits already.
>
> >
> >
> > But yes, I've
On Wednesday, September 11, 2019 12:08:53 AM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 9/10/19 11:18 PM, John M. Harris Jr. wrote:
>
> > Feel free to ignore any such wording that you disagree with. We don't need
> > to agree in order to discuss such things, and it's alright if we
> > disagree on wording.
On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 6:35:39 PM MST Jared K. Smith wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 12:41 AM John M. Harris Jr.
>
> wrote:
> > Further, nothing in that email is what I
> > would describe as "uncivilized". I'm not asking people to necessarily
> > agree
> > with me, everyone is welcome
On Tue, 2019-09-10 at 16:11 +0200, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote:
> Also, I have feeling that Lutris is far superior alternative, at
> least for games :)
I don't want to be mean on PlayOnLinux but yes I agree with the above.
Jirka
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 4:01 PM Michael Cronenworth
> wrote:
> >
On 9/10/19 11:48 PM, drago01 wrote:
On Wednesday, September 11, 2019, John M. Harris Jr.
mailto:joh...@splentity.com>> wrote:
Compiling his app as 32 bit would require 32 bit repositories for the
libraries he plans on linking.
Multilib is still supported so libraries are present in the
On 9/10/19 11:18 PM, John M. Harris Jr. wrote:
Feel free to ignore any such wording that you disagree with. We don't need to
agree in order to discuss such things, and it's alright if we disagree on
wording. Literally every user I talk to has asked me either how to disable the
hot corner, or
On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 09:54 +0530, Danishka Navin wrote:
> Is it ok to modify /etc/os-release for re-branding purpose?
Hi Danishka Navin,
Good question on a bad place. Adding Fedora devel list here, there
could be someone who is able to answer you this question.
Jirka
> On Wed, Sep 4, 2019 at
On 9/10/19 11:01 PM, John M. Harris Jr. wrote:
On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 9:54:50 AM MST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Sure there are... from the change page:
"The i686 kernel is of limited use as most x86 hardware supports 64bit
these days. It has been in a status of "community supported" for
On Wednesday, September 11, 2019 12:28:31 AM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 9/10/19 11:01 PM, John M. Harris Jr. wrote:
>
> > On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 9:54:50 AM MST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> >> Sure there are... from the change page:
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> "The i686 kernel is of limited use as
On 11. 09. 19 4:54, Sérgio Basto wrote:
On Tue, 2019-08-27 at 22:20 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
We are retiring python2 and introducing python27 later this week. Rawhide only.
As for now, nothing should break, except python2-debug will exist no more.
Packages (build)requiring python2 or
On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 9:54:50 AM MST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 9/9/19 9:34 PM, John M. Harris Jr. wrote:
> > There's no reason to drop x86 kernel builds either.
>
> Sure there are... from the change page:
>
> "The i686 kernel is of limited use as most x86 hardware supports 64bit
> these
On Wednesday, September 11, 2019, John M. Harris Jr.
wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 12:41:14 PM MST Przemek Klosowski via devel
> wrote:
> > On 9/10/19 7:55 AM, vvs vvs wrote:
> >
> > > Did I? I thought that I've said that I'm using x86_64 kernel right now
> and
> > > that I have my
On 9/10/19 4:28 PM, vvs vvs wrote:
But that's actually the same that I was trying to say. Meeting that activity
statistics is the essence of such formal group. But grass-roots enthusiasts
don't have such commitments. They can do some work occasionally if time allows
but there is no strict
On 9/11/19 12:50 AM, John M. Harris Jr. wrote:
On Wednesday, September 11, 2019 12:28:31 AM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
It's not incorrect. Almost all x86 hardware is 64-bit capable,
therefore building a 32-bit is of very limited use. It is not easy to
find 32-bit only CPUs now. Yes, I know some
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> it's still retired on all the Fedora branches.
> See:
>
> https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8723#comment-594936
>
> The hook thats blocking it is a check against pdc, which rejects commits
> when the package is eol/not currently supported.
>
> So, you need a re-review and
On 11. 09. 19 11:14, Dave Love wrote:
I'm puzzled why it needs re-reviewing when branches are maintained,
Because it was only maintained in EPEL, not Fedora. IF you want to maintian it
in Fedora (but I assume you don't), it needs a re-review, because it was retired
in Fedora 3 years ago.
Hi folks,
Does anyone here have any experiences with bundled packages?
I'm trying to package one bundled lisp package, which have quite a lot lisp
files bundled within.
I've already have spec with all the things, except the "Provide bundled()"
sections.
Here is the SRPM for my package:
In addition to previous mail.
I've discussed the name-conflict problem with some colleagues and as my
suggestion, I would add cl- (common-lisp) prefix at the begging of the name
of library that is bundled.
Example: cl-alexandria
Here is list of all the libraries that are bundled within the
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20190910.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20190911.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:2
Upgraded packages: 14
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.04 MiB
Size of dropped packages
Hello everyone,
You are invited to attend the Open NeuroFedora team meeting this week
on Thursday at 1500UTC in #fedora-neuro on IRC (Freenode):
https://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#fedora-neuro
You can convert the meeting time to your local time using:
$ date --date='TZ="UTC" 1500 next Thu'
OLD: Fedora-31-20190909.n.0
NEW: Fedora-31-20190911.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 1
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 10
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.80 MiB
Size of dropped packages:4.12 MiB
Size
On Tue, Sep 10, 2019 at 11:28:13PM -, vvs vvs wrote:
> But that's actually the same that I was trying to say. Meeting that
> activity statistics is the essence of such formal group. But grass-roots
> enthusiasts don't have such commitments. They can do some work
> occasionally if time allows
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 4/152 (x86_64), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-31-20190909.n.0):
ID: 447815 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso desktop_browser
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/447815
Old failures (same test failed in
Not sure where this one should go but looks like there's a problem with
policycoreutils-python...
Problem 5: problem with installed package unifi-5.10.25-1.fc30.x86_64
- package unifi-5.10.25-2.fc31.x86_64 requires policycoreutils-python,
but none of the providers can be installed
-
No missing expected images.
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
4 of 45 required tests failed, 2 results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING:
I separated the policycoreutils one since it seemed more dire but here's my
full output (with some RPM Fusion specific stuff filtered out):
Modular dependency problems:
Problem 1: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
Hi everybody,
we are currently looking for community members, which will be willing to
take ownership of Fedocal and Nuancier. To see our reasons for this look
at Fedora community blog article [0].
These two applications are part of the Friday with Infra initiative [1],
so you can see what
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 2:51 AM John M. Harris Jr. wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, September 11, 2019 12:28:31 AM MST Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 9/10/19 11:01 PM, John M. Harris Jr. wrote:
> >
> > > On Tuesday, September 10, 2019 9:54:50 AM MST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > >
> > >> Sure there are... from the
Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
try to run [*]:
sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
--enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
If you get this prompt:
...
Total download size: XXX M
Is this ok [y/N]:
you can
Error:
Problem: problem with installed package
bat-0.10.0-1.module_f30+4037+f98ba4b0.x86_64
- package bat-0.11.0-3.module_f31+5338+1c55392b.x86_64 requires
libgit2.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- bat-0.10.0-1.module_f30+4037+f98ba4b0.x86_64 does not belong to a
On 9/11/19 8:55 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
>
> If you get this prompt:
>
> ...
>
-Original message-
> From:Miroslav Suchý
> Sent: Wednesday 11th September 2019 12:55
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Subject: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F30 to F31
>
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
This is what I got:
Error:
Problem 1: package gegl03-0.3.30-5.fc30.x86_64 requires
libIlmImf-2_2.so.22()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installed
- OpenEXR-libs-2.2.0-16.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- problem with installed package
My attempt revealed these errors
Problem: conflicting requests
- nothing provides module(platform:f30) needed by module
eclipse:2019-06:3020190807134759:6ebe2c0f-0.x86_64
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package
eclipse-jgit-5.4.0-4.module_f30+5264+0fe54b96.noarch
-
I know you didn't ask about F29 upgrades, but it looks like it might work:
Removing:
kernelx86_64 5.2.7-100.fc29
@updates-testing0
kernel-core x86_64 5.2.7-100.fc29
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 04:55:05PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote:
> A few errors reported when testing on KDE (one ticket for problem 4
> at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751242):
>
> Error:
> Problem 1: package plasma-discover-snap-5.15.5-1.fc30.x86_64
> requires plasma-discover =
A few errors reported when testing on KDE (one ticket for problem 4 at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751242):
Error:
Problem 1: package plasma-discover-snap-5.15.5-1.fc30.x86_64 requires
plasma-discover = 5.15.5-1.fc30, but none of the providers can be installed
-
On 9/11/19 8:54 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
>
> If you get this prompt:
>
> ...
>
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 22:50:32 +0100
"Ryan Walklin" wrote:
> I built pulseaudio-equalizer directly from github today and it
> doesn't seem to be able to parse it's own config files? Which is a
> pain because I'd prefer something lighter than pulseeffects for a
> simple EQ.
I built it on f31 from
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:16:28PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> > time and try to run [*]:
> >
> > sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> > --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
Here's an
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:48:51AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> System 2: (Workstation)
Adding in --allowerasing allows the upgrade to proceed:
Removing dependent packages:
0ad x86_64 0.0.23b-6.fc30 @fedora 16 M
aeskulap x86_64
On Wed, 2019-09-11 at 14:54 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> time and try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
>
> If you get this prompt:
On 9/10/19 10:18 PM, Feilong Wang wrote:
> Hi Dusty,
>
> Now Spyros and I are trying to ask for support in Ignition for multi part
> MIME, see https://github.com/coreos/ignition/issues/849 It would be nice if
> we can get your review and support. Thanks.
Any chance you could drop by
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 08:33:24AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> Not sure where this one should go but looks like there's a problem with
> policycoreutils-python...
>
> Problem 5: problem with installed package unifi-5.10.25-1.fc30.x86_64
> - package unifi-5.10.25-2.fc31.x86_64 requires
W dniu 11.09.2019 o 14:54, Miroslav Suchý pisze:
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
> --enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
Had to remove 'openshot' (FTBFS
No dep failures, but downgrades:
Downgrading:
gimp x86_64
2:2.10.12-2.module_f31+5293+eb7fed42 fedora-modular 22 M
gimp-libs x86_64
2:2.10.12-2.module_f31+5293+eb7fed42 fedora-modular2.2 M
podman
What about the Feedback Pipeline service [1] I'm working on for
minimization? The code [2] is on GitHub and I even have a few issues with
things to do.
[1] https://minimization.github.io/reports/
[2] https://github.com/minimization/feedback-pipeline
On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 10:47 PM Ben Cotton
And even that might not be necessary at all because most bugs are common
between 32 and 64-bit. Honestly, I don't think such SIG was really needed after
all.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Even better. That means that you can still get support for x86 but it will
require some more work on the user's side. They should just check if that bug
is indeed i686 specific.
I believe that all that argument for the lats three days was completely
unnecessary and should be blamed on an
This is the Minimization Objective [0] update.
Status: Discovery phase
== Use case analysis ==
Removing Systemd dependency from container use cases:
-- nginx --
* Pull request to drop systemd as a runtime requirement [1]
-- httpd --
* Pull request to drop systemd as a runtime requirement [2]
On Tue, 10 Sep 2019 15:41:14 -0400
Przemek Klosowski via devel wrote:
> Wait---so you are using 32-bit Gnome on a 64-bit capable CPU running
> 64-bit kernel? If the reason is to save 200MB of memory, you should
> definitely try one of the memory-thrifty desktop environments like
> xfce.
>
>
The Go/No-Go meeting is Thursday!
Action summary
Accepted blockers
-
1. dracut-modules-olpc — Cannot be installed due to unsatisfied
'bitfrost' dependency — NEW
ACTION: releng to make Pungi config changes
2. desktop-backgrounds — Fedora 31 still using Fedora
Miro Hrončok writes:
> On 11. 09. 19 11:14, Dave Love wrote:
>> I'm puzzled why it needs re-reviewing when branches are maintained,
>
> Because it was only maintained in EPEL, not Fedora.
I just don't understand why it would be OK for EPEL but not for Fedora,
but no matter.
(I don't remember
On 2019-09-11, Anderson, Charles R wrote:
> No dep failures, but downgrades:
>
> Downgrading:
[...]
> perl-Date-Manip noarch 6.77-2.fc31
>fedora1.0 M
>
The maintainer forgot to submit perl-Date-Manip-6.78-1.fc31 build into
> We need to drop 32-bit packages, except needed to run Steam and Wine32.
Why should I bother helping to keep steam alive?, perhaps the gamers should
allocate some of their gaming time to keeping i686 alive.
___
devel mailing list --
> Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time
and try to run [*]:
>
> sudo dnf --releasever=31 --setopt=module_platform_id=platform:f31
--enablerepo=updates-testing distro-sync
>
> If you get this prompt:
On ppc64le power8 Fedora 30 server(?) image on PowerVM 2.1.1.
Minutes:
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-11/minimization.2019-09-11-15.00.html
Minutes (text):
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2019-09-11/minimization.2019-09-11-15.00.txt
Log:
On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 10:48:51AM -0400, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2019 at 03:16:28PM +0100, Phil Wyett wrote:
> > > Do you want to make Fedora 31 better? Please spend 1 minute of your
> > > time and try to run [*]:
> > >
> > > sudo dnf --releasever=31
On 9/11/19 2:18 AM, John M. Harris Jr. wrote:
Feel free to ignore any such wording that you disagree with. We don't need to
agree in order to discuss such things, and it's alright if we disagree on
wording. Literally every user I talk to has asked me either how to disable the
hot corner, or
Error:
Problem 1: problem with installed package
mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64
- mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-12.fc30.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade
repository
- nothing provides mono(ICSharpCode.SharpZipLib) = 1.1.0.0 needed by
mono-tools-gendarme-4.2-15.fc31.x86_64
Problem 2:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751096
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Image-Sane-3-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750388
--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Image-Sane-3-1.fc30 has been pushed to the Fedora 30 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1750388
--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Image-Sane-3-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751096
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
perl-Image-Sane-3-1.fc29 has been pushed to the Fedora 29 testing repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751411
Bug ID: 1751411
Summary: perl-Mojolicious-8.24 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744714
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #7 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751408
Bug ID: 1751408
Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.37 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone
Keywords: FutureFeature,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749413
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing
blis-0.6.0-4.el8
csnappy-0-16.20181121git973f62f.el8
fluidsynth-1.1.11-6.el8
hypre-2.15.1-6.el8
libnfs-4.0.0-1.el8
miniz-2.1.0-3.el8
perl-Log-Dispatch-2.68-1.el8
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
392 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
168 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-d2c1368294
cinnamon-3.6.7-5.el7
134
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749415
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1751332
Bug ID: 1751332
Summary: perl-App-Cme-1.030 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-App-Cme
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2019/09/12/report-389-ds-base-1.4.2.0-20190911git00e3331.fc30.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749413
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Paul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1749415
--- Comment #2 from Paul Howarth ---
Branches requested:
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/16599
https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/16600
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
