On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:43 AM Charalampos Stratakis
wrote:
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Michael Catanzaro"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 3:37:34 PM
> > Subject: Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change Proposal: ELN
Dne 06. 04. 20 v 14:34 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:26 AM Stasiek Michalski wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:10 pm, Adam Williamson
>>> >>
>>> $100/month per user for Ultimate (the only offering that meets the
>>> "requirements")... 2339 packages in FAS... so $233900 * 12
On 4/6/20 6:41 AM, Leigh Griffin wrote:
We are engaged with the Fedora Council on the next steps here for the
adoption of Gitlab / the retirement of Pagure from the CPE remit. That
much of the decision has been made, the actual specifics are what we are
engaging on to make sure that the Fedora
Le 20-04-06 à 10 h 04, Tomasz Torcz a écrit :
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:27:58AM -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
Are they? We stopped using intel driver around F26, we use
modesetting for Intel GPUs now. The above is clearly non-default
configuratiob.
I am far from an expert on the
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:20 AM Peter Robinson wrote:
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1820815
>
> >
> > Are they? We stopped using intel driver around F26, we use
> > modesetting for Intel GPUs now. The above is clearly non-default
> > configuratiob.
>
> I thought that was
Hi,
I was sponsored to the packager group last year (FAS account korkeala),
that time I had an old bugzilla account which I used. Now that I tried
to do my first review, but it seems that I did not have privileges to assign
the review request to myself. I check that I did not have any bugzilla
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:36 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Monday, 06 April 2020 at 12:29, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> [...]
> > > Yes, this whole "decision" is in dictatorship relation to the
> > > community.
> > >
> > > Not following the standard procedures
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:11 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
> On Monday, 06 April 2020 at 12:41, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> > On Sat, Apr 4, 2020 at 9:36 PM Randy Barlow <
> bowlofe...@fedoraproject.org>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > On 4/4/20 3:02 PM, Aoife Moloney wrote:
Hello,
My name is Ondrej Gajdusek. I currently work as a QE in Red Hat where I
work mainly with Foreman and Katello projects which are upstream projects
for the RH Satellite. I have some Python background so you can expect my
contributions mainly in the Python field. I look forward to
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 4:25 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 15:35 +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> >
> > > Does it mean you didn't consider dist-git<->zuul integration vs. Gitlab
> > > CI? I.e. technical differences and advantages of each? If you did, can
> you,
> > > please,
Le lundi 06 avril 2020 à 11:42 -0400, Alex Scheel a écrit :
>
> I'm not sure why what happens outside Fedora infra has anything to do
> with the dist-git discussion. Are you suggesting that all
> contributors
> to all Fedora upstream should weigh in on this discussion as well? I
> mean, that'd be
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 17:05, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:36 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <
> domi...@greysector.net> wrote:
>
>> On Monday, 06 April 2020 at 12:29, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>> [...]
>> > > Yes, this whole "decision" is in dictatorship relation to the
>> >
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 11:56 AM clime wrote:
>
>
> On Monday, 6 April 2020, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Yes, this whole "decision" is in dictatorship relation to the community.
>>>
>>> Not following the standard procedures caused that I and probably many
>>> people in the
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 11:59 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 06. 04. 20 12:13, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> >
> > You certainly didn't engage with the community.
> >
> >
> > We did.
>
> Not enough. You did initially but than you've stopped. You repeating "we
> have
> made a decision" in various
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:35:58AM -0400, Alex Scheel wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Nicolas Mailhot via devel"
> > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
> >
> > Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> > Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 9:10:56 AM
> > Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04
On 4/6/20 11:17 AM, Leigh Griffin wrote:
It's a form of engagement among others that we are partaking in day in
day out, week in week out.
Ironically, you have illustrated my point here with your response, which
isn't engagement.
I have answered every question directly, if I missed one in
- Original Message -
> From: "Nicolas Mailhot via devel"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 10:57:40 AM
> Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04
>
> Le lundi 06 avril 2020 à 10:09 -0400, Alex Scheel a écrit :
> >
> >
I would like to take arduino.
I can make buildable again 1.8.5 version and may be update it to latest.
My FAS name: vascom
--
Best regards,
Vasiliy Glazov
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
=
#fedora-meeting-1: FESCO (2020-04-06)
=
Meeting started by contyk at 15:00:22 UTC. The full logs are available
at
https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2020-04-06/fesco.2020-04-06-15.00.log.html
Meeting
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:15 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 06. 04. 20 v 14:34 Josh Boyer napsal(a):
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:26 AM Stasiek Michalski
> > wrote:
> >>> On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 12:10 pm, Adam Williamson
> >>> >>>
> >>> $100/month per user for Ultimate (the only offering that
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 10:40:59AM -0400, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> Le 20-04-06 à 10 h 04, Tomasz Torcz a écrit :
> > On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:27:58AM -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> >Are they? We stopped using intel driver around F26, we use
> > modesetting for Intel GPUs now.
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 15:35 +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>
> > Does it mean you didn't consider dist-git<->zuul integration vs. Gitlab
> > CI? I.e. technical differences and advantages of each? If you did, can you,
> > please, publish it? It would be valuable info for the community and
> >
- Original Message -
> From: "Daniel P. Berrangé"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Cc: "Nicolas Mailhot"
> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 11:02:52 AM
> Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04
>
> Watching the discussion in the other big thread, I feel it has become
>
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20200405.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20200406.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 3
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 57
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 6.00 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020, at 12:05 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 03:02:02PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:13:16PM +0200, Daniel Mach wrote:
[snip]
> > > Setting eol_date to the future allows informing a user about
> > > upcoming obsoleting
Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 18:08, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>
>> The qt5, qt5-devel metapackages were introduced a few releases ago as
>> merely a convenience for end-users, not intended to be used in official
>> fedora packages, but seems these have seen some non-trivial adoption
>>
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:27:58AM -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please urgently downgrade xorg-x11-drv-intel before shipping Fedora 32 and
> spare users some pain. At least two very recent crash/segfault reports are
> fixed by downgrading to the fc31 version of
On 4/6/20 8:28 AM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
I think it's hard to see who's vocal against GitLab and who just wants a
truly open decision process for this.
I've heard people who would love to get GitLab, but who are genuinely
sad about how CPE management handled this.
This. I personally actually
On 4/6/20 10:36 AM, Leigh Griffin wrote:
Answering 100+ replies individually is engaging with the community.
Happy to stop that if people aren't seeing the benefit of it though.
Writing 100 e-mails isn't automatically "engagement".
I could reply to what you wrote above with "If I had a world
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 18:08, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
> The qt5, qt5-devel metapackages were introduced a few releases ago as merely
> a convenience for end-users, not intended to be used in official fedora
> packages, but seems these have seen some non-trivial adoption anyway.
>
> Personally, I
On 06. 04. 20 15:36, Mohan Boddu wrote:
Hi all,
Tomorrow, April 7th 2020, is an important day on the Fedora 32
schedule [1], with significant cut-offs.
Tomorrow we have the Final Freeze [2] which starts at 14:00 UTC.
This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze
exception
On 4/6/20 6:37 AM, Leigh Griffin wrote:
I'm sorry if you took my mail up as implying a lack of value from how
the team historically worked.
It's a classic no-no to start an apology with "I'm sorry *if you*". It's
not an apology at all, it's a defense disguised as an apology. It is
thus
Hi, my name is Nadav Har'El. I'm here because I noticed that the
"python-cassandra-driver" driver was orphaned. When asking to adopt it, I
was told (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9365) that because this package
had already been orphaned five months earlier, I should become a packager
and initiate
On 4/5/20 6:06 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
> On 04/04/20 19:23, David S wrote:
>> On 4/4/20 4:38 PM, Antonio Trande wrote:
>>> Hi all.
>>>
>>> `MUMPS-5.3.0` [1] `PETSc-3.13.0` [2] and `Sundials-5.2.0` [3] are coming
>>> on Rawhide; these updates will need rebuilds of dependent packages:
>>>
>>
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:30 PM Leigh Scott wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:00 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> >
> > Taken. Will start builds that fix this later today.
> >
> > -Ian
> You could try
>
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 4:57 PM Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> Yes, that's the kernel side part. But in userland,
> we are NOT using xorg-x11-drv-intel for intel gen4 and up
> (if I understand
>
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-server/blob/HEAD/f/06_use-intel-only-on-pre-gen4.diff
>
Hello. Gilboa, i would like to continue maintaining IceWM. And i interesting in
'springlobby' package. Please add me as co-maintainer. FAS: atim.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
I would like to take arduino.
I can make buildable again 1.8.5 version and may be update it to latest.
My FAS name: vascom -- Best regards, Vasiliy Glazov
вс, 29 мар. 2020 г. в 14:15, Miro Hrončok :
>
> According to the Fedora's Fails To Build From Source policy:
>
>
The qt5, qt5-devel metapackages were introduced a few releases ago as merely
a convenience for end-users, not intended to be used in official fedora
packages, but seems these have seen some non-trivial adoption anyway.
Personally, I objected to metapackage introduction at the fearing this would
Hello,
Due to the extreme time constraints that I'm forced to orphan most of my
remaining packages.
Namely icewm (which has an active co-maintainer), spring and springlobby.
Following the procedure in wiki [1], I should use Pagure to orphan both
packages.
However, the list of projects in the
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:49:13 -0400, rosser@gmail.com wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:36 AM Alex Scheel wrote:
> >
> > [...]
> >
> > I believe we need a different way to engage the rest of our packager
> > base.
>
> I'm a packager who has been staying silent, but I generally strongly
>
- Original Message -
> From: "Ben Rosser"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 9:49:13 AM
> Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04
>
Thanks for sharing your thoughts. :-)
> Not saying you're wrong that it would be nice to have the ability to
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:35:58AM -0400, Alex Scheel wrote:
> That isn't indicative of the entire Fedora packager ecosystem. A lot of
> people are staying silent.
Do you really want/expect 300 folks to chime in with "+1" replies?
Speaking for myself, Neal and Adam (and others) have already
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 2:14 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:48 AM Josh Boyer
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:42 AM Stasiek Michalski
> wrote:
> > >
> > > > On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:26 AM Stasiek Michalski
> > > >
> > > > Why is it disappointing? The Pagure project
I have take the following:
> rubygem-addressable
> rubygem-ruby_parser
> rubygem-ruby2ruby
> rubygem-websocket
>
Vít
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora
Le lundi 06 avril 2020 à 10:09 -0400, Alex Scheel a écrit :
>
> In the last FESCo election, 273 ballots were cast [0]. According to
> the
> graph maintained by Matthew Miller [1], we have between 225 and 375
> active maintainers in Fedora, depending on how you count.
That’s *weekly* activity. As
I corrected a license tag in a new x11vnc 0.9.16 version from "GPLv2" to
"GPLv2+".
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
On 4/6/20 11:02 AM, Leigh Griffin wrote:
Ok let's scenario this out so as several people want us to restart and
go again, largely because they disagree with the decision and Pagure is
the choice that they would have made.
Much of the consternation is due to you not having employed an open
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:49 PM Randy Barlow
wrote:
> On 4/6/20 10:36 AM, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> > Answering 100+ replies individually is engaging with the community.
> > Happy to stop that if people aren't seeing the benefit of it though.
>
> Writing 100 e-mails isn't automatically "engagement".
OLD: Fedora-32-20200405.n.0
NEW: Fedora-32-20200406.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 126
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 10.29 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Hello,
Just wanted to share with everyone the results of a data collection on
various metrics of ELF files when installing just @Core group.
http://people.redhat.com/sgrubb/analysis/f32-analysis.slides.html#/
I recommend clicking on the "pop out" link and then you have more room to see
the
pghmcfc closed without merging a pull-request against the project:
`perl-Unix-Syslog` that you
are following.
Closed pull-request:
``
Spec file cleanups: Use make_build, make_install macros, and use NO_PACKLIST=1
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Unix-Syslog/pull-request/1
pghmcfc commented on the pull-request: `Spec file cleanups: Use make_build,
make_install macros, and use NO_PACKLIST=1` that you are following:
``
I merged this locally and fixed the typo in the ExtUtils::MakeMaker reference.
It's now pushed and built in Fedora.
``
To reply, visit the link
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 03:02:02PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:13:16PM +0200, Daniel Mach wrote:
> > >> # A string representing a Name of a module that is EOLed
> > >> # MANDATORY
> > >> module: nodejs
> > >>
> > >> # A string representing a
>
> "a011" is precisely the last entry found in
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-server/blob/HEAD/f/06_use-intel-only-on-pre-gen4.diff
> which explains why Xorg picks "intel" as seen in the Xorg logs:
>
> [ 7821.917] (==) Matched intel as autoconfigured driver 0
> [ 7821.917] (==)
On 4/6/20 6:13 AM, Leigh Griffin wrote:
CPE is entirely unique in this industry and is not perfectly aligned to
the idealistic software engineering process, we are getting there.
No software team is perfectly aligned to the idealistic software
engineering process. CPE is not unique in that
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Please urgently downgrade xorg-x11-drv-intel before shipping Fedora 32 and
> > spare users some pain. At least two very recent crash/segfault reports are
> > fixed by downgrading to the fc31 version of xorg-x11-drv-intel.
> >
> >
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:10 PM Julen Landa Alustiza <
jla...@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>
>
> 20/4/6 12:29(e)an, Leigh Griffin igorleak idatzi zuen:
>
> > Around 10 tickets a month is the average I believe for infra to deal
> > with / handle from direct pings.
> >
> Where?
>
Infra queue
On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 12:13:16PM +0200, Daniel Mach wrote:
> >> # A string representing a Name of a module that is EOLed
> >> # MANDATORY
> >> module: nodejs
> >>
> >> # A string representing a Stream of a module that is EOLed
> >> # MANDATORY
> >> stream: 11
> >>
> >> # A string
Hi all,
It is just now decided by FESCO to postpone the freeze by 2 days due
to issues with bodhi and koji, that means, the freeze will start on
Thursday, April 09 2020 at 14:00 UTC.
For more information, please look at https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2369
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 9:36 AM Mohan
On 06. 04. 20 17:20, Leigh Griffin wrote:
I'm reaffirming that I hear the concerns and that my team are taking them on
board. I am also reaffirming that our engagement point is with the Fedora
Council, not at the individual level as the Council is responsible for listening
and collating
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 4:34 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 06. 04. 20 17:20, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> >
> > I'm reaffirming that I hear the concerns and that my team are taking
> them on
> > board. I am also reaffirming that our engagement point is with the
> Fedora
> > Council, not at the individual
> > >Are they? We stopped using intel driver around F26, we use
> > > modesetting for Intel GPUs now. The above is clearly non-default
> > > configuratiob.
> >
> > I am far from an expert on the subject, but I am pretty sure we did not stop
> > using intel driver when we use kernel mode
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 10:04 AM Steve Grubb wrote:
> Just wanted to share with everyone the results of a data collection on
> various metrics of ELF files when installing just @Core group.
That is really cool. Thanks for sharing this, Steve.
--
Jerry James
http://www.jamezone.org/
- Original Message -
> From: "Till Maas"
> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>
> Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 1:39:49 PM
> Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04
>
> On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 08:35:28AM -0400, Alex Scheel wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > > From:
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020, at 1:48 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 13:34, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> > Aoife Moloney writes:
> >
> > > * We found a password, we do not know whose it is, but we have turned
> > > it into the lost and found.
> >
> > I'm sorry, what? Can
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 08:20:47AM -0400, Nick Black wrote:
(i don't see any of these posts thus far in 2020, so perhaps
they've fallen out of vogue? i'm merely blindly complying with
the instructions at [0]).
hello there in RPM land! i'm a longtime linux user/developer.
my first Linux install
Should I be able to see analysis for e.g. Ruby? I am asking, because I
can't, so not sure if I am doing anything wrong.
Vít
Dne 06. 04. 20 v 18:03 Steve Grubb napsal(a):
> Hello,
>
> Just wanted to share with everyone the results of a data collection on
> various metrics of ELF files when
Aoife Moloney writes:
> * We found a password, we do not know whose it is, but we have turned
> it into the lost and found.
I'm sorry, what? Can you explain what this is and what it means?
Thanks,
--Robbie
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-32-20200405.0):
ID: 568509 Test: x86_64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/568509
Passed openQA tests: 7/8 (x86_64)
New passes (same
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 09:03:54AM -0400, Nick Black wrote:
Richard Shaw left as an exercise for the reader:
Up to you which way to go... I don't see packaging it in RPM Fusion as a
problem. I would think most people who would be interested in this package
would likely not have a problem
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 8:03 AM Nick Black wrote:
> Richard Shaw left as an exercise for the reader:
> > Up to you which way to go... I don't see packaging it in RPM Fusion as a
> > problem. I would think most people who would be interested in this
> package
> > would likely not have a problem
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> We cannot take the view of a singular person and make changes based on
> that, we defer to them for prioritisation and their input. That's how the
But, having reviewed the 'wishlist' of criteria quoted last
week, [in the thread with Ben Cotton's
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 04:59:14PM +0300, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Due to the extreme time constraints that I'm forced to orphan most of my
> remaining packages.
> Namely icewm (which has an active co-maintainer), spring and springlobby.
> Following the procedure in wiki [1], I should
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 17:52, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 4:25 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 15:35 +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
>> >
>> > > Does it mean you didn't consider dist-git<->zuul integration vs. Gitlab
>> > > CI? I.e. technical
Kevin Fenzi kirjoitti 6.4.2020 21:46:
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 05:40:32PM +0300, Markku Korkeala wrote:
Hi,
I was sponsored to the packager group last year (FAS account
korkeala),
that time I had an old bugzilla account which I used. Now that I tried
to do my first review, but it seems that
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 04:02:34PM +0100, Leigh Griffin wrote:
> Ok let's scenario this out so as several people want us to restart […]
In this context of "restarting the scenario":
> How do we accommodate that when our other stakeholders' needs are now
> not being met as a whole and when the
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 at 13:34, Robbie Harwood wrote:
> Aoife Moloney writes:
>
> > * We found a password, we do not know whose it is, but we have turned
> > it into the lost and found.
>
> I'm sorry, what? Can you explain what this is and what it means?
>
>
This was something I slipped in to see
On Mon, 6 Apr 2020 09:03:54 -0400
Nick Black wrote:
> Now, a "notcurses-noffmpeg" version in Core and a
> "notcurses+ffmpeg" in Fusion seems reasonable. Is this kind of
> thing ever done?
I think this is still true for audacity, mplayer, and chromium so they
get patented video codec support.
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 13:46 -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:57 PM Adam Jackson wrote:
> > But the driver we default to on all the newer Intel chips should work
> > on yours too, though I'm not entirely sure whether you'll end up with
> > working 3D
On Tue, 2020-03-31 at 13:08 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 10:48:55AM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > Some failure of process or communication must have occurred
> > somewhere along the lines, because open source should have been the
> > first and most important
On Monday, April 6, 2020 1:22:15 PM EDT Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Should I be able to see analysis for e.g. Ruby? I am asking, because I
> can't, so not sure if I am doing anything wrong.
Its likely not part of @Core package group. The analysis was run on a small
subset of Fedora 32 to see what a
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 12:57 PM Adam Jackson wrote:
>
> But the driver we default to on all the newer Intel chips should work
> on yours too, though I'm not entirely sure whether you'll end up with
> working 3D acceleration. And if you uninstall xorg-x11-drv-intel,
> you'll fall back to the
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 05:40:32PM +0300, Markku Korkeala wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I was sponsored to the packager group last year (FAS account korkeala),
>
> that time I had an old bugzilla account which I used. Now that I tried
>
> to do my first review, but it seems that I did not have privileges to
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 09:27 -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please urgently downgrade xorg-x11-drv-intel before shipping Fedora 32 and
> spare users some pain. At least two very recent crash/segfault reports are
> fixed by downgrading to the fc31 version of xorg-x11-drv-intel.
On Sun, 5 Apr 2020 21:44:16 -0400
Christopher wrote:
> I'm probably going to abandon the effort anyway. obs-studio in Fedora
> crashes constantly every time I try to change the settings and save,
> so I couldn't figure out how to get it to work with v4l2loopback. I
You are using obs in a
Hi,
libxc 5.0.0 has been released. Due to the addition of several new features, it
comes with an soname bump. Also, the Fortran libraries have changed from the
earlier release: now, the old F03 wrapper employing iso_c_binding is now shipped
as the F90 wrapper, as the old F90 wrapper based on a
On Mon, Apr 06, 2020 at 08:35:28AM -0400, Alex Scheel wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Miro Hrončok"
> > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > Sent: Monday, April 6, 2020 8:28:15 AM
> > Subject: Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-04
> >
> > On 06. 04. 20 14:19, Alex Scheel wrote:
> > > That
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 12:13 -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> > "a011" is precisely the last entry found in
> > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/xorg-x11-server/blob/HEAD/f/06_use-intel-only-on-pre-gen4.diff
> > which explains why Xorg picks "intel" as seen in the Xorg logs:
> >
> > [
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:56 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA256
>
> I've just published a fourth version[1] of the ELN proposal. With a
> lot of input from Miro Hrončok, I think I've finally been able to
> clarify some of the points that we were
I asked this in ask.fedoraproject
(https://ask.fedoraproject.org/t/is-there-a-way-to-mockbuild-systemd),
but FranciscoD suggested this might be a better place.
I'm trying to build a slightly modified version of systemd. To start
with, I tried to do a fedpkg mockbuild of systemd without any
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NetworkTimeSecurity
== Summary ==
Support for the Network Time Security (NTS) authentication mechanism
in the NTP client/server (chrony) and installer (anaconda).
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:mlichvar| Miroslav Lichvar]], [[User:mkolman| Martin Kolman]]
*
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
I've just published a fourth version[1] of the ELN proposal. With a
lot of input from Miro Hrončok, I think I've finally been able to
clarify some of the points that we were getting hung up on.
Changes in this version of the proposal[2]:
* Improve
On 06. 04. 20 23:53, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
* Clarify that the time limit on PRs is only for determining if the
maintainer is responsive. If they reply, the timer is cleared.
As a side note (probably out of scope of this proposal), I think that if we have
RHEL packages in Fedora with not
With all of the other noise going on around this, I wanted to thank you
folks for putting this out. Even this basic update shed light on a few
things I had no idea about, communishift and rpmautospec. So thank you
it is much appreciated that you are doing these.
-Erinn
On 4/4/20 1:02 PM,
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 16:28 -0400, Paul Dufresne via devel wrote:
> Le 20-04-06 à 15 h 34, Adam Jackson a écrit :
> > On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 13:46 -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
> > > Xorg does not start without xorg-x11-drv-intel on GMA 3150. OpenGL
> > > 2.1 used to be enabled on this
Richard Shaw left as an exercise for the reader:
> Yes, there's a number of examples but audacity and sox are two. What we do
> at RPM Fusion is create a new package there that depends on the package in
> Fedora and either append -freeworld (just patent issues, like ffmpeg which
> are in the free
Le 20-04-06 à 15 h 34, Adam Jackson a écrit :
On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 13:46 -0400, Alexei Podtelezhnikov wrote:
Xorg does not start without xorg-x11-drv-intel on GMA 3150. OpenGL
2.1 used to be enabled on this hardware, but got dropped
I think we have a fix for that. Let me poke at things a
On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 6:09 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 5:56 PM Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> >
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > I've just published a fourth version[1] of the ELN proposal. With a
> > lot of input from Miro Hrončok, I think I've
On 07. 04. 20 0:08, Neal Gompa wrote:
This version of the proposal is nearly perfect, in my view.
There are a couple of things I think should change:
* The DistTag should be versioned. Either .eln.elX (e.g. .eln.el9),
.elnX (e.g. .eln9), or just plain .elX (e.g. .el9).
The good thing is that
1 - 100 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
