No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-34-20210831.0):
ID: 964674 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
* Dan Čermák:
> it has been recently proposed to switch openSUSE to run ldconfig via a
> %transfiletriggerin/-un scriptlet instead of manually in %post & %postun
> the same way as Fedora does it at the moment.
>
> However, an interesting issue has been raised: what happens if package A
> gets
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Dan Čermák:
>
> > it has been recently proposed to switch openSUSE to run ldconfig via a
> > %transfiletriggerin/-un scriptlet instead of manually in %post & %postun
> > the same way as Fedora does it at the moment.
> >
> >
Antonio T. sagitter wrote on 2021/09/01 16:58:
You're right, i underestimated the issue.
Probably, Avogadro is not compatible with openbabel3 but Avogadro2 should be.
I try to keep a separated 'openbabel2' package as new rpm, and then upgrade
current 'openbabel' to the release 3+
Thank you.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 4:47 AM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, 01 September 2021 at 10:01, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 31/08/2021 18:53, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we
> > > build stuff like
On 31/08/2021 18:53, Matthew Miller wrote:
This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we
build stuff like libreoffice for i686, but then (mostly) don't ship it.
This seems like a waste of resources and time.
+1. We should only build selected packages for multilib
On 8/31/21 7:53 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we
build stuff like libreoffice for i686, but then (mostly) don't ship it.
This seems like a waste of resources and time.
I know it's somewhat complicated (for example, there's
Hi list,
it has been recently proposed to switch openSUSE to run ldconfig via a
%transfiletriggerin/-un scriptlet instead of manually in %post & %postun
the same way as Fedora does it at the moment.
However, an interesting issue has been raised: what happens if package A
gets upgraded in the
On 31/08/2021 19:21, Justin Forbes wrote:
if the package ships a library, keep
building it for i686, if not, you can disable it
I suggest the following: "if the packages ships a library, used by
Wine/Steam -> build it".
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On Wednesday, 01 September 2021 at 10:01, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 31/08/2021 18:53, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we
> > build stuff like libreoffice for i686, but then (mostly) don't ship it.
> > This seems like a
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-33-20210831.0):
ID: 964480 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
You're right, i underestimated the issue.
Probably, Avogadro is not compatible with openbabel3 but Avogadro2
should be.
I try to keep a separated 'openbabel2' package as new rpm, and then
upgrade current 'openbabel' to the release 3+
Thank you.
On 8/31/21 8:05 PM, Alexander Ploumistos
V Tue, Aug 31, 2021 at 12:53:55PM -0400, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> One immediate way to do this is to start adding `ExcludeArch: i686` to
> "leaf" packages (I mean: to allow / encourage people to do that). But I
> don't want to add _more_ cruft to the standard minimal spec file, so this
> seems
* Richard W. M. Jones:
> On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> There are some packages that install f[ile]s into /etc/ld.so.conf.d, and
>> such packages still have to run ldconfig explicitly. (We should perhaps
>> move those shared objects to /usr/lib64, too.)
>
>
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 11:01:01AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Dan Čermák:
>
> > it has been recently proposed to switch openSUSE to run ldconfig via a
> > %transfiletriggerin/-un scriptlet instead of manually in %post & %postun
> > the same way as Fedora does it at the moment.
> >
> >
On 01/09/2021 10:47, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Also, there are tons of old closed-source i686-only games that depend on
i686 libraries other than Wine or Steam.
We can't provide i686 support forever.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
* Daniel P. Berrangé:
> It has always struck me that ldconfig's impl isn't a great match for
> RPMs use case. IIUC ldconfig scans all files in all registered
> library directory paths, since it doesn't know what files might have
> changed since its last run (or does it check mtime at all to
Hi all,
I just saw that PackagingCon has extended the Call for
Presentations[1] (CfP) for their inaugural event through 4 September.
That seems relevant to this audience.
As a reminder, I include the CfPs I know about in the weekly Friday's
Fedora Facts that I publish on the Community Blog[3].
On 9/1/21 8:15 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 01/09/2021 10:47, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
>> Also, there are tons of old closed-source i686-only games that depend on
>> i686 libraries other than Wine or Steam.
>
> We can't provide i686 support forever.
I think we can
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 10:47:05AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Wednesday, 01 September 2021 at 10:01, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 31/08/2021 18:53, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > This is an off-shoot thought of the 32-bit ARM conversation. Right now, we
> > > build
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 09:07:25AM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 8:16 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> wrote:
> >
> > On 01/09/2021 10:47, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > > Also, there are tons of old closed-source i686-only games that depend on
> > > i686 libraries
OIIO 2.3 has been released[1] with a soname bump. My plan is to build for
rawhide/f35. f33/34 will only receive bugfix releases of the 2.2 series.
The list of affected packages is pretty short:
blender
luxcorerender
notcurses
OpenColorIO
openshadinglanguage
I will also include OCIO 2.1 for f35
Hi Florian,
Florian Weimer writes:
> * Dan Čermák:
>
>> it has been recently proposed to switch openSUSE to run ldconfig via a
>> %transfiletriggerin/-un scriptlet instead of manually in %post & %postun
>> the same way as Fedora does it at the moment.
>>
>> However, an interesting issue has
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 10:45 AM Dan Čermák
wrote:
>
> Hi Florian,
>
> Florian Weimer writes:
>
> > * Dan Čermák:
> >
> >> it has been recently proposed to switch openSUSE to run ldconfig via a
> >> %transfiletriggerin/-un scriptlet instead of manually in %post & %postun
> >> the same way as
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 8:16 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 01/09/2021 10:47, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Also, there are tons of old closed-source i686-only games that depend on
> > i686 libraries other than Wine or Steam.
>
> We can't provide i686 support forever.
>
We
* Dan Čermák:
> Hi Florian,
>
> Florian Weimer writes:
>
>> * Dan Čermák:
>>
>>> it has been recently proposed to switch openSUSE to run ldconfig via a
>>> %transfiletriggerin/-un scriptlet instead of manually in %post & %postun
>>> the same way as Fedora does it at the moment.
>>>
>>> However,
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 1/15 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-IoT-35-20210830.0):
ID: 965364 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso iot_clevis@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/965364
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/16 (x86_64)
(Tests
OLD: Fedora-35-20210829.n.0
NEW: Fedora-35-20210831.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:3
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 2
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 17
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 28.25 MiB
Size of dropped packages:114.78 KiB
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 16/205 (x86_64), 13/141 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-35-20210829.n.0):
ID: 964957 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_remote_logging_server
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/964957
ID: 964991 Test:
On 9/1/21 1:55 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> In autotools parlance, cross-compilation is defined by the inability of
> running even the most trivial program that was just compiled.
It is often possible to avoid this problem using qemu in user-mode
emulation mode, but even that is not needed here.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 5:18 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
> On 9/1/21 1:55 PM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > In autotools parlance, cross-compilation is defined by the inability of
> > running even the most trivial program that was just compiled.
>
> It is often possible to avoid this problem using
Missing expected images:
Xfce raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
Unsatisfied gating requirements that could not be mapped to openQA tests:
MISSING: fedora.Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2.x86_64.64bit - compose.cloud_autocloud
Failed openQA
On 02. 09. 21 0:51, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four dependencies
reviewed:
- python-mkdocs-redirects:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2000347
- python-pyyaml_env_tag:
Hi
To update to the current version of mkdocs, I'd need these four
dependencies reviewed:
- python-mkdocs-redirects:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2000347
- python-pyyaml_env_tag:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2000348
- python-ghp-import:
Hi Antonio,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 8:11 PM Antonio T. sagitter
wrote:
>
> 'openbabel2' and 'openbabel3' cannot co-exist if installed because they
> have same binary files, it's a "binary name conflicts".
>
> Is it acceptable an openbabel2/openbabel(3) conflict in Fedora?
I think that the people
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2021-09-02 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.libera.chat.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2021-09-02 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2021-09-02
On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 1:24 PM Demi Marie Obenour wrote:
>
> On 9/1/21 8:15 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 01/09/2021 10:47, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> >> Also, there are tons of old closed-source i686-only games that depend on
> >> i686 libraries other than Wine or
On 9/1/21 1:32 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 1:24 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
>>
>> On 9/1/21 8:15 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
>>> On 01/09/2021 10:47, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Also, there are tons of old closed-source i686-only games that depend on
On Wed, Sep 01, 2021 at 01:32:41PM -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 1:24 PM Demi Marie Obenour
> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/1/21 8:15 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > > On 01/09/2021 10:47, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > >> Also, there are tons of old closed-source
* Demi Marie Obenour:
> On 9/1/21 1:32 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 1, 2021 at 1:24 PM Demi Marie Obenour
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 9/1/21 8:15 AM, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 01/09/2021 10:47, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Also, there are tons of old closed-source
'openbabel2' and 'openbabel3' cannot co-exist if installed because they
have same binary files, it's a "binary name conflicts".
Is it acceptable an openbabel2/openbabel(3) conflict in Fedora?
On 9/1/21 10:35 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote:
Antonio T. sagitter wrote on 2021/09/01 16:58:
You're
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 35 Branched 20210831.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998176
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998462
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199
Bug ID: 199
Summary: perl-CGI-Fast-2.16 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CGI-Fast
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998446
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1921203
--- Comment #11 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Skipping the scratch build because an SRPM could not be built: ['rpmbuild',
'-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs',
'/var/tmp/thn-ikpsa6n8/perl-Graph.spec'] returned 1: b'error:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1921203
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-Graph-0.9722 is|perl-Graph-0.9723 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998446
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-c2b65209b5 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-c2b65209b5
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998462
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-569e7462da has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-569e7462da
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998176
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2021-b14a374078 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2021-b14a374078
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=199
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998446
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998176
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1998462
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
55 matches
Mail list logo
