One thing which seems to be completely missing in the conversation is how
this affects battery life. Having lower performance, means the CPU has to
do more work / be in a higher power state for a longer time frame.
___
devel mailing list --
drago01 wrote:
> On Sunday, July 10, 2022, Kevin Kofler via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> drago01 wrote:
>> > One thing which seems to be completely missing in the conversation is
>> > how this affects battery life. Having lower performance, means the CPU
>> > has to do
Sorry it's not working.
I simply build the existing approved package that was otherwise abandoned.
Given what you installed with Mandriva, it looks like there's another
package needed - airspyone_host, which is in the Fedora repositories.
(see e.g. https://pkgs.org/search/?q=airspyone_host)
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220709.0):
ID: 1320339 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
@Mark E. Fuller
Something isn't right with your airspyhf software. I installed it, but neither
Gqrx nor SDR++ sees the Airspy HF+ Discovery. Also, I cannot do
"airspyhf_info" to see its status. All I get is:
[BT@PC ~]$ airspyhf_info
AirSpy HF library version: 1.6.8
No devices attached.
I
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220709.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220710.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 56
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Would you need any help regarding the automation?
On Sat, Jul 9, 2022, at 8:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 01:02:15PM -, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> >
>> > That said, until then I can try and run things
Greetings -
I am sure this question has been asked and answered many times but I
could not find anything that specifically addressed my questions via
google search.
I have modified a spec file for a python based application (weewx
specifically although that is not too relevant) to target Fedora
Dne 06. 07. 22 v 20:13 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Preset_All_Systemd_Units_on_First_Boot
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only
On 7/9/22 12:05, Christian Hergert wrote:
>> Why does the unwinding need to happen in the kernel? The kernel can
>> already asynchronously invoke userspace code in the form of signal
>> handlers. Is the problem that it is necessary to collect profiling
>> information in the middle of a system
drago01 wrote:
> One thing which seems to be completely missing in the conversation is how
> this affects battery life. Having lower performance, means the CPU has to
> do more work / be in a higher power state for a longer time frame.
Who in their right mind does CPU profiling on battery?
On Sunday, July 10, 2022, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> drago01 wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, July 10, 2022, Kevin Kofler via devel <
> > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> >> drago01 wrote:
> >> > One thing which seems to be completely missing in the
Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
which have their own somewhat different release/life cycles? What about
module lifecycles? What is it about*lifecycles* that's important,
anyway? Don't we maybe want to
> I strongly prefer the latter approach. I believe the unwinder
> executes in NMI context, meaning that it must not block and must finish
> executing in a bounded amount of time. Furthermore, any oops becomes
> an immediate kernel panic. The eBPF verifier can trivially guarantee
> that the
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220709.0):
ID: 1320355 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
On 09/07/2022 22:32, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I cannot replicate any of the differences that I would expect to be able
to. More than anything else, their results look like evidence of a bug
in the Xeon Platinum 8380.
Have you rebuilt all system packages with -fno-omit-frame-pointer or
just
On Sunday, July 10, 2022, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> drago01 wrote:
> > One thing which seems to be completely missing in the conversation is how
> > this affects battery life. Having lower performance, means the CPU has to
> > do more work / be in a higher
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 14/236 (x86_64), 17/165 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
On 7/10/22 10:55, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 10/07/2022 19:36, Gordon Messmer wrote:
No. Early in the thread, Tomasz Torcz posted a link to a Phoronix
article as evidence that Fedora's performance was behind other
distributions.
All packages in the dependency tree must be rebuilt
On 10/07/2022 19:36, Gordon Messmer wrote:
No. Early in the thread, Tomasz Torcz posted a link to a Phoronix
article as evidence that Fedora's performance was behind other
distributions.
All packages in the dependency tree must be rebuilt with
-fno-omit-frame-pointer flag, otherwise the
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 06:34:11PM +0200, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> Would you need any help regarding the automation?
Well, I'm not doing the implementation there, but we can always use
help. ;)
I think the code is all there now, we were wanting to get staging
working to test it before rolling
Yes I have "airspyone_host" installed on Fedora. It is working with my two
Airspy units (R2 and Mini) fine though SDR++ (also from Fedora) doesn't see
them. Gqrx does see them.
The Airspy HF+ Discovery is my third unit. It does not work with
"airspyone_host". No HF+ works with that
On 7/10/22 04:38, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
Have you rebuilt all system packages with -fno-omit-frame-pointer or
just tested packages?
No. Early in the thread, Tomasz Torcz posted a link to a Phoronix
article as evidence that Fedora's performance was behind other
distributions. At
Hello.
fmt 9.0.x update will include a soversion bump from .8 to .9. It has
both API and ABI changes.
Changelog: https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/releases/tag/9.0.0
The list of affected packages in Rawhide:
0ad
OpenImageIO
cantera
ceph
dolphin-emu
domoticz
folly
libsonata
mkvtoolnix
sdrpp
* Fabio Valentini:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 9:20 PM Christian Hergert wrote:
>>
>> > So it looks like what you folks are doing is actually very similar to what
>> > Facebook is doing. That is interesting, and explains why some GNOME
>> > developers are jumping on the bandwagon of this Change
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 4:15 AM Jerry James wrote:
>
> The various ANTLR packages will be impacted by
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs. The parser
> generators, which are written in Java, will no longer be available on
> i686. If absolutely necessary, we could continue to
On 7/10/2022 11:36 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 7/10/22 04:38, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
Have you rebuilt all system packages with -fno-omit-frame-pointer or
just tested packages?
No. Early in the thread, Tomasz Torcz posted a link to a Phoronix
article as evidence that Fedora's
* Demi Marie Obenour:
> That is the problem right here: .eh_frame-based unwinding is too slow,
> so it has to be done offline in userspace. What about instead adding
> ORC information to userspace? That would be much faster to use.
I'm not sure ORC covers all the registers that could be used
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105729
--- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede ---
I'll try to take a look at this, but:
a) I'm very busy with other stuff, so it may take quite some time before I get
around to this
b) I only took perl-SDL because it is a dependency of frozen-bubble, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103793
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105822
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|epel-release|perl-JSON-XS
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-463787a597
seamonkey-2.53.13-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
iotop-c-1.22-1.el7
Details about builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105868
Bug ID: 2105868
Summary: perl-URI-5.12 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-URI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
33 matches
Mail list logo