Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

[Adam Williamson]

On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 17:28 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Hello everyone!
> 
> I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive
> Packager Policy[1]. Packagers that have been identified as inactive
> have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after
> the F37 final release, packagers who remain inactive will be removed
> from the packager group. (Note that pagure.io is one of the systems
> checked for activity, so commenting on your ticket that you're still
> around will prevent you from showing up in the second round.)

So on this point specifically - I had a look through the tickets for
interest, and saw two cases where people replied to the ticket to say
essentially "yes, it's fine to take away my packager rights". Which,
ironically, would prevent it from happening, it seems.

Can we handle that? Can you manually flag those cases to continue
through the process, or something?
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA
IRC: adamw | Twitter: adamw_ha
https://www.happyassassin.net

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

orphan or intend to retire schroot

[Sérgio Basto]

Hi, 
I do see any utility for schroot , especially on set of packages that I
call "Debian tools" .

schroot have a big update from schroot-1.6.10-17 to 1.6.12 (Update to
1.6.10 happened in 2018-05-03) and I observed that don't install init.d
files. I guess, it misses , the "dh_installinit" stage of debian/rules
.

So to reduce my workload I orphaned it and I think the package can be
retired. 

Best regards,
-- 
Sérgio M. B.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

[Gary Buhrmaster]

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 9:34 PM Ben Cotton  wrote:

> Since this is the first time we've done something like this, it could
> be a little rough.

While I fully expect that this first time is going to be
somewhat "special", I agree with the intent of the
policy, and believe it will result in better packager
engagement and community.

Thanks for doing this work.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing

ansible-collection-community-rabbitmq-1.2.2-1.el9
ansible-packaging-1-7.el9
libcloudproviders-0.3.1-1.el9
liborc-1.7.6-1.el9

Details about builds:



 ansible-collection-community-rabbitmq-1.2.2-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c4065cc97c)
 RabbitMQ collection for Ansible

Update Information:

Update to 1.2.2. Fixes rhbz#2106951.

ChangeLog:

* Thu Aug 18 2022 Maxwell G  - 1.2.2-1
- Update to 1.2.2. Fixes rhbz#2106951.
- Adopt new Fedora licensing guidelines
- Run unit tests
* Wed Jul 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.2.1-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2106951 - ansible-collection-community-rabbitmq-1.2.2 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2106951




 ansible-packaging-1-7.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-65c2732174)
 RPM packaging macros and generators for Ansible collections

Update Information:

Implement %ansible_test_unit and add ansible-packaging-tests metapackage.

ChangeLog:

* Mon Aug  1 2022 Maxwell G  - 1-7
- Implement %ansible_test_unit and add ansible-packaging-tests metapackage.
- Require ansible-core at buildtime
* Wed Jul 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 1-6
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild




 libcloudproviders-0.3.1-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-306d8657d6)
 Library for integration of cloud storage providers

Update Information:

Initial submission of libcloudproviders to EPEL 9.

ChangeLog:

* Mon Jun  8 2020 Fabio Valentini  - 0.3.1-1
- Update to version 0.3.1.
* Wed Jan 29 2020 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.3.0-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild
* Mon Aug 19 2019 Fabio Valentini  - 0.3.0-1
- Update to version 0.3.0.
* Thu Jul 25 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.2.5-0.5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Feb  1 2019 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.2.5-0.4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Jul 13 2018 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
0.2.5-0.3
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2115619 - please provide libcloudproviders for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115619




 liborc-1.7.6-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1d44c6fe4f)
 Library for producing small, fast columnar storage for Hadoop workloads

Update Information:

Apache ORC 1.7.6 GA

ChangeLog:

* Thu Aug 18 2022 Kaleb S. KEITHLEY  - 1.7.6-1
- 1.7.6 GA
* Thu Jul 21 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  - 
1.7.5-2
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Is system upgrade automatic or not?

[Kevin Kofler via devel]

Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> I should have been clearer. I was talking about the changes between
> XP->7->8->8.1->10->11 versus 10. -> 10.. I was thinking of
> it more since for the most part they used pretty much the same compiler
> for all of 10 versus new compiler and major library changes every six
> months

That is a very developer-centric view though. End users will usually not 
care about what compiler the operating system was compiled with, all the 
more on Windows, which does not even ship with a compiler (so those who do 
actually need to compile code can select their compiler version more or less 
independently of the operating system version).

What they will notice though is when the Windows desktop shell (the Windows 
equivalent of KDE Plasma or GNOME Shell) gets a major update which makes it 
look different, and I know from Windows users' complaints that that has 
happened repeatedly in Windows 10 point releases. Start Menu, Control Panel, 
etc. have all had significant look changes at least once.

And as you point out yourself, those updates are also not always without 
issues. E.g., another frequent complaint is that device configuration is 
reset during upgrades, e.g., that it simply forgets printers that are not 
plugged in while upgrading (and always plugging in all hardware is not 
possible on a notebook that travels between different locations).

So I would really compare those Windows point releases with Fedora releases. 
The schedule is basically the same and the risk is also about the same. 
(Though one difference is that Windows ships a lot less software, so you can 
have fewer issues with software getting upgraded as part of the operating 
system upgrade there. Though that can also result in the application 
stopping to work after the operating system upgrade, at least until you 
manually upgrade the application as well.)

I wonder whether we should simply switch Fedora releases to a different 
numbering scheme more like RHEL or Windows. (Keep in mind that my suggestion 
would be only a pure renumbering, there would be no changes whatsoever to 
the schedule (including EOL dates) or the nature of the releases.) So we 
would by default just release the next Fedora as 37.1, then 37.2, etc. Only 
if some comittee (probably FESCo) decides that a release has enough major 
changes to warrant a new major version (e.g., Fedora 9 with KDE/Plasma 4, 
GCC 4, etc., or Fedora 15 with GNOME 3), then it moves to 38.0. This can be 
decided shortly before the release, after having the final list of accepted 
and not reverted changes. After all, Linus also decided on a fairly short 
notice to renumber the kernel from Linux 5.20 to Linux 6.0, without even any 
reason for the bump other than "the second number is getting too large", so 
my proposal would work similarly, but less arbitrarily and more in the 
spirit of semantic versioning.

Kevin Kofler
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-aa30752bd2   
trafficserver-9.1.3-1.el7


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing

copr-cli-1.103-1.el7
python-copr-1.122-1.el7

Details about builds:



 copr-cli-1.103-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9a10937ed4)
 Command line interface for COPR

Update Information:

Integration with Packit  Packit service builds everything in Copr under the
`packit` username. While previously the access list was maintained Packit-side,
newly Packit users need to configure what upstream projects (GitHub) can build
(through the Packit user) in configured copr project.  New options:  - $ copr
create --packit-forge-project-allowed github.com/username/projectname - $ copr
modify --packit-forge-project-allowed github.com/username/projectname

ChangeLog:

* Tue Aug 16 2022 Jiri Kyjovsky  1.103-1
- add packit_forge_projects_allowed for Copr projects




 python-copr-1.122-1.el7 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-9a10937ed4)
 Python interface for Copr

Update Information:

Integration with Packit  Packit service builds everything in Copr under the
`packit` username. While previously the access list was maintained Packit-side,
newly Packit users need to configure what upstream projects (GitHub) can build
(through the Packit user) in configured copr project.  New options:  - $ copr
create --packit-forge-project-allowed github.com/username/projectname - $ copr
modify --packit-forge-project-allowed github.com/username/projectname

ChangeLog:

* Tue Aug 16 2022 Jiri Kyjovsky  1.122-1
- add packit_forge_projects_allowed for Copr projects


___
epel-devel mailing list -- epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to epel-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/epel-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

[Randy Barlow via devel]

On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 14:01 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Thoughts?

♥ nspawn ♥


signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2115573] Please build perl-Data-Entropy for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573
Bug 2115573 depends on bug 2115574, which changed state.

Bug 2115574 Summary: Please build perl-Data-Float for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115574

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ON_QA   |CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |ERRATA




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2075768] selecting the 'Component' at the end, cleares the 'Description'

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075768

Jeff Fearn   changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|VERIFIED|RELEASE_PENDING



--- Comment #5 from Jeff Fearn   ---
This fix has been deployed to stage Bugzilla for a short public testing phase.

https://bugzilla.stage.redhat.com


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075768
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2115572] Please build perl-Number-Bytes-Human for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115572



--- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck  ---
Will you be able to branch and build perl-Number-Bytes-Human in epel9? The EPEL
Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build
it on epel9.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115572
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Missing LLVM stack bugfix updates in stable Fedora branches

[Fabio Valentini]

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 5:23 PM Tom Stellard  wrote:
>
> I'm working on the 14.0.5 update for F36 right now.  The 14.0.6 release
> is going to have to wait until after 15.0.0 lands in F37 and rawhide,
> because I don't think it's worth doing the 14.0.6 update there, since
> 15.0.0 is so close.

Awesome, thanks for the update!

> 14.0.6 only has a small fix that probably won't affect most Fedora users,
> so I think 14.0.5 should be fine for now.

Sounds good to me :)

Thanks again,
Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

[Ben Cotton]

Hello everyone!

I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive
Packager Policy[1]. Packagers that have been identified as inactive
have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after
the F37 final release, packagers who remain inactive will be removed
from the packager group. (Note that pagure.io is one of the systems
checked for activity, so commenting on your ticket that you're still
around will prevent you from showing up in the second round.)

Since this is the first time we've done something like this, it could
be a little rough. I appreciate your patience and understanding. If
you have suggestions for improvement, look for the open feature
issues[3] and file an issue in the find-inactive-packagers repo[4] if
it's not there already.

For the curious, here are the stats from today's run:

2550 users checked
913 of those had no activity on src.fedoraproject.org or pagure.io
835 of those had no activity in Bodhi
812 of those had no activity on the mailing lists
606 of those (~24% of packagers) had no activity in Bugzilla.

The script took a little under three hours to run.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/
[2] 
https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issues?tags=inactive_packager=Open
[3] https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issues?tags=feature
[4] https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/new_issue

-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

[Ben Cotton]

Hello everyone!

I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive
Packager Policy[1]. Packagers that have been identified as inactive
have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after
the F37 final release, packagers who remain inactive will be removed
from the packager group. (Note that pagure.io is one of the systems
checked for activity, so commenting on your ticket that you're still
around will prevent you from showing up in the second round.)

Since this is the first time we've done something like this, it could
be a little rough. I appreciate your patience and understanding. If
you have suggestions for improvement, look for the open feature
issues[3] and file an issue in the find-inactive-packagers repo[4] if
it's not there already.

For the curious, here are the stats from today's run:

2550 users checked
913 of those had no activity on src.fedoraproject.org or pagure.io
835 of those had no activity in Bodhi
812 of those had no activity on the mailing lists
606 of those (~24% of packagers) had no activity in Bugzilla.

The script took a little under three hours to run.

[1] https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_inactive_packagers/
[2] 
https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issues?tags=inactive_packager=Open
[3] https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/issues?tags=feature
[4] https://pagure.io/find-inactive-packagers/new_issue

-- 
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Fedora Program Manager
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2116587] perl-Bencode-1.502 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116587



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d5d80462bb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d5d80462bb

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116587
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

[Jonathan Wright via devel]

Do it!

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, 4:01 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> Greetings everyone.
>
> Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
> use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
> was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there were
> issues and since then the fedoraproject koji has defaulted to using
> chroot isolation.
>
> Releng has had a ticket open for a long time to switch
> ( https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6967 )
>
> I think the two items listed there (kernel bind mounts and loop devices)
> have long since been fixed, so I would like to propose we switch rawhide
> to using nspawn and see if any other issues show up.
>
> If everyone is ok with it, I can enable it (just for rawhide) and we can
> look for issues with composes or any other items. At least then we would
> have a good list of things we would like to fix. If it turns out things
> just work ok we can leave it enabled.
>
> I think moving to this will:
> * More closely match developers local test mock builds.
> * Provide better isolation for builds
> * Help with resources as systemd-nspawn is a lot more cgroup aware than
> chroot
> * Allow us to close a 5 year old ticket. ;)
>
> Thoughts?
>
> kevin
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

[Kalev Lember]

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:02 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> Greetings everyone.
>
> Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
> use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
> was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there were
> issues and since then the fedoraproject koji has defaulted to using
> chroot isolation.
>
> Releng has had a ticket open for a long time to switch
> ( https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6967 )
>
> I think the two items listed there (kernel bind mounts and loop devices)
> have long since been fixed, so I would like to propose we switch rawhide
> to using nspawn and see if any other issues show up.
>
> If everyone is ok with it, I can enable it (just for rawhide) and we can
> look for issues with composes or any other items. At least then we would
> have a good list of things we would like to fix. If it turns out things
> just work ok we can leave it enabled.
>
> I think moving to this will:
> * More closely match developers local test mock builds.
> * Provide better isolation for builds
> * Help with resources as systemd-nspawn is a lot more cgroup aware than
> chroot
> * Allow us to close a 5 year old ticket. ;)
>
> Thoughts?
>

Go for it :) I think now is a good time to do it: Most people are focusing
on getting F37 lined up and some rough waters in rawhide would be fine. F38
is still a long way out.

-- 
Kalev
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

[Neal Gompa]

Yes, please! I'm looking forward to this!

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, 5:02 PM Kevin Fenzi  wrote:

> Greetings everyone.
>
> Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
> use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
> was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there were
> issues and since then the fedoraproject koji has defaulted to using
> chroot isolation.
>
> Releng has had a ticket open for a long time to switch
> ( https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6967 )
>
> I think the two items listed there (kernel bind mounts and loop devices)
> have long since been fixed, so I would like to propose we switch rawhide
> to using nspawn and see if any other issues show up.
>
> If everyone is ok with it, I can enable it (just for rawhide) and we can
> look for issues with composes or any other items. At least then we would
> have a good list of things we would like to fix. If it turns out things
> just work ok we can leave it enabled.
>
> I think moving to this will:
> * More closely match developers local test mock builds.
> * Provide better isolation for builds
> * Help with resources as systemd-nspawn is a lot more cgroup aware than
> chroot
> * Allow us to close a 5 year old ticket. ;)
>
> Thoughts?
>
> kevin
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct:
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives:
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it:
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

nspawn for rawhide?

[Kevin Fenzi]

Greetings everyone. 

Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there were
issues and since then the fedoraproject koji has defaulted to using
chroot isolation. 

Releng has had a ticket open for a long time to switch
( https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6967 )

I think the two items listed there (kernel bind mounts and loop devices)
have long since been fixed, so I would like to propose we switch rawhide
to using nspawn and see if any other issues show up. 

If everyone is ok with it, I can enable it (just for rawhide) and we can
look for issues with composes or any other items. At least then we would
have a good list of things we would like to fix. If it turns out things
just work ok we can leave it enabled.

I think moving to this will:
* More closely match developers local test mock builds.
* Provide better isolation for builds
* Help with resources as systemd-nspawn is a lot more cgroup aware than
chroot
* Allow us to close a 5 year old ticket. ;) 

Thoughts?

kevin


signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2103389] Please branch and build perl-Monitoring-Plugin in epel9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103389

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-86abddef26 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-86abddef26

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103389
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2102685] Add perl-Graph to EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102685

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2099f4aa2c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2099f4aa2c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102685
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2115573] Please build perl-Data-Entropy for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0d334fa354 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0d334fa354

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2102646] Add perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch to EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102646

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2099f4aa2c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2099f4aa2c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102646
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2102659] Add perl-SQL-Translator to EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102659

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA



--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2099f4aa2c has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 9 testing
repository.

You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-2099f4aa2c

See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102659
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-3256bd6d96   
trafficserver-9.1.3-1.el9


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing

bwping-2.5-1.el9
cockpit-navigator-0.5.9-2.el9
composer-2.4.0-1.el9
copr-cli-1.103-1.el9
dfuzzer-2.2-4.el9
libwebsockets-4.3.2-1.el9
mold-1.4.1-1.el9
mosquitto-2.0.15-1.el9
perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch-1.03-46.el9
perl-Data-Entropy-0.007-20.el9
perl-Graph-0.97.25-3.el9
perl-Monitoring-Plugin-0.40-13.el9
perl-SQL-Translator-1.62-8.el9
python-copr-1.122-1.el9
python-toposort-1.7-4.el9
root-6.26.06-2.el9
yank-1.3.0-1.el9

Details about builds:



 bwping-2.5-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a7e6f563e6)
 Measure bandwidth and response times using ICMP

Update Information:

Initial build

ChangeLog:

* Fri Aug 12 2022 Alessio  2.5-1
- Initial build

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2117772 - Review Request: bwping - Measure bandwidth and response 
times using ICMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117772




 cockpit-navigator-0.5.9-2.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b778370530)
 A File System Browser for Cockpit

Update Information:

File browser for Cockpit

ChangeLog:

* Mon Aug 15 2022 Stephen Gallagher  0.5.9-2
- Add package.cfg
* Mon Aug 15 2022 Stephen Gallagher  0.5.9-1
- Update to 0.5.9
* Wed Jul 20 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  0.5.8-5
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_37_Mass_Rebuild
* Wed Jan 19 2022 Fedora Release Engineering  0.5.8-4
- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
* Fri Jan  7 2022 Stephen Gallagher  0.5.8-3
- Reduce dependencies on cockpit
* Thu Dec  9 2021 Stephen Gallagher  0.5.8-2
- Include docs
* Thu Dec  2 2021 Stephen Gallagher  0.5.8-1
- Update to cockpit-navigator 0.5.8
* Mon Nov 29 2021 Stephen Gallagher  0.5.7-1
- Update to 0.5.7
* Mon Nov 15 2021 Stephen Gallagher  0.5.6-1
- Fix mangling of large files during upload
* Tue Oct  5 2021 Stephen Gallagher  0.5.5-1
- Update to 0.5.5
* Tue Sep  7 2021 Stephen Gallagher  0.5.4-1
- Initial import

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2116052 - cockpit-navigator-0.5.9 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116052




 composer-2.4.0-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-60c4b0bf94)
 Dependency Manager for PHP

Update Information:

**Version 2.4.0** -  2022-08-16* Added `json` format output to the new
`audit` command (#10965)   * Added `json` format output to the `check-platform-
reqs` command (#10979)   * Added GitLab 15+ token refresh support (#10988)   *
Fixed `COMPOSER_NO_DEV` so it also works with `require` and `remove`'s
`--update-no-dev` (#10995)   * Fixed various bash completion issues  
**Version 2.4.0-RC1** -  2022-07-21* Added bash completions for Composer
commands, package names, etc (see [how to
setup](https://getcomposer.org/doc/03-cli.md#bash-completions)) (#10320)   *
Added `bump` command to bump requirements to the currently installed version
(#10829)   * Added `audit` command to check for known security vulnerabilities
in installed packages (#10798, #10898)   * Added automatic auditing of security
vulnerabilities after `update` is done, can be overridden with `--no-audit`
(#10798, #10898)   * Added `--audit` to `install` command to also do an audit
(#10798, #10898)   * Added `r` alias to `require` command (#10953)   * Added
`composer/class-map-generator` dependency to replace
`Composer\Autoload\ClassMapGenerator` which is now deprecated (#10885)   * Added
`--locked` to `depends`/`prohibits` commands (#10834)   * Added `--strict-psr`
flag to `dump-autoload` command to fail the process if PSR violations were
detected, useful for CI (#10886)   * Added `COMPOSER_PREFER_STABLE` and
`COMPOSER_PREFER_LOWEST` env vars to turn on `--prefer-stable`/`--prefer-lowest`
on `update` and `require` command, useful for CI (#10919)   * Added support for
temporary update constraints on all packages (now also including non-root

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

[updates]

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
 Age  URL
  29  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-89ad385971   
chromium-103.0.5060.114-1.el8
   6  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d7916edd2e   
trafficserver-9.1.3-1.el8


The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing

bwping-2.5-1.el8
copr-cli-1.103-1.el8
mold-1.4.1-1.el8
nativefiledialog-extended-1.0.0-1.el8
perl-Bencode-1.502-1.el8
python-copr-1.122-1.el8
yank-1.3.0-1.el8

Details about builds:



 bwping-2.5-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-70606723de)
 Measure bandwidth and response times using ICMP

Update Information:

Initial build

ChangeLog:

* Fri Aug 12 2022 Alessio  2.5-1
- Initial build

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2117772 - Review Request: bwping - Measure bandwidth and response 
times using ICMP
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2117772




 copr-cli-1.103-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c61f647658)
 Command line interface for COPR

Update Information:

Integration with Packit  Packit service builds everything in Copr under the
`packit` username. While previously the access list was maintained Packit-side,
newly Packit users need to configure what upstream projects (GitHub) can build
(through the Packit user) in configured copr project.  New options:  - $ copr
create --packit-forge-project-allowed github.com/username/projectname - $ copr
modify --packit-forge-project-allowed github.com/username/projectname

ChangeLog:

* Tue Aug 16 2022 Jiri Kyjovsky  1.103-1
- add packit_forge_projects_allowed for Copr projects




 mold-1.4.1-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c610faa170)
 A Modern Linker

Update Information:

Bump version to 1.4.1 (#2119324)

ChangeLog:

* Thu Aug 18 2022 Christoph Erhardt  - 1.4.1-1
- Bump version to 1.4.1 (#2119324)
- Refresh patch
- Remove superfluous directory entries from `%files`

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2119324 - mold-1.4.1 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119324




 nativefiledialog-extended-1.0.0-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-fa91458eb7)
 Native file dialog library with C and C++ bindings

Update Information:

initial package build

ChangeLog:

* Sat Aug 13 2022 Jonathan Wright  - 1.0.0-1
- Initial package build




 perl-Bencode-1.502-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d5d80462bb)
 BitTorrent serialization format

Update Information:

This release improves a build script and upstream tests in a dedicated
subpackage. We deliver it mainly to provide an up-to-date version.

ChangeLog:

* Tue Aug 16 2022 Petr Pisar  - 1.502-1
- 1.502 bump
* Tue Jan 11 2022 Petr Pisar  - 1.501-8
- Modernize a spec file
- Package the tests

References:

  [ 1 ] Bug #2116587 - perl-Bencode-1.502 is available
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116587




 python-copr-1.122-1.el8 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-c61f647658)
 Python interface for Copr

Update Information:

Integration with Packit  Packit service builds everything in Copr under the
`packit` 

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #18: 6.37 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
6.37 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/18
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2115573] Please build perl-Data-Entropy for EPEL 9

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573

Fedora Update System  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED



--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System  ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0d334fa354 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0d334fa354


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #18: 6.37 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that 
you are following:
``
6.37 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/18
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #17: 6.37 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you 
are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
6.37 bump
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/17
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #17: 6.37 bump

[Michal Josef Špaček]

mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that 
you are following:
``
6.37 bump
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/17
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Missing LLVM stack bugfix updates in stable Fedora branches

[Tom Stellard]

On 8/18/22 08:05, Fabio Valentini wrote:

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:43 PM Tom Stellard  wrote:


We've been training up more people on LLVM packaging so we should be able
to cover the stable release of Fedora better in the future.  I'm sorry
that the stable releases have been falling behind, we'll work on getting them
back up to date.


I see an update for llvm 13.0.1 has been pushed to Fedora 35, thank
you for that!
Has there been progress in getting llvm updated to 14.0.5 on F36?
Also, the latest bugfix release (14.0.6) has now been out for 2
months, would it be possible to get that update for Fedora soon-ish,
as well?



I'm working on the 14.0.5 update for F36 right now.  The 14.0.6 release
is going to have to wait until after 15.0.0 lands in F37 and rawhide,
because I don't think it's worth doing the 14.0.6 update there, since
15.0.0 is so close.

14.0.6 only has a small fix that probably won't affect most Fedora users,
so I think 14.0.5 should be fine for now.

-Tom


Thank you for your work,
Fabio


___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: libgda5, libgda 6.0

[Gwyn Ciesla via devel]

Good catch, thanks. Fix is building.



-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, August 18th, 2022 at 8:38 AM, Ben Beasley 
 wrote:


> Regardless of the messy rebuild, thank you for working on libgda 6.0.
> 

> I think I was able to repair sequeler’s changelogs to the extent that
> they are linear and no pre-existing changelogs are lost. I suppose I
> could have edited out the entries for the builds that never succeeded,
> but I chose not to.
> 

> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sequeler/c/cd442978b013b374bd1a9127a9e42d8f2f5a1e34?branch=rawhide
> 

> However, the package still doesn’t build:
> 

> Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
> - nothing provides libgda(x86-64) = 1:5.2.10-11.fc38 needed by
> libgda5-devel-1:5.2.10-11.fc38.x86_64
> 

> In fact:
> 

> $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo=local -i libgda5-devel
> […]
> 

> Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
> - nothing provides libgda(x86-64) = 1:5.2.10-11.fc38 needed by
> libgda5-devel-1:5.2.10-11.fc38.x86_64
> 

> It seems like the problem is here:
> 

> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libgda5/blob/rawhide/f/libgda5.spec#_73
> 

> Requires: %{upstream}%{?_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}
> 

> where “upstream” is “libgda”.
> 

> On 8/18/22 09:10, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:
> 

> > Sorry. Still learning rpmautospec. :)
> > 

> > --
> > Gwyn Ciesla
> > she/her/hers
> > 
> > in your fear, seek only peace
> > in your fear, seek only love
> > -d. bowie
> > 

> > Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
> > 

> > --- Original Message ---
> > On Wednesday, August 17th, 2022 at 4:15 PM, Fabio Valentini 
> > decatho...@gmail.com wrote:
> > 

> > > On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 10:02 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
> > > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> > > 

> > > > I'm building libgda5, based on libgda as of today, and updating libdga 
> > > > to 6.0.0.
> > > > 

> > > > The following packages are impacted.
> > > > 

> > > > If they do not rebuild with 6.0.0, I'll update their BuildRequires with 
> > > > libgda5-devel.
> > > > 

> > > > anjuta
> > > > elementary-music
> > > > gtranslator
> > > > libgdamm
> > > > sequeler
> > > > Hi Gwyn,
> > > 

> > > I don't know which script you used for your rebuild attempts, but it
> > > looks like they are broken with packages that use rpmautospec:
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/40dbfe7c425e6e65fab03d00bc7ddfbb0befe0c6?branch=rawhide
> > > The changelog file should never be touched unless you want to amend
> > > wrong contents.
> > > 

> > > And now I guess I'll need to figure out how messed up the
> > > elementary-music changelog is because of this, and how to remove the
> > > superfluous "bump" and "revert bump" changelog messages) generated by
> > > the two follow-up commits ...
> > > 

> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/3636cbb68e2c6025d31d3e90cba776123feb0033?branch=rawhide
> > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/ca0771f290b80ebdf16dd225eab2047eeadad392?branch=rawhide
> > > 

> > > Please just fix your tools before you need to run your next scripted 
> > > rebuilds :)
> > > 

> > > Fabio
> > > ___
> > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives: 
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> > > 

> > > ___
> > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> > > List Archives: 
> > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> > > Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> > > https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
> 

> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to 

Re: Missing LLVM stack bugfix updates in stable Fedora branches

[Fabio Valentini]

On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:43 PM Tom Stellard  wrote:
>
> We've been training up more people on LLVM packaging so we should be able
> to cover the stable release of Fedora better in the future.  I'm sorry
> that the stable releases have been falling behind, we'll work on getting them
> back up to date.

I see an update for llvm 13.0.1 has been pushed to Fedora 35, thank
you for that!
Has there been progress in getting llvm updated to 14.0.5 on F36?
Also, the latest bugfix release (14.0.6) has now been out for 2
months, would it be possible to get that update for Fedora soon-ish,
as well?

Thank you for your work,
Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2096953] perl-HTTP-Message-6.37 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2096953
Bug 2096953 depends on bug 2113870, which changed state.

Bug 2113870 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Compress-Brotli - Brotli 
compression library for perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113870

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2096953
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora 37 compose report: 20220818.n.0 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-37-20220817.n.1
NEW: Fedora-37-20220818.n.0

= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images:  1
Added packages:  3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages:   28
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  112.69 KiB
Size of dropped packages:1.34 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   1.70 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   478.96 KiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =

= DROPPED IMAGES =
Image: Silverblue dvd-ostree x86_64
Path: Silverblue/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Silverblue-ostree-x86_64-37-20220817.n.1.iso

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: flatpak-rpm-macros-37-1.module_f37+15012+d91ecd81
Summary: Macros for building RPMS for flatpaks
RPMs:flatpak-rpm-macros
Size:43.55 KiB

Package: flatpak-runtime-config-37-1.module_f37+15012+d91ecd81
Summary: Configuration files that live inside the flatpak runtime
RPMs:flatpak-runtime-config
Size:46.51 KiB

Package: rust-web-ext-native-messaging-0.1.0-1.fc37
Summary: WebExtension native messaging with serde_json as the (de)serializer
RPMs:rust-web-ext-native-messaging+default-devel 
rust-web-ext-native-messaging-devel
Size:22.64 KiB


= DROPPED PACKAGES =
Package: evolution-rss-1:0.3.96-9.fc36
Summary: Evolution RSS Reader
RPMs:evolution-rss
Size:1.34 MiB


= UPGRADED PACKAGES =
Package:  apptainer-1.1.0~rc.2-1.fc37
Old package:  apptainer-1.1.0~rc.1-2.fc37
Summary:  Application and environment virtualization
RPMs: apptainer apptainer-suid
Size: 104.69 MiB
Size change:  -17.24 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Aug 17 2022 Dave Dykstra  - 1.1.0~rc.2
  - Update to upstream 1.1.0~rc.2.  Remove customizations put into
1.1.0-rc.1 packaging except for f35 inclusion of golang source.


Package:  firefox-104.0-2.fc37
Old package:  firefox-103.0.1-2.fc37
Summary:  Mozilla Firefox Web browser
RPMs: firefox firefox-langpacks firefox-wayland firefox-x11
Size: 206.46 MiB
Size change:  1.33 MiB
Changelog:
  * Fri Aug 12 2022 Martin Stransky - 103.0.2-1
  - Updated to 103.0.2

  * Tue Aug 16 2022 Martin Stransky - 104.0-1
  - Updated to 104.0

  * Wed Aug 17 2022 Martin Stransky - 104.0-2
  - Added build fixes


Package:  gnome-software-43.beta-3.fc37
Old package:  gnome-software-43.beta-2.fc37
Summary:  A software center for GNOME
RPMs: gnome-software gnome-software-devel gnome-software-rpm-ostree
Size: 10.18 MiB
Size change:  42.84 KiB
Changelog:
  * Wed Aug 17 2022 Milan Crha  - 43.beta-3
  - Resolves: #2119089 (No enough apps to show for the "Editor's Choice" 
section)


Package:  grub2-1:2.06-52.fc37
Old package:  grub2-1:2.06-47.fc37
Summary:  Bootloader with support for Linux, Multiboot and more
RPMs: grub2-common grub2-efi-aa64 grub2-efi-aa64-cdboot 
grub2-efi-aa64-modules grub2-efi-ia32 grub2-efi-ia32-cdboot 
grub2-efi-ia32-modules grub2-efi-x64 grub2-efi-x64-cdboot grub2-efi-x64-modules 
grub2-emu grub2-emu-modules grub2-pc grub2-pc-modules grub2-ppc64le 
grub2-ppc64le-modules grub2-tools grub2-tools-efi grub2-tools-extra 
grub2-tools-minimal
Size: 31.49 MiB
Size change:  -13.17 KiB
Changelog:
  * Mon Aug 15 2022 Robbie Harwood  - 2.06-48
  - Use --with-rpm-version
  - Resolves: #2118390

  * Mon Aug 15 2022 Robbie Harwood  - 2.06-49
  - Skip rpm mtime verification on likely-vfat filesystems

  * Wed Aug 17 2022 Robbie Harwood  - 2.06-50
  - Fix duplicated args and cope with /etc/default/grub modification

  * Wed Aug 17 2022 Robbie Harwood  - 2.06-51
  - Give up on rhgb quiet

  * Wed Aug 17 2022 Robbie Harwood  - 2.06-52
  - Handle ostree's non-writable /etc/kernel


Package:  grubby-8.40-65.fc37
Old package:  grubby-8.40-64.fc37
Summary:  Command line tool for updating bootloader configs
RPMs: grubby
Size: 132.79 KiB
Size change:  593 B
Changelog:
  * Wed Aug 17 2022 Robbie Harwood  - 8.40-65
  - Mark package as obsoleting -deprecated
  - Resolves: #2117817


Package:  ibus-1.5.26-17.fc37
Old package:  ibus-1.5.26-16.fc37
Summary:  Intelligent Input Bus for Linux OS
RPMs: ibus ibus-desktop-testing ibus-devel ibus-devel-docs ibus-gtk2 
ibus-gtk3 ibus-gtk4 ibus-libs ibus-setup ibus-tests ibus-wayland
Size: 50.17 MiB
Size change:  2.33 KiB
Changelog:
  * Thu Aug 18 2022 Takao Fujiwara  - 1.5.26-17
  - Resolves: #2119020 Require gettext-runtime instead of gettext for ibus-devel


Package:  ibus-chewing-1.6.1-19.fc37
Old package:  ibus-chewing-1.6.1-18.fc37
Summary:  The Chewing engine for IBus input platform
RPMs: ibus-chewing
Size: 423.06 KiB
Size change:  -248 B
Changelog:
  * Thu Aug 18 2022 Takao Fujiwara  - 1.6.1-19
  - Resolves: #2119019 Not to require gettext


Package:  imhex-1.21.2-1.fc37
Old package:  imhex-1.21.1-1.fc37
Summary:  A hex editor for reverse engineers and programmers
RPMs: imhex
Size: 25.34 MiB
S

Re: libgda5, libgda 6.0

[Ben Beasley]

Regardless of the messy rebuild, thank you for working on libgda 6.0.

I think I was able to repair sequeler’s changelogs to the extent that 
they are linear and no pre-existing changelogs are lost. I suppose I 
could have edited out the entries for the builds that never succeeded, 
but I chose not to.


https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/sequeler/c/cd442978b013b374bd1a9127a9e42d8f2f5a1e34?branch=rawhide

However, the package still doesn’t build:

     Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
      - nothing provides libgda(x86-64) = 1:5.2.10-11.fc38 needed by 
libgda5-devel-1:5.2.10-11.fc38.x86_64


In fact:

    $ mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --enablerepo=local -i libgda5-devel
    […]

 Problem: cannot install the best candidate for the job
      - nothing provides libgda(x86-64) = 1:5.2.10-11.fc38 needed by 
libgda5-devel-1:5.2.10-11.fc38.x86_64


It seems like the problem is here:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libgda5/blob/rawhide/f/libgda5.spec#_73

    Requires:   %{upstream}%{?_isa} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{release}

where “upstream” is “libgda”.

On 8/18/22 09:10, Gwyn Ciesla via devel wrote:

Sorry. Still learning rpmautospec. :)



--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers

in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, August 17th, 2022 at 4:15 PM, Fabio Valentini 
 wrote:



On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 10:02 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:


I'm building libgda5, based on libgda as of today, and updating libdga to 6.0.0.

The following packages are impacted.

If they do not rebuild with 6.0.0, I'll update their BuildRequires with 
libgda5-devel.

anjuta
elementary-music
gtranslator
libgdamm
sequeler

Hi Gwyn,

I don't know which script you used for your rebuild attempts, but it
looks like they are broken with packages that use rpmautospec:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/40dbfe7c425e6e65fab03d00bc7ddfbb0befe0c6?branch=rawhide
The changelog file should never be touched unless you want to amend
wrong contents.

And now I guess I'll need to figure out how messed up the
elementary-music changelog is because of this, and how to remove the
superfluous "bump" and "revert bump" changelog messages) generated by
the two follow-up commits ...

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/3636cbb68e2c6025d31d3e90cba776123feb0033?branch=rawhide
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/ca0771f290b80ebdf16dd225eab2047eeadad392?branch=rawhide

Please just fix your tools before you need to run your next scripted rebuilds :)

Fabio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Is system upgrade automatic or not?

[Stephen Smoogen]

On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 18:23, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > I don't know of an Operating System which isn't a rolling operating
> system
> > which works this way. MacOS, Windows, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora all require
> a
> > manual clickthru to get to the 'next' version which is available.
>
> For Windows, it really depends on what you mean by the "next version". If
> you are thinking in RHEL-like time frames, then the "next version" is
> Windows n+1 (e.g., 10 to 11), to which upgrades are not automatic. But
> Windows does release major upgrades to every Windows version every 6
> months
> (which pretty much corresponds to Fedora n+1) and upgrades users to those
> more or less automatically. Even fully automatically without the user's
> consent at the latest around when the next upgrade comes out (which would
> correspond to fully automatic upgrades to Fedora n+1 around when n+2 is
> released, which conveniently is when Fedora n is about to reach its EOL).
>
> Now, I think there would be a huge outcry if Fedora did this the Microsoft
> way with no way to opt out (I would be one of the first to complain), but
> claiming that Windows does not do this is just wrong.
>

I should have been clearer. I was talking about the changes between
XP->7->8->8.1->10->11 versus 10. -> 10.. I was thinking of
it more since for the most part they used pretty much the same compiler for
all of 10 versus new compiler and major library changes every six months

 The later ones are forced through with a system which from my experience
seems to go the following:

0. Download patches/new code
1. Reboot
2. Copy older version to backup
3. Patch/install to the newer version
4. If patch fails, copy backup to running
4. Reboot
5. If reboot failed try to copy backup to running
6. Reboot
7. If going back to backup failed, reinstall OS system from safety partition
8. Reboot
9. If that fails, put up a screen with a website or phone number.

I have had all the post #4 scenarios play out several times. I don't think
Fedora could handle the outrage from that.

-- 
Stephen Smoogen, Red Hat Automotive
Let us be kind to one another, for most of us are fighting a hard battle.
-- Ian MacClaren
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: libgda5, libgda 6.0

[Gwyn Ciesla via devel]

Sorry. Still learning rpmautospec. :)



-- 
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
 
in your fear, seek only peace 
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie


Sent with Proton Mail secure email.

--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, August 17th, 2022 at 4:15 PM, Fabio Valentini 
 wrote:


> On Thu, Aug 4, 2022 at 10:02 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org wrote:
> 

> > I'm building libgda5, based on libgda as of today, and updating libdga to 
> > 6.0.0.
> > 

> > The following packages are impacted.
> > 

> > If they do not rebuild with 6.0.0, I'll update their BuildRequires with 
> > libgda5-devel.
> > 

> > anjuta
> > elementary-music
> > gtranslator
> > libgdamm
> > sequeler
> 

> 

> Hi Gwyn,
> 

> I don't know which script you used for your rebuild attempts, but it
> looks like they are broken with packages that use rpmautospec:
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/40dbfe7c425e6e65fab03d00bc7ddfbb0befe0c6?branch=rawhide
> The changelog file should never be touched unless you want to amend
> wrong contents.
> 

> And now I guess I'll need to figure out how messed up the
> elementary-music changelog is because of this, and how to remove the
> superfluous "bump" and "revert bump" changelog messages) generated by
> the two follow-up commits ...
> 

> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/3636cbb68e2c6025d31d3e90cba776123feb0033?branch=rawhide
> https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/elementary-music/c/ca0771f290b80ebdf16dd225eab2047eeadad392?branch=rawhide
> 

> Please just fix your tools before you need to run your next scripted rebuilds 
> :)
> 

> Fabio
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Fedora Code of Conduct: 
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
> List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
> List Archives: 
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> Do not reply to spam, report it: 
> https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

ca-certificates latest updates and Mozilla NSS certdata.txt modifications

[Yann Droneaud]

Hi,

I've noticed ca-certificates package was updated recently, and went looking
at the changes, and I have some questions.

The first issue is what certdata.txt was used ? It's supposed to be
downloaded from Mozilla NSS sources, but doesn't match any released 
versions.


The second issue is what are the changes that were made to certdata.txt ?
The commit messages and RPM changelogs say the root CA certificate database
was updated thrice to the same version.

Below the 3 latest updates to certdata.txt used to build the root CA
certificates database in ca-certificates RPM package for Fedora Rawhide
from ca-certificates git repository (file digests are SHA-2 256 truncated
to 12 hexadecimal characters):

  - 4a4152aa79bb  certdata.txt  [commit 3e2443900394 ('Update to CKBI 
2.54 from NSS 3.79')]


https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ca-certificates/c/3e2443900394

  - fb7f5af4187e  certdata.txt  [commit d4451d31cd7b ('Update to CKBI 
2.54 from NSS 3.79')]


https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ca-certificates/c/d4451d31cd7b

  - 18b023a77e5e  certdata.txt  [commit f6b8f45e836d ('Update to CKBI 
2.54 from NSS 3.79')]


https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ca-certificates/c/f6b8f45e836d

Previous package version used the following Mozilla NSS's certdata.txt:

  - bb36818a81fe  certdata.txt  [commit 662998d9d75a ('Update to CKBI 
2.52 from NSS 3.72')]


https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ca-certificates/c/662998d9d75a

Checking all NSS releases from 3.72 up to the latest from NSS mercurial
repository:

  - 9bf3799611fb  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [tag NSS_3_81_RTM 
('Set version numbers to 3.81 final')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/NSS_3_81_RTM

  - 9bf3799611fb  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [tag NSS_3_80_RTM 
('Set version numbers to 3.80 final')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/NSS_3_80_RTM

  - 34a54d519177  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [tag NSS_3_79_RTM 
('Set version numbers to 3.79 final')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/NSS_3_79_RTM

  - 34a54d519177  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [tag NSS_3_78_1_RTM 
('Release notes for NSS 3.78.1')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/NSS_3_78_1_RTM

  - 34a54d519177  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [tag NSS_3_78_RTM 
('Set version numbers to 3.78 final')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/NSS_3_78_RTM

  - 34a54d519177  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [tag NSS_3_77_RTM 
('Set version number to 3.77 final')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/NSS_3_77_RTM

  - d59c5c83ce7a  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [tag NSS_3_76_1_RTM 
('Release notes for NSS 3.76.1')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/NSS_3_76_1_RTM

  - d59c5c83ce7a  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [tag NSS_3_76_RTM 
('Set version numbers to 3.76 final')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/NSS_3_76_RTM

  - 187ef9dc2311  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [tag NSS_3_75_RTM 
('Release notes for NSS 3.75')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/NSS_3_75_RTM

  - 187ef9dc2311  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [tag NSS_3_74_RTM 
('Set version numbers to 3.74 RTM')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/NSS_3_74_RTM

  - bb36818a81fe  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [tag NSS_3_73_1_RTM 
('Bug 966856 - mozilla::pkix: support SHA-2...')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/NSS_3_73_1_RTM

  - bb36818a81fe  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [tag NSS_3_73_RTM 
('Set version numbers to 3.73 final')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/NSS_3_73_RTM

  - bb36818a81fe  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [tag NSS_3_72_1_RTM 
('Bug 966856 - mozilla::pkix: support SHA-2...')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/NSS_3_72_1_RTM

  - bb36818a81fe  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [tag NSS_3_72_RTM 
('Set version numbers to 3.72 final')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/NSS_3_72_RTM

Checking every changes to NSS's certdata.txt from around NSS 3.70 to
the today's tip:

  - 9bf3799611fb  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [commit 9c2cbf14f6a5 
('Bug 1759815 - Remove Hellenic Academic 2011...')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/9c2cbf14f6a5

  - b39fa9e1d7a4  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [commit 9555008fdd1a 
('Bug 1770267 - Add E-Tugra Roots...')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/9555008fdd1a

  - 855c5457fb00  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [commit 6307e75bedce 
('Bug 1768970 - Add Certainly Roots...')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/6307e75bedce

  - 751a9a328987  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [commit 0863d9ec3ece 
('Bug 1764392 - Add DigitCert Roots...')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/0863d9ec3ece

  - 34a54d519177  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [commit f63fb86db692 
('Bug 1754890 - Add two D-TRUST 2020...')]


  https://hg.mozilla.org/projects/nss/rev/f63fb86db692

  - 07e19378e7c1  lib/ckfw/builtins/certdata.txt  [commit 1fcbbd7e4f5f 
('Bug 1751298 - Add Telia Root CA 

[Bug 2103742] perl-SNMP-Info-3.89 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103742



--- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-SNMP-Info-3.89-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90963643


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103742
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

[Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek]

On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:21:05AM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> I've just finished the pcre deprecation change [1].
> If anyone is interested, please take a look.
> 
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PcreDeprecation

Why F39? Shouldn't the deprecation (and the work on porting) be already 
happening for F38?

Zbyszek
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2103742] perl-SNMP-Info-3.89 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103742

Upstream Release Monitoring  
changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-SNMP-Info-3.87 is  |perl-SNMP-Info-3.89 is
   |available   |available



--- Comment #12 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Releases retrieved: 3.89
Upstream release that is considered latest: 3.89
Current version/release in rawhide: 3.82-3.fc37
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/SNMP-Info/

Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/


More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring


Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.


Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3318/


To change the monitoring settings for the project, please visit:
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-SNMP-Info


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103742
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2103742] perl-SNMP-Info-3.89 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103742



--- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring 
 ---
Created attachment 1906196
  --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1906196=edit
Update to 3.89 (#2103742)


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103742
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

[Lukas Javorsky]

I've just finished the pcre deprecation change [1].
If anyone is interested, please take a look.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PcreDeprecation

Lukas

On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:43 PM Lukas Javorsky  wrote:

> Hi Richard,
>
> The Fedora 39 System Wide changes are scheduled for Jun 2023, so that
> would be the deadline for this.
>
> However, after feedback, I've decided to create a pcre deprecation change
> at first so it's broken into more pieces and it's better documented.
> When it's ready, I'll paste the link for the new pcre deprecation change.
> You can ignore the retirement change for now, because that one will be
> proposed after the package is deprecated.
>
> Thank you and sorry for the inconvenience.
> Lukas
>
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:33 PM Richard W.M. Jones 
> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 02:25:06PM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
>> > The Fedora change for this topic is created [1].
>> >
>> > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PcreRetirement
>>
>> It would be helpful to have an actual deadline written in there.
>> "Fedora 39" requires an indirection.  Are we talking 2023?  2024?
>> What date exactly?  I need to tell upstreams that they have until a
>> certain date to make the change.
>>
>> Rich.
>>
>> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2022 at 11:46 AM Lukas Javorsky 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > I've decided to write a Fedora change that will contain all of the
>> > information about this possible retirement.
>> >
>> > I have to fill the dependencies that will be affected by this
>> change, so
>> > I'm looking for the tool/command which will give them to me.
>> > I've seen multiple suggestions here in this thread, but is there
>> some kind
>> > of consensus about which one should I choose (which one is the most
>> > accurate)?
>> >
>> > Thank you so much
>> > Lukas
>> >
>> > On Tue, Jul 26, 2022 at 11:17 AM Paolo Bonzini 
>> wrote:
>> >
>> > Due to static linking, not all functions will be included in the
>> > executable and therefore some simple "hello world"  binaries
>> will not
>> > need sysprof-capture-static. However, anything that used the
>> .pc file
>> > will need it.
>> >
>> > Technically, you could also use glib's static library without
>> dependent
>> > .a libraries if you link with glib's .a file but do not specify
>> > -static; but that's not a good argument against having a
>> Requires for
>> > the dependency in my opinion, because it makes the .pc file not
>> work
>> > out of the box. Perhaps a weak dependency, but even that sounds
>> > strange.
>> >
>> > As to glibc-static I think it's fair to say that whoever uses
>> -static
>> > will have to install it on their own, so it can be left out of
>> > glib2.spec.
>> >
>> > Paolo
>> >
>> >
>> > Il mar 26 lug 2022, 10:59 Daniel P. Berrangé <
>> berra...@redhat.com> ha
>> > scritto:
>> >
>> > Although listed in glib-2.0.pc, I didn't find any need for
>> the
>> > sysprof-capture-static package, but it does need
>> glibc-static
>> >
>> > ___
>> > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > To unsubscribe send an email to
>> devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > Fedora Code of Conduct:
>> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/
>> > code-of-conduct/
>> > List Guidelines:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>> > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/
>> > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> > Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/
>> > fedora-infrastructure
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > S pozdravom/ Best regards
>> >
>> > Lukáš Javorský
>> >
>> > Software Engineer, Core service - Databases
>> >
>> > Red Hat
>> >
>> > Purkyňova 115 (TPB-C)
>> >
>> > 612 00 Brno - Královo Pole
>> >
>> > ljavo...@redhat.com
>> >
>> > [logo--200]
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > S pozdravom/ Best regards
>> >
>> > Lukáš Javorský
>> >
>> > Software Engineer, Core service - Databases
>> >
>> > Red Hat
>> >
>> > Purkyňova 115 (TPB-C)
>> >
>> > 612 00 Brno - Královo Pole
>> >
>> > ljavo...@redhat.com
>> >
>> > [logo--200]
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat
>> http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
>> Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
>> virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
>> http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
>>
>>
>
> --
> S pozdravom/ Best regards
>
> Lukáš Javorský
>
> Software Engineer, Core service - Databases
>
> Red Hat 
>
> Purkyňova 115 (TPB-C)
>
> 612 00 Brno - Královo Pole
>
> ljavo...@redhat.com
> 
>


-- 
S pozdravom/ Best regards

Lukáš Javorský

Software Engineer, Core service - 

[Bug 2116371] Upgrade perl-Class-Observable to 2.002

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116371

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Assignee|andr...@bawue.net   |jples...@redhat.com
   Fixed In Version||perl-Class-Observable-2.002
   ||-1.fc38
   ||perl-Class-Observable-2.002
   ||-1.fc37
Last Closed||2022-08-18 09:11:34




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116371
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119302] New: Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.016008

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119302

Bug ID: 2119302
   Summary: Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.016008
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
   URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Type-Tiny
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Type-Tiny
  Assignee: rc040...@freenet.de
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: p...@city-fan.org, perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
ppi...@redhat.com, rc040...@freenet.de,
xav...@bachelot.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest Fedora delivers 1.014000 version. Upstream released 1.016008. When you
have free time, please upgrade it.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119302
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119299] New: Upgrade perl-Curses to 1.40

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119299

Bug ID: 2119299
   Summary: Upgrade perl-Curses to 1.40
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
   URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Curses
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Curses
  Assignee: steve.tray...@cern.ch
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org,
steve.tray...@cern.ch
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest Fedora delivers 1.38 version. Upstream released 1.40. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119299
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2116371] Upgrade perl-Class-Observable to 2.001

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116371

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

URL||https://metacpan.org/dist/C
   ||lass-Observable
Version|37  |rawhide



--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
Latest Fedora delivers 2.000 version. Upstream released 2.002. When you have
free time, please upgrade it.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116371
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2116371] Upgrade perl-Class-Observable to 2.002

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116371

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|Upgrade |Upgrade
   |perl-Class-Observable to|perl-Class-Observable to
   |2.001   |2.002




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116371
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119294] New: Upgrade perl-Carp-Assert-More to 2.1.0

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119294

Bug ID: 2119294
   Summary: Upgrade perl-Carp-Assert-More to 2.1.0
   Product: Fedora
   Version: rawhide
   URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Carp-Assert-More
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-Carp-Assert-More
  Assignee: spo...@gmail.com
  Reporter: jples...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira@gmail.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, spo...@gmail.com,
xav...@bachelot.org
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora



Latest Fedora delivers 2.0.1 version. Upstream released 2.1.0. When you have
free time, please upgrade it.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119294
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2105955] Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.014000

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105955

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
 Status|NEW |CLOSED
   Fixed In Version||perl-Type-Tiny-1.014000-1.f
   ||c37
Last Closed||2022-08-18 08:23:26



--- Comment #2 from Jitka Plesnikova  ---
Built by corsepiu.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105955
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2105085] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085

Sandipan Roy  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Priority|medium  |low
   Severity|medium  |low
   Fixed In Version||HTTP-Daemon 6.15




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2118814] perl-Filter-1.64 is available

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118814

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Fixed In Version||perl-Filter-1.64-1.fc38
   ||perl-Filter-1.64-1.fc37
 Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
 Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Last Closed||2022-08-18 07:37:53




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118814
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2105085] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085

Sandipan Roy  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Depends On||2119271, 2119273, 2119272,
   ||2119274, 2119270





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270
[Bug 2119270] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request
smuggling [fedora-all]
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119270] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling [fedora-all]

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270

Sandipan Roy  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Blocks||2105085 (CVE-2022-31081)





Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
[Bug 2105085] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request
smuggling
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119270] New: CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling [fedora-all]

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270

Bug ID: 2119270
   Summary: CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows
request smuggling [fedora-all]
   Product: Fedora
   Version: 36
Status: NEW
 Component: perl-HTTP-Daemon
  Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
  Severity: low
  Priority: low
  Assignee: mspa...@redhat.com
  Reporter: sa...@redhat.com
QA Contact: extras...@fedoraproject.org
CC: mspa...@redhat.com,
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org, ppi...@redhat.com
  Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora




This is an automatically created tracking bug!  It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected versions
of fedora-all.

For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against the "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.

For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs

When submitting as an update, use the fedpkg template provided in the next
comment(s).  This will include the bug IDs of this tracking bug as well as
the relevant top-level CVE bugs.

Please also mention the CVE IDs being fixed in the RPM changelog and the
fedpkg commit message.

NOTE: this issue affects multiple supported versions of Fedora. While only
one tracking bug has been filed, please correct all affected versions at
the same time.  If you need to fix the versions independent of each other,
you may clone this bug as appropriate.


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2119270] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling [fedora-all]

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270



--- Comment #1 from Sandipan Roy  ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug.  This will ensure that all associated bugs get updated
when new packages are pushed to stable.

=

# bugfix, security, enhancement, newpackage (required)
type=security

# low, medium, high, urgent (required)
severity=low

# testing, stable
request=testing

# Bug numbers: 1234,9876
bugs=2105085,2119270

# Description of your update
notes=Security fix for [PUT CVEs HERE]

# Enable request automation based on the stable/unstable karma thresholds
autokarma=True
stable_karma=3
unstable_karma=-3

# Automatically close bugs when this marked as stable
close_bugs=True

# Suggest that users restart after update
suggest_reboot=False

==

Additionally, you may opt to use the bodhi web interface to submit updates:

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/new


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2105085] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085



--- Comment #8 from Sandipan Roy  ---
https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-5520-1

The issue is fixed upstream in 6.15:
https://github.com/libwww-perl/HTTP-Daemon/security/advisories/GHSA-cg8c-pxmv-w7cf


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2105085] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085



--- Comment #9 from Sandipan Roy  ---
Created perl-HTTP-Daemon tracking bugs for this issue:

Affects: fedora-all [bug 2119270]


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

[Bug 2105085] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085

Sandipan Roy  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

Summary|perl-HTTP-Daemon:   |CVE-2022-31081
   |HTTP::Daemon allows request |perl-HTTP-Daemon:
   |smuggling   |HTTP::Daemon allows request
   ||smuggling




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220817.n.1 changes

[Fedora Rawhide Report]

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220816.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220817.n.1

= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images:  0
Added packages:  18
Dropped packages:28
Upgraded packages:   214
Downgraded packages: 0

Size of added packages:  1.44 GiB
Size of dropped packages:21.42 MiB
Size of upgraded packages:   3.54 GiB
Size of downgraded packages: 0 B

Size change of upgraded packages:   -98.30 MiB
Size change of downgraded packages: 0 B

= ADDED IMAGES =
Image: Scientific_KDE live x86_64
Path: Labs/x86_64/iso/Fedora-Scientific_KDE-Live-x86_64-Rawhide-20220817.n.1.iso
Image: Container_Base docker ppc64le
Path: 
Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Base-Rawhide-20220817.n.1.ppc64le.tar.xz
Image: Kinoite dvd-ostree aarch64
Path: Kinoite/aarch64/iso/Fedora-Kinoite-ostree-aarch64-Rawhide-20220817.n.1.iso
Image: Cloud_Base qcow2 ppc64le
Path: Cloud/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20220817.n.1.ppc64le.qcow2
Image: Container_Minimal_Base docker ppc64le
Path: 
Container/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Container-Minimal-Base-Rawhide-20220817.n.1.ppc64le.tar.xz
Image: Cloud_Base raw-xz ppc64le
Path: Cloud/ppc64le/images/Fedora-Cloud-Base-Rawhide-20220817.n.1.ppc64le.raw.xz

= DROPPED IMAGES =

= ADDED PACKAGES =
Package: avocado-vt-90.0-1.module_f38+14985+64db4577
Summary: Avocado Virt Test Plugin
RPMs:python3-avocado-vt
Size:8.83 MiB

Package: basez-1.6.2-1.fc38
Summary: Base 16/32/64 encode/decode data to standard output
RPMs:basez
Size:184.70 KiB

Package: cbonsai-1.3.1-2.fc38
Summary: Grow bonsai trees in your terminal
RPMs:cbonsai
Size:157.07 KiB

Package: cri-o-1.22.5-1.module_f38+14967+36288aa7
Summary: Open Container Initiative-based implementation of Kubernetes Container 
Runtime Interface
RPMs:cri-o
Size:176.29 MiB

Package: cri-tools-1.22.0-3.module_f38+14967+36288aa7
Summary: CLI and validation tools for Container Runtime Interface
RPMs:cri-tools
Size:51.97 MiB

Package: galera-26.4.11-3.module_f38+14997+c830dac9
Summary: Synchronous multi-master wsrep provider (replication engine)
RPMs:galera
Size:4.37 MiB

Package: ghc-8.10.7-102.module_f38+14993+ed7fe8fc
Summary: Glasgow Haskell Compiler
RPMs:ghc ghc-Cabal ghc-Cabal-devel ghc-Cabal-doc ghc-Cabal-prof ghc-array 
ghc-array-devel ghc-array-doc ghc-array-prof ghc-base ghc-base-devel 
ghc-base-doc ghc-base-prof ghc-binary ghc-binary-devel ghc-binary-doc 
ghc-binary-prof ghc-bytestring ghc-bytestring-devel ghc-bytestring-doc 
ghc-bytestring-prof ghc-compiler ghc-containers ghc-containers-devel 
ghc-containers-doc ghc-containers-prof ghc-deepseq ghc-deepseq-devel 
ghc-deepseq-doc ghc-deepseq-prof ghc-devel ghc-directory ghc-directory-devel 
ghc-directory-doc ghc-directory-prof ghc-doc ghc-doc-index ghc-exceptions 
ghc-exceptions-devel ghc-exceptions-doc ghc-exceptions-prof ghc-filepath 
ghc-filepath-devel ghc-filepath-doc ghc-filepath-prof ghc-ghc ghc-ghc-boot 
ghc-ghc-boot-devel ghc-ghc-boot-doc ghc-ghc-boot-prof ghc-ghc-boot-th 
ghc-ghc-boot-th-devel ghc-ghc-boot-th-doc ghc-ghc-boot-th-prof ghc-ghc-compact 
ghc-ghc-compact-devel ghc-ghc-compact-doc ghc-ghc-compact-prof ghc-ghc-devel 
ghc-ghc-doc ghc-ghc-heap ghc-ghc-heap-devel ghc-ghc-heap-doc ghc-ghc-heap-prof 
ghc-ghc-prof ghc-ghci ghc-ghci-devel ghc-ghci-doc ghc-ghci-prof ghc-haskeline 
ghc-haskeline-devel ghc-haskeline-doc ghc-haskeline-prof ghc-hpc ghc-hpc-devel 
ghc-hpc-doc ghc-hpc-prof ghc-libiserv ghc-libiserv-devel ghc-libiserv-doc 
ghc-libiserv-prof ghc-manual ghc-mtl ghc-mtl-devel ghc-mtl-doc ghc-mtl-prof 
ghc-parsec ghc-parsec-devel ghc-parsec-doc ghc-parsec-prof ghc-pretty 
ghc-pretty-devel ghc-pretty-doc ghc-pretty-prof ghc-process ghc-process-devel 
ghc-process-doc ghc-process-prof ghc-prof ghc-stm ghc-stm-devel ghc-stm-doc 
ghc-stm-prof ghc-template-haskell ghc-template-haskell-devel 
ghc-template-haskell-doc ghc-template-haskell-prof ghc-terminfo 
ghc-terminfo-devel ghc-terminfo-doc ghc-terminfo-prof ghc-text ghc-text-devel 
ghc-text-doc ghc-text-prof ghc-time ghc-time-devel ghc-time-doc ghc-time-prof 
ghc-transformers ghc-transformers-devel ghc-transformers-doc 
ghc-transformers-prof ghc-unix ghc-unix-devel ghc-unix-doc ghc-unix-prof 
ghc-xhtml ghc-xhtml-devel ghc-xhtml-doc ghc-xhtml-prof
Size:898.12 MiB

Package: mariadb-3:10.9.1-1.module_f38+14997+c830dac9
Summary: A very fast and robust SQL database server
RPMs:mariadb mariadb-backup mariadb-common mariadb-connect-engine 
mariadb-cracklib-password-check mariadb-devel mariadb-embedded 
mariadb-embedded-devel mariadb-errmsg mariadb-gssapi-server 
mariadb-oqgraph-engine mariadb-pam mariadb-rocksdb-engine mariadb-s3-engine 
mariadb-server mariadb-server-galera mariadb-server-utils mariadb-sphinx-engine 
mariadb-test
Size:231.79 MiB

Package: nativefiledialog-extended-1.0.0-1.fc38
Summary: Native file dialog library with C and C++ bindings
RPMs:nativefiledialog-extended nativefiledialog-extended-devel
Size:172.67 KiB

[Bug 2119130] Please rebuild perl-Module-Loaded after perl-generators-1.14 lands to pick up perl(base) requirement

[bugzilla]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119130

Jitka Plesnikova  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
 Status|NEW |ASSIGNED




-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119130
___
perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue