Re: Heads up! OpenImageIO 2.4 series coming to rawhide

The side tag update has been submitted, feel free to update the release notes if you'd like. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-11f61b3a96 Thanks, Richard ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: status update on "ostree native containers"

On 9/27/22 5:08 PM, Colin Walters wrote: But back to Fedora CoreOS, another thing that's happened recently is https://github.com/coreos/coreos-layering-examples has matured and has many functional examples of using this. We're getting increasingly close to the point where I want to call this

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Fedora Source-git SIG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Fedora Source-git SIG on 2022-10-12 from 14:30:00 to 15:30:00 GMT At meet.google.com/mic-otnv-kse The meeting will be about: Meeting of the Fedora source-git SIG Agenda: https://pagure.io/fedora-source-git/sig/issues?tags=meeting=Open SIG

Re: DNF5 Blockers

On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 07:54, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 10/10/22 10:15, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required > for particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want > to resolve it? Commands has multiple

Orphaned some obsolete / unused (by me) Rust applications

Hi all, I have orphaned a few Rust applications that ended up unmaintained after Igor dropped his packages. I use none of these applications myself, having a maintainer that actually uses these packages would be great. However, some of the orphaned packages have dead upstreams - it might be good

Re: Handle sysroot.readyonly=true migration in other rpm-ostree Fedora(s)

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022, at 7:41 AM, Antonio Murdaca wrote: > Hi folks, in rpm-ostree based systems like fedora iot I would love to > handle the migration process similar to what happens today in > silverblue et all wrt sysroot.readonly >

Re: DNF5 Blockers

On 10/10/22 10:15, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want to resolve it? Commands has multiple options and some of them could be unused. Specially repoquery has

Re: DNF5 Blockers

On 10/11/22 15:17, Stephen Smoogen wrote: On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 07:54, Panu Matilainen > wrote: On 10/10/22 10:15, Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for particular command? Why is it

Orphaning rubygem-{Platform,POpen4}

Hi, I have orphaned rubygem-Platform and rubygem-POpen4, because I don't use them and nothing should depend on these. Vít OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

[Test-Announce] Fedora-IoT 37 RC 20221011.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora-IoT 37 RC 20221011.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see:

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:27:52 +0200 Dominik Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 11 October 2022 at 11:18, Luna Jernberg wrote: > > On 10/11/22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > Hi! > > > It seems that s390x builds in koji are not progressing. At the time of > > > writing, I can see ~150

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:15:35 +0200 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi! > It seems that s390x builds in koji are not progressing. At the time of > writing, I can see ~150 s390x buildArch tasks in "free" state. I've > opened https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11079 to track this issue. and we

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

This might be related: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/CLWFDN22YDF65R33BB3ZRSZHBZOE2LCK/ On 10/11/22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > Hi! > It seems that s390x builds in koji are not progressing. At the time of > writing, I can

Re: [INPUT REQUESTED] Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)

Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:04 AM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Sun, Oct 09, 2022 at 10:58:58PM +0200, Dan Čermák wrote: > > > There's another potential upgrade issue: We have multiple choices of > > > how to upgrade from the nodejs package to the nodejsXX packages: > > > 1) Upgrading from

Fedora 37 compose report: 20221010.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-37-20221009.n.0 NEW: Fedora-37-20221010.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 6 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size of upgraded

Re: rpm pulls in a dependency on perl in a noarch subpackage

V Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 04:31:31PM +, Mattia Verga via devel napsal(a): > Il 10/10/22 15:46, Petr Pisar ha scritto: > > I'm now facing a build failure on EPEL, which I can't figure out: > >> /usr/bin/ld: lilxml.o (symbol from plugin): undefined reference to > >> symbol

Re: ** s390x builders Outage **

and we should be running again at almost full capacity On 10/10/22, Tomas Hrcka wrote: > There is an ongoing BOS power outage impacting s390x builders. > > Reason for outage: Power outage in the DC > > > -- > Tomas Hrcka > role: CPE Team - Senior Software Engineer > fas: humaton > freenode:

Orphaned rubygem-arel

Arel used to be independent package, but has been bundled into ActiveRecord and it is not maintained independently anymore, therefore I am orphaning rubygem-arel. Vít OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ devel mailing list

stuck s390x builds in koji

Hi! It seems that s390x builds in koji are not progressing. At the time of writing, I can see ~150 s390x buildArch tasks in "free" state. I've opened https://pagure.io/releng/issue/11079 to track this issue. Regards, Dominik -- Fedora https://getfedora.org | RPM Fusion http://rpmfusion.org

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

On Tuesday, 11 October 2022 at 11:18, Luna Jernberg wrote: > On 10/11/22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > Hi! > > It seems that s390x builds in koji are not progressing. At the time of > > writing, I can see ~150 s390x buildArch tasks in "free" state. I've > > opened

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:18:12 +0200 Luna Jernberg wrote: > This might be related: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/CLWFDN22YDF65R33BB3ZRSZHBZOE2LCK/ right, the builders are not running yet Dan > On 10/11/22, Dominik

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

On Tuesday, 11 October 2022 at 11:27, Dan Horák wrote: > On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:18:12 +0200 > Luna Jernberg wrote: > > On 10/11/22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > > > Hi! > > > It seems that s390x builds in koji are not progressing. At the time of > > > writing, I can see ~150 s390x

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20221010.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20221009.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20221010.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 46 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:0 B Size

Re: DNF5 Blockers

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:48:14AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:15 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > > > Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for > > particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want to > >

Re: [side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

> Oh, also I forgot to mention... > > If your sidetag is deleted, you can just request a new one, tag the old > builds back into it and be back in business. I realize that that could > be anoying if you told people a specific one and then had to make a new > one, but it's not like those builds

Re: DNF5 Blockers

On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 9:15 AM Jaroslav Mracek wrote: > > Please can you be more specific which kind of functionality is required for > particular command? Why is it important to know what user case you want to > resolve it? Commands has multiple options and some of them could be unused. >

soname bump (Rawhide): libtraceevent libtracefs kernelshark

Hi, I'm updating libtraceevent, libtracefs to newer versions and rebuilding the dependencies libtracecmd, trace-cmd, kernelshark. This caused soname bump as the following libtraceevent.so to 1.6.3 libtracefs.so to 1.5.0 And also the following from kernelshark, although they are expected not

Any updates on Cassandra / MongoDB / Groovy?

Hey devel list! Anyone knows how to update the contents of our Fedora Developer Portal pages? Already asked once here: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/N3VCUO7KB72GBTEIE5DDLQDY7RQDOF7F/ Deprecation changes announced here:

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Thanks ! Guess I'll take it then. Le 10/10/2022 à 22:04, Miro Hrončok a écrit : On 10. 10. 22 21:05, Lyes Saadi wrote: Does anyone know what happened to python-yapsy? https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2866 ___ devel mailing list --

Re: [INPUT REQUESTED] Re: F38 proposal: Node.js Repackaging (Self-Contained Change proposal)

I have not used nodejs for development in quite a while so cannot respond from an involved user perspective. Given that context, I concur with Dan's reasoning and choices. On a more meta note, Fedora has at least 3 mechanisms to provide multiple versions of some component for a given release -

Re: stuck s390x builds in koji

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022 at 11:35:45AM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Tuesday, 11 October 2022 at 11:27, Dan Horák wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 11:18:12 +0200 > > Luna Jernberg wrote: > > > On 10/11/22, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski > > > wrote: > > > > Hi! > > > > It seems

Re: [side tags] Undesired automatic side-tag removal happened - how to deal with it in the future?

Zdenek Dohnal kirjoitti 10.10.2022 klo 11.17: However the side tag: f38-build-side-58658 got automatically deleted, even when it had builds connected to it already. Documentation [1] does not mention any automatic side-tags cleanup and its deadlines. [1]

Re: Fedora Developer Portal update

On 10/11/22 20:15, Jarek Prokop wrote: Hi all, Fedora Developer Portal has a new update, it should be visible in a few hours. Most notable changes: Website:   * The "Edit this page" and "Report an issue" buttons spawn a new tab instead of redirecting now. Updates:   *

Fedora Developer Portal update

Hi all, Fedora Developer Portal has a new update, it should be visible in a few hours. Most notable changes: Website:   * The "Edit this page" and "Report an issue" buttons spawn a new tab instead of redirecting now. Updates:   *

Re: status update on "ostree native containers"

I've been following the development of the ostree native containers pretty closely, first as a member of the CoreOS team and now as a member of the RHEL for Edge team, but never had a chance to really try it myself. So I took a few hours here and there over the last few days to build a small

Re: Donate 1 minute of your time to test upgrades from F36 to F37

Added --allowerasing I'll have to wait for the 'beid-release', usually a few weeks after the official Fedora-release. Removing dependent packages: gufw noarch 21.04.0-2@rpmsphere-noarch

Re: status update on "ostree native containers"

On Tue, Oct 11, 2022, at 4:22 PM, Micah Abbott wrote: > So I took a few hours here and there over the last few days to build a > small project using the ostree native container functionality. I wanted > to create a variant of Fedora CoreOS (FCOS) that has the Image Builder >

[Bug 2133972] New: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.55 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133972 Bug ID: 2133972 Summary: perl-DateTime-TimeZone-2.55 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-DateTime-TimeZone Keywords: FutureFeature,

[Bug 2133973] New: perl-IPC-Shareable-1.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133973 Bug ID: 2133973 Summary: perl-IPC-Shareable-1.13 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-IPC-Shareable Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 2133973] perl-IPC-Shareable-1.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133973 --- Comment #1 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Scratch build failed. Details below: BuilderException: Build failed: Command '['rpmbuild', '-D', '_sourcedir .', '-D', '_topdir .', '-bs', '/var/tmp/thn-0k488abx/perl-IPC-Shareable.spec']'

[Bug 2133462] perl-No-Worries-1.7-4.fc38 FTBFS with perl-URI-5.13-1.fc38: t/1syslog.t crashes with: uri_escape: Invalid [] range "0-\x1f" in regex

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133462 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|lionel.c...@cern.ch |jples...@redhat.com CC|

[rpms/perl-URI] PR #2: 5.14 bump

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-URI` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 5.14 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-URI/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Help needed with running tests in mock chroot

Hi, I'm stuck at trying to get tests to run for a Python package I submitted for review [1]. During build the package generates skmisc/__config__.py, which is needed by pytest. I copied it over from %pyproject_build_lib/skmisc only to hit another ImportError: E ModuleNotFoundError: No

Re: Python 3.12 pathfix.py removal

On 11. 10. 22 11:47, Miro Hrončok wrote: Hello Pythonistas, The pathfix.py script has been removed from future Python 3.12: https://discuss.python.org/t/remove-outdated-tools-scripts-scripts/19571 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/98167 In Fedora, we package it to python3-devel as

Re: Help needed with running tests in mock chroot

This is the classic issue where the “un-built” package gets imported instead of the “built” one in the buildroot that you are trying to test. I had some luck executing the tests, but ran into a BLAS linking issue that I did not have time to investigate fully. Please see

Re: Python 3.12 pathfix.py removal

Hi, Some background on pathfix.py. On Fedora, pathfix.py is available as /usr/bin/pathfix.py but also /usr/bin/pathfixX.Y.py where X.Y is the Python version (ex: pathfix3.10.py). So it's an executable program (implemented in Python). Yep, I just removed pathfix.py from Python 3.12, as part of

[Bug 1435834] Package perl-Carton for EPEL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1435834 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|NEW

[Bug 2133140] perl-Term-ProgressBar-2.23 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133140 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2133462] perl-No-Worries-1.7-4.fc38 FTBFS with perl-URI-5.13-1.fc38: t/1syslog.t crashes with: uri_escape: Invalid [] range "0-\x1f" in regex

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133462 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-URI-5.14-1.fc38 -- You are

[Bug 2133462] perl-No-Worries-1.7-4.fc38 FTBFS with perl-URI-5.13-1.fc38: t/1syslog.t crashes with: uri_escape: Invalid [] range "0-\x1f" in regex

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133462 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2133562] perl-URI-5.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133562 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 8 Modules get the axe on Halloween 2022

V Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 12:54:44PM -0500, Carl George napsal(a): > One of the biggest problems with modularity in EPEL is the our current > implementation doesn't allow requiring modules from another build > system [0][1]. Has some other third party implementation solved this? > And more

[Bug 2133562] perl-URI-5.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133562 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC|caillon+fedoraproject@gmail | |.com,

[rpms/perl-URI] PR #2: 5.14 bump

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-URI` that you are following: `` 5.14 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-URI/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Python 3.12 pathfix.py removal

Hello Pythonistas, The pathfix.py script has been removed from future Python 3.12: https://discuss.python.org/t/remove-outdated-tools-scripts-scripts/19571 https://github.com/python/cpython/pull/98167 In Fedora, we package it to python3-devel as /usr/bin/pathfix.py and we use it in:

[Bug 2099988] Please branch and build perl-Parallel-ForkManager in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2099988 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |ERRATA Status|ON_QA

[EPEL-devel] [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: EPEL Steering Committee on 2022-10-12 from 16:00:00 to 17:00:00 US/Eastern At fedora-meet...@irc.libera.chat The meeting will be about: This is the weekly EPEL Steering Committee Meeting. A general agenda is the following: #topic aloha

[Bug 2132803] perl-URI-5.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2132803 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-b3a70737cb has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2133562] perl-URI-5.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133562 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2133865] New: perl-URI-5.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133865 Bug ID: 2133865 Summary: perl-URI-5.15 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-URI Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 2133462] perl-No-Worries-1.7-4.fc38 FTBFS with perl-URI-5.13-1.fc38: t/1syslog.t crashes with: uri_escape: Invalid [] range "0-\x1f" in regex

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133462 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: Dropping modules from EPEL-8. Not adding modules to EPEL-9

On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:50 AM Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > > On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 17:08, Stephen Smoogen wrote: > >> >> When EPEL-8 was launched, it came with some support for modules with the >> hope that a module ecosystem could be built from Fedora packages using RHEL >> modules as an

[EPEL-devel] Re: Proposal: Dropping modules from EPEL-8. Not adding modules to EPEL-9

On Tue, 11 Oct 2022 at 14:34, Troy Dawson wrote: > On Thu, Oct 6, 2022 at 8:50 AM Stephen Smoogen > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 at 17:08, Stephen Smoogen >> wrote: >> >>> >>> When EPEL-8 was launched, it came with some support for modules with the >>> hope that a module ecosystem

Re: Help needed with running tests in mock chroot

On 11-10-2022 16:20, Ben Beasley wrote: This is the classic issue where the “un-built” package gets imported instead of the “built” one in the buildroot that you are trying to test. I had some luck executing the tests, but ran into a BLAS linking issue that I did not have time to investigate

[Bug 2133865] perl-URI-5.15 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2133865 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added CC|caillon+fedoraproject@gmail | |.com,