I didn't mean to say that using a VM was a bad thing. It's an obvious
improvement over mock. Attacks that elevate to root in the host are
in the realm of highly theoretical at the moment.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
New in Fedora 11:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 09:45 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
One use of features (and I don't want to say the only one!!!) is for
marketing
purposes. And actually - it works! I read several Fedora reviews, people
talking
about nice new features in Fedora they installed - but that feature
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 09:45 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
One use of features (and I don't want to say the only one!!!) is for
marketing
purposes. And actually - it works! I read several Fedora reviews, people
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Toshio Kuratomi a.bad...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:48:26AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
so are all these bugs, for that matter: they're actual bugs encountered
by
18:53:17 ajax i've heard a modest amount of complaints that abrt is doing
more harm than good
18:53:53 ajax along multiple axes, but in particular it's simply too much
data for apps like firefox and evo for maintainers to respond to
18:54:22 ajax i don't have any particular suggestions for
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661472
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 12/09/2010 10:55 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 12/09/2010 10:38 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
18:53:17ajax i've heard a modest amount of complaints that abrt is
doing more harm than good
18:53:53ajax along multiple axes, but in particular it's simply too
much data for apps like firefox and
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 11:18 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote:
Is there a compelling reason for this not to be:
- cups snmp backend says to the firewall, hey, please allow
responses on this port I've got
- cups snmp backend listens for responses until timeout
- cups snmp backend says to the
On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then once
(or some other threshold):)
Dont we loose hard to catch odd ball bugs if that's implemented?
JBG
--
Compose started at Thu Dec 9 08:15:04 UTC 2010
Broken deps for x86_64
--
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0()(64bit)
beagle-0.3.9-19.fc14.x86_64 requires libmono.so.0(VER_1)(64bit)
On 12/09/2010 01:08 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then once
(or some other threshold):)
Dont we loose hard to
On 12/09/2010 01:27 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 12/09/2010 01:08 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then once
(or
On 12/09/2010 02:04 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/09/2010 01:27 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 12/09/2010 01:08 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
ABRT to allow reporting the bug
PR == Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com writes:
PR My understanding was that if it was blocked it had to go through
PR review again.
Depends on how long:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers
Re-review required for older packages
If a package was last
On 12/09/2010 02:59 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 12/09/2010 02:04 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/09/2010 01:27 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 12/09/2010 01:08 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally
Here are the latest set of changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines:
---
A new page has been added which describes how to deal with bundled
libraries when you find them in your package:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Treatment_Of_Bundled_Libraries
---
Some clarification has been
On 12/09/2010 08:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
snip
- debuginfo-install is just a fallback if ABRT fails to retrieve the
debuginfo itself (and ABRT doesn't need the root privs, as is *does not*
install the packages, it just unpacks them)
snip
Jirka
Currently, abrt says the debuginfo packages
Here's some of my pet irritations with abrt. Feel free to add your own,
but please keep the gratuitous me tooing to a minimum.
1) The generated reports contain far too little information for library
owners. Consider this report:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658013
I get the
On 12/09/2010 03:52 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/09/2010 02:59 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 12/09/2010 02:04 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/09/2010 01:27 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 12/09/2010 01:08 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
Just a
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 10:51 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote:
Here's some of my pet irritations with abrt. Feel free to add your own,
but please keep the gratuitous me tooing to a minimum.
1) The generated reports contain far too little information for library
owners. Consider this report:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660952
--- Comment #7 from Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com 2010-12-09 11:09:06
EST ---
(In reply to comment #6)
There is some
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Math-Base36:
3af1a961e45c0e367e78685a518f5dde Math-Base36-0.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 025e40e0fd505d71a4c3cececa57d510818ec4dc
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Dec 9 17:18:03 2010 +0100
update to 0.09
.gitignore|1 +
perl-Math-Base36.spec |7 +--
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Gathering the RFEs at: https://fedorahosted.org/abrt/wiki/Wishlist
On 12/09/2010 04:51 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
Here's some of my pet irritations with abrt. Feel free to add your own,
but please keep the gratuitous me tooing to a minimum.
1) The generated reports contain far too little
Le Jeu 9 décembre 2010 15:52, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
It has never done so for me (on fedora 13 + fedora 14). ABRT always
instructs me to run debuginfo-install, which will fail for obvious
reasons in a normal user environment and thus requires me to become root
(On real ordinary user
On 12/09/2010 05:31 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 9 décembre 2010 15:52, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
It has never done so for me (on fedora 13 + fedora 14). ABRT always
instructs me to run debuginfo-install, which will fail for obvious
reasons in a normal user environment and thus requires
* Jiri Moskovcak [09/12/2010 17:42] :
so, can we call the RFE: attach backtrace even when dupe is found ?
- Always attach backtrace
- Do not do so in Bugzilla
Emmanuel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
commit c6ad27627536ec9617cb741fa41082dd45b3d878
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Dec 9 17:48:58 2010 +0100
update to latest upstream version
- fixes FTBFS RHBZ#660763
- clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
.gitignore |1 +
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-POE-Component-SNMP:
9a2ef36ca0c40e030f0af35174a67172 POE-Component-SNMP-1.1006.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit f33c61364c51efc5de6e261f33aa52a2ea2d6a93
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Dec 9 17:55:48 2010 +0100
update to 1.1006
- fixes FTBFS RHBZ#660832
- clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
.gitignore |1 +
perl-POE-Component-SNMP.spec | 17
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660763
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for
perl-POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP:
5bbb34dd9525e2c5a93d0199338ded91 POE-Component-Server-SimpleHTTP-2.06.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
commit 03490fd04bffce74665296071d8f1570f78939fa
Author: Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com
Date: Thu Dec 9 18:03:42 2010 +0100
update to 2.06
- fixes FTBFS RHBZ#660836
- clean up spec for modern rpmbuild
.gitignore|1 +
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:08 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then once
(or some other threshold):)
Dont we
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660832
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:20 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
4) Reporting to bugzilla without being able to scrape the bz username
and password out of the firefox credential store is just cruel.
- added as: share bz credential with other apps
- not sure if we can share the credentials with
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:36 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
so, can we call the RFE: attach backtrace even when dupe is found ?
or, cooler, 'attach backtrace even when dupe is found *if current
backtrace is better than any already attached to the bug*'.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660836
Iain Arnell iarn...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 10:38 AM, Tomas Mraz tm...@redhat.com wrote:
18:53:17 ajax i've heard a modest amount of complaints that abrt is doing
more harm than good
18:53:53 ajax along multiple axes, but in particular it's simply too much
data for apps like firefox and evo for maintainers to
Adam Williamson wrote:
Could we turn this into 'use the same reporting system as selinux'? It's
absurd that they use different ones, you should merge them.
Something like: *cough* Event Log *cough* ;)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 12/09/2010 06:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:36 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
so, can we call the RFE: attach backtrace even when dupe is found ?
or, cooler, 'attach backtrace even when dupe is found *if current
backtrace is better than any already attached to the
On 12/09/2010 06:10 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:20 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
4) Reporting to bugzilla without being able to scrape the bz username
and password out of the firefox credential store is just cruel.
- added as: share bz credential with other apps
- not
I'm building Audacious 2.4.2 in Rawhide, and once available in the koji build
root, this will require rebuilds of the separate _plugin_ packages.
The tools/apps linked with Audacious' core libraries are not affected:
audtty
conky
2.4.2 is the first maintenance release in the [supposed to be
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 18:24 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 12/09/2010 06:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:36 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
so, can we call the RFE: attach backtrace even when dupe is found ?
or, cooler, 'attach backtrace even when dupe is found *if
On Thursday 09 December 2010, Tom Callaway wrote:
The guidelines have been updated to indicate that %doc files must not
have executable permissions.
Why? If they (example scripts etc) don't add any dependencies that aren't
already in the package's dependency chain, what is the problem solved
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:20 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
2) I really dislike that local trace generation and retrace server
are discussed as though they're the only options. If nothing else, for
many non-trivial apps where abrt is potentially of the most use the core
you're uploading can
On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 09:29:10PM +0100, Till Maas wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 08:39:50PM -0600, BJ Dierkes wrote:
All three pieces follow each release meaning, when 0.8.12 (current stable)
was released... new tarbals were released for all three. The reason for
separate tarbals is
On 12/09/2010 07:46 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:20 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
2) I really dislike that local trace generation and retrace server
are discussed as though they're the only options. If nothing else, for
many non-trivial apps where abrt is potentially of
It's that time of year again. I'm heading off to Antarctica again,
which means I'll effectively be unavailable to do any meaningful
Fedora related work.
Since I went through this last year, most if not all of my packages
should have coverage with existing co-maintainers. I'll be checking in
which
On 12/09/2010 12:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 12:08 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make
ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then
biosdevname, now version 0.3.3.
I re-added the PCI IRQ Routing Table lookup code. This is used as a
fallback, in the event system BIOS doesn't provide index and label
information in a way we can get at via sysfs, or via reading SMBIOS
directly. This is necessary as quite a few systems I want to
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654773
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Am Dienstag, den 07.12.2010, 13:29 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
Pdfmerge: Command line utility program for merging PDF files
Took the ownership for that one. Co-Maintainers welcome. :)
Regards,
Dominic
--
Dominic Hopf dma...@googlemail.com
http://dominichopf.de/
Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC
This plugin did not work as I had hoped it would, and I have no use for
it anymore.
pghmcfc was a co-maintainer, and is welcome to take it over, more
co-maintainers welcome as well.
--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
--
devel mailing list
Yesterday Miloslav Trma said:
Curtis Doty píÿÿe v St 08. 12. 2010 v 01:02 -0800:
Monday Miloslav Trma said:
Just disable the firewall and you'll get pretty much equivalent
functionality.
How? Now that the filter table and stateful connection tracking, aren't
modules anymore. They now
On Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:39:24 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 12/09/2010 07:46 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
I have trouble following what you're saying here. At what point does
one need to read the whole debuginfo file?
I'm referring to this:
Ville Skyttä ville.sky...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thursday 09 December 2010, Tom Callaway wrote:
The guidelines have been updated to indicate that %doc files must not
have executable permissions.
Why? If they (example scripts etc) don't add any dependencies that aren't
already in the package's
On 12/09/2010 07:43 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Thursday 09 December 2010, Tom Callaway wrote:
The guidelines have been updated to indicate that %doc files must not
have executable permissions.
Why?
The issue Spot tries to address with this change, is to prevent rpm's
dependency tracking
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Thursday 09 December 2010, Tom Callaway wrote:
The guidelines have been updated to indicate that %doc files must not
have executable permissions.
Why? If they (example scripts etc) don't add any dependencies that aren't
already in the
On 12/10/2010 07:03 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 1:43 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Thursday 09 December 2010, Tom Callaway wrote:
The guidelines have been updated to indicate that %doc files must not
have executable permissions.
Why? If they (example scripts etc) don't add
commit 767a83c24cef072a725d57ff118e97bddcf7bbad
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Dec 9 09:14:45 2010 +0100
- Add BR: perl(CGI) (Fix FTBFS: BZ 660972).
perl-Test-MockObject.spec |6 +-
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660972
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661472
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit 9cc0b2a63ba8a8c1f75842f49e13deee805c361b
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Thu Dec 9 10:15:18 2010 +0100
- Pass vendordirs to Build.PL (Fix FTBFS: BZ 661044).
perl-Module-Starter-Plugin-CGIApp.spec | 11 ++-
1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 5
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661470
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661044
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit e2c1e9853d35d7b6a5ef0e8cf1eda741222b877b
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Dec 9 10:30:01 2010 +0100
Fix changelog entry for 0.74-1
perl-Padre.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/perl-Padre.spec b/perl-Padre.spec
index
commit 5d12798ba4bbaef0b4b4b8cc907096c8c3b4803a
Author: Petr Písař ppi...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Dec 9 10:29:26 2010 +0100
0.76 bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Padre.spec | 21 -
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
---
diff
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Class-XSAccessor:
e5640b633c451c14ef7dfc289733e0b5 Class-XSAccessor-1.11.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 9c8bff541f52784fb4a72048253ae986afddf09e
Author: Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com
Date: Thu Dec 9 10:44:59 2010 +0100
v1.11 release bump
.gitignore |1 +
perl-Class-XSAccessor.spec |5 -
sources|2 +-
3 files changed, 6
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661470
Petr Sabata psab...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
commit bff48884d12b9b13c6c0a2b8f95c2a6f1da37c74
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Thu Dec 9 11:31:38 2010 +
Update to 1.36
- New upstream release 1.36:
- update documentation for SSL_verify_callback based on
CPAN RT#63743 and CPAN RT#63740
.gitignore
The lightweight tag 'perl-IO-Socket-SSL-1.36-1.fc15' was created pointing to:
bff4888... Update to 1.36
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/07/2010 04:57 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
I applied the patch in September, because I completely forgot about that
email. The idea was install all modules into core directory
/usr/lib64/perl5 or /usr/share/perl5. The
On 12/09/2010 02:27 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/07/2010 04:57 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
If core and vendor are the same as it is in F-14, then it's non-existent
module looked up twice in the same path without luck.
So, my
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 02:35:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/09/2010 02:27 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/07/2010 04:57 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
If core and vendor are the same as it is in F-14, then it's
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660952
Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661088
Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=658973
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
On 12/09/2010 03:01 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Thu, Dec 09, 2010 at 02:35:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/09/2010 02:27 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 05:19:34PM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 12/07/2010 04:57 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
If core and vendor are the same
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661052
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Test-Class:
9d33a80215754b4e5234e9116088f403 Test-Class-0.36.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 4d9e3df05f0d36456a0b58bc8458269bf803b32e
Author: Ralf Corsépius corse...@fedoraproject.org
Date: Fri Dec 10 06:57:03 2010 +0100
- Update to 0.36 (Fix FTBFS: BZ 661059).
- Update Source0-URL.
- Cleanup BuildRequires/Requires, spec-file overhaul.
.gitignore |1 +
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661059
Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=630644
--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppi...@redhat.com 2010-12-10 02:01:12 EST ---
It still cannot find the development files because
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=631323
Marcela Mašláňová mmasl...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
86 matches
Mail list logo
