Re: Review swaps

Il 27/05/2015 18:04, gil ha scritto: Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto: I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more will be coming). There are some interdependencies, noted below: 1. gap-p

Re: libvpx got soname bump and no one noticed?

Marcin: Oh. You said you upgraed to Rawhide. But you seems not actually using Rawhide repos. -robin On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Robin Lee wrote: > Marcin: > > You should update rpmfusion-free-relase. And run 'dnf downgrade > ffmpeg-libs'. > > There is no 'branched' repos in RPMFusion. And

Re: libvpx got soname bump and no one noticed?

Marcin: You should update rpmfusion-free-relase. And run 'dnf downgrade ffmpeg-libs'. There is no 'branched' repos in RPMFusion. And before f22 is released, you are actually using the 'rawhide' repos of RPMFusion. But After f22 released, RPMFusion f22 repos is then finally branched and the yum re

Re: libvpx got soname bump and no one noticed?

On Wed, 27 May 2015 22:39:30 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote: > F22 got released so I upgraded my machine from F22 to rawhide. But as > usual it meant rebuilding rpmfusion packages (as they do not support > rawhide). > > All went quite good. Except installing: > > Error: package ffmpeg-libs-2.

Re: New content (Was: Re: Reminder: Fedora 20 end of life on 2015-06-23)

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:51:37PM +0300, Antti Järvinen wrote: > May is ending soon, > 4 months to go before October. Say, if I have a new package in package Yep — time goes fast! The F23 schedule is at . > review in hopes of finding a sponsor

No extra-backgrounds for Fedora 22

Hi, just a short question: Did I miss something or are there (currently) no extra-backgrounds for Fedora 22 (f22-backgrounds-extras) in the repos? -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

libvpx got soname bump and no one noticed?

F22 got released so I upgraded my machine from F22 to rawhide. But as usual it meant rebuilding rpmfusion packages (as they do not support rawhide). All went quite good. Except installing: Error: package ffmpeg-libs-2.6.2-3.fc23.x86_64 requires libvpx.so.2()(64bit), but none of the providers

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2015-05-28 16:00 UTC) Follow-ups: 4, New: 3

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2015-05-28 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2015-05-28 09:00 Thu US/Pacific PDT 2015-05-28 12:00 Thu US/Eastern EDT 2015-05-28 1

Re: New content (Was: Re: Reminder: Fedora 20 end of life on 2015-06-23)

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 9:51 PM, Antti Järvinen wrote: > Matthew Miller writes: > > So, here's a question With F21 released December 9, but F23 > > scheduled for October*, if we go with the normal one month overlap, > > that means the total F21 livespan will be only 11 months. We often tell

New content (Was: Re: Reminder: Fedora 20 end of life on 2015-06-23)

Matthew Miller writes: > So, here's a question With F21 released December 9, but F23 > scheduled for October*, if we go with the normal one month overlap, > that means the total F21 livespan will be only 11 months. We often tell May is ending soon, 4 months to go before October. Say, if I

Re: Reminder: Fedora 20 end of life on 2015-06-23

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > This next time around, do we want to say "and > 'about' sometimes means 11!", or do we instead want to EOL in December > (or even January)? > It seems like we almost always end up going long by at least a few weeks, so I wouldn't expect the

Re: Reminder: Fedora 20 end of life on 2015-06-23

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 2:50 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:55:04AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> Fedora 20 will reach end of life on 2015-06-23, and no further updates >> will be pushed out after that time. Additionally, with the recent >> release of Fedora 22, no new pa

Re: Reminder: Fedora 20 end of life on 2015-06-23

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 11:55:04AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Fedora 20 will reach end of life on 2015-06-23, and no further updates > will be pushed out after that time. Additionally, with the recent > release of Fedora 22, no new packages will be added to the Fedora 20 > collection. So, here

Reminder: Fedora 20 end of life on 2015-06-23

Greetings. This is a reminder email about the end of life process for Fedora 20. Fedora 20 will reach end of life on 2015-06-23, and no further updates will be pushed out after that time. Additionally, with the recent release of Fedora 22, no new packages will be added to the Fedora 20 collection

Re: Fedora 22 Dispplay with stripes

On 05/27/2015 05:27 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: Video card: Slot: 00:02.0 Class: VGA compatible controller Vendor: Intel Corporation Device: 82945G/GZ Integrated Graphics Controller SVendor:Elitegroup Computer Systems SDevice:Device 1b76 Rev:02 Driver: i915 Module: i915 W

Re: Review swaps

Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto: I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more will be coming). There are some interdependencies, noted below: 1. gap-pkg-autpgrp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

Re: Review swaps

Il 27/05/2015 17:28, Jerry James ha scritto: I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more will be coming). There are some interdependencies, noted below: 1. gap-pkg-autpgrp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

Review swaps

I'm working toward supporting GAP's HAP package, which is used by sagemath. I need reviews for some of the foundational packages (more will be coming). There are some interdependencies, noted below: 1. gap-pkg-autpgrp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1205777 No dependencies. 2. g

Re: Fedora 22 Dispplay with stripes

2015-05-12 12:27 GMT-03:00 Sergio Belkin : > > 2015-05-12 12:16 GMT-03:00 Samuel Sieb : >> >> On 05/12/2015 07:29 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: >>> >>> I'm trying Fedora 22 and shows randomly stripes, my info: >>> >> It didn't do this with F21?  Can you describe the effect more or take a >> picture?  I

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 05:07:52PM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote: > > Having keywords makes the search functionality much > > better, but isn't actually required for your application to be shown > > in the software center. > What would they add that's not found within the RPM package %description >

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

On Wed, May 27, 2015 at 10:11:55AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > Crazy idea... > Could keywords be pulled from tagger which have been upvoted to a > specific level? Hah, yes, this. :) -- Matthew Miller Fedora Project Leader -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedor

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

Crazy idea... Could keywords be pulled from tagger which have been upvoted to a specific level? Thanks, Richard -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

On Wed, 27 May 2015 12:47:04 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > It's not only the "green" applications that make the cut, the amber > ones go in too. Okay. Glad to hear we're not supposed to "fix" something like that post release. > Having keywords makes the search functionality much > better, but i

Anyone uses centerim?

Hi, I'm wondering if anyone uses CenterIM? It hasn't seen an upstream update in a while. However, as long as it works and doesn't have unpatched known security issues I'd prefer keeping it in the package collection. If there's anyone who'd like to maintain the package, I'd be happy to pass it on

Re: system-config-users and IPA

I have finished the patch that allows to configure users and group on IPA server. I attached the patch to this letter. > > 14.05.2015, 17:08, "Мартынов Александр" : >>  Hello. I is still making the patch for system-config-users. And I would >> still like the changes be included in the system-conf

Re: Contact info for FAS user: vicodan

On 05/27/2015 02:51 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote: Does someone know how to contact viciodan? My last attempt to contact him was a year ago and it was also unsuccessful. His last Fedora package commits are two years ago. I tracked him down to github[1] and YouTube[2] (via Google+[3]). You may

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

On 27 May 2015 at 11:57, Michael Schwendt wrote: > It kinda sucks that you list a "No keywords in .desktop file" warning > for almost all packages even if they meet the packaging guidelines and > the specific requirements of the F22 development cycle, i.e. running > "appstream-util validate-relax"

rawhide report: 20150527 changes

Compose started at Wed May 27 05:15:03 UTC 2015 Broken deps for i386 -- [OpenTK] OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc22.noarch requires mono(mscorlib) = 0:2.0.0.0 OpenTK-1.1-1.4c.fc22.noarch requires mono(System.Xml) = 0:2.0.0.0 OpenTK-1

rebasehelper 0.5.0 version

Hi beginners and developers, we are happy to announce that we released new rebase-helper version 0.5.0. GitHub [1]. There are several new features and bugfixes. New features: - building packages with fedpkg. - rebases are now done by git rebase command. - all operations with local git repositori

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

On Tue, 26 May 2015 16:33:19 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/screenshots/f22/matrix.html It kinda sucks that you list a "No keywords in .desktop file" warning for almost all packages even if they meet the packaging guidelines and the specific requirements of th

Re: Rapid release for security updates

On 05/26/2015 06:22 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Tue, 2015-05-26 at 15:33 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: On 05/26/2015 12:10 PM, Andrew Haley wrote: Something needs to be done, but I'm not sure exactly what. IMO, all this should not be a problem, if collaborative maintenance works. What I

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

On 27 May 2015 at 09:32, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > Is it GUI only or is there any chance to get at least TUI apps? Some > as mc are pretty popular even in the group of GUI only users. I think mc fails quite a few of the criteria: https://github.com/hughsie/appstream-glib/blob/master/README.md -- a

Re: Fedora 22 and missing applications

- Original Message - > Quite a few people are going to be installing Fedora 22 in the coming > days, searching for things in the software center and not finding > their esoteric GUI tool. This is because some applications still don’t > ship AppData files, which have become compulsory in the

Contact info for FAS user: vicodan

Hi everyone, Fedora infrastructure is trying to reach the FAS user vicodan. The email address listed in FAS for this user does not correspond to a bugzilla account, while this user is a packager. We have been trying to contact him via the hotmail address set in FAS, but unsuccessfully. Does someo