On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 06:39:14PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 09/24/2015 05:47 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 24.9.2015 16:34, Kalev Lember wrote:
> >> python-Fionachurchyard, group::python-sig
> >
> >
> > This one cannot work with Fedora 23 due to GDAL 2. Feel free to
On 09/25/2015 02:18 PM, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Removed librtmp (what could go wrong?), now I get the following error:
>
> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux dnf[621]: Error: package
> kernel-core-4.1.7-200.fc22.x86_64 requires systemd >= 200, but none of
> the providers can be installed
> Sep 25 23:14:39
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 23:18 +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> Removed librtmp (what could go wrong?), now I get the following
> error:
>
> Sep 25 23:14:39 iMacLinux dnf[621]: Error: package
> kernel-core-4.1.7-200.fc22.x86_64 requires systemd >= 200, but none
> of
> the providers can be installed
> S
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 23:11 +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
> I got the following error, any idea what could be wrong?
>
> Sep 25 23:06:56 iMacLinux dnf[616]: Error: package
> librtmp-2.4-3.20131205.gitdc76f0a.fc22.x86_64 requires
> libgnutls.so.28()(64bit), but none of the providers can be installe
# F23 Blocker Review meeting
# Date: 2015-09-28
# Time: 1600 UTC
# Location: #fedora-blocker-review on irc.freenode.net
It's that time again: Blocker review time! We currently have 4 proposed
blockers for Final. It'd be good to meet and knock them out. Should be
a short meeting.
If you have time
On 25.09.2015 22:44, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 19:40:16 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
You could ask releng to add apitrace-libs to the multilib whitelist:
https://pagure.io/mash/new_issue
However, I have to wonder, why wouldn't the library have a -devel
package? Is there
2015-09-25 23:11 GMT+02:00 Andreas Tunek :
> 2015-09-23 20:39 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
>> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 07:47:58PM +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>>> 2015-09-23 0:16 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson :
>>> > On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 13:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>>> >> On Tue, Sep 2
2015-09-23 20:39 GMT+02:00 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek :
> On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 07:47:58PM +0200, Andreas Tunek wrote:
>> 2015-09-23 0:16 GMT+02:00 Adam Williamson :
>> > On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 13:33 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> >> On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 06:21:00PM +0100, Pádraig Brady wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 19:40:16 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> >> You could ask releng to add apitrace-libs to the multilib whitelist:
> >>
> >> https://pagure.io/mash/new_issue
> >>
> >> However, I have to wonder, why wouldn't the library have a -devel
> >> package? Is there no way to link against
* Matthew Miller:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:10:40AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Also, you might consider to ship the precompiled bytecode just
>> optionally, using recommends.
>>
>> On contrary, if you insist on shipping the bytecode, why you don't drop
>> the .py files? I see a lot of duplic
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 3:25 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 25.9.2015 v 16:15 Mathieu Bridon napsal(a):
> > (it is invaluable for learning and
> > debugging purposes to be able to read/edit the code).
>
> Come on, this is not an argument. We don't install source code for any
> other language which
Dne 25.9.2015 v 16:15 Mathieu Bridon napsal(a):
> On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 10:04 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:10:40AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> Also, you might consider to ship the precompiled bytecode just
>>> optionally, using recommends.
>>>
>>> On contrary, if you
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not 23 Branched 20150924
No images in 23 Branched 20150924 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 12 of 52
ID: 3596Test: x86_64 universal server_multi_empty
ID: 3593Test: x86_64 universal server_software_raid@uefi
ID: 3581
No missing expected images.
No images in this compose but not Rawhide 20150924
No images in Rawhide 20150924 but not this.
Failed openQA tests: 52 of 52
ID: 3591Test: x86_64 universal server_btrfs
ID: 3523Test: i386 kde_live default_install
ID: 3522Test: i386 workstation
Dne 25.9.2015 v 16:04 Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:10:40AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> Also, you might consider to ship the precompiled bytecode just
>> optionally, using recommends.
Just to be clear, not/optional shipping the bytecode is the preferred
method IMO
>
On 25.09.2015 17:44, Michael Schwendt wrote:
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:13:20 +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 13:03 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Is there any other option short of introducing a dummy -devel
package?
You could ask releng to add apitrace-libs to the multilib white
Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 12:02 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
>> Hello
>>
>> Got bug #1266181 filed about apitrace.i686 missing in the x86_64
>> repos.
>> The reporter probably meant apitrace-libs.i686, which in the past was
>> indeed installable on x86_64. Any ideas what the reas
On 09/25/2015 10:01 AM, Christopher Meng wrote:
> On 9/25/15, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:30:38AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>>> Maybe we could utilize weak dependencies here. The python-foo package
>>> would have only bytecompiled files and would Recommend
>>> python-fo
2015-09-25 13:05 GMT-03:00 Les Howell :
> All of that said, who do I contact at the users list to get that setup
> and working again?
The mailing [0]. The members of list will help.
0 - https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Albino
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 12:31 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Please use the 'users' list for non-development questions.
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
>
> Rich.
>
Hi, Richard,
Does the users list still exist? I received a note saying it
had too many bounces
On 9/25/15, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:30:38AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
>> Maybe we could utilize weak dependencies here. The python-foo package
>> would have only bytecompiled files and would Recommend
>> python-foo-sourcefiles. That way python-foo-sourcefiles would b
On 09/25/2015 10:04 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:10:40AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Also, you might consider to ship the precompiled bytecode just
optionally, using recommends.
On contrary, if you insist on shipping the bytecode, why you don't drop
the .py files? I see a
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 11:30:38AM -0400, Bohuslav Kabrda wrote:
> Maybe we could utilize weak dependencies here. The python-foo package
> would have only bytecompiled files and would Recommend
> python-foo-sourcefiles. That way python-foo-sourcefiles would be
> installed in standard setting, but i
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015 13:13:20 +0200, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 13:03 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> > Is there any other option short of introducing a dummy -devel
> > package?
>
> You could ask releng to add apitrace-libs to the multilib whitelist:
>
> https://pagure.io/mash
- Original Message -
> On 09/25/2015 08:36 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:09:50AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> >> It's nice to be able to edit the .py for testing without going through
> >> hoops or building/installing rpms.
> >
> > Right, but you know that if you'
On 09/25/2015 08:36 AM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:09:50AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
It's nice to be able to edit the .py for testing without going through
hoops or building/installing rpms.
Right, but you know that if you're doing that in /usr/lib, that's
*gross*, right
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 10:09:50AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
> It's nice to be able to edit the .py for testing without going through
> hoops or building/installing rpms.
Right, but you know that if you're doing that in /usr/lib, that's
*gross*, right? :)
--
Matthew Miller
Fedora Project L
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:26 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 16:17 +0200, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Matthew Miller
>> wrote:
>> > > On contrary, if you insist on shipping the bytecode, why you
>> > > don't drop
>> > > the .py files? I see a lot
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 16:17 +0200, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Matthew Miller
> wrote:
> > > On contrary, if you insist on shipping the bytecode, why you
> > > don't drop
> > > the .py files? I see a lot of duplication all around python
> > > packages
>
> Don't d
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:04 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
>> On contrary, if you insist on shipping the bytecode, why you don't drop
>> the .py files? I see a lot of duplication all around python packages
Don't do that, it has impact on functionality.
We did this for years [0], but you wonder h
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 10:04 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:10:40AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Also, you might consider to ship the precompiled bytecode just
> > optionally, using recommends.
> >
> > On contrary, if you insist on shipping the bytecode, why you don't
>
On Fri, 25 Sep 2015, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:10:40AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Also, you might consider to ship the precompiled bytecode just
optionally, using recommends.
On contrary, if you insist on shipping the bytecode, why you don't drop
the .py files? I see a lo
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 10:10:40AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Also, you might consider to ship the precompiled bytecode just
> optionally, using recommends.
>
> On contrary, if you insist on shipping the bytecode, why you don't drop
> the .py files? I see a lot of duplication all around python pa
On Fri, Sep 25, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:59:09AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
>> > cares?" adds up. If it *got* us anything in terms of functionality,
>> > okay, I can sell that to people, but for the base, this is just bloat.
>> Bummer. The
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 12:59:09AM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> > cares?" adds up. If it *got* us anything in terms of functionality,
> > okay, I can sell that to people, but for the base, this is just bloat.
> Bummer. The reason for libxkbcommon dependency is to be able to make
> su
Compose started at Fri Sep 25 07:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[apache-scout]
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires mvn(org.apache.juddi:uddi-ws)
apache-scout-1.2.6-11.fc21.noarch requires
mvn(org.apache.juddi:
mizdebsk set the koschei monitoring flag of perl-Test-Manifest to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Compose started at Fri Sep 25 05:15:03 UTC 2015
Broken deps for i386
--
[IQmol]
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_serialization.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0-9.fc24.i686 requires libboost_iostreams.so.1.58.0
IQmol-2.3.0
mizdebsk set the koschei monitoring flag of perl-Number-Compare to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
mizdebsk set the koschei monitoring flag of perl-Number-Tolerant to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
Please use the 'users' list for non-development questions.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
Fedora Windows cross-c
mizdebsk set the koschei monitoring flag of perl-MooseX-Traits-Pluggable to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
mizdebsk set the koschei monitoring flag of
perl-MooseX-Types-DateTime-MoreCoercions to True
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/perl-devel
On Thu, Sep 24, 2015 at 04:34:11PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
> mariadb-galera rohara, hhorak
[I'm not a maintainer of this one, except that I did the initial port
of galera to aarch64.]
The error is:
[mariadb-galera]
1:mariadb-galera-server-10.0.17-5.fc23.armv7hl requires galera
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 13:03 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Is there any other option short of introducing a dummy -devel
> package?
You could ask releng to add apitrace-libs to the multilib whitelist:
https://pagure.io/mash/new_issue
However, I have to wonder, why wouldn't the library have a -d
On 25.09.2015 12:19, Mathieu Bridon wrote:
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 12:02 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
Hello
Got bug #1266181 filed about apitrace.i686 missing in the x86_64
repos.
The reporter probably meant apitrace-libs.i686, which in the past was
indeed installable on x86_64. Any ideas what the
On Fri, 2015-09-25 at 12:02 +0200, Sandro Mani wrote:
> Hello
>
> Got bug #1266181 filed about apitrace.i686 missing in the x86_64
> repos.
> The reporter probably meant apitrace-libs.i686, which in the past was
> indeed installable on x86_64. Any ideas what the reasons can be that
> the package
Hello
Got bug #1266181 filed about apitrace.i686 missing in the x86_64 repos.
The reporter probably meant apitrace-libs.i686, which in the past was
indeed installable on x86_64. Any ideas what the reasons can be that the
package disappeared? Suppose something about the "mash" step, but that's
I would like to announce that Koschei [1], a continous intagration
system for Fedora packages, has just been updated to a new version,
which includes several new features and fixes multiple bugs.
Summary of most important user-visible changes follows.
Group management has been improved. Users can
On 24/09/15 05:54 PM, Les Howell wrote:
> On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 14:59 -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
>> This isn't the right place to be asking this question. The users
>> list
>> or IRC would be better.
>>
>> On 09/24/2015 02:35 PM, Les Howell wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2015-09-24 at 14:07 -0700, Samuel Sieb
50 matches
Mail list logo
