Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 20:14 +, Samuel Rakitničan wrote: > Strange error with camotics: > > Error: > Problem: package cairo-devel-1.15.10-2.fc28.x86_64 requires > pkgconfig(gobject-2.0), but none of the providers can be installed > - conflict

Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection (was: Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 10:36 +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:18:05AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > My build of american-fuzzy-lop fails because clang doesn't > > understand the ‘-mcet -fcf-protection’ flags wh

Orphaning scram

Hi, I orphaned scram. My hard drive w/ Fedora died a while ago. Lost all my packaging setup and never caught up w/ the new packaging changes :( There's an open "upgrade-request" [bug 1544524] that I cannot fix: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1544524 I'm an upstream developer and wi

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 12:07 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 11:59 -0500, David Cantrell wrote: > > The dist-git changelogs are mostly noise and I would prefer better > > organized information about impacts to users and developers. Like > > tell > > me what things changed in t

Removal of BuildRoot

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Just a small heads up, BuildRoot tag is not needed since RHEL6 (which is oldest supported one nowadays, it's been year or so after EL5 retirement). And we don't support EL5 anymore, so... I wanted to send this heads up before I actually did that, bu

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

On Tue, 2018-02-13 at 09:37 +, Peter Robinson wrote: > > > > About 5K packages is very high for the average mass rebuild failures > (around 25% of the total source packages), there was a dist-git outage > during the mass rebuild and I wonder if a bunch of these were affected > by that issue, a

Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config ` feature?

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 9:51 PM, Michal Novotny wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Michael Šimáček > wrote: > >> On 2018-02-13 11:47, Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> >>> Sorry, I wanted to CC fedora devel before, forwarding. >>> >>> Pavel >>> >>> On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:54:55

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

El mar, 13-02-2018 a las 20:14 +, Samuel Rakitničan escribió: > Strange error with camotics: > > Error: > Problem: package cairo-devel-1.15.10-2.fc28.x86_64 requires > pkgconfig(gobject-2.0), but none of the providers can be installed > - conflicting requests > - nothing provides /usr/bi

Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config ` feature?

Hello, On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:54 PM, Michael Šimáček wrote: > On 2018-02-13 11:47, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >> Sorry, I wanted to CC fedora devel before, forwarding. >> >> Pavel >> >> On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:54:55 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: >> >>> Because we are unable to find a cons

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 3:24 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:07:27PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> > The dist-git changelogs are mostly noise and I would prefer better >> > organized information about impacts to users and developers. Like tell >> > me what things changed

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 12:07:27PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > The dist-git changelogs are mostly noise and I would prefer better > > organized information about impacts to users and developers. Like tell > > me what things changed in the new glibc package, not that the glibc RPM > > has bee

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

Strange error with camotics: Error: Problem: package cairo-devel-1.15.10-2.fc28.x86_64 requires pkgconfig(gobject-2.0), but none of the providers can be installed - conflicting requests - nothing provides /usr/bin//usr/bin/python3 needed by glib2-devel-2.55.2-1.fc28.x86_64

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Mon, 2018-02-12 at 11:59 -0500, David Cantrell wrote: > The dist-git changelogs are mostly noise and I would prefer better > organized information about impacts to users and developers. Like tell > me what things changed in the new glibc package, not that the glibc RPM > has been upgraded to th

Gating test in bodhi failing on dependency check, can't tell why

https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-55ac90e798 is the update I'm trying to push. The dist.rpmdeplint test is failing, for example with https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/7207b7c8-10ed-11e8-9d8f-525400fc9f92/task_output/ghc-listsafe-0.1.0.1-1.fc27.x86_64.log The thi

Re: Python2 stub packages now in EPEL stable

De: "Jason L Tibbitts III" > The initial set of stub python2-* packages I created have now made their > way to EPEL6 and EPEL7 stable, so packages can now depend on > python2-setuptools, python2-six, python2-pytest and python2-sphinx > in all releases without having to add conditionals for EPEL.

Re: Python2 stub packages now in EPEL stable

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 5:32 PM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: > [For those who don't read epel-devel, this is a duplicate of a message > also posted there.] > > The initial set of stub python2-* packages I created have now made their > way to EPEL6 and EPEL7 stable, so packages can now depend on >

Qt 5.10.1 coming to rawhide

Sorry for the late notice... kde sig is working to import Qt 5.10.1 into rawhide starting today, so there will be some related rawhide buildroot broken dependencies until this task is complete -- Rex ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

On 02/12/2018 11:16 PM, Vascom wrote: > I am see that my package libzen in need rebuild list. but I can't find > failed koji build for it to see logs. > Where I can find failed build? Or I must run it manually? There were some packages missed because pkgs01 had a short outage. I suspect yours is o

Re: "Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)"

On 02/13/2018 01:02 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2018-02-13, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> What does it mean? >> > I opened . A config change was pushed that was missing a , in it so the config was invalid. This was fixed last night. kevin si

Re: Fedora27: NFS v4 terrible write performance, is async working

On 13 February 2018 at 02:01, Terry Barnaby wrote: >> Yes: http://nfs.sourceforge.net/#faq_a8 >> >> --b. > > > Quite right, it was network limited (disk vs network speed is about the > same). Using a slower USB stick disk shows that fsync() is not working with > a NFSv4 "async" export. > > But wh

Python2 stub packages now in EPEL stable

[For those who don't read epel-devel, this is a duplicate of a message also posted there.] The initial set of stub python2-* packages I created have now made their way to EPEL6 and EPEL7 stable, so packages can now depend on python2-setuptools, python2-six, python2-pytest and python2-sphinx in all

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

On February 13, 2018 8:24:12 AM CST, "Tomasz Torcz 👁️" wrote: >On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:16:01AM +, Vascom wrote: >> I am see that my package libzen in need rebuild list. but I can't >find >> failed koji build for it to see logs. >> Where I can find failed build? Or I must run it manually? >

Re: HEADS UP: upcoming giflib-5.1.4 update in rawhide

The giflib-5.1.4 update is mostly done now, three packages failed to build hitting unrelated issues: * java-9-openjdk (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25000111) error: cannot access module-info   bad class file: /builddir/build/BUILD/java-9-openjdk-9.0.4.11-6.fc28.x86_64/o

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 07:16:01AM +, Vascom wrote: > I am see that my package libzen in need rebuild list. but I can't find > failed koji build for it to see logs. > Where I can find failed build? Or I must run it manually? I see the same with my "maradns". GIT shows version bump in spec, b

Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection

On Tuesday, 13 February 2018 at 14:27, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 02/13/2018 11:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: > > redhat-rpm-config flags have usually been compatible with both gcc and > > clang, so if there's no newer clang that supports this, it feels like > > we've a few options > > > > 1.

Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection

On 02/13/2018 11:36 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: redhat-rpm-config flags have usually been compatible with both gcc and clang, so if there's no newer clang that supports this, it feels like we've a few options 1. Have the RPM spec for apps using clang filter these flags out of the RPM cf

Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection

On 02/13/2018 11:46 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: Given that -mcet seems to turn on extra instructions is this not an issue for compatibility with older processors? or are they sequences which decode as no-ops on older processors? They are NOPs on all current CPUs. They trap on some older CPUs, but we

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 08:18:20AM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 8:08 AM, Randy Barlow > wrote: > > On 02/12/2018 08:00 PM, Michal Schorm wrote: > >> The changelogs are long ass hell. > >> What about keeping just 2 latest releases in it and deleting the rest? > >> (It will be

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 8:08 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: > On 02/12/2018 08:00 PM, Michal Schorm wrote: >> The changelogs are long ass hell. >> What about keeping just 2 latest releases in it and deleting the rest? >> (It will be still kept in GIT history) >> 2 releases could be 2- > > I usually trim

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On 02/12/2018 08:00 PM, Michal Schorm wrote: > The changelogs are long ass hell. > What about keeping just 2 latest releases in it and deleting the rest? > (It will be still kept in GIT history) > 2 releases could be 2- I usually trim my changelogs to the last year of entries. It's kinda arbitrary

Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config ` feature?

On 2018-02-13 11:47, Pavel Raiskup wrote: Sorry, I wanted to CC fedora devel before, forwarding. Pavel On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:54:55 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: Because we are unable to find a consensus on implementation details, it's likely we'll drop this feature from copr API and i

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 10:25:48PM +0100, David Sommerseth wrote: > I personally find it abusing shared resources throwing builds at it which has > not been tested first. So I prefer to do local mockbuilds first, simply to > lessen the load on shared resources. I'm not saying I haven't tossed fa

Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:46:37AM +, Tom Hughes wrote: > Given that -mcet seems to turn on extra instructions is this not an > issue for compatibility with older processors? or are they sequences > which decode as no-ops on older processors? https://software.intel.com/sites/default/files/mana

Re: Usefulness of `copr mock-config ` feature?

Sorry, I wanted to CC fedora devel before, forwarding. Pavel On Tuesday, February 13, 2018 10:54:55 AM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Because we are unable to find a consensus on implementation details, it's > likely we'll drop this feature from copr API and it will be probably a bit > more complicat

Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection

On 13/02/18 10:36, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:18:05AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: My build of american-fuzzy-lop fails because clang doesn't understand the ‘-mcet -fcf-protection’ flags which seem to be added by RPM. clang -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-sec

Re: clang -mcet -fcf-protection (was: Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28)

On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 10:18:05AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > My build of american-fuzzy-lop fails because clang doesn't > understand the ‘-mcet -fcf-protection’ flags which seem to be > added by RPM. > > clang -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 > -Wp,

clang -mcet -fcf-protection (was: Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28)

My build of american-fuzzy-lop fails because clang doesn't understand the ‘-mcet -fcf-protection’ flags which seem to be added by RPM. clang -O2 -g -pipe -Wall -Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -Wp,-D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS -fexceptions -fstack-protector-strong -grecord-gcc-switches

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

>> We have now completed the automated part of the Fedora 28 mass rebuild, >> The details for the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 28 can be found >> here[1]. The failure page for the rebuilds can be found here[3] and the >> full list of packages that are needing rebuilding can be found here[4]. >

Re: "Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)"

On 2018-02-13, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > What does it mean? > I opened . -- Petr ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: Escaping macros in %changelog

On Monday, February 12, 2018 5:59:57 PM CET David Cantrell wrote: > On 02/09/2018 08:34 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 8, 2018 at 1:32 PM, Matthew Miller > > wrote: > >> On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 05:02:10PM +0100, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > >>> It seems that a lot of people have %file, %check, %

"Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)"

What does it mean? Rich. - Forwarded message from upda...@fedoraproject.org - The following comment has been added to the libguestfs-1.36.13-1.fc26 update: bodhi - 2018-02-13 03:01:37.555909 (karma: 0) Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, li

Re: "Bodhi is unable to request this update for stabilization: invalid syntax (ssl.py, line 7)"

On 13.2.2018 09:00, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: What does it mean? Rich. - Forwarded message from upda...@fedoraproject.org - The following comment has been added to the libguestfs-1.36.13-1.fc26 update: bodhi - 2018-02-13 03:01:37.555909 (karma: 0) Bodhi is unable to request this updat