Fedora-Atomic 27-20180309.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[389-devel] Re: Use of int types in the code base,

- Original Message - > From: "William Brown" > To: "Simon Pichugin" > Cc: "389-devel" <389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Sent: Friday, March 9, 2018 12:30:40 AM > Subject: Re: Use of int types in the code base, > > On Thu, 2018-03-08

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 11:24 -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > * CI/automated tests run on it, and if all is ok goes out in the next > rawhide compose. > * If not ok, you could wave the results or build more things/edit the > update until it passes. Hi, so it looks like you are going to remove

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

> "PM" == Panu Matilainen writes: PM> It's not a solution because doing so usually drags half the distro PM> along due to library dependencies etc. That's true if you're updating to the rpm/dnf/whatever from the distro you want to upgrade to. That's not true if you're

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

On 03/08/2018 07:53 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Randy Barlow wrote: >> It may be possible to automate the process a bit to make it less heavy >> for developers, though there is some complication for multi-package >> updates > > Some automation would help, sure. But if we are going to do things >

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20180308.n.2 compose check report

e images in the compose: > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180308.n.2/compose/CloudImages/x86_64/images/ > > I wonder if the name should be > Fedora-AtomicHost-Rawhide-20180308.n.2.x86_64.qcow2 > and that's why it's complaining? We should be able to fix

Re: On Ye Olde Foreste of Anciente LLVM Versiones

We really need to get things working with the latest (or at least the second-to-latest, but ideally only the latest) LLVM and not carry ancient compatibility versions that are a symbol conflict minefield: Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2018-03-08 16:54, Adam Williamson wrote: >> llvm3.9 > >

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

Randy Barlow wrote: > As one of the Bodhi contributors, I am inclined to suggest that we could > use Bodhi on Rawhide, similar to how we use it for our stable/branched > releases, with more relaxed rules (perhaps 1 day in testing or something > simple). IMHO, this is highly impractical. Having to

Re: libqalculate soname change

Adam Williamson wrote: > This cycle was actually kind of an interesting case, because on the one > hand, there's a pretty good argument that we were in a very bad state > at freeze time this cycle. On the *other* hand, one of the main reasons > we were in a bad state is because people kept

Re: Fedora Rawhide-20180308.n.2 compose check report

On 03/08/2018 08:17 PM, Fedora compose checker wrote: > Missing expected images: > > Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 > Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 This is kind of interesting.. I see these images in the compose: https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/compose/rawhide/Fedora-Rawhide-20180308

Fedora Rawhide-20180308.n.2 compose check report

Missing expected images: Atomichost qcow2 x86_64 Atomichost raw-xz x86_64 Failed openQA tests: 25/129 (x86_64), 6/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 199278 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/199278 ID: 199280 Test: x86_64

Re: On Ye Olde Foreste of Anciente LLVM Versiones

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 04:06:33PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 17:23 -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > > > > llvm3.9 > > > > Still required by julia[1]. > > "The Julia Language: A fresh approach to technical computing." > > But not *too* fresh, apparently. ;)

[Bug 1553503] New: perl-Time-Moment-0.43 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553503 Bug ID: 1553503 Summary: perl-Time-Moment-0.43 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Time-Moment Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

Re: On Ye Olde Foreste of Anciente LLVM Versiones

On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 17:23 -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > llvm4.0 > > Still required by ldc due to an issue on ppc64le[2]. The 'issue' referred to there is closed upstream: https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=36292 as of a couple of weeks ago. Perhaps the fix can be applied to our

Re: On Ye Olde Foreste of Anciente LLVM Versiones

On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 17:23 -0600, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > > llvm3.9 > > Still required by julia[1]. "The Julia Language: A fresh approach to technical computing." But not *too* fresh, apparently. ;) -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP:

Re: On Ye Olde Foreste of Anciente LLVM Versiones

On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 15:47 -0800, Josh Stone wrote: > On 03/08/2018 03:25 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > > On 2018-03-08 17:05, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 14:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > While rebuilding stuff for "GCC 8 ABI change on x86_64", I noticed we > > >

Re: On Ye Olde Foreste of Anciente LLVM Versiones

On 03/08/2018 03:25 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2018-03-08 17:05, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 14:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >>> While rebuilding stuff for "GCC 8 ABI change on x86_64", I noticed we >>> have a rather magnificent collection of ancient llvm versions:

Re: On Ye Olde Foreste of Anciente LLVM Versiones

On 03/08/2018 03:23 PM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On 2018-03-08 16:54, Adam Williamson wrote: >> While rebuilding stuff for "GCC 8 ABI change on x86_64", I noticed we >> have a rather magnificent collection of ancient llvm versions: > > Please double-check, but based on results of dnf repoquery

[Bug 1553479] SElinux denials on stock install

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553479 --- Comment #1 from R P Herrold --- another symptom of the problem is the inability to save a cookie, and so having to repeatedly log in over and over again -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC

rust-structopt and rust-structopt-derive license change

rust-structopt-0.2.5-1.fc29 and rust-structopt-derive-0.2.5-1.fc29 come with a license change from "WTFPL" to "ASL 2.0 or MIT". ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[389-devel] Re: Use of int types in the code base,

On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 17:33 -0500, Simon Pichugin wrote: > Hi William! > Thank you for the email. It has clarified the things for me. :) > I still have one question though. > > Do I understand right that I need also to cast types with these types > from inttypes.h? > So use it not only in the

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

Le jeudi 08 mars 2018 à 15:47 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit : > On 8 March 2018 at 15:32, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: > > On 8 March 2018 at 13:38, Nicolas Mailhot > et> wrote: > > I have spent this afternoon going through many of your emails

Re: On Ye Olde Foreste of Anciente LLVM Versiones

On 2018-03-08 17:05, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 14:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: >> While rebuilding stuff for "GCC 8 ABI change on x86_64", I noticed we >> have a rather magnificent collection of ancient llvm versions: >> >> llvm34 >> llvm35 >> llvm3.9 >> llvm4.0 >> llvm5.0

Re: On Ye Olde Foreste of Anciente LLVM Versiones

On 2018-03-08 16:54, Adam Williamson wrote: > While rebuilding stuff for "GCC 8 ABI change on x86_64", I noticed we > have a rather magnificent collection of ancient llvm versions: Please double-check, but based on results of dnf repoquery of the respective -libs subpackage: > llvm34 Don't see

Re: question about Obsoletes/Provides

On 2018-03-08 5:58 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Jos de Kloe wrote: I have a question about an open review request on the eccodes package, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508950 Eccodes will replace grib_api for which downstream will

[Bug 1553479] New: SElinux denials on stock install

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553479 Bug ID: 1553479 Summary: SElinux denials on stock install Product: Fedora EPEL Version: el6 Component: bugzilla Assignee: ita...@ispbrasil.com.br Reporter:

Re: On Ye Olde Foreste of Anciente LLVM Versiones

On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 14:54 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > While rebuilding stuff for "GCC 8 ABI change on x86_64", I noticed we > have a rather magnificent collection of ancient llvm versions: > > llvm34 > llvm35 > llvm3.9 > llvm4.0 > llvm5.0 > > None of these is retired (llvm33 and llvm3.7

On Ye Olde Foreste of Anciente LLVM Versiones

While rebuilding stuff for "GCC 8 ABI change on x86_64", I noticed we have a rather magnificent collection of ancient llvm versions: llvm34 llvm35 llvm3.9 llvm4.0 llvm5.0 None of these is retired (llvm33 and llvm3.7 also exist, but *are* retired). llvm34 and llvm35 don't build successfully and

[389-devel] Re: Please review: Issue 49593 - NDN cache stats should be under the global stats

Fixed issues with inttypes. On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 08:01:33PM +0100, Simon Pichugin wrote: > Fixed compile warnings. > > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 06:53:53PM +0100, Simon Pichugin wrote: > > Hi team, > > please, review: > > > > https://pagure.io/389-ds-base/pull-request/49595 > >

[389-devel] Re: Use of int types in the code base,

Hi William! Thank you for the email. It has clarified the things for me. :) I still have one question though. Do I understand right that I need also to cast types with these types from inttypes.h? So use it not only in the defenitions. - sprintf(buf, "%lu", (long unsigned int)maxsize); +

Re: Atomic Working Group VFAD 03/09

We would like to have a VFAD (virtual Fedora Activity Day) on March 9th at approximately Fri Mar 9 15:00:00 UTC 2018 .  This is 10 AM eastern. signature.asc Description: PGP signature ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 13:00 -0500, Randy Barlow wrote: > Greetings fellow Fedorans! > > I would like to kick off a general discussion about how we might gate > packages in Rawhide. I think it would be nice to get something in > place > for the

Re: Package name of flask_oauthlib

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 19:33 +, Richard Hughes wrote: > Hi, > > I've packaged up flask_oauthlib to use for a project I'm developing, > and am close to submitting it for a Fedora package review. I'm > wondering if the underscore should be used,

Re: libqalculate soname change

> On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 20:46 -0500, Mukundan Ragavan wrote: > > Thanks for the notification. > > Note F28 is currently in freeze for Beta; this is a long freeze, and > honestly, might get longer, given the current state of things. So I'm > not sure whether it'd be optimal to have this committed

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

El jue, 08-03-2018 a las 12:55 +0200, Panu Matilainen escribió: > On 03/08/2018 12:42 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > On 03/08/2018 12:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: > > > > > > > > > Am 08.03.2018 um 08:53 schrieb Panu Matilainen: > > > > P.P.S. So why didn't yum have anything like that? Because

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On 8 March 2018 at 15:32, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On 8 March 2018 at 13:38, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > I have spent this afternoon going through many of your emails and our > logs so I could find try to figure out what to help you. Coming back

Atomic Working Group VFAD 03/09

Hi everyone, This is a reminder that tomorrow we have a VFAD (Virtual Fedora Activity Day) for everyone who  can and wants to join in on the discussions:  https://pagure.io/atomic-wg/issue/429 -- Location: https://bluejeans.com/dmabe -- Topics: [upstream technology] * rpm-ostree

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On 8 March 2018 at 13:38, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le jeudi 08 mars 2018 à 17:57 +, Tom Hughes a écrit : >> >> No, it almost certainly means that laposte.net have announced via >> their DNS records that emails with laposte.net addresses should not >> be trusted

Re: unresponsive maintainer: nss-mdns

On Do, 08.03.18 16:51, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek (zbys...@in.waw.pl) wrote: > On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 05:45:24PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > On Mo, 05.03.18 20:35, Adam Goode (a...@spicenitz.org) wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:45:35PM -, Adam Goode wrote: > > > > >

Re: Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On 18-03-07 14:14:38, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le mercredi 07 mars 2018 à 12:18 -0500, Josh Boyer a écrit : > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Nicolas Mailhot > wrote: > > Le mercredi 07 mars 2018 à 11:31 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen a écrit > > : > > > > > > I

Package name of flask_oauthlib

Hi, I've packaged up flask_oauthlib to use for a project I'm developing, and am close to submitting it for a Fedora package review. I'm wondering if the underscore should be used, and the package guidelines tell me to ask here. The source package could either be: * python-flask_oauthlib *

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

On 08/03/18 19:25, Mattia Verga wrote: Il 08/03/2018 20:11, Richard Shaw ha scritto: What about making side tags easily available to packagers directly? I could build my package that includes an ABI breaking update and rebuild the dependencies within that side tag and then submit when

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

On 03/08/2018 11:11 AM, Richard Shaw wrote: > What about making side tags easily available to packagers directly? I could > build my package that includes an ABI breaking update and rebuild the > dependencies within that side tag and then submit when everything is > complete. Yes, teaching bodhi

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

Il 08/03/2018 20:11, Richard Shaw ha scritto: What about making side tags easily available to packagers directly? I could build my package that includes an ABI breaking update and rebuild the dependencies within that side tag and then submit when everything is complete. +1 Maybe something

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

What about making side tags easily available to packagers directly? I could build my package that includes an ABI breaking update and rebuild the dependencies within that side tag and then submit when everything is complete. Richard ___ devel mailing

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

Il 08/03/2018 19:00, Randy Barlow ha scritto: As one of the Bodhi contributors, I am inclined to suggest that we could use Bodhi on Rawhide, similar to how we use it for our stable/branched releases, with more relaxed rules (perhaps 1 day in testing or something simple). Rawhide is a place

Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

On jeudi 8 mars 2018 16:37:57 CET Jan Chaloupka wrote: > On 03/07/2018 04:07 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote: > > > > Saying that, I will prepare new builds of gofed so the new spec files > > are generated with the new macros. > > > F27 gofed build: >

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

On 03/08/2018 10:00 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: > Greetings fellow Fedorans! > > I would like to kick off a general discussion about how we might gate > packages in Rawhide. I think it would be nice to get something in place > for the Fedora 29 timeframe. I was hoping we could come up with a more

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

On 03/08/2018 01:32 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > Why must the process change? It seems every bit of Fedora in the past > year has been changing... for the sake of change. We've had extreme issues with stability in Rawhide lately that could have been prevented with automated testing. These

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

Le jeudi 08 mars 2018 à 17:57 +, Tom Hughes a écrit : > > No, it almost certainly means that laposte.net have announced via > their DNS records that emails with laposte.net addresses should not > be trusted unless they come direct from a laposte.net server. Actually, it probably means the

Re: Gating packages in Rawhide

On 03/08/2018 12:00 PM, Randy Barlow wrote: If you have other suggestions on how we might gate packages in Rawhide that are wildly different than the above, please feel free to share! Why must the process change? It seems every bit of Fedora in the past year has been changing... for the sake

Gating packages in Rawhide

Greetings fellow Fedorans! I would like to kick off a general discussion about how we might gate packages in Rawhide. I think it would be nice to get something in place for the Fedora 29 timeframe. As one of the Bodhi contributors, I am inclined to suggest that we could use Bodhi on Rawhide,

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On 08/03/18 17:46, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: Le jeudi 08 mars 2018 à 18:11 +0100, Fabio Valentini a écrit : Additionally, I frequently get Spam warnings for your e-mails because they don't pass the validation tests for being sent from a laposte.net address. That tells a lot more about USA

Re: GCC 8 ABI change on x86_64

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 05:52:05PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 10:25 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 07:20:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 19:50 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > > > > I did another mass rebuild with a

unproductive finger pointing; was: Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On Thu, 8 Mar 2018, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > That tells a lot more about USA operators being not willing to work with > non USA operators than anything else. ehh? from the headers in that post, as received by me: X-Authentication-Results: bastion01.phx2.fedoraproject.org; dkim=fail

Re: GCC 8 ABI change on x86_64

On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 10:25 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 07:20:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 19:50 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > > > I did another mass rebuild with a specially-tweaked gcc in order > > > to > > > find out > > > which packages

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

Le jeudi 08 mars 2018 à 18:11 +0100, Fabio Valentini a écrit : > > Additionally, I frequently get Spam warnings for your e-mails because > they don't pass the validation tests for being sent from a laposte.net > address. That tells a lot more about USA operators being not willing to work with

Re: libqalculate soname change

On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 10:15 -0500, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > > Having said that, I could see there might be a case for delaying the > freeze before it starts, if the overall schedule is delayed for > well-understood reasons. This cycle was actually kind of an interesting case, because on the

Re: libqalculate soname change

On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 15:51 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Adam Williamson wrote: > > Note F28 is currently in freeze for Beta; this is a long freeze, and > > honestly, might get longer, given the current state of things. > > IMHO, if we know that we are not in a good enough state to release, we >

Re: Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On Thu, 2018-03-08 at 17:47 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le jeudi 08 mars 2018 à 18:15 +0200, Yanko Kaneti a écrit : > > > > Nobody would care if a MTA on the way Fedora-ml->your-mailbox adds > > because nobody but you would see it. > > And what, exactly, do you think answers to those mails

Re: Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 5:47 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le jeudi 08 mars 2018 à 18:15 +0200, Yanko Kaneti a écrit : >> >> Nobody would care if a MTA on the way Fedora-ml->your-mailbox adds >> because nobody but you would see it. > > And what, exactly, do you think

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 1095 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-1087 dokuwiki-0-0.24.20140929c.el7 858 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-dac7ed832f mcollective-2.8.4-1.el7 440

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 6 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing: Age URL 968 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-7168 rubygem-crack-0.3.2-2.el6 858 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2015-e2b4b5b2fb mcollective-2.8.4-1.el6 829

Re: unresponsive maintainer: nss-mdns

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 05:45:24PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: > On Mo, 05.03.18 20:35, Adam Goode (a...@spicenitz.org) wrote: > > > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:45:35PM -, Adam Goode wrote: > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Lennart has the flu, so he'll probably wont' reply immediately. > >

Re: Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

Le jeudi 08 mars 2018 à 18:15 +0200, Yanko Kaneti a écrit : > > Nobody would care if a MTA on the way Fedora-ml->your-mailbox adds > because nobody but you would see it. And what, exactly, do you think answers to those mails look like once they had this added on the incoming route? You're not

Re: unresponsive maintainer: nss-mdns

On Mo, 05.03.18 20:35, Adam Goode (a...@spicenitz.org) wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 06:45:35PM -, Adam Goode wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > Lennart has the flu, so he'll probably wont' reply immediately. > > I'll ping him, but you can expect that he will want to give the > > package away.

Re: Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 20:14 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le mercredi 07 mars 2018 à 12:18 -0500, Josh Boyer a écrit : > > On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:11 PM, Nicolas Mailhot > > wrote: > > > Le mercredi 07 mars 2018 à 11:31 -0500, Stephen John Smoogen a > > > écrit >

[Bug 1551819] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000104 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551819 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Simple-1.302130-1.fc28 perl-Test2-Suite-0.000106-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.

[Bug 1552358] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000106 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552358 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-Simple-1.302130-1.fc28 perl-Test2-Suite-0.000106-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28.

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-03-09)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-03-09 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues below

Re: libqalculate soname change

On 03/08/2018 09:51 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > IMHO, if we know that we are not in a good enough state to release, we > should delay the start of the freeze (in the current case where it has > already started: cancel the freeze and try again later) until we are in a > releasable state. It just

Re: Trying out More Go Packaging: Bugs and Questions

On 03/07/2018 04:07 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote: On 03/07/2018 04:02 PM, Jan Chaloupka wrote: On 03/07/2018 03:50 PM, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: On mardi 6 mars 2018 12:47:40 CET Jan Chaloupka wrote: Hi Robert-André, thank you for your patience and all comments pointing out pieces that

[Bug 1552960] perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate-1.35 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552960 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 719874] perl-threads-lite keeps hanging during self checks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719874 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|CLOSED |ON_QA

[Bug 1549504] perl-Event-Lib-1.03-35.fc29 FTBFS: Lib.xs:131:14: error: ' struct event' has no member named 'ev_arg'

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1549504 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1551819] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000104 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1551819 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1552358] perl-Test2-Suite-0.000106 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552358 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

Re: [ACTION NEEDED #2] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 10:02 AM William Cohen wrote: > On 03/07/2018 02:43 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA256 > > > > This is the second iteration of my mass-scratch-rebuild without > > gcc/gcc-c++ in the buildroot[0]. Everything

Re: libqalculate soname change

On 03/08/2018 09:51 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Adam Williamson wrote: Note F28 is currently in freeze for Beta; this is a long freeze, and honestly, might get longer, given the current state of things. IMHO, if we know that we are not in a good enough state to release, we should delay the start

Re: Fedora 28 Change Checkpoint: 100% Code Complete Deadline & Beta Freeze

I wrote: > Fedora: >> Beta and Final freezes are in effect from 00:00 UTC of the freeze day. > > KDE: >> All deadlines are due 23:59 UTC, but if you need a few more hours, notify >> someone from the release team. PS: The deadlines I encountered for academic CfPs were also KDE style (23:59 in a

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On 03/08/2018 02:23 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:48 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 03/08/2018 01:39 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:53 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 03/07/2018 03:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Wed,

Re: [ACTION NEEDED #2] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

On 03/07/2018 02:43 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA256 > > This is the second iteration of my mass-scratch-rebuild without > gcc/gcc-c++ in the buildroot[0]. Everything what was written in > original mail still applies. > > Since people might have fixed

Re: libqalculate soname change

Adam Williamson wrote: > Note F28 is currently in freeze for Beta; this is a long freeze, and > honestly, might get longer, given the current state of things. IMHO, if we know that we are not in a good enough state to release, we should delay the start of the freeze (in the current case where it

gnome-shell-extension - gschemas.compiled is no created

Hi, When creating the package gnome-shell-extension-media-player-indicator, no gschemas.compiled is created. rpm spec file: https://src.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/gnome-shell-extension-media-player-indicator.git/tree/gnome-shell-extension-media-player-indicator.spec What is going wrong ?

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 6:48 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 03/08/2018 01:39 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:53 AM, Panu Matilainen >> wrote: >>> >>> On 03/07/2018 03:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at

[Bug 1553141] New: perl-Filesys-Notify-Simple-0.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1553141 Bug ID: 1553141 Summary: perl-Filesys-Notify-Simple-0.13 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Filesys-Notify-Simple Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On 03/08/2018 01:39 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:53 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 03/07/2018 03:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: And you forgot: 5. Teach DNF to use

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On Thu, Mar 8, 2018 at 2:53 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: > On 03/07/2018 03:10 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> >> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 5:52 AM, Igor Gnatenko >> wrote: >>> >>> And you forgot: >>> 5. Teach DNF to use "target" DNF/RPM stack to

Re: question about Obsoletes/Provides

On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 11:23:45AM +0100, Jos de Kloe wrote: > I have a question about an open review request on the eccodes package, > see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508950 > > Eccodes will replace grib_api for which downstream will stop support at > the end of this year. >

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On 03/08/2018 12:42 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote: On 03/08/2018 12:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 08.03.2018 um 08:53 schrieb Panu Matilainen: P.P.S. So why didn't yum have anything like that? Because back then, there were other upgrade methods that did run on the "target stack": anaconda,

Re: [SO-NAME BUMP] libjson-c.so.4 comes to fc28 and Rawhide

Am Dienstag, den 06.03.2018, 15:10 +0100 schrieb Björn 'besser82' Esser: > Hello folks, > > I'll update json-c to v0.13.1 for fc28 and Rawhide. This will bump > libjson-c so-name from 3 to 4 without any changes to the API. The > bump > was done, because some distributions already bumped the

Re: Broken system upgrade due to rich dependencies

On 03/08/2018 12:21 PM, Reindl Harald wrote: Am 08.03.2018 um 08:53 schrieb Panu Matilainen: P.P.S. So why didn't yum have anything like that? Because back then, there were other upgrade methods that did run on the "target stack": anaconda, preupgrade, fedup to name a few and i never used

question about Obsoletes/Provides

I have a question about an open review request on the eccodes package, see: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1508950 Eccodes will replace grib_api for which downstream will stop support at the end of this year. Therefore the first draft spec file had Obsoletes/Provides entries to make

Re: GCC 8 ABI change on x86_64

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 09:19:15PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 19:50 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > > Recently we discovered a serious bug in the compiler whereby we miscompiled > > several packages. The problem started with my ABI-changing patch which > > changed > >

Re: GCC 8 ABI change on x86_64

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 09:36:29PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 12:27:34PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 19:50 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > > > Recently we discovered a serious bug in the compiler whereby we > > > miscompiled > > > several

Re: GCC 8 ABI change on x86_64

On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 07:20:18PM +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 19:50 +0100, Marek Polacek wrote: > > I did another mass rebuild with a specially-tweaked gcc in order to > > find out > > which packages need to be rebuild with patched gcc-8.0.1-0.16. > > How we find out the

[Bug 1552960] perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate-1.35 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1552960 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Log-Dispatch-FileRotate-1.35-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9cb96b97de -- You are

[Bug 719874] perl-threads-lite keeps hanging during self checks

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=719874 --- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System --- perl-threads-lite-0.034-13.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-95f1522681 -- You are receiving this

Re: [ACTION NEEDED #2] Missing BuildRequires: gcc/gcc-c++

Dne 8.3.2018 v 09:19 Igor Gnatenko napsal(a): > On Wed, 2018-03-07 at 16:39 +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 7.3.2018 v 15:08 Jerry James napsal(a): > >> On Wed, Mar 7, 2018 at 12:43 AM, Igor Gnatenko > >> wrote: > >>> This is the second iteration of my

Re: compilation of lollypop fails on mock build server

then I will omit meson_test in the %check section. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

  1   2   >