Hello,
does anyone else beside me think it's not OK to introduce new
dependencies without any explanation in package updates released
to stable Fedora branches?
Arguably, the current stable updates policy is against this
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Stable_Releases :
[...] Updates
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 02:11:40AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> > Failing all this should we drop the Serif fonts for Japanese and Korean -
> > but it seems unfair to single them out?
>
> So just drop ALL the CJK Serif fonts, and also the monospace ones (CJK Sans
> is
On Tue, Apr 10, 2018 at 9:11 AM, Kevin Kofler
wrote:
> And IMHO the KDE and LXQt Spins should revert to shipping only
> wqy-microhei-fonts and no other CJK fonts. They never promised CJK support
> beyond "we can bring up SOME rendering for every character of the typical
> SC/TC/J/K text" (and the
Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
> Failing all this should we drop the Serif fonts for Japanese and Korean -
> but it seems unfair to single them out?
So just drop ALL the CJK Serif fonts, and also the monospace ones (CJK Sans
is essentially monospaced anyway), bringing us back to where we were in F26
Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity Office Hours on 2018-04-10 from 10:00:00 to 11:00:00 US/Eastern
At fedora-modular...@chat.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
This is where you ask the Fedora Modularity Team questions (and we try to
answer them)!
Join us on
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 46/137 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 219058 Test: x86_64 Everything-boot-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/219058
ID: 219062 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso install_default@uefi
URL: https://ope
On Sun, 2018-04-08 at 18:05 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
> No missing expected images.
>
> Failed openQA tests: 46/137 (x86_64), 6/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
A large chunk of the failures are down to a bug in the new qemu that
showed up in Rawhide recently:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 3/137 (x86_64), 4/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
ID: 219305 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/219305
ID: 219306 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject
Ian
here are 2 bugs
autofs : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565293
nfs-utils : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1565310
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.f
On Mon, Apr 9, 2018 at 10:24 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
wrote:
> Le 2018-04-08 10:11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit :
>>>
>>> Nothing is set in stone yet, but some
>>> time soon he is going to upload a whole new license text (hopefully in
>>> English), probably something custom-made.
>
>
> Try to
On 09/04/18 13:38 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On 09/04/18 13:01 +0100, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
>> 8) If someone is using Linux working in VM or headless HW ..
>
> Actually a lot of VMs have mice mapped by default.
>
>> -CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=y
>> +CONFIG_INPUT_MOUSEDEV=m
>>
>> -CONFIG_MOUSE_PS2
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 10:54:10AM +0200, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 10:01:21AM +0200, Martin Sehnoutka wrote:
> > > Restarted Firefox and then also the whole laptop. Doesn't work. But
> > > then I'm in Fedora 28 so it may be a bug. Anyway, getting this to work
> > > for me isn
OLD: Fedora-28-20180407.n.0
NEW: Fedora-28-20180409.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:4
Dropped images: 2
Added packages: 6
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 120
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 3.36 MiB
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of
On Mon, 2018-04-09 at 11:15 -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> True, if you need to preserve order you need to use -Wl, for each such
> argument, e.g.:
>
> libdemo_la_LDFLAGS = -Xlinker --as-needed -Xlinker -lm -Xlinker
> --no-as-needed -lvirt
>
> or:
>
> libdemo_la_LDFLAGS = -Wl,--as-needed,
> * Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh,
> 20:08:36)
TBH I think that's quite a divergence from a typical "enterprise
server" that the Server SIG has targetted.
>>>
>>> But this is probably much closer to what "real-world" Fedora server
>>>
On 2018-04-09 05:21, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 04:21:54AM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> On 2018-04-09 03:59, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> Is there a recommend way to get libtool to pass through all flags
>>> specified in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unchanged, and have the GCC comp
On 2018-04-09 04:40, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 04/09/2018 11:21 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
>> On 2018-04-09 03:59, Florian Weimer wrote:
>>> Is there a recommend way to get libtool to pass through all flags
>>> specified in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unchanged, and have the GCC compiler
>>> driver sort o
On 8 April 2018 at 07:08, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 12:01 PM, Tomasz Torcz 👁️ wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 10:05:12AM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>>
>>> > * Feedback: Easy "home media server" would be nice (sgallagh,
>>> > 20:08:36)
>>>
>>> TBH I think that's qu
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180408.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180409.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 140
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
Have you actually tested any of these proposed changes before you come
barging in, or even looked for history as to why they're like that?
In reality you should send this, with them all separate, with
reasons/justification why you believe they should be changed to the
kernel list.
> Just checked
On 9 April 2018 at 07:24, Peter Robinson wrote:
[..]
> It's also unrelated to this topic, it's (and I use it's, not they're,
> as it's one driver) built in because it makes booting faster in the
> general use case, it also makes debug and recovery easier when one of
> the core filesystems is there
On 04/08/18 17:49, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Rex Dieter wrote:
And we've circled back to the original post starting this thread.
Note: intent to *orphan*, not intent to *retire*.
If it is not going to be retired, then why would we want to kill python2-*
subpackages throughout the distribution for n
On Monday, 09 April 2018 at 13:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
[...]
> Finally the reason this has not been correctly announced is that we are still
> investigating the capacity of the system and the pipeline to check if it can
> handle the load of all the package in Fedora, but as said, the pipeline
Hi all!
This week, the Fedora Infrastructure team is convening for a Hackathon
from April 9-13 at Fredericksburg, VA. The hackathon is intended to help
the team leap ahead for several critical Fedora and CentOS initiatives.
Dennis Otugo, a member of the CommOps team, interviewed members of the
Fed
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 11:13:11AM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote:
> The body is not exactly meaningful either, and if you follow the
> link you just get a mostly blank page.
>
> As best I can tell they are triggered by doing builds, but I seemed
> to get three from two builds yesterday so it's not exact
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 7:35 PM, Nicolas Mailhot <
nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> wrote:
> Le vendredi 30 mars 2018 à 16:45 +0900, Akira TAGOH a écrit :
> > The problem on this workaround is that we need an exception for
> > packaging because the packaging guidelines mentions we must package
> > var
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 04:21:54AM -0500, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> On 2018-04-09 03:59, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > Is there a recommend way to get libtool to pass through all flags
> > specified in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unchanged, and have the GCC compiler
> > driver sort out which flags to pass to th
The body is not exactly meaningful either, and if you follow the
link you just get a mostly blank page.
As best I can tell they are triggered by doing builds, but I seemed
to get three from two builds yesterday so it's not exactly one-to-one
but I still have no idea what they're about.
Tom
On 0
I don't mind to receive such notification, but I would welcome if the
subject was meaningful.
V.
Dne 8.4.2018 v 13:47 Michael Schwendt napsal(a):
> Please make such a message flood opt-in by default instead of opt-out.
> The communication about such new services and their purpose is extremely
>
On 04/09/2018 11:21 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
On 2018-04-09 03:59, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is there a recommend way to get libtool to pass through all flags
specified in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unchanged, and have the GCC compiler
driver sort out which flags to pass to the compiler/assembler/linker?
On 2018-04-09 03:59, Florian Weimer wrote:
> Is there a recommend way to get libtool to pass through all flags
> specified in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unchanged, and have the GCC compiler
> driver sort out which flags to pass to the compiler/assembler/linker?
$ libtool --mode=compile --help
[snip]
This
On 04/09/2018 10:59 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
Is there a recommend way to get libtool to pass through all flags
specified in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unchanged, and have the GCC compiler
driver sort out which flags to pass to the compiler/assembler/linker?
Never mind, I found the old thread again:
On 09/04/18 09:54, Matthias Runge wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 10:01:21AM +0200, Martin Sehnoutka wrote:
Restarted Firefox and then also the whole laptop. Doesn't work. But
then I'm in Fedora 28 so it may be a bug. Anyway, getting this to work
for me isn't really the point of the thread. I'm w
Is there a recommend way to get libtool to pass through all flags
specified in CFLAGS and LDFLAGS unchanged, and have the GCC compiler
driver sort out which flags to pass to the compiler/assembler/linker?
Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing list -- deve
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 10:01:21AM +0200, Martin Sehnoutka wrote:
> > Restarted Firefox and then also the whole laptop. Doesn't work. But
> > then I'm in Fedora 28 so it may be a bug. Anyway, getting this to work
> > for me isn't really the point of the thread. I'm wondering about
> > something tha
Le 2018-04-08 10:11, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek a écrit :
Nothing is set in stone yet, but some
time soon he is going to upload a whole new license text (hopefully in
English), probably something custom-made.
Try to point it to the OFL and its FAQ, it has been created exactly for
this purpos
Le 2018-04-08 14:55, Alexander Ploumistos a écrit :
My concern is if he can retroactively apply the new license to the
older versions of the fonts. Is this a valid concern or is it not how
licensing works?
Legally, he can’t. We can ship existing fonts forever, however having an
hostile upstre
On 04/09/2018 02:07 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 4:59 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
>> On Monday, 09 April 2018 at 00:52, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> [...]
>>> [chris@f28h ~]$ dnssec-trigger-control status
>>> at 2018-04-08 16:46:45
>>> cache 75.75.76.76: OK
>>> cach
Le 2018-04-05 17:00, Tom Hughes a écrit :
On 05/04/18 15:50, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
according to https://release-monitoring.org/project/267/
But the Homepage: in the above and the Source: in the .spec would seem
to be saying that http://download.ceph.com/tarballs/ is where
the-new-hotness is
No missing expected images.
Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64)
--
Mail generated by check-compose:
https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On Mon, Apr 09, 2018 at 12:55:04AM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> > "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek writes:
>
> ZJ> Please don't. This is a repeat of the original idea of having
> ZJ> separate python3 packages back when python3 was being
> ZJ> introduced.
>
> It seems that you are
On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 11:58:29PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 8, 2018 at 8:30 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Apr 08, 2018 at 02:55:49PM +0200, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> >> My concern is if he can retroactively apply the new license to the
> >> older
42 matches
Mail list logo
