https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044825
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Paul
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044851
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 15:18 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> There are still over a dozen packages in the distro that
> require it:
Hi,
the gnome-software also calls pkexec is some occasions, once when
external appstream data is used (not a thing in Fedora, as far as I
know) and when
Hey!
Answered now
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 9:04 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> I have a personal conflict with the current meeting time for the
> Prioritized Bugs meeting, so I'm looking to reschedule. If you'd like
> to attend semi-regularly, please feel free to add your availability:
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045950
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Welcome to the community Matthew!
Great to see so many new people join and especially willing to contribute to
epel! Hope you're going to have a great time :-)
Cheers,
Dan
On January 27, 2022 1:31:37 AM UTC, Matthew Davis
wrote:
>Greetings,
>
>I am Matthew. I am a DevOps lead engineer for
As part of the golang-salsa-debian-vasudev-gospake2 0.2.1 update, the license
has changed from `LGPLv2+` to `MIT or GPLv3+`.
--
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
PGP Key Fingerprint: f57c76e5a238fe0a628e2ecef79e4e25e8c661f8
PGP Keyserver: hkp://keyserver.ubuntu.com
gotmax@e.email
Adam Williamson wrote:
> But that was then, and this is now. Does anything in Workstation use
> pkexec? Does anything in KDE use it?
Not sure. KDE stuff SHOULD use kdesu for this purpose, if it needs to run as
root at all to begin with. But some application developer might have
preferred pkexec
Hi,
when working on finally fixing Trojitá to build (it had been FTBFS since
F34, so removal was impending), I have noticed that the Akonadi contacts
plugin was not getting built because of missing transitive build
dependencies:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046299
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046600
Bug ID: 2046600
Summary: perl-App-cpanminus-1.7045 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-App-cpanminus
Keywords: FutureFeature,
Greetings,
I am Matthew. I am a DevOps lead engineer for a small company. I have
used Red Hat / rpm-based distributions for a long time now.I have built
rpms for almost as long.I have come through my career from operations
track rather than a software development track.In addition to building
That looks like it’s due to fmt not having been rebuilt with the ABI change
yet, presumably due to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045391.
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022, at 7:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 23:57 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>> Hi!
>>
>> A new gcc with
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 12:45:07PM -0800, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> On 1/26/22 09:50, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:10:34AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > > On 26/01/2022 07:40, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > > > One of suggestions is making a package containing a set of
On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 00:46 +, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 23:57 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > A new gcc with most importantly the https://gcc.gnu.org/PR104172
> > bug (that caused a lot of ppc64le failures) fixed and various other
> > fixes (e.g.
On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 23:57 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> A new gcc with most importantly the https://gcc.gnu.org/PR104172
> bug (that caused a lot of ppc64le failures) fixed and various other
> fixes (e.g. std::basic_string(std::nullptr_t) = deleted only done
> for C++23 etc.) is now in
On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 23:57 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> A new gcc with most importantly the https://gcc.gnu.org/PR104172
> bug (that caused a lot of ppc64le failures) fixed and various other
> fixes (e.g. std::basic_string(std::nullptr_t) = deleted only done
> for C++23 etc.) is now in
Hello :)
I opened two small PRs with spec file changes for dependencies of mine.
Both maintainers of the projects are active, but I got no response for a
while now. Concretely, I’d like those changes for the matrix-synapse
package and the two PRs and maintainers are the following:
On Wed, 2022-01-26 at 14:21 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> Am I forgetting some other reason we still need it?
BTW, bonus follow-up to this: as part of researching the background of
polkit, I noticed that we never actually entirely got done moving off
usermode :( There are still over a dozen
Hi!
A new gcc with most importantly the https://gcc.gnu.org/PR104172
bug (that caused a lot of ppc64le failures) fixed and various other
fixes (e.g. std::basic_string(std::nullptr_t) = deleted only done
for C++23 etc.) is now in rawhide.
Can rel-eng please retry all FTBS builds that failed on
Mattia,
I'll swap you for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2034758
Dave
On Sun, Jan 23, 2022 at 10:43:34AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Here I am again asking one more review swap.
>
> I'm in need to have https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2042043
>
Hi folks!
For anyone who hasn't seen it yet - there's quite a kerfuffle today
about a major security issue in polkit:
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/01/a-bug-lurking-for-12-years-gives-attackers-root-on-every-major-linux-distro/
turns out that ever since it was invented,
On Tue, Jan 25, 2022 at 03:39:40PM +0100, Dan Horák wrote:
> Hi,
>
> gcc-12.0.1-0.3.fc36 [1] is building now and in addition to the usual
> updates from upstream it fixes at least 2 kinds of the ppc64le issues -
> the segfaulting ICE with "during RTL pass: final" and the "not
> assembling" one.
>
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2022-01-27 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.libera.chat.
Local time information (via. uitime):
= Day: Thursday ==
2022-01-27 09:00 PST US/Pacific
2022-01-27
On 1/26/22 09:50, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:10:34AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 26/01/2022 07:40, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
One of suggestions is making a package containing a set of 10 Fedora
release wallpaper. The issue will be the increase of file size as
On 1/26/22 03:49, Iker Pedrosa wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently working in rebasing shadow-utils to the latest version,
4.11.1, and it contains a soname bump for the subid library. I've
created the side tag "f36-build-side-49901" to prepare the update.
dnf reports that the only package that
I have a personal conflict with the current meeting time for the
Prioritized Bugs meeting, so I'm looking to reschedule. If you'd like
to attend semi-regularly, please feel free to add your availability:
https://whenisgood.net/c8iqggm/
I make no promises about when the meeting will be scheduled,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046366
--- Comment #2 from Product Security DevOps Team ---
This CVE Bugzilla entry is for community support informational purposes only as
it does not affect a package in a commercially supported Red Hat product. Refer
to the dependent bugs for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046228
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 06:53:01PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> This makes me wonder if we should (or do?) have a mechanism to remove
> a package which is not used. "used" in the sense of being used by any
> account on the system, rather than in the dependency sense. If we had
> that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044851
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 09:50:48AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:10:34AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 26/01/2022 07:40, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > > One of suggestions is making a package containing a set of 10 Fedora
> > > release wallpaper. The issue
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046228
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 07:24:03PM +0100, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 19:09, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 05:48:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > >
> > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6fc6070c5a
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Search-Xapian-1.2.25.4 |perl-Search-Xapian-1.2.25.4
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 19:09, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 05:48:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6fc6070c5a
> > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-416cd48fd5
> >
> > What do the comments about XX
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041077
Bug 2041077 depends on bug 2041248, which changed state.
Bug 2041248 Summary: perl-XML-Stream for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041248
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038205
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041284
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Test-Manifest-2.023-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038283
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Plack-Middleware-Rever
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033633
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Types-Path-Tiny-0.006-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2036510
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038239
Bug 2038239 depends on bug 2038205, which changed state.
Bug 2038205 Summary: Please branch and build perl-podlinkcheck for EPEL-9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038205
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038286
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Search-Xapian-1.2.25.4
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037658
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-MouseX-Foreign-1.000-1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041248
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041279
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Convert-TNEF-0.18-17.e
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038269
Bug 2038269 depends on bug 2041174, which changed state.
Bug 2041174 Summary: Please branch and build perl-Crypt-PasswdMD5 in epel9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041174
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041174
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 05:48:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6fc6070c5a
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-416cd48fd5
>
> What do the comments about XX being "ejected" mean?
It means the build(s) were not tagged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046372
Product Security DevOps Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:23:49AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 25/01/2022 22:33, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > login and disable both email and irc.
>
> Will this disable Bodhi notifications as well?
Depends on which ones you mean. If you mean comments on bodhi updates,
no, because
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046372
--- Comment #2 from Product Security DevOps Team ---
This CVE Bugzilla entry is for community support informational purposes only as
it does not affect a package in a commercially supported Red Hat product. Refer
to the dependent bugs for
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:10:34AM +0100, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 26/01/2022 07:40, Luya Tshimbalanga wrote:
> > One of suggestions is making a package containing a set of 10 Fedora
> > release wallpaper. The issue will be the increase of file size as the
> > Design Team chose to keep
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033633
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8625cb0e0e has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8625cb0e0e
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6fc6070c5a
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-416cd48fd5
What do the comments about XX being "ejected" mean?
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046366
Product Security DevOps Team changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |UPSTREAM
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033633
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046367
--- Comment #1 from Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046366
--- Comment #1 from Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz ---
Created slic3r tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 2046367]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046373
--- Comment #1 from Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046373
Bug ID: 2046373
Summary: CVE-2021-45847 slic3r: NULL pointer dereference in 3MF
XML via a crafted 3MF input file [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046373
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2046372
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046372
--- Comment #1 from Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz ---
Created slic3r tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 2046373]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046372
Bug ID: 2046372
Summary: CVE-2021-45847 slic3r: NULL pointer dereference in 3MF
XML via a crafted 3MF input file
Product: Security Response
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046372
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2046373
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046367
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2046366
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046366
Guilherme de Almeida Suckevicz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2046367
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046367
Bug ID: 2046367
Summary: CVE-2021-45846 slic3r: NULL pointer dereference in AMF
XML parser via a crafted AMF document [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 35
Status:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046366
Bug ID: 2046366
Summary: CVE-2021-45846 slic3r: NULL pointer dereference in AMF
XML parser via a crafted AMF document
Product: Security Response
Hardware: All
OS:
For information, i have no access to rust-pam-sys. i merely watch the repo and
i put the info in anitya since nobody else was doing it.
Sent with ProtonMail Secure Email.
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
Le mercredi 26 janvier 2022 à 06:29, Fabio Valentini a
écrit:
> Maintainers per
> From: Brandon Nielsen [mailto:niels...@jetfuse.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2022 5:14 PM
> On 1/26/22 3:25 AM, Roberto Sassu via devel wrote:
>
> [Snip]
>
> >
> > - web servers or other kind of servers where you, as client, would
> >like the guarantee that your data is processed
On 1/26/22 3:25 AM, Roberto Sassu via devel wrote:
[Snip]
- web servers or other kind of servers where you, as client, would
like the guarantee that your data is processed only if the software
running in the server is not compromised
For what it's worth, I, and several people I work
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045863
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-1e62fda204 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-1e62fda204
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 16:23, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
>
> Dne 26. 01. 22 v 15:48 Iñaki Ucar napsal(a):
> > On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 15:46, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> >> More issues with this change:
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046246
> >>
> >> Packages such as R (octave and others, I
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045863
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046206
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 7:37 AM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 26. 01. 22 16:30, Troy Dawson wrote:
> > EPEL 8 Playground is going away.
> > One of the steps in that process [1] is to clean out playground from all
> the
> > various package.cfg files.
> > I will not be removing the package.cfg files.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044096
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-f7fd149e34 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-f7fd149e34
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On 26. 01. 22 16:30, Troy Dawson wrote:
EPEL 8 Playground is going away.
One of the steps in that process [1] is to clean out playground from all the
various package.cfg files.
I will not be removing the package.cfg files. I will only remove
epel8-playground entry if it is there. If you, as
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045863
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
EPEL 8 Playground is going away.
One of the steps in that process [1] is to clean out playground from all
the various package.cfg files.
I will not be removing the package.cfg files. I will only remove
epel8-playground entry if it is there. If you, as a package maintainer,
want to remove the
Dne 26. 01. 22 v 15:48 Iñaki Ucar napsal(a):
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 15:46, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
More issues with this change:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046246
Packages such as R (octave and others, I suppose, as well) save the
build flags because they are needed to build
On Wed, 26 Jan 2022 at 15:46, Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> More issues with this change:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046246
>
> Packages such as R (octave and others, I suppose, as well) save the
> build flags because they are needed to build package extensions. With
> this change, a
More issues with this change:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046246
Packages such as R (octave and others, I suppose, as well) save the
build flags because they are needed to build package extensions. With
this change, a path that only exists during the parent package build
stage is
Notification time stamped 2022-01-24 20:29:32 UTC
From 904461f8484977cc5c89b13497c1f5edb87f1a91 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Fedora Release Engineering
Date: Jan 21 2022 07:03:05 +
Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild
Signed-off-by: Fedora Release
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044096
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|iarn...@gmail.com, |
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041430
--- Comment #6 from Xavier Bachelot ---
I've filed https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Plack/pull-request/2.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
xavierb opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Plack` that you
are following:
``
Drop support for mod_perl in EL9 and later
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Plack/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039505
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #3 from
Hello.
I've just orphaned package hatch - Python project management tool.
The current version fails to build from source in rawhide - one test
fails, not a big deal. There is also new version 1.0.0rc11 but it
depends on it's own Python build system which I don't want to package
for Fedora.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039505
Xavier Bachelot changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039505
--- Comment #1 from Paul Howarth ---
Will you be able to branch and build perl-Email-MIME in epel9?
I would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish
to build it on epel9.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043397
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046228
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2046233
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046206
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2046233
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046233
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046233
Bug ID: 2046233
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Text-Autoformat for
EPEL-9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component:
* Jakub Jelinek:
>> debugbreak: %check uses gdb, which now crashes (“(core dumped) gdb -q -x
>> "${exe}-rpm-test.gdb" --batch < /dev/null”) on ppc64le/x86_64, but not on
>> aarch64
>
> If gdb crashes, it would be nice if somebody from the gdb team had a look,
> of course it can be a gcc bug too.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046230
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2041283
Doc Type|---
Dne 21. 01. 22 v 17:08 Roberto Sassu via devel napsal(a):
(note for the infrastructure mailing list: please check if the changes
I'm proposing could be tested in the Fedora infrastructure, like Copr)
Copr does not use `rpmsign` at all. Copr uses `obs-sign` [1]. The benefits of obs-sign is that
1 - 100 of 123 matches
Mail list logo
