[Bug 2039819] Please branch and build perl-Curses for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039819 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2046233] Please branch and build perl-Text-Autoformat for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046233 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 2041283] Please branch and build perl-Geography-Countries in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041283 Emmanuel Seyman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||emman...@seyman.fr --- Comment #3

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

Hi Adam, also gvfs uses pkexec currently to start gvfsd-admin backend... Regards O. st 26. 1. 2022 v 23:39 odesílatel Adam Williamson napsal: > > Hi folks! > > For anyone who hasn't seen it yet - there's quite a kerfuffle today > about a major security issue in polkit: > >

[EPEL-devel] Revisiting policy for limited arch packages?

Hi all, I just filed https://pagure.io/epel/issue/152 to ask if we should revisit the policy for https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/epel/epel-packaging/#limited_arch_packages This policy seems very similar to the policy we agreed on in https://pagure.io/epel/issue/134 (but haven't documented

[EPEL-devel] Re: Removing playground from package.cfg files

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 7:54 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 7:37 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > >> On 26. 01. 22 16:30, Troy Dawson wrote: >> > EPEL 8 Playground is going away. >> > One of the steps in that process [1] is to clean out playground from >> all the >> > various

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-cf4fee5aa6 perl-Image-ExifTool-12.38-1.el8 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1ba918cfc7 strongswan-5.9.5-2.el8 The following

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-246382d5dc golang-1.16.13-2.el7 0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6395a45cb3 perl-Image-ExifTool-12.38-1.el7 The following builds

[Bug 2046230] Please branch and build perl-User-Identity for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046230 --- Comment #1 from Sergio Basto --- branched requested https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41422 I think I changed the numbers, but it doesn't matter the information is: the branch was requested -- You are receiving this

[Bug 2041283] Please branch and build perl-Geography-Countries in epel9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041283 --- Comment #2 from Sergio Basto --- branch request https://pagure.io/releng/fedora-scm-requests/issue/41421 ? @Paul what is yours fas username ? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

Selinux slow / How to disable selinux labeling from SPEC Was: mv is massively slower on the host rather than in a nspawn chroot, regression somewhere?

On 1/24/22 01:30, Robert-André Mauchin wrote: Hi, So I have an annoying bug that started near the beginnings of F35. My papirus-icon-theme became very slow to install: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2029709#c18 During the installation, all the files are copied, then renamed by rpm

[Bug 2021149] perl-bignum-0.53-2.fc35 FTBFS: tests fail with Big-Int-1.999824

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021149 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2045029] CVE-2022-23935 perl-Image-ExifTool: lib/Image/ExifTool.pm in ExifTool before 12.38 mishandles a $file =~ /\|$/ check [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045029 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-c0c11c4776 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2044096] perl-DateTime-Format-Natural-1.13 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044096 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2045863] biber-2.17 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045863 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2043770] perl-Net-HTTP-6.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043770 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-af9f3e8f02 has been pushed to the Fedora 35 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

Hi Adam, thanks for asking this question! Due to similar horrible bugs before, I have uninstalled sudo and friends, but I never managed to uninstall pkexec due to those dependencies. > The issue and some of the comments around it prompted me to wonder - > why is `pkexec` still a thing?

[Bug 2045029] CVE-2022-23935 perl-Image-ExifTool: lib/Image/ExifTool.pm in ExifTool before 12.38 mishandles a $file =~ /\|$/ check [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045029 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-f3ab9c77bc has been pushed to the Fedora 34 testing repository. Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command: `sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing

[Bug 2043770] perl-Net-HTTP-6.22 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2043770 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

libvpx soname bump 6.3.0 -> 7.0.0

Updating libvpx in rawhide to 1.11.0 comes with an soname bump to 7.0.0. Affected Fedora packages: * baresip * godot * gstreamer1-plugins-good * linphone * qt5-qtwebengine * seamonkey * toxcore * utox * xpra I'm doing a rawhide chain-build since all of these rebuild locally without issue against

Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

Hi Mark, > Of course gcc -fsanitize=undefined cannot be used on production code. Why not? Will it find too many errors? Kind regards, Chris ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: `BuildRequires: /usr/lib/libc.a` fails on epel8 x86_64

Hi Florian, > Yes, I understood that. x86_64 buildroots only have x86_64 packages in > Koji. You cannot build and run 32-bit binaries (unless you put them > together completely from scratch, without help from i686 RPM packages). alright, thank you for clarifying! Curiously though, the Koji

Re: F36 Change: Ruby 3.1 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Just to let everybody know, Ruby 3.1 has landed in Rawhide [1]. The binary packages have been rebuilt, but there might be other compatibility issue. If you need help fixing your package, please come to discuss the issue to ruby-sig ML. Vít [1]

[Bug 2045029] CVE-2022-23935 perl-Image-ExifTool: lib/Image/ExifTool.pm in ExifTool before 12.38 mishandles a $file =~ /\|$/ check [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045029 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6395a45cb3 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 7 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

[Bug 2045029] CVE-2022-23935 perl-Image-ExifTool: lib/Image/ExifTool.pm in ExifTool before 12.38 mishandles a $file =~ /\|$/ check [fedora-all]

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045029 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 2033633] Add perl-Types-Path-Tiny to EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2033633 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 2044851] Please branch and build perl-Unicode-Map8 for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044851 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2038269] perl-Authen-Simple for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038269 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2046228] Please branch and build perl-Text-Reform for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046228 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2039077] perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039077 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2031807] perl-Net-OAuth for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031807 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[Bug 2044825] perl-Unicode-MapUTF8 for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044825 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 2046206] Please branch and build perl-TeX-Hyphen for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046206 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 2039505] Please branch and build perl-Email-MIME for EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039505 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 2037243] perl-String-Similarity missing from EPEL

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037243 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #8 from

Re: RFE: CMake AutoRequires?

Hi Kevin, On January 27, 2022 3:59:04 AM UTC, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: >Hi, > >when working on finally fixing Trojitá to build (it had been FTBFS since >F34, so removal was impending), I have noticed that the Akonadi contacts >plugin was not getting built because of missing transitive

Re: `BuildRequires: /usr/lib/libc.a` fails on epel8 x86_64

* Christoph Erhardt: > I'm not actually trying to cross-build mold for i686; my goal is to do a > regular x86_64 build of mold and to run its complete testsuite. Yes, I understood that. x86_64 buildroots only have x86_64 packages in Koji. You cannot build and run 32-bit binaries (unless you

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 1:05 PM Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 02:21:19PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > My best recollection is that pkexec was kinda a kludge to allow us to > > get rid of consolehelper: some apps weren't getting rewritten to the > > Right Way of doing

Re: `BuildRequires: /usr/lib/libc.a` fails on epel8 x86_64

I'm not actually trying to cross-build mold for i686; my goal is to do a regular x86_64 build of mold and to run its complete testsuite. Since mold is a linker that supports multiple target architectures, its testsuite contains a bunch of scripts that explicitly invoke `cc -m32` and `cc -m32

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "Perl 5.34 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From c2233c605419d677ff0d6e775234cd2ad5afd06d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: May 23 2021 00:04:02 + Subject: Perl 5.34 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Types-Path-Tiny.spec b/perl-Types-Path-Tiny.spec index

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "- Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From 8713af4b6e7fc355b7fd8cb0ef2eb6e8f953fa81 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 27 2021 07:13:56 + Subject: - Second attempt - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_35_Mass_Rebuild

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From 18547ec819c1a267af6cc631050eaa207f91943c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 27 2021 05:39:15 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_34_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From 7b02d2e134f042acad6ad127937ab7a036e88903 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 21 2022 06:27:20 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_36_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From 905c73742de841aa78aded4f0f361f5c0031f132 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 28 2020 19:53:57 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "Perl 5.32 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From 35f85fa452adad07f72eb225d4e057bff1b7021e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 23 2020 10:32:18 + Subject: Perl 5.32 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Types-Path-Tiny.spec b/perl-Types-Path-Tiny.spec index

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From dfa66c6076785e735a3207388eaf81ce159eac8d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jan 30 2020 05:51:41 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_32_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From 03f0681324cc2dc7405fdc74ad5880099b2c6720 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 13 2018 20:37:12 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_29_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "Add BuildRequires: make (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From c75deeac5d8008a3504fbd4f4ac4f513af6ef1e8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Stellard Date: Jan 08 2021 18:59:56 + Subject: Add BuildRequires: make https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Remove_make_from_BuildRoot --- diff --git

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From 1ed2c4dc3d78922763c7b6aa1ec5671da0f0a943 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 02 2019 01:21:48 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_30_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From 1e1c0d59003e5a52974fd3eddb7f39fd95ddb7e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 26 2019 07:50:02 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_31_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "Perl 5.28 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From 3dee3dc74bd0d64b34166e3d8f2f61a88d2af2f1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 30 2018 04:11:51 + Subject: Perl 5.28 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Types-Path-Tiny.spec b/perl-Types-Path-Tiny.spec index

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "Perl 5.30 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From 17968cbf154f52fcbdb34b106ab6275a9c3a57ad Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: May 31 2019 17:31:01 + Subject: Perl 5.30 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Types-Path-Tiny.spec b/perl-Types-Path-Tiny.spec index

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN "

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From ae1817d41a6268fd739e6a5151f69782684753d8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jun 04 2018 13:16:55 + Subject: cpan.org addresses moved to MetaCPAN --- diff

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "Update to 0.006."

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From 0b7fa39555f5bf25a37980e799a5f84f75e19a44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Corsépius Date: May 22 2018 13:39:31 + Subject: Update to 0.006. --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index 8ec4ff2..c9320e2 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild (..more)"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From c7df6a8064cca407f1043ab520845dbbd527a674 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Feb 09 2018 02:06:49 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_28_Mass_Rebuild Signed-off-by: Fedora Release

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From 169f3f50e37907ed43238bb480408e37e94d199e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Jul 27 2017 06:53:40 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_27_Mass_Rebuild --- diff --git

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter "

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From aa0d59496e43e24154b49092fb3a64a3153f4038 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Petr Písař Date: Jul 12 2017 12:39:28 + Subject: perl dependency renamed to perl-interpreter

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "Initial import"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From f2ddf2ba56882dbfef09e5c304ee7ad01748b892 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ralf Corsépius Date: Feb 08 2017 18:52:41 + Subject: Initial import --- diff --git a/.gitignore b/.gitignore index e69de29..8ec4ff2 100644 --- a/.gitignore +++

ppisar pushed to perl-Types-Path-Tiny (epel9). "Perl 5.26 rebuild"

Notification time stamped 2022-01-26 17:17:00 UTC From 3e76b4b82c93ef4801c22979c63d42db3777c505 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jitka Plesnikova Date: Jun 06 2017 19:49:33 + Subject: Perl 5.26 rebuild --- diff --git a/perl-Types-Path-Tiny.spec b/perl-Types-Path-Tiny.spec index

Re: `BuildRequires: /usr/lib/libc.a` fails on epel8 x86_64

* Florian Weimer: > * Christoph Erhardt: > >> I'm trying to build mold for epel8. A bunch of mold's unit tests produce >> statically linked 32-bit binaries, so on x86_64 we need a build dependency >> on >> a static multilib glibc. >> >> I have learnt that multilib build dependencies are a

Re: `BuildRequires: /usr/lib/libc.a` fails on epel8 x86_64

* Christoph Erhardt: > I'm trying to build mold for epel8. A bunch of mold's unit tests produce > statically linked 32-bit binaries, so on x86_64 we need a build dependency on > a static multilib glibc. > > I have learnt that multilib build dependencies are a tricky thing in Koji, > and > the

Re: CVE-2021-4034: why is pkexec still a thing?

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 02:21:19PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > My best recollection is that pkexec was kinda a kludge to allow us to > get rid of consolehelper: some apps weren't getting rewritten to the > Right Way of doing things under policykit, they still just wanted to > have the entire

`BuildRequires: /usr/lib/libc.a` fails on epel8 x86_64

Hi list, I'm trying to build mold for epel8. A bunch of mold's unit tests produce statically linked 32-bit binaries, so on x86_64 we need a build dependency on a static multilib glibc. I have learnt that multilib build dependencies are a tricky thing in Koji, and the only solution I have

Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:37:29AM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi, > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:41:36AM +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > > On 1/22/22 10:05 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > > > So I would give valgrind a 6/6 (100%) score :) > > > > But if the compiler starts copying zeros on

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 36 Rawhide 20220127.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

On Thu, 2022-01-27 at 18:05 +0100, Peter Boy wrote: > > > Am 27.01.2022 um 13:14 schrieb rawh...@fedoraproject.org: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_36_Rawhide_20220127.n.0_Summary > > I’m missing Server aarch64 raw-xz. Is it not yet finished or not successful? You

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 36 Rawhide 20220127.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

> Am 27.01.2022 um 13:14 schrieb rawh...@fedoraproject.org: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Results:Fedora_36_Rawhide_20220127.n.0_Summary I’m missing Server aarch64 raw-xz. Is it not yet finished or not successful? ___ devel mailing list

Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

Hello Mark, On Thursday, January 27, 2022 5:37:29 AM EST Mark Wielaard wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:41:36AM +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > > On 1/22/22 10:05 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > > So I would give valgrind a 6/6 (100%) score :) > > > > But if the compiler starts copying zeros on

[EPEL-devel] Re: Announcing LLVM Snapshot Packages for Fedora Linux

On Fri, 2021-10-08 at 12:13 +0200, Konrad Kleine wrote: > Dear Fedora packagers, developers and users, > > we have some good news for you: > > We are beginning to build nightly snapshot packages of LLVM for the > latest > versions of Fedora Linux (currently 34, 35 and rawhide) for a growing >

Re: Announcing LLVM Snapshot Packages for Fedora Linux

On Fri, 2021-10-08 at 12:13 +0200, Konrad Kleine wrote: > Dear Fedora packagers, developers and users, > > we have some good news for you: > > We are beginning to build nightly snapshot packages of LLVM for the > latest > versions of Fedora Linux (currently 34, 35 and rawhide) for a growing >

Re: Announcing LLVM Snapshot Packages for Fedora Linux

On Thursday, 27 January 2022 16.14.36 WET José Abílio Matos wrote: > $ src/lyx > > [1] 61542 > > src/lyx: /lib64/libstdc++.so.6: version `GLIBCXX_3.4.30' not found (required > by src/lyx) > > > Any help here? OK, one option is set the linker path $ LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/gcc-latest/lib64/

Re: Announcing LLVM Snapshot Packages for Fedora Linux

On Wednesday, 3 November 2021 13.47.22 WET Jonathan Wakely wrote: > Nice to see this going public, I will definitely be using it, thanks! > > And I'll shamelessly plug my copr with weekly GCC snapshots ;-) > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/jwakely/gcc-latest/ Thank you for providing it.

[Bug 2039077] perl-Authen-Simple-Passwd for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2039077 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[Bug 2031807] perl-Net-OAuth for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2031807 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

[Bug 2046803] perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-PKCS10: FTBFS in Fedora rawhide/f36

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2046803 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Doc Type|---

Fedora-Rawhide-20220127.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 7 of 43 required tests failed, 5 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 25/225 (x86_64), 23/148 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed

Re: Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 9:57 AM David Sommerseth wrote: > > On 27/01/2022 15:50, Neal Gompa wrote: > > pkcs11-helper doesn't exist in RHEL/CentOS itself, and it's probably > > being filtered out in ELN to mimic RHEL. It's shipped in EPEL, so you > > need an EPEL repository. > > Alright, sounds

Re: Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL

On 27/01/2022 15:50, Neal Gompa wrote: pkcs11-helper doesn't exist in RHEL/CentOS itself, and it's probably being filtered out in ELN to mimic RHEL. It's shipped in EPEL, so you need an EPEL repository. Alright, sounds reasonable. ELN won't be very useful for you because it's a stripped

Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

On Thu, Jan 27 2022 at 11:37:29 AM +0100, Mark Wielaard wrote: If you believe the tools are pretty good for detecting these issues (and I believe they are, the example given was just unfortunate because some of the issues weren't actually bad code and some others were rightfully optimized out,

Re: Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 9:45 AM David Sommerseth wrote: > > On 27/01/2022 15:35, Neal Gompa wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 9:33 AM David Sommerseth wrote: > >> > >> > >> Hi, > >> > >> I've hit a challenge I've not been able to figure out properly. I'm > >> putting together a Fedora Copr

[Bug 2038269] perl-Authen-Simple for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2038269 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #2 from

Re: Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL

On 27/01/2022 15:35, Neal Gompa wrote: On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 9:33 AM David Sommerseth wrote: Hi, I've hit a challenge I've not been able to figure out properly. I'm putting together a Fedora Copr repo which should cover most the various distros supported via Copr- CentOS Stream, EPEL,

Re: Intent to retire w3c-markup-validator, perl-HTML-Tidy, tidyp

On Tue, 2022-01-25 at 09:54 +, Paul Howarth wrote: > Hello all, > > I'm the Fedora maintainer of the perl-HTML-Tidy package and its > underlying library, tidyp. > > The upstream maintainer of these packages has now stopped work on > tidyp, and has archived the upstream repository in a

[Bug 2044825] perl-Unicode-MapUTF8 for EPEL 9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2044825 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from

Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 15:06:31 +0100, František Šumšal wrote: > I've indeed noticed the other warnings. However, given this mass rebuild was > done with a new snapshot of gcc-12, the error is probably related to that, > that's why I pointed out the most severe issue (since it's an error, not > a

Re: Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 9:33 AM David Sommerseth wrote: > > > Hi, > > I've hit a challenge I've not been able to figure out properly. I'm > putting together a Fedora Copr repo which should cover most the various > distros supported via Copr- CentOS Stream, EPEL, Fedora and Fedora ELN. > > The

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

Will do so :) On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 3:35 PM Stephen Gallagher wrote: > I am canceling the ELN SIG meeting this week in favor of encouraging > members to attend Devconf.cz. > > Visit https://www.devconf.info/cz/ for more information. > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 7:00 AM wrote: > > > > Dear

Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : ELN SIG

I am canceling the ELN SIG meeting this week in favor of encouraging members to attend Devconf.cz. Visit https://www.devconf.info/cz/ for more information. On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 7:00 AM wrote: > > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >ELN SIG on 2022-01-28 from 12:00:00 to

Fedora Copr - and building Fedora + Stream with EPEL

Hi, I've hit a challenge I've not been able to figure out properly. I'm putting together a Fedora Copr repo which should cover most the various distros supported via Copr- CentOS Stream, EPEL, Fedora and Fedora ELN. The challenge is that for CentOS Stream, the EPEL repository is required - as

Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 01:58:34PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hmm, so it sounds like OCaml was actually broken already. For example, > if OCaml is linked with -flto or -use-ld=lld, then this should not "leak" > into extensions. The split between flags which are appropriate to

Re: Revisiting Fedora backgrounds spec

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:17 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote: > > On 26/01/2022 09:49, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > If your only motivation is to avoid the review, then please don't. > > Reviews are good. They discover problems with the package (if done > > properly). (snip) > Fedora backgrounds

Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25

On 1/27/22 14:58, Michael Schwendt wrote: On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:01:40 +0100, František Šumšal wrote: Looks like the culprit is: You may have noticed that there are many more compiler errors in the build.log, but it seems you've missed that the src.rpm builds fine for all other archs. What

Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 2:55 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:51:54AM +0100, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 11:34, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > > > > Another concrete proposal: > > > > > > Is there a way to scan all binary packages in

Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 12:04:02PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 12:50:33PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > > Dne 27. 01. 22 v 12:18 Iñaki Ucar napsal(a): > > >On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 12:09, Vít Ondruch wrote: > > >> > > >>Dne 27. 01. 22 v 11:19 Iñaki Ucar napsal(a):

Re: mass rebuild status - 2022-01-25

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 14:01:40 +0100, František Šumšal wrote: > Looks like the culprit is: You may have noticed that there are many more compiler errors in the build.log, but it seems you've missed that the src.rpm builds fine for all other archs. What gives?

Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:51:54AM +0100, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 11:34, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > > > > > Another concrete proposal: > > > > Is there a way to scan all binary packages in Fedora to get either a > > count or list of those packages that contain strings like >

Re: Package notes feature causing build paths to be embedded

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 11:29:13AM +0100, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 11:19, Iñaki Ucar wrote: > > > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 10:58, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > wrote: > > > > > > > I think this change should be reverted until a cleaner way can be > > > > found to implement

Re: Uninitialized variables and F37

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 10:41:36AM +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 1/22/22 10:05 PM, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > >So I would give valgrind a 6/6 (100%) score :) > > But if the compiler starts copying zeros on uninitialized memory, > valgrind loses any ability to detect the defect in the code.

[Bug 2021149] perl-bignum-0.53-2.fc35 FTBFS: tests fail with Big-Int-1.999824

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2021149 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED --- Comment #1 from

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL 9: Interested in fails to install reports?

On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 4:40 AM Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, Jan 27, 2022 at 7:37 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > Hello EPEL, > > > > would you be interested in automated bugzilla reports for EPEL 9 > packages that > > fail to install in the buildroot? Or is it too soon? > > > > When testing

[EPEL-devel] Re: btrbk-0.31.3-1 missing dependency

On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 07:23, Nick Howitt wrote: > > > On 27/01/2022 12:20, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > > > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2022 at 04:38, Nick Howitt via epel-devel > > > > wrote: > > > > Hi gents, > > It looks like btrbk has been

  1   2   >