Hi everyone,
I have been de-facto maintaining containerd in Fedora as a member of the go-
sig for a little while now, as the previous maintainer no longer has time to
do. In addition to the Fedora branches, this package also exists on EPEL 7.
That branch has not been maintained for a while and
Hi everyone,
I have been de-facto maintaining containerd in Fedora as a member of the go-
sig for a little while now, as the previous maintainer no longer has time to
do. In addition to the Fedora branches, this package also exists on EPEL 7.
That branch has not been maintained for a while and
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094836
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> I guess it could be fixed with a clean-room reimplementation of the
> stripped parts of FDK-AAC.
Unfortunately, the concept of clean-room does not apply to patents, only to
copyright. So it will not help here.
Kevin Kofler
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> Not everyone. New users will not be aware of RPM Fusion, so I see much
> value in having things mostly work out-of-the-box. We just have to agree
> to disagree here.
It depends on where the new users are coming from. And if they really find
Fedora but not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091242
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Devel-REPL-1.003029-1. |perl-Devel-REPL-1.003029-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091432
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=200
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091242
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Status|ON_QA
Thanks for your answer Chris.
```
blackbird:~ # cryptsetup benchmark -c aes-xts-plain64 --key-size 512
# Tests approximatifs en utilisant uniquement la mémoire (pas de stockage E/S).
# Algorithme | Clé | Chiffrement |Déchiffrement
aes-xts512b84,3 MiB/s
Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> An unfiltered version has recently been approved[1].
>
> [1]: https://pagure.io/fedora-workstation/issue/300
I agree with the RPM Fusion developers that this is an absolutely ridiculous
double standard, especially with statements like "and we retire Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041281
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
I am unable to clone repos from src.fpo since this morning.
$ fedpkg co xfce4-power-manager
Cloning into 'xfce4-power-manager'...
nonamed...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org: Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: Could not read from remote repository.
Please make sure you have the correct access rights
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 07:32:21PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> Hey Mark,
>
> will rawhide builds in Koji automatically create Bodhi updates after the
> outage is over, or is there some manual action that will be required?
I'm not Mark, but there shouldn't be any manual action needed. When
On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 2:54:51 PM CDT Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> without messing with config files (which I
> hate, because that means newer crb.repo changes won't be picked up).
I thought files marked `%config(noreplace)` don't get updated automatically
even
if the user didn't modify
Thank you for asking.
Go for it.
On Mon, Jun 6, 2022 at 12:55 AM Iker Pedrosa wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to update pam_radius from v1.4 to v2.0 in EPEL9 and 8. The newer
> version includes several patches to make the PAM module thread-safe.
>
> I've opened a ticket in the steering committee's
On Wed, Jun 8 2022 at 10:49:51 PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
I guess it could be fixed with a clean-room reimplementation of the
stripped parts of FDK-AAC.
Probably not. Aren't the stripped parts the parts that Fedora Legal
does not want us to have? (They wouldn't be
On Wednesday, 08 June 2022 at 22:41, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 8 2022 at 09:47:53 PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > The above is mostly correct. It's not about audio quality, but
> > correctness. Specifically, HE-AAC audio is decoded incorrectly.
> > See
On Wed, Jun 8 2022 at 09:47:53 PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
The above is mostly correct. It's not about audio quality, but
correctness. Specifically, HE-AAC audio is decoded incorrectly.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1501522#c22
for more details.
Looking
Martin Stransky kirjoitti 6.6.2022 klo 11.48:
You can get exact info by running Firefox with
MOZ_LOG="PlatformDecoderModule:5"
env variable.
Thank you, this is a good thing to know.
However, te problem was resolved by ffmpeg-free update,
so I do not need to delve into the output this
On Wed, 2022-06-08 at 15:06 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Michel Alexandre Salim
> said:
> > This won't be ready until EPEL 10 or even 11, but one thing I've
> > discussed with the DNF maintainer is the possibility of having
> > something like /etc/yum.repos.d/reponame.repo.d/
On Wednesday, 08 June 2022 at 22:11, Alexander G. M. Smith wrote:
> On 2022-06-08 15:52, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > 4xxx is not IvyBridge, it's Haswell.
>
> You sure? I was going by
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Bridge_(microarchitecture)#Desktop_processors
>
> There would
Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski kirjoitti 6.6.2022 klo 11.54:
On Saturday, 04 June 2022 at 00:05, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
I have discovered that installing the ffmpeg-free package degrades Firefox
video support. Without any kind of ffmpeg installed, Firefox is able to play
all the videos I want
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2095035
Bug ID: 2095035
Summary: perl-Chart-2.402.0 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Chart
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On 2022-06-08 15:52, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> 4xxx is not IvyBridge, it's Haswell.
You sure? I was going by
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ivy_Bridge_(microarchitecture)#Desktop_processors
There would be a significant change between Ivy Bridge and Haswell,
since it's a "tock"
Once upon a time, Michel Alexandre Salim said:
> This won't be ready until EPEL 10 or even 11, but one thing I've
> discussed with the DNF maintainer is the possibility of having
> something like /etc/yum.repos.d/reponame.repo.d/ where you can drop
> overrides, similar to how you can drop
On Sat, 2022-06-04 at 20:47 -0400, Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
> On Sat, 4 Jun 2022 at 18:54, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 4, 2022 at 10:52 PM Troy Dawson
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > When I first created the EPEL issue to auto-enable crb repo[1] I
> > > was only thinking of CAN we do it. I
On Wednesday, 08 June 2022 at 21:00, Alexander G. M. Smith wrote:
> Ian Laurie wrote on Friday, 3 June 2022 at 11:17 p.m.:
> > Is anyone else seeing crashes and other strange events in VirtualBox
> > 6.1.34 (from RPMFusion) with Linux guests when the Linux host is running
> > Fedora 36 with
On Tuesday, 07 June 2022 at 16:25, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 7 2022 at 03:11:41 PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > You could say that about any software that we ship that's missing
> > features. FESCo decided it's better to include an incomplete or inferior
> >
Ian Laurie wrote on Friday, 3 June 2022 at 11:17 p.m.:
> Is anyone else seeing crashes and other strange events in VirtualBox
> 6.1.34 (from RPMFusion) with Linux guests when the Linux host is running
> Fedora 36 with kernel-5.17.12?
Same thing here. Host is Fedora 35 with kernel 5.17.12, using
On Wed, Jun 8, 2022 at 1:43 PM Maxwell G via devel
wrote:
>
> On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 8:59:21 AM CDT Petr Pisar wrote:
> > The problem is that RPM Fusion only targets Fedora.
>
> It also targets RHEL, CentOS Stream, and the various RHEL rebuilds.
>
For all practical purposes, that is
On Wednesday, June 8, 2022 8:59:21 AM CDT Petr Pisar wrote:
> The problem is that RPM Fusion only targets Fedora.
It also targets RHEL, CentOS Stream, and the various RHEL rebuilds.
--
Thanks,
Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
On 08/06/2022 15:59, Petr Pisar wrote:
If Fedora linked to RPM
Fusion, then according some (U.S.) jurisdical frameworks Fedora and RPM Fusion
would form a unit and Fedora would become legally responsible for RPM Fusion.
I don't think so. RPM Fusion is a third party repository located and
Jun 8, 2022 8:51:45 AM Matthew Miller :
> The differences outlined there result in different constraints.
I disagree that flathub flatpaks breaking our policies is incidental. The way
it
solves the "problem with Linux app distribution" is (in part) by allowing
developers to package and
On 08/06/2022 15:31, Matthew Miller wrote:
The differences outlined there result in different constraints.
Flathub is a third-party repository which provides software for various
Linux distributions. It doesn't shape what software it carries around what
Fedora does not. It fundamentally
On Sun, Jun 05, 2022 at 08:02:21AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
>
> Il 05/06/22 09:37, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel ha scritto:
> > On 04/06/2022 22:43, Otto Urpelainen wrote:
> >> But the question is, what needs to be done so that ffmpeg-free will not
> >> suffer, either.
> > ffmpeg-free is
On 08. 06. 22 17:48, Mark O'Brien wrote:
Hi all,
Apologies for the very delayed notice on this. I should have sent this mail a
lot earlier.
TL;DR there will be an outage of Bodhi tomorrow morning EU time for some
upgrades
Planned Outage - Bodhi upgrade - 2022-06-09 09:00 UTC
There will be
Notification time stamped 2022-06-03 11:02:12 UTC
From 2f7eaf46de2a587c5b4f0a3155e6550685ae6e64 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 03 2022 11:02:05 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages
---
diff --git a/perl-Type-Tie.spec b/perl-Type-Tie.spec
Notification time stamped 2022-06-03 10:30:44 UTC
From 08a42d654ec02839a7fa319ea36e20b15e4e1330 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 03 2022 10:30:38 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages
---
diff --git a/perl-Params-ValidationCompiler.spec
Notification time stamped 2022-06-03 10:23:46 UTC
From 4e577520b04b10e9f5c557655d2bff9d6bf86805 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 03 2022 10:23:39 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages
---
diff --git a/perl-Mail-Message.spec
Notification time stamped 2022-06-03 10:14:03 UTC
From d6e1cf77e0fb9c8ba0cda4bbd12895743b2fb0a4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jitka Plesnikova
Date: Jun 03 2022 10:13:57 +
Subject: Perl 5.36 re-rebuild of bootstrapped packages
---
diff --git a/perl-Specio.spec b/perl-Specio.spec
index
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose PASSES proposed Rawhide gating check!
All required tests passed
Failed openQA tests: 6/231 (x86_64), 13/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Rawhide-20220531.n.0):
ID: 1286655 Test: x86_64 Workstation-live-iso
V Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 09:31:34AM -0400, Matthew Miller napsal(a):
> On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 09:35:15PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> > On 07/06/2022 17:31, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >
On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 09:35:15PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 07/06/2022 17:31, Matthew Miller wrote:
> >https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/le...@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/HYBZLG2X2G6GJKAE5VAK6UHQ4B3GNAJS/
> There is no real answer there.
The differences outlined
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094836
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-081dbc30ed has been submitted as an update to Fedora 35.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-081dbc30ed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094836
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-465b629fa6 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-465b629fa6
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094836
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094836
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091635
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |MODIFIED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094836
Bug ID: 2094836
Summary: perl-Graphics-TIFF-19 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Graphics-TIFF
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
On Wed, Jun 08, 2022 at 12:37:03PM +0200, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> ** are you using 'journal --setup-keys' and 'journalctl --verify-key=…'?
> In no, feel free to ignore this.
I tried it back in the day (like, 10 years ago), and concluded that the
"just delete logs" hole made it not
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094515
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar ---
As far as I know, the only implementation of ECDSA in Perl packages is
perl-CryptX (it bundles a developmental version of libtomcrypt). Other Perl
packages should transitively use OpenSSL or perl-CryptX.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094395
Bug 2094395 depends on bug 2094397, which changed state.
Bug 2094397 Summary: F37FailsToInstall: perl-Redis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094397
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094396
Bug 2094396 depends on bug 2094397, which changed state.
Bug 2094397 Summary: F37FailsToInstall: perl-Redis
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094397
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041281
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-723e366858 has been submitted as an update to Fedora EPEL 9.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-723e366858
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2091635
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-8e9caddb8b has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-8e9caddb8b
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094397
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Redis-1.999-3.fc37
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094515
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppi...@redhat.com
--- Comment #1 from
Hi!
** are you using 'journal --setup-keys' and 'journalctl --verify-key=…'?
In no, feel free to ignore this.
** background story:
[A very simplified explanation of "Forward Secure Sealing":
public-private key pair is generated when setting up a journal, the
private key is copied off the device
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041281
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar ---
I'm sorry for the delay. I forgot.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041281
The irony is that XTS uses two different keys for different parts of the
operation. This means that AES-XTS-256 is AES128 and AES-XTS-512 is
AES256 (security is not increased by the second key).
So, you compared AES with 128 bit encryption with XChaCha with 256 bit.
And despite the doubled
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2041281
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Filesys-Df-0.92-45.el9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094396
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2094395
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Apache-Session-Browsea
64 matches
Mail list logo
