Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Demi Marie Obenour wrote: >> Valgrind is not helpful for profiling production workloads. It is >> too slow and will not provide an accurate indication of where the >> time is being spent. That requires a sampling profiler. > > IMHO, Valgrind (with the Callgrind

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > Valgrind is not helpful for profiling production workloads. It is > too slow and will not provide an accurate indication of where the > time is being spent. That requires a sampling profiler. IMHO, Valgrind (with the Callgrind or Cachegrind profiles) has a pretty

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-17d14b279e python-bottle-0.12.21-2.el8 1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8d638fabd8 restic-0.13.1-1.el8 The following builds have

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-0286a0e93a python-bottle-0.12.21-1.el7 3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-a9236c0113 oniguruma-6.8.2-2.el7 The following builds

[Bug 2097884] perl-Filter-1.61 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097884 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #2 from

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

On Sat, 2022-06-18 at 00:31 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > > > Interesting bugzillas: > > > > > > fedpkg: FTBFS in Fedora Rawhide with bodhi-client 6: Failed to establish > > > a new > > > connection: [Errno -3] Temporary failure in name resolution > > >

Re: Self Introduction: Ganesh Murthy

Hey Ganesh, On Fri, Jun 17, 2022, at 5:30 PM, Ganesh Murthy wrote: > Hello all, > My name is Ganesh Murthy and I live in Massachusetts. I am > currently a contributor to the Apache qpid-dispatch project [1] and I > maintain its downstream packages (AMQ Interconnect). I also contribute >

OpenCV update to 4.6.0 in rawhide with soname bump

Hi, The plan is to use a side-tag and rebuild all dependencies I exepect a few problems because I think is more or less a bug fix release. Nothing is needed from maintainers. Best regards, -- Sérgio M. B. ___ devel mailing list --

[Bug 2098300] New: perl-Text-Table-Tiny-1.03 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098300 Bug ID: 2098300 Summary: perl-Text-Table-Tiny-1.03 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Text-Table-Tiny Keywords: FutureFeature,

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

On 17. 06. 22 23:21, Adam Williamson wrote: On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 11:49 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10. 06. 22 11:33, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.11, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.1

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:41 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:20 PM Carl George wrote: > >> On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:33 AM Troy Dawson wrote: >> > >> > >> > >> > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:22 PM Carl George wrote: >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:12 PM Troy Dawson

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

On Friday, June 17, 2022 9:03:07 AM CDT Patrick Riehecky via epel-devel wrote: > This way any extra ideas for actions can be added easily later on. > Perhaps a "check" or "status" to see if CRB is enabled/disabled/not- > what-the-os-ships. +1. Having some logic to check if CRB is actually enabled

[EPEL-devel] Re: Request for fence-agents-pve package

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:31 AM Alex Talaran wrote: > > would anyone be willing to package this in epel or help get it in the > existing package please? > > i asked on bugzilla [1] but the current maintainer isnt able to help at > the moment. from what i can tell it might just need uncommented in

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 11:49 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 10. 06. 22 11:33, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.11, we are running a coordinated > > rebuild in > > a side tag. > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.1 > >

Re: Missing dependency in Fedora 35 - bug 2097817

On Fri, Jun 17 2022 at 02:00:14 PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Nope, it has to stay forever. Sorry. Hi, can you explain why? Since we do not maintain upgrade paths from one release to the next anymore, and instead require use of system upgrade, I would have assumed that epoch would only have

Re: New Fedora Developer Portal release

Hi, On 6/17/22 22:39, Ron Olson wrote: Hi, how would I go about adding a page for Swift under Languages and Databases? I looked at "Create a new Project" but I couldn't how to create a page that would fall under that section. First of all, I recommend checkout out our documentation regarding

Re: Missing dependency in Fedora 35 - bug 2097817

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 10:38:19AM +0100, José Abílio Matos wrote: > On Thursday, 16 June 2022 17.55.45 WEST Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > > Hi all. > > > > I need to downgrade python-reportlab in Fedora 35 for a missing runtime > > dependency. What's the most accurate way? > > > > Bug ticket:

Spring Cleaning go-sig/June 2022

Hello Golang packagers, As it happened last month, we are trying to clean the situation with golang packages. In the last month we have seen big improvements (265 ->131 packages in the list), and I really hope next month we will be able to claim such a great result again! At the moment I've

Re: New Fedora Developer Portal release

On 6/17/22 22:13, Eduard Lucena wrote: Hi again, You should consider updating the favicon for the new logo. Right, thanks! Kinda forgot about that one. Filed as https://github.com/developer-portal/website/issues/131 . Thanks, Jarek Br, -- Eduard Lucena Móvil: +56962318010 GNU/Linux User

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 1:20 PM Carl George wrote: > On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:33 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:22 PM Carl George wrote: > >> > >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:12 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > >> > > >> > I'm totally top-posting, and I apologize for

Re: New Fedora Developer Portal release

Hi, how would I go about adding a page for Swift under Languages and Databases? I looked at "Create a new Project" but I couldn't how to create a page that would fall under that section. Ron On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:04 PM Jarek Prokop wrote: > Hi all, > > I have pushed new update for Fedora

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 8:33 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:22 PM Carl George wrote: >> >> On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:12 PM Troy Dawson wrote: >> > >> > I'm totally top-posting, and I apologize for that. >> > >> > For right now, I'm going to put my enable-crb script in

Re: New Fedora Developer Portal release

Hi again, You should consider updating the favicon for the new logo. Br, -- Eduard Lucena Móvil: +56962318010 GNU/Linux User #589060 Ubuntu User #8749 Fedora Marketing Representative ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: New Fedora Developer Portal release

Hi, If the site is not available, please wait a bit. The automation kicks in > periodically (I do not remember how often though), if it is not available > by tomorrow, then I'll take a look by monday :). > It's live now! Great work! -- Eduard Lucena Móvil: +56962318010 GNU/Linux User #589060

Re: Plan / proposal: enable openQA update testing and potentially gating on Rawhide updates

On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 19:33 +, Dan Čermák wrote: > Sounds like a great addition Adam! > > Just to double check: if you have not enabled gating, then openQA will not be > run at all? No, the two are separable. We can enable the tests before we turn on gating. Right now, the tests are already

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 6/17/22 15:10, Daan De Meyer via devel wrote: >> they hit everyone, not just those who are highly dependent on the >> profiling tools the proposal is concerned about. > The kernel benchmarks were added as an example of openly available data we > could find on the potential impact of frame

Re: Plan / proposal: enable openQA update testing and potentially gating on Rawhide updates

Sounds like a great addition Adam! Just to double check: if you have not enabled gating, then openQA will not be run at all? Cheers, Dan On June 9, 2022 7:48:29 PM UTC, Adam Williamson wrote: >Hi folks! > >We've had openQA testing of updates for stable and branched releases, >and gating

Making Fedora faster (was Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal))

On 6/17/22 01:41, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 07:13:55PM -0400, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: >> >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fno-omit-frame-pointer >>> [...] >>> === Unwinding === >>> [...] >>> * Kernel 4.8 frame pointer benchmarks by Suse showed 5%-10% >>> regressions

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

> Regressions of such magnitude can veto such changes, especially when > they hit everyone, not just those who are highly dependent on the > profiling tools the proposal is concerned about. The kernel benchmarks were added as an example of openly available data we could find on the potential

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

Do you really need more than five or so *physical* stack frames during profiling, to figure out what is going on? Graphs generated from DWARF unwinding typically will show logical stack frames from inlining, too, and appear much deeper. Yes, more than a couple times per year I encounter cases

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

* Ben Cotton: > * Meta builds all its libraries and executables with > -fno-omit-frame-pointer by default. Internal benchmarks did not show > significant impact on performance when omitting the frame pointer for > two of our most performance intensive applications. They probably saw

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 6/17/22 06:55, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: > Ben Cotton wrote (on behalf of Daan De Meyer, Davide Cavalca, Andrii > Nakryiko): > >> Fedora will add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to the default C/C++ >> compilation flags, which will improve the effectiveness of profiling >> and debugging tools. >

Re: New Fedora Developer Portal release

Hi, On 6/17/22 19:16, Eduard Lucena wrote: Hi, New: Julia installation page:    * https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/julia/julia-installation.html It looks like the Julia site[1] is down or not existent. If the site is not available, please wait a bit. The

Re: New Fedora Developer Portal release

Hi, New: Julia installation page: >* > > https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/julia/julia-installation.html > It looks like the Julia site[1] is down or not existent. Br, -- Eduard Lucena Móvil: +56962318010 GNU/Linux User #589060 Ubuntu User #8749 Fedora Marketing

New Fedora Developer Portal release

Hi all, I have pushed new update for Fedora Developer Portal. New content should be available in the coming hour or 2 with the following changes and updates. New: Julia installation page:   * https://developer.fedoraproject.org/tech/languages/julia/julia-installation.html Update go package

[Test-Announce] Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220617.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 37 Rawhide 20220617.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Self Introduction: Ganesh Murthy

Hello all, My name is Ganesh Murthy and I live in Massachusetts. I am currently a contributor to the Apache qpid-dispatch project [1] and I maintain its downstream packages (AMQ Interconnect). I also contribute to the skupper project [2]. I am excited to join this mailing list. I want to

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 06:33 -0700, Troy Dawson wrote: > > > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:22 PM Carl George wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:12 PM Troy Dawson > > wrote: > > > > > > I'm totally top-posting, and I apologize for that. > > > > > > For right now, I'm going to put my enable-crb

About Fedora containers

Hi all! TL;DR: Is there any documentation about how to properly take care of our containers? :) --- The Go container has been outdated for a while, and I would love to update it[0], but I'm not familiar with the container process in Fedora. I checked Python3's container[1] looking for

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 9:33 AM Troy Dawson wrote: > I notice that you said crb-enable, crb-disable. > Do you like having the name first, or the function first? I'd put in a vote for "object action" like Carl denoted. As a side note, and this is more for personal learning/clarification, is

Re: CMake fails to configure when "-S ." source method is used

On Thu, 2022-06-16 at 22:02 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 9:57 PM Sérgio Basto > wrote: > > On Wed, 2022-06-15 at 20:28 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:24 PM Sérgio Basto > > > wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2022-06-13 at 17:42 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:

[EPEL-devel] Re: Thoughts: epel-release auto-enable crb repo

On Thu, Jun 16, 2022 at 10:22 PM Carl George wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 5:12 PM Troy Dawson wrote: > > > > I'm totally top-posting, and I apologize for that. > > > > For right now, I'm going to put my enable-crb script in epel-release, > but not automatically run it in a %post script or

[EPEL-devel] Request for fence-agents-pve package

would anyone be willing to package this in epel or help get it in the existing package please? i asked on bugzilla [1] but the current maintainer isnt able to help at the moment. from what i can tell it might just need uncommented in the spec file [2]. someone else asked about it [1][3] and

[Bug 2096953] perl-HTTP-Message-6.37 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2096953 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

Fedora-Rawhide-20220617.n.0 compose check report

Missing expected images: Minimal raw-xz armhfp Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check! 7 of 43 required tests failed, 3 results missing openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING** below Failed openQA tests: 39/231 (x86_64), 73/161 (aarch64) New failures

Review Request: zstd-jni

Zstd-jni are java bindings for de-/compressing zstd archives. It is used for example by apache-commons-compress which currently has zstd support patched out. Zstd is one of archive formats used by rpm. Some other java programs that handle rpms also require this library. I had to unbundle

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220617.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220616.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220617.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 0 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 16 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 0 B Size of dropped packages:258.40

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

Ben Cotton wrote (on behalf of Daan De Meyer, Davide Cavalca, Andrii Nakryiko): > Fedora will add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to the default C/C++ > compilation flags, which will improve the effectiveness of profiling > and debugging tools. […] > Any performance or efficiency work relies on accurate

Re: Updated criteria proposal: networking requirements

Adam Williamson wrote: > DDG tells me that's an open source server intended to be compatible > with openconnect clients, i.e. an open source alternative to the > proprietary CISCO server. It is also by far the easiest to set up Free Software VPN server. It is configured through one configuration

Re: F37 proposal: Add -fno-omit-frame-pointer to default compilation flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 12:14 AM Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fno-omit-frame-pointer > > [...] > > === Unwinding === > > [...] > > * Kernel 4.8 frame pointer benchmarks by Suse showed 5%-10% > > regressions in some benchmarks > >

CPE Weekly Update – Week 24 2022

Hi everyone, This is a weekly report from the CPE (Community Platform Engineering) Team. If you have any questions or feedback, please respond to this report or contact us on #redhat-cpe channel on libera.chat (https://libera.chat/). Week: 13th - 17th June 2022 If you wish to read this in

[Bug 2098108] New: Upgrade perl-Class-MakeMethods to 1.01

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098108 Bug ID: 2098108 Summary: Upgrade perl-Class-MakeMethods to 1.01 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Class-MakeMethods Assignee:

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

On 10. 06. 22 11:33, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.11, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.1 1 We

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 37 Python 3.11 rebuilds to start in a side tag early next week

On 10. 06. 22 11:33, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: Hello, in order to deliver Python 3.11, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a side tag. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.1 1 We

Re: Missing dependency in Fedora 35 - bug 2097817

On Thursday, 16 June 2022 17.55.45 WEST Antonio T. sagitter wrote: > Hi all. > > I need to downgrade python-reportlab in Fedora 35 for a missing runtime > dependency. What's the most accurate way? > > Bug ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097817 > Update:

[Bug 2097884] perl-Filter-1.61 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097884 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-2022-46d1cb38e0 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 36. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-46d1cb38e0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list

[Bug 2097884] perl-Filter-1.61 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097884 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In Version|

[rpms/perl-Filter] PR #2: Tests

jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Filter` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` Tests `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Filter/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-Filter] PR #2: Tests

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Filter` that you are following: `` Tests `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Filter/pull-request/2 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Fedora-Cloud-36-20220617.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (aarch64) New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220616.0): ID: 1301249 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 base_package_install_remove@uefi URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1301249 ID: 1301253 Test:

[Bug 2097884] perl-Filter-1.61 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097884 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED