>> Yes, but this approach is unlikely to be adopted there.
> Why is this?
I do not have any extra information beyond what is on the LKML record.
- FChE
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
Hello team,
Just a reminder that, openvdb 9.1.0 is on side built due to so version
changes. The following packages need an update:
- Blender
- OpenImageIO (important due to the dependence of openshadinglanguage
and Blender)
- pursa-slicer
Please use the following build-side:
fedpkg build
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-17d14b279e
python-bottle-0.12.21-2.el8
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-8d638fabd8
restic-0.13.1-1.el8
The following builds have
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
4 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-6812bb3862
python-bottle-0.12.21-2.el9
1 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-e3b62a5569
restic-0.13.1-1.el9
The following builds have
On Sun, 2022-06-19 at 00:02 +0300, Mark E. Fuller wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have two Fedora machines that are essentially identically
> configured
> (to the best of my knowledge) - a daily use desktop and a laptop for
> lugging around.
>
> Anyway, somehow the laptop is properly returning `go
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2098396
Bug ID: 2098396
Summary: perl-Chart-2.402.3 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Chart
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hi all,
I have two Fedora machines that are essentially identically configured
(to the best of my knowledge) - a daily use desktop and a laptop for
lugging around.
Anyway, somehow the laptop is properly returning `go version` and
properly running a go debugger, etc. is VS Codium, but this
Hi all,
I have two Fedora machines that are essentially identically configured
(to the best of my knowledge) - a daily use desktop and a laptop for
lugging around.
Anyway, somehow the laptop is properly returning `go version` and
properly running a go debugger, etc. is VS Codium, but this
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 02:21:39PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2022-06-17 at 11:49 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
...snip...
> >
> > Kevin, Adam, do could you please do some kind of compose validation?
>
> I can validate a compose if Kevin can build one.
I'm not sure I have any easy way
On 6/18/22 13:22, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
> demiobenour wrote:
>
>>> (Note FWIW that systemtap's kernel runtime does DWARF-based unwinding
>>> for the kernel and user-designated userspace executables and
>>> shared-libraries on demand, and it's not particularly slow at it.)
>>
>> How does it
demiobenour wrote:
>> (Note FWIW that systemtap's kernel runtime does DWARF-based unwinding
>> for the kernel and user-designated userspace executables and
>> shared-libraries on demand, and it's not particularly slow at it.)
>
> How does it do that? Does it have a kernel-mode DWARF unwinder?
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:28:10PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 18/06/2022 12:57, Mark E. Fuller wrote:
> > Devel List: If no response from Emiliano, what's the process here for
> > taking over a package in this case (and also renaming the repo to drop
> > the version from it)?
>
>
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 02:00:03PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 18/06/2022 13:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > So it sounds like the suffix is used for the purpose I guessed. Why
> > not let any packager use a descriptive suffix (without pre-approval)?
>
> +1. I like this idea.
On Fri, Jun 17, 2022 at 04:15:35PM -0500, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 17 2022 at 02:00:14 PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi
> wrote:
> > Nope, it has to stay forever. Sorry.
>
> Hi, can you explain why? Since we do not maintain upgrade paths from one
> release to the next anymore, and instead
On 6/18/22 08:57, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote:
>
>> [...]
>> What Meta is doing can indeed only reasonably be done with a sampling
>> profiler, with additional restrictions (in particular, they state that
>> Perf's support to drop back to userspace for DWARF unwinding is too slow for
>> them) [...]
Any attempt to install my hp4630 all-in one printer on a clean install
F36 produces dialog saying "python3 not responding" and ultimately fails.
Same printer has installed and worked as expected on F35 and many
previous fedora installations.
Installation attempt is for wireless connection.
> [...]
> What Meta is doing can indeed only reasonably be done with a sampling
> profiler, with additional restrictions (in particular, they state that
> Perf's support to drop back to userspace for DWARF unwinding is too slow for
> them) [...]
(Note FWIW that systemtap's kernel runtime does
Thanks! I have been missing my Airspy HF+. It is an awesome piece of hardware
especially for shortwave. I wish Airspy would make theeir software SDR#
cross-platform, but Gqrx and SDR++ work for me in Linux.
___
devel mailing list --
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required test results missing
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 13/231 (x86_64), 88/161 (aarch64)
New failures (same test
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 5/15 (aarch64), 1/15 (x86_64)
New failures (same test not failed in Fedora-IoT-36-20220616.2):
ID: 1302495 Test: aarch64 IoT-dvd_ostree-iso base_services_start@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1302495
Old failures (same test
On 18/06/2022 14:05, Ralf Corsépius wrote:
It is just useless featuritis and doesn't make any sense at all, breaks
lots of tools/scripts, breaks 3rd party packaging conventions, and many
more ...
If an optional RPM BuildTag is introduced, it won't break anything. If
you don't need it, you
Am 18.06.22 um 13:05 schrieb Aleksandra Fedorova:
Hi, all,
I'd like to discuss how we can add Build tag in the RPM.
As one of the key points is to turn it into a common standard for rpm
packages across the ecosystem, the conversation is currently opened
upstream [1] and in RHEL Engineering.
On 18/06/2022 13:47, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
So it sounds like the suffix is used for the purpose I guessed. Why
not let any packager use a descriptive suffix (without pre-approval)?
+1. I like this idea.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On 18/06/2022 13:43, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
And, for example, rpmautospec will not help in the case we need to
update a build on pull request update: When you work with
pull-requests you don’t necessarily add commits, you rework the
history of a branch from which you run a PR. Sometimes even
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 01:32:47PM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 18/06/2022 13:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >I thought I'd be nice and use a suffix for my side tag so it would be
> >clear (not least to me!) which side tag was being used for the OCaml
> >rebuild in Rawhide, but ...
Hi,
On Sat, Jun 18, 2022 at 1:24 PM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
>
> On 18/06/2022 13:05, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
> > * Provide a possibility to change build environment and rebuild rpm
> > packages without changing their content: neither sources nor spec
> > files.
>
> I have a better
On 16/06/2022 22:53, Ben Cotton wrote:
* Kernel 4.8 frame pointer benchmarks by Suse showed 5%-10%
regressions in some benchmarks
I'm not satisfied with the 10% performance loss.
Please do more testing on large projects like Chromium (you must also
rebuild all dependent packages with
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220617.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220618.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:2
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:4
Upgraded packages: 49
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 44.72 KiB
Size of dropped packages
On 18/06/2022 13:08, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I thought I'd be nice and use a suffix for my side tag so it would be
clear (not least to me!) which side tag was being used for the OCaml
rebuild in Rawhide, but ...
You don't need any suffixes to perform a routine rebuild. Suffixes are
only
On 18/06/2022 12:57, Mark E. Fuller wrote:
Devel List: If no response from Emiliano, what's the process here for
taking over a package in this case (and also renaming the repo to drop
the version from it)?
Also releng need change their scripts to check for $version/etc.
presence. Such
On 18/06/2022 13:05, Aleksandra Fedorova wrote:
* Provide a possibility to change build environment and rebuild rpm
packages without changing their content: neither sources nor spec
files.
I have a better solution - let's move all packages to %autorelease +
%autochangelog.
Release:
I thought I'd be nice and use a suffix for my side tag so it would be
clear (not least to me!) which side tag was being used for the OCaml
rebuild in Rawhide, but ...
$ fedpkg request-side-tag --help
usage: fedpkg request-side-tag [-h] [--base-tag BASE_TAG] [--suffix SUFFIX]
options:
-h,
Hi, all,
I'd like to discuss how we can add Build tag in the RPM.
As one of the key points is to turn it into a common standard for rpm
packages across the ecosystem, the conversation is currently opened
upstream [1] and in RHEL Engineering. And I'd like to get Fedora
community on board.
This
This package has actually already been approved for Fedora in March of
2021: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1917510
The repository is at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/airspyhf-1.6.8-1
It looks like Emiliano (the packager, on CC) never actually imported and
built the approved
I hope Fedora does. openSUSE has a bunch so far:
https://software.opensuse.org/search?baseproject=ALL=airspy
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
Hello Robet,
Actually I've some issues with Bugzilla emails, I just notice those BZ
tickets, I'll add you as co-maintainer on all branches. I'll sort the
other ones later.
Best regards.
-Othman
On Wed, Jun 15, 2022 at 11:37 PM Robert Scheck wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> does somebody know how to
Hi,
On June 16, 2022 8:53:59 PM UTC, Ben Cotton wrote:
>https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/fno-omit-frame-pointer
>
>This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
>process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
>community feedback. This proposal will only
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 2/8 (aarch64)
Old failures (same test failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220617.0):
ID: 1302067 Test: aarch64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2
base_package_install_remove@uefi
URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/1302067
ID: 1302071 Test: aarch64
On 18. 06. 22 2:33, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 2022-06-18 at 00:31 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Interesting bugzillas:
fedpkg: FTBFS in Fedora Rawhide with bodhi-client 6: Failed to establish a new
connection: [Errno -3] Temporary failure in name resolution
39 matches
Mail list logo
