* Demi Marie Obenour:
> That is the problem right here: .eh_frame-based unwinding is too slow,
> so it has to be done offline in userspace. What about instead adding
> ORC information to userspace? That would be much faster to use.
I'm not sure ORC covers all the registers that could be used
On Thu, Jul 7, 2022 at 4:15 AM Jerry James wrote:
>
> The various ANTLR packages will be impacted by
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Drop_i686_JDKs. The parser
> generators, which are written in Java, will no longer be available on
> i686. If absolutely necessary, we could continue to
* Fabio Valentini:
> On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 9:20 PM Christian Hergert wrote:
>>
>> > So it looks like what you folks are doing is actually very similar to what
>> > Facebook is doing. That is interesting, and explains why some GNOME
>> > developers are jumping on the bandwagon of this Change
On 7/10/2022 11:36 AM, Gordon Messmer wrote:
On 7/10/22 04:38, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
Have you rebuilt all system packages with -fno-omit-frame-pointer or
just tested packages?
No. Early in the thread, Tomasz Torcz posted a link to a Phoronix
article as evidence that Fedora's
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-463787a597
seamonkey-2.53.13-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
iotop-c-1.22-1.el7
Details about builds:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105868
Bug ID: 2105868
Summary: perl-URI-5.12 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-URI
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
On Sun, Jul 10, 2022 at 06:34:11PM +0200, Simon de Vlieger wrote:
> Would you need any help regarding the automation?
Well, I'm not doing the implementation there, but we can always use
help. ;)
I think the code is all there now, we were wanting to get staging
working to test it before rolling
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105822
Kevin Fenzi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|epel-release|perl-JSON-XS
Yes I have "airspyone_host" installed on Fedora. It is working with my two
Airspy units (R2 and Mini) fine though SDR++ (also from Fedora) doesn't see
them. Gqrx does see them.
The Airspy HF+ Discovery is my third unit. It does not work with
"airspyone_host". No HF+ works with that
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103793
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On 7/10/22 10:55, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 10/07/2022 19:36, Gordon Messmer wrote:
No. Early in the thread, Tomasz Torcz posted a link to a Phoronix
article as evidence that Fedora's performance was behind other
distributions.
All packages in the dependency tree must be rebuilt
On 10/07/2022 19:36, Gordon Messmer wrote:
No. Early in the thread, Tomasz Torcz posted a link to a Phoronix
article as evidence that Fedora's performance was behind other
distributions.
All packages in the dependency tree must be rebuilt with
-fno-omit-frame-pointer flag, otherwise the
Hello.
fmt 9.0.x update will include a soversion bump from .8 to .9. It has
both API and ABI changes.
Changelog: https://github.com/fmtlib/fmt/releases/tag/9.0.0
The list of affected packages in Rawhide:
0ad
OpenImageIO
cantera
ceph
dolphin-emu
domoticz
folly
libsonata
mkvtoolnix
sdrpp
On 7/10/22 04:38, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
Have you rebuilt all system packages with -fno-omit-frame-pointer or
just tested packages?
No. Early in the thread, Tomasz Torcz posted a link to a Phoronix
article as evidence that Fedora's performance was behind other
distributions. At
On 7/9/22 12:05, Christian Hergert wrote:
>> Why does the unwinding need to happen in the kernel? The kernel can
>> already asynchronously invoke userspace code in the form of signal
>> handlers. Is the problem that it is necessary to collect profiling
>> information in the middle of a system
Greetings -
I am sure this question has been asked and answered many times but I
could not find anything that specifically addressed my questions via
google search.
I have modified a spec file for a python based application (weewx
specifically although that is not too relevant) to target Fedora
Would you need any help regarding the automation?
On Sat, Jul 9, 2022, at 8:10 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 08, 2022 at 01:02:15PM -, Mukundan Ragavan wrote:
>> > On Sun, Jul 03, 2022 at 12:11:40PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>> >
>> > That said, until then I can try and run things
Dne 08. 07. 22 v 4:59 Stewart Smith via devel napsal(a):
Another - what do we do about, e.g., Fedora IoT and Fedora CoreOS,
which have their own somewhat different release/life cycles? What about
module lifecycles? What is it about*lifecycles* that's important,
anyway? Don't we maybe want to
Sorry it's not working.
I simply build the existing approved package that was otherwise abandoned.
Given what you installed with Mandriva, it looks like there's another
package needed - airspyone_host, which is in the Fedora repositories.
(see e.g. https://pkgs.org/search/?q=airspyone_host)
Missing expected images:
Minimal raw-xz armhfp
Compose FAILS proposed Rawhide gating check!
1 of 43 required tests failed
openQA tests matching unsatisfied gating requirements shown with **GATING**
below
Failed openQA tests: 14/236 (x86_64), 17/165 (aarch64)
New failures (same test not failed
Dne 06. 07. 22 v 20:13 Ben Cotton napsal(a):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Preset_All_Systemd_Units_on_First_Boot
This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes
process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive
community feedback. This proposal will only
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105729
--- Comment #1 from Hans de Goede ---
I'll try to take a look at this, but:
a) I'm very busy with other stuff, so it may take quite some time before I get
around to this
b) I only took perl-SDL because it is a dependency of frozen-bubble, I
On Sunday, July 10, 2022, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> drago01 wrote:
>
> > On Sunday, July 10, 2022, Kevin Kofler via devel <
> > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> >> drago01 wrote:
> >> > One thing which seems to be completely missing in the
drago01 wrote:
> On Sunday, July 10, 2022, Kevin Kofler via devel <
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
>> drago01 wrote:
>> > One thing which seems to be completely missing in the conversation is
>> > how this affects battery life. Having lower performance, means the CPU
>> > has to do
On Sunday, July 10, 2022, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> drago01 wrote:
> > One thing which seems to be completely missing in the conversation is how
> > this affects battery life. Having lower performance, means the CPU has to
> > do more work / be in a higher
On 09/07/2022 22:32, Gordon Messmer wrote:
I cannot replicate any of the differences that I would expect to be able
to. More than anything else, their results look like evidence of a bug
in the Xeon Platinum 8380.
Have you rebuilt all system packages with -fno-omit-frame-pointer or
just
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220709.n.0
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220710.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 56
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size
drago01 wrote:
> One thing which seems to be completely missing in the conversation is how
> this affects battery life. Having lower performance, means the CPU has to
> do more work / be in a higher power state for a longer time frame.
Who in their right mind does CPU profiling on battery?
One thing which seems to be completely missing in the conversation is how
this affects battery life. Having lower performance, means the CPU has to
do more work / be in a higher power state for a longer time frame.
___
devel mailing list --
@Mark E. Fuller
Something isn't right with your airspyhf software. I installed it, but neither
Gqrx nor SDR++ sees the Airspy HF+ Discovery. Also, I cannot do
"airspyhf_info" to see its status. All I get is:
[BT@PC ~]$ airspyhf_info
AirSpy HF library version: 1.6.8
No devices attached.
I
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-35-20220709.0):
ID: 1320355 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
> I strongly prefer the latter approach. I believe the unwinder
> executes in NMI context, meaning that it must not block and must finish
> executing in a bounded amount of time. Furthermore, any oops becomes
> an immediate kernel panic. The eBPF verifier can trivially guarantee
> that the
No missing expected images.
Soft failed openQA tests: 1/8 (x86_64), 1/8 (aarch64)
(Tests completed, but using a workaround for a known bug)
Old soft failures (same test soft failed in Fedora-Cloud-36-20220709.0):
ID: 1320339 Test: x86_64 Cloud_Base-qcow2-qcow2 cloud_autocloud
URL:
33 matches
Mail list logo
