Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

2022-08-18 Thread Adam Williamson
On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 17:28 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: > Hello everyone! > > I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive > Packager Policy[1]. Packagers that have been identified as inactive > have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after > the F37 final

orphan or intend to retire schroot

2022-08-18 Thread Sérgio Basto
Hi, I do see any utility for schroot , especially on set of packages that I call "Debian tools" . schroot have a big update from schroot-1.6.10-17 to 1.6.12 (Update to 1.6.10 happened in 2018-05-03) and I observed that don't install init.d files. I guess, it misses , the "dh_installinit" stage

Re: Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

2022-08-18 Thread Gary Buhrmaster
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 9:34 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > Since this is the first time we've done something like this, it could > be a little rough. While I fully expect that this first time is going to be somewhat "special", I agree with the intent of the policy, and believe it will result in better

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

2022-08-18 Thread updates
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing ansible-collection-community-rabbitmq-1.2.2-1.el9 ansible-packaging-1-7.el9 libcloudproviders-0.3.1-1.el9 liborc-1.7.6-1.el9 Details about builds:

Re: Is system upgrade automatic or not?

2022-08-18 Thread Kevin Kofler via devel
Stephen Smoogen wrote: > I should have been clearer. I was talking about the changes between > XP->7->8->8.1->10->11 versus 10. -> 10.. I was thinking of > it more since for the most part they used pretty much the same compiler > for all of 10 versus new compiler and major library changes every

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing report

2022-08-18 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-aa30752bd2 trafficserver-9.1.3-1.el7 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing copr-cli-1.103-1.el7 python-copr-1.122-1.el7

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-18 Thread Randy Barlow via devel
On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 14:01 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Thoughts? ♥ nspawn ♥ signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

[Bug 2115573] Please build perl-Data-Entropy for EPEL 9

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573 Bug 2115573 depends on bug 2115574, which changed state. Bug 2115574 Summary: Please build perl-Data-Float for EPEL 9 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115574 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 2075768] selecting the 'Component' at the end, cleares the 'Description'

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075768 Jeff Fearn  changed: What|Removed |Added Status|VERIFIED|RELEASE_PENDING --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 2115572] Please build perl-Number-Bytes-Human for EPEL 9

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115572 --- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck --- Will you be able to branch and build perl-Number-Bytes-Human in epel9? The EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build it on epel9. -- You are receiving this

Re: Missing LLVM stack bugfix updates in stable Fedora branches

2022-08-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 5:23 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > > I'm working on the 14.0.5 update for F36 right now. The 14.0.6 release > is going to have to wait until after 15.0.0 lands in F37 and rawhide, > because I don't think it's worth doing the 14.0.6 update there, since > 15.0.0 is so close.

Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

2022-08-18 Thread Ben Cotton
Hello everyone! I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive Packager Policy[1]. Packagers that have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after the F37 final release, packagers who remain inactive will be removed from the

Inactive packagers to be removed after the F37 release

2022-08-18 Thread Ben Cotton
Hello everyone! I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive Packager Policy[1]. Packagers that have been identified as inactive have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after the F37 final release, packagers who remain inactive will be removed from the

[Bug 2116587] perl-Bencode-1.502 is available

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116587 --- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System --- FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d5d80462bb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing repository. You can provide feedback for this update here:

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-18 Thread Jonathan Wright via devel
Do it! On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, 4:01 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings everyone. > > Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to > use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation > was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-18 Thread Kalev Lember
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:02 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings everyone. > > Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to > use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation > was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there were >

Re: nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-18 Thread Neal Gompa
Yes, please! I'm looking forward to this! On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, 5:02 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings everyone. > > Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to > use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation > was added, it was used in

nspawn for rawhide?

2022-08-18 Thread Kevin Fenzi
Greetings everyone. Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there were issues and since then the fedoraproject koji has defaulted to

[Bug 2103389] Please branch and build perl-Monitoring-Plugin in epel9

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103389 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 2102685] Add perl-Graph to EPEL 9

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102685 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #5 from

[Bug 2115573] Please build perl-Data-Entropy for EPEL 9

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #6 from

[Bug 2102646] Add perl-DBIx-ContextualFetch to EPEL 9

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102646 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #4 from

[Bug 2102659] Add perl-SQL-Translator to EPEL 9

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102659 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA --- Comment #3 from

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing report

2022-08-18 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing: Age URL 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-3256bd6d96 trafficserver-9.1.3-1.el9 The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing bwping-2.5-1.el9

[EPEL-devel] Fedora EPEL 8 updates-testing report

2022-08-18 Thread updates
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing: Age URL 29 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-89ad385971 chromium-103.0.5060.114-1.el8 6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d7916edd2e trafficserver-9.1.3-1.el8 The following

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #18: 6.37 bump

2022-08-18 Thread Michal Josef Špaček
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 6.37 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/18 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[Bug 2115573] Please build perl-Data-Entropy for EPEL 9

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED --- Comment #5 from

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #18: 6.37 bump

2022-08-18 Thread Michal Josef Špaček
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you are following: `` 6.37 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/18 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #17: 6.37 bump

2022-08-18 Thread Michal Josef Špaček
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you are following. Merged pull-request: `` 6.37 bump `` https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/17 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

[rpms/perl-HTTP-Message] PR #17: 6.37 bump

2022-08-18 Thread Michal Josef Špaček
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you are following: `` 6.37 bump `` To reply, visit the link below https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/17 ___ perl-devel mailing list --

Re: Missing LLVM stack bugfix updates in stable Fedora branches

2022-08-18 Thread Tom Stellard
On 8/18/22 08:05, Fabio Valentini wrote: On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:43 PM Tom Stellard wrote: We've been training up more people on LLVM packaging so we should be able to cover the stable release of Fedora better in the future. I'm sorry that the stable releases have been falling behind,

Re: libgda5, libgda 6.0

2022-08-18 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
Good catch, thanks. Fix is building. --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. --- Original Message --- On Thursday, August 18th, 2022 at

Re: Missing LLVM stack bugfix updates in stable Fedora branches

2022-08-18 Thread Fabio Valentini
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:43 PM Tom Stellard wrote: > > We've been training up more people on LLVM packaging so we should be able > to cover the stable release of Fedora better in the future. I'm sorry > that the stable releases have been falling behind, we'll work on getting them > back up to

[Bug 2096953] perl-HTTP-Message-6.37 is available

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2096953 Bug 2096953 depends on bug 2113870, which changed state. Bug 2113870 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Compress-Brotli - Brotli compression library for perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113870 What|Removed

Fedora 37 compose report: 20220818.n.0 changes

2022-08-18 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-37-20220817.n.1 NEW: Fedora-37-20220818.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 3 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 28 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 112.69 KiB Size of dropped packages:1.34 MiB

Re: libgda5, libgda 6.0

2022-08-18 Thread Ben Beasley
Regardless of the messy rebuild, thank you for working on libgda 6.0. I think I was able to repair sequeler’s changelogs to the extent that they are linear and no pre-existing changelogs are lost. I suppose I could have edited out the entries for the builds that never succeeded, but I chose

Re: Is system upgrade automatic or not?

2022-08-18 Thread Stephen Smoogen
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 18:23, Kevin Kofler via devel < devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote: > Stephen Smoogen wrote: > > I don't know of an Operating System which isn't a rolling operating > system > > which works this way. MacOS, Windows, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora all require > a > > manual

Re: libgda5, libgda 6.0

2022-08-18 Thread Gwyn Ciesla via devel
Sorry. Still learning rpmautospec. :) --  Gwyn Ciesla she/her/hers   in your fear, seek only peace  in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie Sent with Proton Mail secure email. --- Original Message --- On Wednesday, August 17th, 2022 at

ca-certificates latest updates and Mozilla NSS certdata.txt modifications

2022-08-18 Thread Yann Droneaud
Hi, I've noticed ca-certificates package was updated recently, and went looking at the changes, and I have some questions. The first issue is what certdata.txt was used ? It's supposed to be downloaded from Mozilla NSS sources, but doesn't match any released versions. The second issue is

[Bug 2103742] perl-SNMP-Info-3.89 is available

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103742 --- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of perl-SNMP-Info-3.89-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90963643 -- You are

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

2022-08-18 Thread Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:21:05AM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote: > I've just finished the pcre deprecation change [1]. > If anyone is interested, please take a look. > > [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PcreDeprecation Why F39? Shouldn't the deprecation (and the work on porting) be already

[Bug 2103742] perl-SNMP-Info-3.89 is available

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103742 Upstream Release Monitoring changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-SNMP-Info-3.87 is |perl-SNMP-Info-3.89 is

[Bug 2103742] perl-SNMP-Info-3.89 is available

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103742 --- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring --- Created attachment 1906196 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1906196=edit Update to 3.89 (#2103742) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for

Re: Retiring the pcre package from Fedora

2022-08-18 Thread Lukas Javorsky
I've just finished the pcre deprecation change [1]. If anyone is interested, please take a look. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PcreDeprecation Lukas On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:43 PM Lukas Javorsky wrote: > Hi Richard, > > The Fedora 39 System Wide changes are scheduled for Jun 2023, so

[Bug 2116371] Upgrade perl-Class-Observable to 2.002

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116371 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|NEW

[Bug 2119302] New: Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.016008

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119302 Bug ID: 2119302 Summary: Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.016008 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Type-Tiny Status: NEW Component:

[Bug 2119299] New: Upgrade perl-Curses to 1.40

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119299 Bug ID: 2119299 Summary: Upgrade perl-Curses to 1.40 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Curses Status: NEW Component: perl-Curses

[Bug 2116371] Upgrade perl-Class-Observable to 2.001

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116371 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://metacpan.org/dist/C

[Bug 2116371] Upgrade perl-Class-Observable to 2.002

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116371 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Upgrade |Upgrade

[Bug 2119294] New: Upgrade perl-Carp-Assert-More to 2.1.0

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119294 Bug ID: 2119294 Summary: Upgrade perl-Carp-Assert-More to 2.1.0 Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Carp-Assert-More Status: NEW

[Bug 2105955] Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.014000

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105955 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE Status|NEW

[Bug 2105085] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085 Sandipan Roy changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |low Severity|medium

[Bug 2118814] perl-Filter-1.64 is available

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118814 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version||perl-Filter-1.64-1.fc38

[Bug 2105085] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085 Sandipan Roy changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||2119271, 2119273, 2119272,

[Bug 2119270] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling [fedora-all]

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270 Sandipan Roy changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||2105085 (CVE-2022-31081) Referenced

[Bug 2119270] New: CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling [fedora-all]

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270 Bug ID: 2119270 Summary: CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling [fedora-all] Product: Fedora Version: 36 Status: NEW Component:

[Bug 2119270] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling [fedora-all]

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270 --- Comment #1 from Sandipan Roy --- Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as this tracking bug. This will ensure that all

[Bug 2105085] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085 --- Comment #8 from Sandipan Roy --- https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-5520-1 The issue is fixed upstream in 6.15: https://github.com/libwww-perl/HTTP-Daemon/security/advisories/GHSA-cg8c-pxmv-w7cf -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 2105085] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085 --- Comment #9 from Sandipan Roy --- Created perl-HTTP-Daemon tracking bugs for this issue: Affects: fedora-all [bug 2119270] -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

[Bug 2105085] CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows request smuggling

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085 Sandipan Roy changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|perl-HTTP-Daemon: |CVE-2022-31081

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20220817.n.1 changes

2022-08-18 Thread Fedora Rawhide Report
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220816.n.1 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220817.n.1 = SUMMARY = Added images:6 Dropped images: 0 Added packages: 18 Dropped packages:28 Upgraded packages: 214 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 1.44 GiB Size of dropped packages:

[Bug 2119130] Please rebuild perl-Module-Loaded after perl-generators-1.14 lands to pick up perl(base) requirement

2022-08-18 Thread bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119130 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value