On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 17:28 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> Hello everyone!
>
> I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive
> Packager Policy[1]. Packagers that have been identified as inactive
> have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after
> the F37 final
Hi,
I do see any utility for schroot , especially on set of packages that I
call "Debian tools" .
schroot have a big update from schroot-1.6.10-17 to 1.6.12 (Update to
1.6.10 happened in 2018-05-03) and I observed that don't install init.d
files. I guess, it misses , the "dh_installinit" stage
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 9:34 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> Since this is the first time we've done something like this, it could
> be a little rough.
While I fully expect that this first time is going to be
somewhat "special", I agree with the intent of the
policy, and believe it will result in better
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
ansible-collection-community-rabbitmq-1.2.2-1.el9
ansible-packaging-1-7.el9
libcloudproviders-0.3.1-1.el9
liborc-1.7.6-1.el9
Details about builds:
Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> I should have been clearer. I was talking about the changes between
> XP->7->8->8.1->10->11 versus 10. -> 10.. I was thinking of
> it more since for the most part they used pretty much the same compiler
> for all of 10 versus new compiler and major library changes every
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-aa30752bd2
trafficserver-9.1.3-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
copr-cli-1.103-1.el7
python-copr-1.122-1.el7
On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 14:01 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Thoughts?
♥ nspawn ♥
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573
Bug 2115573 depends on bug 2115574, which changed state.
Bug 2115574 Summary: Please build perl-Data-Float for EPEL 9
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115574
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2075768
Jeff Fearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|VERIFIED|RELEASE_PENDING
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115572
--- Comment #2 from Robert Scheck ---
Will you be able to branch and build perl-Number-Bytes-Human in epel9? The EPEL
Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer if you do not wish to build
it on epel9.
--
You are receiving this
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 5:23 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
>
> I'm working on the 14.0.5 update for F36 right now. The 14.0.6 release
> is going to have to wait until after 15.0.0 lands in F37 and rawhide,
> because I don't think it's worth doing the 14.0.6 update there, since
> 15.0.0 is so close.
Hello everyone!
I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive
Packager Policy[1]. Packagers that have been identified as inactive
have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after
the F37 final release, packagers who remain inactive will be removed
from the
Hello everyone!
I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive
Packager Policy[1]. Packagers that have been identified as inactive
have a ticket in the find-inactive-packagers repo[2]. One week after
the F37 final release, packagers who remain inactive will be removed
from the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116587
--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d5d80462bb has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 8 testing
repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
Do it!
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, 4:01 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings everyone.
>
> Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
> use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
> was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:02 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings everyone.
>
> Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
> use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
> was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there were
>
Yes, please! I'm looking forward to this!
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022, 5:02 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Greetings everyone.
>
> Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
> use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
> was added, it was used in
Greetings everyone.
Many years ago mock introduced and then made default it's isolation to
use systemd-nspawn instead of chroot. Shortly after the nspawn isolation
was added, it was used in fedoraproject koji builds, but there were
issues and since then the fedoraproject koji has defaulted to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103389
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102685
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #6 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102646
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #4 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102659
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-3256bd6d96
trafficserver-9.1.3-1.el9
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
bwping-2.5-1.el9
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
29 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-89ad385971
chromium-103.0.5060.114-1.el8
6 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-d7916edd2e
trafficserver-9.1.3-1.el8
The following
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.37 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/18
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2115573
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that
you are following:
``
6.37 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/18
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
6.37 bump
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/17
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-HTTP-Message` that
you are following:
``
6.37 bump
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-HTTP-Message/pull-request/17
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On 8/18/22 08:05, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:43 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
We've been training up more people on LLVM packaging so we should be able
to cover the stable release of Fedora better in the future. I'm sorry
that the stable releases have been falling behind,
Good catch, thanks. Fix is building.
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Thursday, August 18th, 2022 at
On Mon, Jul 18, 2022 at 4:43 PM Tom Stellard wrote:
>
> We've been training up more people on LLVM packaging so we should be able
> to cover the stable release of Fedora better in the future. I'm sorry
> that the stable releases have been falling behind, we'll work on getting them
> back up to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2096953
Bug 2096953 depends on bug 2113870, which changed state.
Bug 2113870 Summary: Review Request: perl-IO-Compress-Brotli - Brotli
compression library for perl
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2113870
What|Removed
OLD: Fedora-37-20220817.n.1
NEW: Fedora-37-20220818.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 1
Added packages: 3
Dropped packages:1
Upgraded packages: 28
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 112.69 KiB
Size of dropped packages:1.34 MiB
Regardless of the messy rebuild, thank you for working on libgda 6.0.
I think I was able to repair sequeler’s changelogs to the extent that
they are linear and no pre-existing changelogs are lost. I suppose I
could have edited out the entries for the builds that never succeeded,
but I chose
On Wed, 17 Aug 2022 at 18:23, Kevin Kofler via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Stephen Smoogen wrote:
> > I don't know of an Operating System which isn't a rolling operating
> system
> > which works this way. MacOS, Windows, Debian, Ubuntu, Fedora all require
> a
> > manual
Sorry. Still learning rpmautospec. :)
--
Gwyn Ciesla
she/her/hers
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie
Sent with Proton Mail secure email.
--- Original Message ---
On Wednesday, August 17th, 2022 at
Hi,
I've noticed ca-certificates package was updated recently, and went looking
at the changes, and I have some questions.
The first issue is what certdata.txt was used ? It's supposed to be
downloaded from Mozilla NSS sources, but doesn't match any released
versions.
The second issue is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103742
--- Comment #14 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
the-new-hotness/release-monitoring.org's scratch build of
perl-SNMP-Info-3.89-1.fc36.src.rpm for rawhide completed
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=90963643
--
You are
On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 11:21:05AM +0200, Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> I've just finished the pcre deprecation change [1].
> If anyone is interested, please take a look.
>
> [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PcreDeprecation
Why F39? Shouldn't the deprecation (and the work on porting) be already
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103742
Upstream Release Monitoring
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-SNMP-Info-3.87 is |perl-SNMP-Info-3.89 is
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2103742
--- Comment #13 from Upstream Release Monitoring
---
Created attachment 1906196
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1906196=edit
Update to 3.89 (#2103742)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for
I've just finished the pcre deprecation change [1].
If anyone is interested, please take a look.
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PcreDeprecation
Lukas
On Wed, Aug 17, 2022 at 2:43 PM Lukas Javorsky wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> The Fedora 39 System Wide changes are scheduled for Jun 2023, so
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116371
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119302
Bug ID: 2119302
Summary: Upgrade perl-Type-Tiny to 1.016008
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Type-Tiny
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119299
Bug ID: 2119299
Summary: Upgrade perl-Curses to 1.40
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Curses
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Curses
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116371
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://metacpan.org/dist/C
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2116371
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Upgrade |Upgrade
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119294
Bug ID: 2119294
Summary: Upgrade perl-Carp-Assert-More to 2.1.0
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://metacpan.org/release/Carp-Assert-More
Status: NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105955
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|NEW
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
Sandipan Roy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|medium |low
Severity|medium
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2118814
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Filter-1.64-1.fc38
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
Sandipan Roy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||2119271, 2119273, 2119272,
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270
Sandipan Roy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||2105085 (CVE-2022-31081)
Referenced
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270
Bug ID: 2119270
Summary: CVE-2022-31081 perl-HTTP-Daemon: HTTP::Daemon allows
request smuggling [fedora-all]
Product: Fedora
Version: 36
Status: NEW
Component:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119270
--- Comment #1 from Sandipan Roy ---
Use the following template to for the 'fedpkg update' request to submit an
update for this issue as it contains the top-level parent bug(s) as well as
this tracking bug. This will ensure that all
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
--- Comment #8 from Sandipan Roy ---
https://ubuntu.com/security/notices/USN-5520-1
The issue is fixed upstream in 6.15:
https://github.com/libwww-perl/HTTP-Daemon/security/advisories/GHSA-cg8c-pxmv-w7cf
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
--- Comment #9 from Sandipan Roy ---
Created perl-HTTP-Daemon tracking bugs for this issue:
Affects: fedora-all [bug 2119270]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2105085
Sandipan Roy changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|perl-HTTP-Daemon: |CVE-2022-31081
OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20220816.n.1
NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20220817.n.1
= SUMMARY =
Added images:6
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 18
Dropped packages:28
Upgraded packages: 214
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 1.44 GiB
Size of dropped packages:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2119130
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
62 matches
Mail list logo