https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123834
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
jplesnik merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Log-Log4perl` that
you are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Tests
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Log-Log4perl/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124241
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Doc Type|---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124001
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Proc-Fork-0.808-1.fc38
jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Log-Log4perl`
that you are following:
``
Tests
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Log-Log4perl/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 05:59:42PM +0200, Pablo Mendez Hernandez wrote:
> Adding Daniel for awareness.
Why was the heavyweight rather than lightweight configuration used? Why
compare with all the expensive optional security features enabled? Even
the lightweight configuration has 2 of the
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 10:19:51AM -0700, John Reiser wrote:
> > Bottom line opinion: hardened_malloc ... costs too much.
>
> Attempting to be constructive: Psychologically, I might be willing to pay
> a "security tax" of something like 17%, partly on the basis of similarity
> to the VAT rate
As I did those updates..
well explained, thx.
But this then seems to be a more general problem of how we want to
support a switch an application from one ESR/LTS release if it is EOL to
the next.
not terribly differently than others -- with an abundance of end-user education
and caution?
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 12:13:26PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 09. 22 11:07, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >
> > Apart from that, I don't think that the pseudo-users or group ownership
> > would work. I saw a good amount of people giving the packages to some
> > groups or pseudo-users, but in
On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 15:00 -0500, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
> On Monday, September 5, 2022 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I have a downstream patch[0] which -- I don't really understand why
> > --
> > breaks riscv64 builds but is necessary for primary Fedora arches.
> > Is
> > it correct to do:
On 5/9/22 16:42, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I have a downstream patch[0] which -- I don't really understand why --
breaks riscv64 builds but is necessary for primary Fedora arches. Is
it correct to do:
%ifnarch riscv64
Patch123: downstream.patch
%endif
When I have to do things like
On Monday, September 5, 2022 Mark E. Fuller wrote:
> Can someone point me to a good resource on how (if permitted) I can make
> appropriate compat(?) packages to allow for two major versions of the
> same package to be available?
> Is this allowed for EPEL?
You can package compat packages as long
On Monday, September 5, 2022 Mark E. Fuller wrote:
> Can someone point me to a good resource on how (if permitted) I can make
> appropriate compat(?) packages to allow for two major versions of the
> same package to be available?
> Is this allowed for EPEL?
You can package compat packages as long
On Monday, September 5, 2022 Peter Robinson wrote:
> it would probably be easier to join and become a packager by
> packaging a random leaf package no one would use, then as a packager
> pick up an random orphaned package that's in the core distro and then
> just compromise the distro that way
On Monday, September 5, 2022 Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I have a downstream patch[0] which -- I don't really understand why --
> breaks riscv64 builds but is necessary for primary Fedora arches. Is
> it correct to do:
>
> %ifnarch riscv64
> Patch123: downstream.patch
> %endif
>
> given
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 09:56:58PM +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Monday, 05 September 2022 at 21:42, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I have a downstream patch[0] which -- I don't really understand why --
> > breaks riscv64 builds but is necessary for primary Fedora arches. Is
>
On Monday, 05 September 2022 at 21:42, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I have a downstream patch[0] which -- I don't really understand why --
> breaks riscv64 builds but is necessary for primary Fedora arches. Is
> it correct to do:
>
> %ifnarch riscv64
> Patch123: downstream.patch
> %endif
>
I have a downstream patch[0] which -- I don't really understand why --
breaks riscv64 builds but is necessary for primary Fedora arches. Is
it correct to do:
%ifnarch riscv64
Patch123: downstream.patch
%endif
given that the package uses %autosetup and therefore doesn't have
explicit
Hi all,
Can someone point me to a good resource on how (if permitted) I can make
appropriate compat(?) packages to allow for two major versions of the
same package to be available?
Is this allowed for EPEL?
Thanks
--
Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.
ful...@fedoraproject.org
ful...@mefuller.dev
Hi all,
Can someone point me to a good resource on how (if permitted) I can make
appropriate compat(?) packages to allow for two major versions of the
same package to be available?
Is this allowed for EPEL?
Thanks
--
Mark E. Fuller, Ph.D.
ful...@fedoraproject.org
ful...@mefuller.dev
Hello All!
This spec is actually quite simple - it does all the heavy lifting
with generic Erlang macros, builds cleanly, so it won't take you long
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123175
I am willing to review something which got stuck in your queue for a while.
--
With best
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 2:01 PM Sandro wrote:
> Thank you, Miro, for the explanation and the pull request. I remember
> switching away from setup.cfg after being told that pyproject.toml is
> the way forward. I must have missed the fact that this required a newer
> minimum version of setuptools.
On 05-09-2022 19:17, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 05. 09. 22 19:00, Sandro wrote:
I see the following errors in the build log of a fc36 build [1]:
ValueError: Globs did not match any module: pymunin
Going up it looks like the name of the package is not expanded and falls back
to UNKNOWN:
Hey All,
We have a bunch of test days coming up, we are currently running
StrongCryptoSettings3 test day. I will be keeping this open for
community members to come and test. It's fairly simple, just run the
commands you find in[0] and your output should correspond to [1]
This is an
On Wed, Aug 31, 2022 at 1:37 PM Jerry James wrote:
> They're all done, except for this one:
>
> python-furo: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2121594
>
> It's a bit complicated, due to needing a pile of JavaScript at build
> time. Who would like to swap reviews? Give me a complicated
On 05. 09. 22 19:17, Miro Hrončok wrote:
My guess is that when PyMunin3 started to use this feature:
https://github.com/penguinpee/PyMunin3/commit/3993dcaa5366da9d771575e8735dd5a7a2c13894
They should have changed the minimal required setuptools version in:
On 05. 09. 22 19:00, Sandro wrote:
I see the following errors in the build log of a fc36 build [1]:
ValueError: Globs did not match any module: pymunin
Going up it looks like the name of the package is not expanded and falls back
to UNKNOWN:
Successfully built UNKNOWN
However, the builds
I see the following errors in the build log of a fc36 build [1]:
ValueError: Globs did not match any module: pymunin
Going up it looks like the name of the package is not expanded and falls
back to UNKNOWN:
Successfully built UNKNOWN
However, the builds for fc37 and rawhide did succeed. I
On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 5:30 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> And anybody who isn't willing .
... or able (they are not free, and there may be other
restrictions regarding crypto capable device export/import
that can require a bit of hoop jumping due to sourcing
site shrinkage, all of which
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 6:00 PM Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> I was able to fix my EPEL 7 package and performed a successful build:
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2058266
>
> So I forced a Koschei build to clear the error, but it still built the
> PREVIOUS SRPM:
>
On 05/09/2022 17:58, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
They are using tokens from Aladdin,
Feitian, and Rutoken, compatible with FIDO2 U2F/WebAuthn. These products
are certified and allowed for use in Russia.
AFAIK, Aladdin and Rutoken requires their own proprietary drivers for
GNU/Linux.
--
I've taken a few more (a few for the neuro-sig):
> Depending on: mcpanel (1), status change: 2022-08-30 (0 weeks ago)
> eegview (maintained by: aekoroglu, ankursinha, neuro-sig)
> eegview-0.0-15.fc37.src requires mcpanel-devel = 0.0-15.fc37
>
On ma, 05 syys 2022, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 05/09/2022 17:05, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
The site blocks access from outside of Russia.
Yes, you need RU proxy to read the original documents. But you can use
your favorite search engine to find "FSB notification" articles in
On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 16:16 +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 4:09 PM Miro Hrončok
> wrote:
> >
> > On 05. 09. 22 14:07, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > >
> > > fortune-mod says "Orphaned for: Orphaned by releng" , which user
> > > was
> > > considered unresponsive ?
> > > Where I
On 05/09/2022 17:05, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
The site blocks access from outside of Russia.
Yes, you need RU proxy to read the original documents. But you can use
your favorite search engine to find "FSB notification" articles in English.
Example:
On ma, 05 syys 2022, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
On 05/09/2022 14:58, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Do you have any references to articles of law or other regulations?
Sorry, but this sounds so absurd I can't just take your word for it.
Sure (in Russian, use Google Translate):
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124296
Johannes Kreuzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|---
On 05/09/2022 14:58, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Do you have any references to articles of law or other regulations?
Sorry, but this sounds so absurd I can't just take your word for it.
Sure (in Russian, use Google Translate):
- http://clsz.fsb.ru/clsz/in-out.htm
-
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124296
Bug ID: 2124296
Summary: Please branch and build perl-File-BaseDir in epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-File-BaseDir
Severity: medium
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 4:09 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
>
> On 05. 09. 22 14:07, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> >
> > fortune-mod says "Orphaned for: Orphaned by releng" , which user was
> > considered unresponsive ?
> > Where I can find the tickets of unresponsive maintainer ?
>
> $ koji list-history
On 05. 09. 22 14:07, Sérgio Basto wrote:
fortune-mod says "Orphaned for: Orphaned by releng" , which user was
considered unresponsive ?
Where I can find the tickets of unresponsive maintainer ?
$ koji list-history --package=fortune-mod
...
Mon Sep 5 07:11:28 2022 package owner changed for
On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 11:33 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> It would be really nice if the wording of the bug could contain some
> kind of a "thank you" note to the EPEL maintainers of the package in
> question. Not everyone will understand this process as "great, I
> don't
> have
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124002
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-6f0397b5b9 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-6f0397b5b9
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123834
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jose.p.oliveira.oss@gmail.c |
|om,
Hi,
As I did those updates..
On Friday, 2022-09-02 17:49:57 +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Here we go again: thunderbird 102 update was submitted to F36.
Actually we already had 102.2.0 a week before on 2022-08-23 with
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-ddee3eb27c for
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124002
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-YAML-LibYAML-0.84-1.fc
Hi Dan,
On Mon, 05 Sep 2022 14:18:05 +0200,
Dan Čermák wrote:
> "Neal H. Walfield" writes:
> As Sequoia is written in Rust, what is your RISCV story? Fedora is (at
> least that's my impression) a quite popular choice for RISCV boards, so
> rpm working on RISCV would be crucial for us staying
On Monday, 05 September 2022 at 12:40, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 05/09/2022 10:13, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> > Wait, what? Which countries are 2FA token illegal in?
>
> Russia, China and all countries from the US export banlist.
Do you have any references to articles of
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 2:18 PM Dan Čermák
wrote:
>
> Hi Neal,
>
> "Neal H. Walfield" writes:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > rpm 4.18 is on the horizon and includes a new OpenPGP backend based on
> > Sequoia PGP.
> >
> > https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.18.0
> > https://sequoia-pgp.org/
> >
> > Thanks
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124002
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #1 from
On Mon, 05 Sep 2022 10:12:23 +0200,
Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
> Mind the
> https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CryptoPolicies
>
> Will we need to introduce a configuration mechanism to limit algorithm
> selection in Sequoia PGP? Or just wait untl it switches to OpenSSL?
I corrected a license declaration in perl-BSSolv package from
"GPL or Artistic" to "GPL-1.0-or-later OR Artistic-1.0-Perl".
-- Petr
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124002
Paul Howarth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
OLD: Fedora-37-20220904.n.0
NEW: Fedora-37-20220905.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:0
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
Hi Neal,
"Neal H. Walfield" writes:
> Hi all,
>
> rpm 4.18 is on the horizon and includes a new OpenPGP backend based on
> Sequoia PGP.
>
> https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.18.0
> https://sequoia-pgp.org/
>
> Thanks to Fabio Valentini (decathorpe) for packaging not only
> rpm-sequoia, but
Hi Mattia,
We seem to be having the same conversation but with opposite
interpretations :) I'll try to clarify my comments below.
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 9:25 AM Mattia Verga via devel <
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Il 05/09/22 08:59, Brian (bex) Exelbierd ha scritto:
>
>
>
> On Sat,
fortune-mod says "Orphaned for: Orphaned by releng" , which user was
considered unresponsive ?
Where I can find the tickets of unresponsive maintainer ?
Thank you
On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 12:36 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are
jwm-2.4.2 in Fedora-rawhide changed its license from GPLv2 to MIT
--
Ali Erdinc Koroglu
Linux OS Systems Engineering
-
Intel Finland Oy
Registered Address: PL 281, 00181 Helsinki
Business Identity Code: 0357606 - 4
Domiciled
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124241
Bug ID: 2124241
Summary: perl-PAR-Packer-1.056 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PAR-Packer
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123496
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2022-a693cec74a has been submitted as an update to Fedora 37.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-a693cec74a
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
On Sun, 2022-09-04 at 17:18 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 08:32:47PM +1000, Frank Crawford wrote:
> >
> > The document I used
> > was https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-
> > maintainers/Package_Update_Guide/#multiple_packages
> >
> > It was the only place I could
> > However, last this was discussed, the Fedora AAA system(s)
> > did not (yet?) support the full fido2/webauthn/passkey
> > functionality, so at this time such full integration is just a
> > dream(*).
>
> You don't have to be a provenpackager to be able to do serious damage;
> you just need to
> tasksh orphan 0 weeks ago
Taken tasksh over to begin with. Co-maintainers welcome.
--
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London
signature.asc
Hi Paul,
Thanks for your comments.
On Fri, 02 Sep 2022 20:21:21 +0200,
Paul Wouters wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Sep 2022, Neal H. Walfield wrote:
>
> > Note: Sequoia currently uses Nettle on Fedora, but there is ongoing
> > work to port it to Sequoia to OpenSSL:
>
> I think this should be considered a
On 05/09/2022 10:33, Tommy Nguyen wrote:
I cannot think of any reason why 2FA would be illegal in any country
when TOTP is based on HMAC and by default uses SHA-1.
In some countries (eg. Russia, China) all cryptographic devices must be
certified by local government security service.
On 05/09/2022 10:13, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
Wait, what? Which countries are 2FA token illegal in?
Russia, China and all countries from the US export banlist.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
___
devel mailing
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
On 05. 09. 22 11:07, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Apart from that, I don't think that the pseudo-users or group ownership would
work. I saw a good amount of people giving the packages to some groups or
pseudo-users, but in turn, that meant there is nobody who would care about such
package.
+100
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124001
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123496
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version||perl-Verilog-Perl-3.480-1.f
On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 08:33:40AM +, Tommy Nguyen wrote:
> On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 10:13 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
> wrote:
> > Wait, what? Which countries are 2FA token illegal in?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dominik
>
> I cannot think of any reason why 2FA would be illegal in any
On Friday, 02 September 2022 at 18:25, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2022 at 12:12:07PM -0500, Maxwell G via epel-devel wrote:
> > On Wednesday, August 31, 2022 Troy Dawson wrote:
> > > EPEL2RHEL is part of the RHEL 8 and 9 new package workflow. When a RHEL
> > > maintainer wants to add a
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
47 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-89ad385971
chromium-103.0.5060.114-1.el8
2 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-83ed996f1e
rubygem-rack-2.2.4-1.el8
0
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2022-b86f845eb8
libapreq2-2.17-1.el7
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 7 updates-testing
mup-7.0-1.el7
Details about builds:
The following builds have been pushed to Fedora EPEL 9 updates-testing
mold-1.4.2-1.el9
mup-7.0-1.el9
Details about builds:
mold-1.4.2-1.el9 (FEDORA-EPEL-2022-1dd1cd73e4)
A Modern Linker
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102581
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #5 from
Dne 03. 09. 22 v 22:28 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On Sat, Sep 03, 2022 at 02:01:59PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
Il 26/08/22 07:17, David Tardon ha scritto:
Hi,
On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 11:04 +0300, Alexander Bokovoy wrote:
On to, 25 elo 2022, Miro Hrončok wrote:
We use the python-maint
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:55 AM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:12 AM Alexander Sosedkin
> wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Neal H. Walfield (2022-09-02 16:31:18)
> > > rpm 4.18 is on the horizon and includes a new OpenPGP backend based on
> > > Sequoia PGP.
> > >
> > >
On Mon, Sep 5, 2022 at 10:12 AM Alexander Sosedkin wrote:
>
> Quoting Neal H. Walfield (2022-09-02 16:31:18)
> > rpm 4.18 is on the horizon and includes a new OpenPGP backend based on
> > Sequoia PGP.
> >
> > https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.18.0
> > https://sequoia-pgp.org/
> >
> > Thanks to
On Mon, 2022-09-05 at 10:13 +0200, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
> Wait, what? Which countries are 2FA token illegal in?
>
> Regards,
> Dominik
I cannot think of any reason why 2FA would be illegal in any country
when TOTP is based on HMAC and by default uses SHA-1.
Further if I may
On Monday, 05 September 2022 at 09:16, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel wrote:
> On 04/09/2022 19:30, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> > And anybody who isn't willing to buy a security key wouldn't be able to
> > contribute to Fedora at all.
>
> So, you want to ban all contributors from countries where such
Quoting Neal H. Walfield (2022-09-02 16:31:18)
> rpm 4.18 is on the horizon and includes a new OpenPGP backend based on
> Sequoia PGP.
>
> https://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.18.0
> https://sequoia-pgp.org/
>
> Thanks to Fabio Valentini (decathorpe) for packaging not only
> rpm-sequoia, but all of
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2102597
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
--- Comment #2 from
Hi
I've put up python-qt6 for review:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2124098
Happy to review in exchange.
Thanks
Sandro
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123496
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|chitl...@gmail.com, |
Dear colleagues,
I'm going to push the updated version of OpenSSL to rawhide.
This version incorporates FIPS-related changes from RHEL 9.
A major change that may affect your applications in FIPS mode is limiting
the RSA encryption.
There are also minor tweaks limiting explicit curves support in
Il 05/09/22 08:55, Douglas Kosovic ha scritto:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 1:38 PM Mattia Verga wrote:
>> If anyone wants to have a look to what packages **may** be orphaned
>> when those users are removed from the packager group, I've set up a
>> script and uploaded the results here [1].
>>
>> Do
Il 05/09/22 08:59, Brian (bex) Exelbierd ha scritto:
> On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 9:24 PM Adam Williamson
> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 17:28 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
>>> Hello everyone!
>>>
>>> I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive
>>> Packager Policy[1].
On 04/09/2022 19:30, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
And anybody who isn't willing to buy a security key wouldn't be able to
contribute to Fedora at all.
So, you want to ban all contributors from countries where such tokens
are prohibited, am I right? Strongly -1.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev
On Sat, Sep 3, 2022 at 9:24 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-08-18 at 17:28 -0400, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > Hello everyone!
> >
> > I just completed the first run of FESCo's newly approved Inactive
> > Packager Policy[1]. Packagers that have been identified as inactive
> > have a ticket in
On Sun, Sep 4, 2022 at 1:38 PM Mattia Verga wrote:
> If anyone wants to have a look to what packages **may** be orphaned
> when those users are removed from the packager group, I've set up a
> script and uploaded the results here [1].
>
> Do not be too scared by those results: there's still
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123967
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123968
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2123969
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
94 matches
Mail list logo
