Re: F38 proposal: Shorter Shutdown Timer (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:36 PM Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Instead, the idea is to attack the problem from the other end: reduce > the timeout for everyone. Once this happens, we should start getting > feedback about what services where this doesn't work. Sound's terrible to me. Could

Re: Automation of Fedora SCM requests

Richard Shaw kirjoitti 10.1.2023 klo 15.08: On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 5:26 AM Michal Konecny wrote: Hi everyone, this automation is now in place and new SCM requests will be processed automatically. If you find any issue with the automation, please report it to toddlers issue tracker [0]. On

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2023-01-12 17:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2023-01-12 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.libera.chat.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2023-01-12 09:00 PST US/Pacific 2023-01-12

[Bug 2160344] New: perl-Pod-Weaver-4.019 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160344 Bug ID: 2160344 Summary: perl-Pod-Weaver-4.019 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Pod-Weaver Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

Adding a Package to DNF (BeEF)

Hi there, I want to ask about adding a package to DNF, if it would be accepted, how i may go about doing/helping with it. I'm not certain if this is the right mailing list to ask, it seemed so from looking at the ones listed below but please let me know if i'm mistaken:

[Bug 2160317] New: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver-4.010 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160317 Bug ID: 2160317 Summary: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver-4.010 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component: perl-Dist-Zilla-Plugin-PodWeaver

Re: libmpc: fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional failure

I've been looking at the yaml files in the tmt distribution. I'm a tmt newbie, so don't laugh at me. :-) On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:47 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > [32m[17:03:30] [+] [worker_0] [stdout] [Fedora-Rawhide:x86_64:/plans/ci] > Found 1 plan. [0m > [32m[17:03:30] [+] [worker_0] [stdout]

Re: Cfitsio soname bump, side tag created

El vie, 30 dic 2022 a las 2:33, Maxwell G via devel (< devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>) escribió: > On Thu Dec 29, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > On Thu Dec 29, 2022, Maxwell G via devel wrote: > > > On Wed Dec 28, 2022 at 15:00 +0100, Sergio Pascual wrote: > > > > Hello again, as stated

Re: F38 proposal: Add _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 to distribution build flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 4:43 PM Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 4:37 PM Siddhesh Poyarekar > wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:05 PM Michel Alexandre Salim > > wrote: > > > Just `mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 ./*.src.rpm` > > > > > > I have these additional knobs in

Re: libmpc: fedora-ci.koji-build.tier0.functional failure

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 12:47 AM Petr Pisar wrote: > From there I got to > > which reads: > > [32m[17:03:29] [+] [worker_0] [Fedora-Rawhide:x86_64:/plans/ci] starting > tests execution [0m > [32m[17:03:29] [+]

Re: F38 proposal: Add _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 to distribution build flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 4:37 PM Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:05 PM Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: > > Just `mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 ./*.src.rpm` > > > > I have these additional knobs in ~/.config/mock.cfg: > > > > > > config_opts['plugin_conf']['ccache_enable']

Re: F38 proposal: Add _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 to distribution build flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:05 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Just `mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 ./*.src.rpm` > > I have these additional knobs in ~/.config/mock.cfg: > > > config_opts['plugin_conf']['ccache_enable'] = True > config_opts['plugin_conf']['ccache_opts']['max_cache_size'] = '10G'

Re: F38 proposal: Shorter Shutdown Timer (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11 2023 at 11:48:27 AM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: I do appreciate the change to do an abort on these units. Will that get reported via abrt? It should, yes, the same as any other crash. ___ devel mailing list --

Re: F38 proposal: Add _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 to distribution build flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, 2023-01-11 at 14:29 -0500, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:15 PM Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: > > The warning seems to happen only in mock, the Koji build is clean: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96015653 > > > > Let me paste the root.log

Re: F38 proposal: Shorter Shutdown Timer (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 04:35:33PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > We have thousands of systemd services in Fedora. To "just add timeouts > to things that take too long" would mean updating them individually. > (Or maybe only some, but we don't really know which ones.) Sure,

Re: F38 proposal: Add _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 to distribution build flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:15 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > The warning seems to happen only in mock, the Koji build is clean: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=96015653 > > Let me paste the root.log and build.log from the local build (I'm now > working on upgrading a

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:02 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 11. 01. 23 17:52, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > > Il 11/01/23 13:58, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > >> sigulkevin, mitr > > > > Retiring this would blow up Fedora infrastructure... the FTB/FTI is

SPDX Office hours

Hello. the owners of SPDX Change proposal want to have this Change as smooth as possible. And we decided to setup Office hours. Do you have any questions about SPDX migration? Do you hesitate about what steps you should take? How to proceed with your package? We will do our best to help you.

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 11. 01. 23 17:52, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: Il 11/01/23 13:58, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: sigulkevin, mitr Retiring this would blow up Fedora infrastructure... the FTB/FTI is being worked on, but it depends on python-nss to be un-retired and

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed Jan 11, 2023 at 13:58 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > golang-github-d2g-dhcp4servereclipseo, go-sig I need a package review to fix this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160202 -- Maxwell G (@gotmax23) Pronouns: He/Him/His

Re: F38 proposal: Add _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 to distribution build flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:04:45PM -0500, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:45 PM Michel Alexandre Salim > wrote: > > Is this supported yet? I'm doing a build of rubberband for Rawhide, and > > every file generates this warning: > > > > ../src/test/TestStretcher.cpp: warning:

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed Jan 11, 2023 at 13:58 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. > golang-github-gin-gonic eclipseo, go-sig I've fixed this:

Re: F38 proposal: Add _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 to distribution build flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 12:45 PM Michel Alexandre Salim wrote: > Is this supported yet? I'm doing a build of rubberband for Rawhide, and > every file generates this warning: > > ../src/test/TestStretcher.cpp: warning: -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE defined but > value is too low Yes the change is in, it even

Re: F37 kernel 6.0.16/6.0.18 breaking Python tests: Allows to bind a socket twice

On 11. 01. 23 16:21, Sjoerd Mullender wrote: See thread https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/us...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/VCFSB3YHGTJJSXGBTH2B5FB6OOAL3JLR/ on the Fedora user list where I raised this same problem. Somebody there suggested this commit [1] as being suspicious,

Re: F38 proposal: Add _FORTIFY_SOURCE=3 to distribution build flags (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Mon, 2022-12-05 at 14:58 -0500, Ben Cotton wrote: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Add_FORTIFY_SOURCE%3D3_to_distribution_build_flags > > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11 2023 at 05:19:03 PM +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Thanks Michael, what a headache. So for RPM Fusion to be included, it would have to change its scope/definition and host a more "varied" suit of packages? Well I can't be certain what Fedora Legal will or won't accept, but

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Il 11/01/23 13:58, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > sigulkevin, mitr Retiring this would blow up Fedora infrastructure... the FTB/FTI is being worked on, but it depends on python-nss to be un-retired and the package review for that is in progress (just

[Bug 2160077] perl-Prima-1.67-1.fc38 FTBFS: t/Image/Transform.t aborts

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160077 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Link ID||Github dk/Prima/issues/78 -- You are

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:58:51PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. > > 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:26 PM Ben Cotton wrote: > One thing I don't see addressed here is how this would impact the release > criteria. Would it? If so, now's the time to start coordinating with the QA > team to make those changes. > I think we're mostly concerned with the default experience,

Re: F38 proposal: Shorter Shutdown Timer (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 06:16:07PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 06:00:59PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 10 2023 at 03:19:10 PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi > > wrote: > > > Is there something wrong with that approach that I am not understanding? > > > > No, I

License updates: c4core, grpc, libfplll, python-graph-tool, python-mapbox-earcut

I am about to update a few packages that use header-only libraries (and which do not use them only for tests that are not installed, as is often the case with e.g. doctest-static) to include the licenses of those libraries in their SPDX license expressions. The rationale is that header-only

[Bug 2160077] perl-Prima-1.67-1.fc38 FTBFS: t/Image/Transform.t aborts

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160077 --- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar --- This is probably triggered by upgrading redhat-rpm-config from 235-1.fc38 to 239-1.fc38: * Tue Jan 03 2023 Siddhesh Poyarekar - 237-1 - Make _FORTIFY_SOURCE configurable and bump default to 3. -- You

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

One thing I don't see addressed here is how this would impact the release criteria. Would it? If so, now's the time to start coordinating with the QA team to make those changes. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

Once upon a time, Alexander Ploumistos said: > Thanks Michael, what a headache. > So for RPM Fusion to be included, it would have to change its > scope/definition and host a more "varied" suit of packages? Probably, but there's no reason for RPM Fusion to expand the scope beyond "things that

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 4:47 PM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11 2023 at 02:44:01 AM +0100, Alexander Ploumistos > wrote: > > Flathub carries programs like VLC, mpv, yt-dlp, bundled versions of > > ffmpeg and so on. Why is it ok now to get these from flathub, but not > > from RPM

Re: Automation of Fedora SCM requests

Hi everyone, all the remaining issues were solved and the bot is now processing tickets as it should. I will watch the SCM request repository for next few days to see if everything is working as it should. Thanks for your patience. On behalf of CPE Team, Michal On 10. 01. 23 18:29, Michal

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 2023-01-11 04:58, Miro Hrončok wrote: golang-helm-3go-sig, orphan I'll take another stab at updating this one over the weekend. libv3270 dcavalca Will fix this, thanks for the heads up. Cheers Davide

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 5:02 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Kalev Lember wrote on 2023/01/12 0:03: > > Hi Mamoru, > > > > Out of curiosity, why? Do you actually need libgnome? I was hoping it > would > > get removed this cycle so we can finally stop shipping the old gnome 2 > > library stack. > > > >

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Kalev Lember wrote on 2023/01/12 0:03: On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:51 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Miro Hrončok wrote on 2023/01/11 21:58: libgnome alexl, caolanm, gnome-sig, mbarnes, rhughes, rstrode,

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11 2023 at 03:47:41 PM +, DJ Chase wrote: True, but it was my understanding that “our Flathub offering” in “This change would remove the filtering from our Flathub offering” refers to Fedora Flatpaks, which is enabled by default, not the filtered view of Flathub that can be

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:47 AM Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11 2023 at 02:44:01 AM +0100, Alexander Ploumistos > wrote: > > Flathub carries programs like VLC, mpv, yt-dlp, bundled versions of > > ffmpeg and so on. Why is it ok now to get these from flathub, but not > > from RPM

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed Jan 11, 2023 at 10:18 AM EST, Ben Cotton wrote: > The first two sentences of the proposal summary are "Fedora > Workstation's existing third party repo feature allows users to enable > a selection of software repos that are hosted by external > organizations. This selection has included a

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11 2023 at 02:44:01 AM +0100, Alexander Ploumistos wrote: Flathub carries programs like VLC, mpv, yt-dlp, bundled versions of ffmpeg and so on. Why is it ok now to get these from flathub, but not from RPM Fusion? Hi, it's because RPM Fusion is explicitly designed to provide extra

Claiming ownership of perl-Parse-EDID

Somehow I missed the orphaning of perl-Parse-EDID. Anyway, I'd like to take over maintenance of this package as other packages I maintain are dependent on it. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Porting Fedora for the LoongArch architecture.

在 2023/1/11 14:24, Peter Robinson 写道: 主题: Re: Porting Fedora for the LoongArch architecture. From: Peter Robinson 日期: 2023/1/11 14:24 收件人: Development discussions related to Fedora 抄送: "siyant...@loongson.cn" , "chenhua...@loongson.cn" , "shipuji...@gmail.com" , Xiaotian Wu ,

Re: Web Assembly on Fedora: interested in a Fedora SIG to work on this?

It's the new year and we are going to get things going. Zuzana is going to set up a Wiki page where we can track info and we are going to setup an initial meeting to get together to discuss how we get started. The proposed initial agenda is: - Communication channels - Mailing list -

Re: F38 proposal: Shorter Shutdown Timer (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Tue, Jan 10 2023 at 06:00:59 PM -0600, Michael Catanzaro wrote: I'm going to amend this proposal to specify TimeoutStopFailureMode=abort as well, so we can get crash dumps and bug reports when programs fail to quit properly. By the way, the goal with this is to surface bugs and dodge any

Re: Porting Fedora for the LoongArch architecture.

Hi 在 2023/1/11 6:37, Richard W.M. Jones 写道: Hi, Porting Fedora to a new architecture is quite a challenge but a lot of fun. It sounds as if you've made a lot of progress already. A few thoughts from the Fedora/RISC-V effort ... (1) Cross-compiling RPMs (eg. from x86-64 to LoongArch) isn't

Re: Porting Fedora for the LoongArch architecture.

在 2023/1/11 21:15, Stephen Smoogen 写道: 主题: Re: Porting Fedora for the LoongArch architecture. From: Stephen Smoogen 日期: 2023/1/11 21:15 收件人: Development discussions related to Fedora 抄送: "siyant...@loongson.cn" , "chenhua...@loongson.cn" , "shipuji...@gmail.com" , Xiaotian Wu ,

Re: F37 kernel 6.0.16/6.0.18 breaking Python tests: Allows to bind a socket twice

On 11/01/2023 15.07, Justin Forbes wrote: On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 7:33 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11. 01. 23 14:12, Justin Forbes wrote: Is this a bug that needs to be fixed or do the tests need to be changed not to assert this? The fact that 6.2.0 makes this go away makes me think this is

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:09 AM DJ Chase wrote: > > Then in that sense, aren’t we already shipping unfiltered Flathub? IIRC > you can already enable Flathub in GNOME Software. The first two sentences of the proposal summary are "Fedora Workstation's existing third party repo feature allows

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed Jan 11, 2023 at 9:33 AM EST, Kamil Paral wrote: > It's not out of the box. You have to *opt-in* to third-party repos (which > already contain Steam, Nvidia binary driver, etc). Then in that sense, aren’t we already shipping unfiltered Flathub? IIRC you can already enable Flathub in GNOME

libgps soname bump (gpsd-3.25)

libgps from the gpsd package had another ABI break. The following packages need to be rebuilt: collectd direwolf foxtrotgps marble plasma-workspace vfrnav viking xtide All packages rebuilt correctly for me locally, except vfrnav which seems to have some broken dependencies due to new texlive.

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:51 PM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > Miro Hrončok wrote on 2023/01/11 21:58: > > libgnome alexl, caolanm, > gnome-sig, > > mbarnes, rhughes, > rstrode, > > I've just fixed now: >

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:53 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > Hi Fabio, > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:32 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:07 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > > > > > We could just remove xorg-x11-drv-qxl from the list of drivers pulled > > > in from

Heads up: tox 4 in Rawhide buildroot

> Successfully waited 0:00 for python-tox-4.2.6-1.fc38 to appear in the f38-build repo. If you hit unexpected issues with %tox, let us know here or in Bugzilla. Thanks. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ python-devel mailing

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 11. 01. 23 15:51, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Miro Hrončok wrote on 2023/01/11 21:58: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Hi Fabio, On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:32 PM Fabio Valentini wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:07 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > > > We could just remove xorg-x11-drv-qxl from the list of drivers pulled > > in from xorg-x11-drivers, wdyt? > > Aren't QXL the default graphics when setting up a

[Bug 2160110] New: perl-Sys-Statistics-Linux missing in EPEL-9

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160110 Bug ID: 2160110 Summary: perl-Sys-Statistics-Linux missing in EPEL-9 Product: Fedora EPEL Version: epel9 OS: Linux Status: NEW Component: perl-Sys-Statistics-Linux

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2023/01/11 21:58: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. 5 weekly reminders are required, hence the retirement will happen approximately in 5

Re: Building Python 3.12 with no-omit-frame-pointer

On 23. 11. 22 9:12, Petr Viktorin wrote: On 22. 11. 22 18:30, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 21. 11. 22 11:01, Petr Viktorin wrote: And since the Python slowdown comes from a single weird function, I think that Fedora should ignore the Python benchmarks when evaluating the distro default -- and if

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 03:31:46PM +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:07 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > > > We could just remove xorg-x11-drv-qxl from the list of drivers pulled > > in from xorg-x11-drivers, wdyt? > > Aren't QXL the default graphics when setting up a Fedora

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:37 PM DJ Chase wrote: > Providing nonfree packages out of the box ultimately promotes the use of > that nonfree software, which violates this foundation. > It's not out of the box. You have to *opt-in* to third-party repos (which already contain Steam, Nvidia binary

Re: F39 proposal: Replace DNF with DNF5 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Dear community, I would like to mentioned that there is last chance (about a week) to comment the updated proposal and discussion on DNF5 github before FESCO will make a decision. Jaroslav ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 3:07 PM Olivier Fourdan wrote: > > We could just remove xorg-x11-drv-qxl from the list of drivers pulled > in from xorg-x11-drivers, wdyt? Aren't QXL the default graphics when setting up a Fedora VM with libvirt (i.e. gnome-boxes and virt-manager)? Maybe letting that

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 11. 01. 23 15:02, Vít Ondruch wrote: I would not ask if this was true... Sorry, my fault, I brainfarted. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone: +420777974800 IRC: mhroncok ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: F37 kernel 6.0.16/6.0.18 breaking Python tests: Allows to bind a socket twice

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 7:33 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 11. 01. 23 14:12, Justin Forbes wrote: > >> Is this a bug that needs to be fixed or do the tests need to be changed > >> not to > >> assert this? > >> > >> The fact that 6.2.0 makes this go away makes me think this is a kernel bug > >>

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Hi Miro, On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 2:03 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 11. 01. 23 13:58, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Dear maintainers. > > > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following > > packages > > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching.

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dne 11. 01. 23 v 14:40 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): On 11. 01. 23 14:34, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 11. 01. 23 v 13:58 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): coffee-script patches, vondruch Could you please exclude this ^^ from the list? I am afraid I can't exclude packages just like that. If you believe this

[Bug 2160077] perl-Prima-1.67-1.fc38 FTBFS: t/Image/Tile.t aborts

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160077 --- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar --- Valgrind reports: ==28039== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==28039== Copyright (C) 2002-2022, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==28039== Using Valgrind-3.20.0 and LibVEX; rerun with -h for

[Bug 2160077] New: perl-Prima-1.67-1.fc38 FTBFS: t/Image/Tile.t aborts

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160077 Bug ID: 2160077 Summary: perl-Prima-1.67-1.fc38 FTBFS: t/Image/Tile.t aborts Product: Fedora Version: rawhide URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Prima?c

Re: Porting Fedora for the LoongArch architecture.

在 2023/1/11 0:20, Matthew Miller 写道: On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:12:22PM +0800, 孙海勇 wrote: I want to add LoongArch to the official Fedora support architecture, This is really cool -- welcome, and I'd love to help make sure you succeed! Thank you very much！ I'm currently a newbie in the

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 11. 01. 23 14:34, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 11. 01. 23 v 13:58 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): coffee-script patches, vondruch Could you please exclude this ^^ from the list? I am afraid I can't exclude packages just like that. If you believe this package should be exempted from the policy I

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

I am wholely against this. One of the primary reasons I use Fedora is because it only ships free software repos by default. Indeed, the first of the Four Foundations is Freedom, which explicitly lists these as part of the foundation: • “innovation in free and open source software that can

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Dne 11. 01. 23 v 13:58 Miro Hrončok napsal(a): coffee-script patches, vondruch Could you please exclude this ^^ from the list? While this package is on life support, removing it won't make the situation any better :/ There also was rename/update attempt which was deferred for the time

Re: F37 kernel 6.0.16/6.0.18 breaking Python tests: Allows to bind a socket twice

On 11. 01. 23 14:12, Justin Forbes wrote: Is this a bug that needs to be fixed or do the tests need to be changed not to assert this? The fact that 6.2.0 makes this go away makes me think this is a kernel bug but I am not sure. This does seem a bug. The big question, is does 6.1 make it go

Re: Porting Fedora for the LoongArch architecture.

在 2023/1/11 0:50, Robin Lee 写道: On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 11:13 PM 孙海勇 wrote: Hi everyone, I am Sun Haiyong, from China. I want to port Fedora for the LoongArch architecture. LoongArch is a RISC ISA released by Loongson Technology Corporation Limited, and has supported a series of (Binutils,

Re: Porting Fedora for the LoongArch architecture.

在 2023/1/10 23:54, Neal Gompa 写道: On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 10:13 AM 孙海勇 wrote: Hi everyone, I am Sun Haiyong, from China. I want to port Fedora for the LoongArch architecture. LoongArch is a RISC ISA released by Loongson Technology Corporation Limited, and has supported a series of (Binutils,

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 1:22 PM Neal Becker wrote: > The one concern I have with this proposal is it says that flatpak version > would only be offered if it didn't duplicate a package in fedora. > Citation needed. Do you mean this sentence? > Where there are overlaps, Fedora content will be

Re: Porting Fedora for the LoongArch architecture.

On Tue, 10 Jan 2023 at 17:37, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > Hi, > > ... clipped as I want to focus on this part. > (4) As another reply mentioned, to get LoongArch as a primary Fedora > architecture, an essential requirement is 19" rackable server-class > hardware. It needs to be fully

Re: F37 kernel 6.0.16/6.0.18 breaking Python tests: Allows to bind a socket twice

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 6:53 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello. > > On Monday I observed that the Fedora 37 and 36 Python CI tests on the Testing > farm fail. > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/c...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/YOXVRWJNJMNSTUG6O43KE4K6Q57GV7DR/ > > The same tests

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

W dniu 11.01.2023 o 13:58 Miro Hrončok pisze: > Dear maintainers. > > Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages > should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. > zyga: zmk, golang-gopkg-mgo-2 Thank you for reminding me. I will

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

On 11. 01. 23 13:58, Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the current fail to build from source policy, the following packages should be retired from Fedora 38 approximately one week before branching. ... Depending on: xorg-x11-drv-qxl (16), status change: 2020-04-02 (144 weeks ago)

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

On 11/01/2023 13:20, Neal Becker wrote: The potential problem I see is this depends on Fedora and Flathub being totally consistent in their naming. Both RPM and Flatpak use the reverse domain ID from the upstream-provided metainfo file. -- Sincerely, Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)

F37 kernel 6.0.16/6.0.18 breaking Python tests: Allows to bind a socket twice

Hello. On Monday I observed that the Fedora 37 and 36 Python CI tests on the Testing farm fail. https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/c...@lists.fedoraproject.org/thread/YOXVRWJNJMNSTUG6O43KE4K6Q57GV7DR/ The same tests work on Rawhide and worked on Fedora 37/36 previously --

[Bug 2160057] New: perl-WWW-Curl-4.17-31.fc38 FTBFS: curlopt-constants.c:19:51: error: 'CURL_DEPRECATED' undeclared

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160057 Bug ID: 2160057 Summary: perl-WWW-Curl-4.17-31.fc38 FTBFS: curlopt-constants.c:19:51: error: 'CURL_DEPRECATED' undeclared Product: Fedora Version: rawhide

Re: Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 01:45:08PM +0300, Benson Muite wrote: > On 1/11/23 13:41, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > >> > >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697 > >> > >> I'm willing to swap this one with a package of

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 7:22 AM Neal Becker wrote: > > The one concern I have with this proposal is it says that flatpak version > would only be offered if it didn't duplicate a package in fedora. The > potential problem I see is this depends on Fedora and Flathub being totally > consistent

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2023-01-03)

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 6:25 AM Vít Ondruch wrote: > > > Dne 11. 01. 23 v 12:16 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): > > So shouldn't there be some policy for revoting? E.g.: > > > > > > ~~~ > > > > If revote is initiated (by somebody?), the revote is going to be > > announced on devel(-announce) and can

Re: F38 proposal: Unfiltered Flathub (System-Wide Change proposal)

The one concern I have with this proposal is it says that flatpak version would only be offered if it didn't duplicate a package in fedora. The potential problem I see is this depends on Fedora and Flathub being totally consistent in their naming. ___

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20230111.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20230109.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20230111.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:8 Dropped images: 1 Added packages: 14 Dropped packages:197 Upgraded packages: 194 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 4.35 MiB Size of dropped packages

[Bug 2159980] F38FailsToInstall: fusioninventory-agent-task-inventory

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2159980 Michal Josef Spacek changed: What|Removed |Added Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value

[Bug 2160038] New: bugzilla-5.0.6-15.fc38 FTBFS: LaTeX Error: File `tgtermes.sty' not found.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2160038 Bug ID: 2160038 Summary: bugzilla-5.0.6-15.fc38 FTBFS: LaTeX Error: File `tgtermes.sty' not found. Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Status: NEW Component:

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2023-01-03)

Dne 11. 01. 23 v 12:16 Vít Ondruch napsal(a): So shouldn't there be some policy for revoting? E.g.: ~~~ If revote is initiated (by somebody?), the revote is going to be announced on devel(-announce) and can happen as soon as in one week. ~~~ Also, I am not quite sure who and how

Re: Schedule for Tuesday's FESCo Meeting (2023-01-03)

So shouldn't there be some policy for revoting? E.g.: ~~~ If revote is initiated (by somebody?), the revote is going to be announced on devel(-announce) and can happen as soon as in one week. ~~~ And maybe it should not happen in the ticket, but on the meeting? Vít Dne 11. 01. 23 v

[Test-Announce] Fedora 38 Rawhide 20230111.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing

Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event for Fedora 38 Rawhide 20230111.n.0. Please help run some tests for this nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly release validation testing, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki

Re: Porting Fedora for the LoongArch architecture.

On Wed, 11 Jan 2023 11:45:59 +0100 Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 05:26:33PM +0800, Robin Lee wrote: > > EDK2 support is also upstreamed but Fedora does not catch up. > > There is no cross compiler (yet) in Fedora so I can hardly > build edk2 firmware binaries ... > > I expect

Re: Porting Fedora for the LoongArch architecture.

On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 05:26:33PM +0800, Robin Lee wrote: > EDK2 support is also upstreamed but Fedora does not catch up. There is no cross compiler (yet) in Fedora so I can hardly build edk2 firmware binaries ... I expect that will change when the gcc-13 update lands in rawhide. take care,

Re: Review swap: libblkio (Rust-written library with C API)

On 1/11/23 13:41, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2023 at 10:39:50AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2124697 >> >> I'm willing to swap this one with a package of similar complexity. >> >> This package / review bug has been extensively

  1   2   >