The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-29b054d297
chromium-110.0.5481.177-1.el7
5 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-d09ff99ff8
stb-0-0.24.20230129git5736b15.el7
The
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174756
--- Comment #3 from Jeff Fearn ---
If you edit the search and pop-down the 'Search By People' section you should
see the old email address is hard coded.
All the relationships are based in the user id not login name, so nothing old
will be
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174756
John Dodson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags|needinfo?(jwadodson@gmail.c |
|om)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173738
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-1067dc376c has been pushed to the Fedora 37 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf upgrade --enablerepo=updates-testing
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174402
--- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-f3895c13fb has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-f3895c13fb
See also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173738
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-ba84c41727 has been pushed to the Fedora 38 testing repository.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ba84c41727
See also
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174457
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #2 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2173738
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #5 from
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:24 PM Benson Muite
wrote:
> Would like to unretire Include What You Use
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175012
Taken,
>
> ___
> devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> To unsubscribe send an
Kenneth Goldman kirjoitti 1.3.2023 klo 22.35:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_
GNU_Hello/
The tutorial says:
Lines which are not needed (e.g. BuildRequires and Requires) can be
commented out with the hash # for now.
However, I believe that this line
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174756
Jeff Fearn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Flags||needinfo?(jwadodson@gmail.c
On Thu, Dec 8, 2022, at 9:51 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> I think the "Upgrade/compatibility impact" section ought to call out the
> possible risk with config mgmt tools like puppet/ansible, that might be
> managing SSH host keys and their permissions/ownership
So that was done with:
>
Would like to unretire Include What You Use
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2175012
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Data-Dump` that
you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Data-Dump/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing
The Fedora Linux 38 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Thursday
9 March at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will
determine the status of the F38 Beta for the 14 March early target
date[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the
wiki[3].
[1]
The Fedora Linux 38 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Thursday
9 March at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will
determine the status of the F38 Beta for the 14 March early target
date[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the
wiki[3].
[1]
Guessing the first sentence should be 38 and not 37 right?
On 3/2/23, Ben Cotton wrote:
> The Fedora Linux 37 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Thursday
> 9 March at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will
> determine the status of the F38 Beta for the 14 March early target
>
The Fedora Linux 37 Beta Go/No-Go[1] meeting is scheduled for Thursday
9 March at 1700 UTC in #fedora-meeting. At this time, we will
determine the status of the F38 Beta for the 14 March early target
date[2]. For more information about the Go/No-Go meeting, see the
wiki[3].
[1]
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 4:48 PM Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 02. 03. 23 16:06, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 3:47 PM Tomas Tomecek
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Fabio, answers inline below.
> >>
> >> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:50 PM Fabio Valentini
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023
In one week (2023-03-09), or slightly later, I plan to update libbraiding from
1.1 to 1.2 in F39/Rawhide. Upstream says, “Minor changes for compatibility with
newer C++.”
https://github.com/miguelmarco/libbraiding/compare/1.1...1.2
This is not supposed to be an incompatible update, and the .so
On 2/28/23 05:06, Petr Pisar wrote:
> V Tue, Feb 28, 2023 at 02:47:03AM -, Daniel Alley napsal(a):
>> I am not sure whether by "all historical updates" you are only referring to
>> all updates being listed in updateinfo.xml, or all history generally
>> (including old packages).
>
> The
Thanks for picking this up!
When I saw that linphone was orphaned, I wanted to adopt it too,
but when I saw how much work it needed and being a new packager,
I didn't trust myself to be able to do all the work alone.
Let me know if I can help with something :D
Hussein
Am 02.03.23 um 10:13
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Algorithm-C3` that you
are following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Algorithm-C3/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel mailing list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174756
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
mspacek merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-YAML` that you are
following.
Merged pull-request:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-YAML/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Algorithm-C3` that
you are following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Algorithm-C3/pull-request/2
___
perl-devel
mspacek opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-YAML` that you are
following:
``
Update license to SPDX format
``
To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-YAML/pull-request/1
___
perl-devel mailing list --
Hi all,
Once upon a time...
One day a fedora packager found libosip2 orphaned and decided it needed some
love and adopted it.
Little did he know the rabbit hole he was about to go down. ;-)
All things lead to linphone and as a result I have adopted:
- libosip2
- libeXosip2
- linphone
An
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> True. But is this annoyance bigger than updating dependent packages
> to load headers from a different location? Apparently many (most?)
> packages will need to use the compat headers at least for now, so that
> cost would be pretty high.
This depends mainly
On 02. 03. 23 16:06, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 3:47 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
Hi Fabio, answers inline below.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:34 PM Matej Focko wrote:
- linux-system-roles v1.35.1: submitted to F39, F37,
Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> The main reason for i686 continuing to exist at all in Fedora is to
> facilitate running of externally distributed 32-bit apps (for example
> wine/steam related). Those apps are all going to be built with 32-bit
> time_t.
WINE is packaged in Fedora. If Fedora rebuilds
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 3:47 PM Tomas Tomecek wrote:
>
> Hi Fabio, answers inline below.
>
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:34 PM Matej Focko wrote:
>>
>> - linux-system-roles v1.35.1: submitted to F39, F37, F36, but not F38
>> -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174891
Bug ID: 2174891
Summary: perl-Prima-1.68002 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Prima
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Hi Fabio, answers inline below.
On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:50 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 1, 2023 at 5:34 PM Matej Focko wrote:
>
> - linux-system-roles v1.35.1: submitted to F39, F37, F36, but not F38
> - osbuild-composer v75: submitted to F39, F37, F36, but not F38
> -
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 02:35:11PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:57:42AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > If any other Fedora maintainer looks after packages that use GNULIB,
> > then it is quite likely that they also need to add --disable-year2038
> > to their
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 02:35:11PM +0100, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:57:42AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> > If any other Fedora maintainer looks after packages that use GNULIB,
> > then it is quite likely that they also need to add --disable-year2038
> > to their
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:57:42AM +, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> If any other Fedora maintainer looks after packages that use GNULIB,
> then it is quite likely that they also need to add --disable-year2038
> to their specfiles to avoid i686 brokenness when talking to any
> non-glibc libraries
In one week (2023-03-02), or slightly later, I plan to update the
python-shapely package from 1.8.5.post1 to 2.0.1 in Rawhide/F39 by
merging the linked PR[1].
There are incompatible changes[2], but after some patching and some
waiting for upstream releases, all dependent packages now build
OLD: Fedora-38-20230301.n.0
NEW: Fedora-38-20230302.n.0
= SUMMARY =
Added images:1
Dropped images: 0
Added packages: 0
Dropped packages:0
Upgraded packages: 0
Downgraded packages: 0
Size of added packages: 0 B
Size of dropped packages:0 B
Size of upgraded
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2162633
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Status|ASSIGNED
Dne 02. 03. 23 v 0:50 Jason Tibbitts napsal(a):
I do see that the license tag should probably have an SPDX identifier
"GPL-3.0-or-later" instead of "GPLv3+" but that's somewhat minor.
Fair enough.
https://pagure.io/fedora-docs/package-maintainer-docs/pull-request/114
Miroslav
Dne 01. 03. 23 v 23:39 Kenneth Goldman napsal(a):
There's Source, Source0, and sources. What are the definitions?
I think that older RPMs require the numbered version, e.g. `Source0`.
With advent of macros such as `%autosetup`, the number is not as
important as it used to be and therefore
On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 11:06:04AM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:28:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > It seems as if there is some issue with TLS (is gnutls borked on i686?)
>
> Yes as it happens, see the thread here:
>
>
Dne 01. 03. 23 v 22:59 Kenneth Goldman napsal(a):
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/Packaging_Tutorial_
GNU_Hello/
~~~
when running that tutorial (Fedora 37, x86), I get this error:
ERROR: Exception(/home/kgold/hello/hello-2.10-1.fc37.src.rpm)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174756
Bug ID: 2174756
Summary: If I ask for my closed bugs it uses an old email
address & gives nothing
Product: Fedora
Version: 37
Status: NEW
Component: bugzilla
On Mon, Feb 27, 2023 at 06:28:56PM +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> It seems as if there is some issue with TLS (is gnutls borked on i686?)
Yes as it happens, see the thread here:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2023-March/145992.html
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Virtualization
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174457
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2023-3191bc3f85 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 38.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-3191bc3f85
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174457
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
On 02/03/2023 08:43, Olivier Fourdan wrote:
TB still uses Xwayland?
By default, yes.
If you install thunderbird-wayland then you will get an
alternative native Wayland version.
Tom
--
Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu)
http://compton.nu/
___
devel
Hi,
On Thu, Mar 2, 2023 at 9:39 AM Vít Ondruch wrote:
>
> I have updated my Rawhide yesterday and today I have noticed, that KB
> layout changes do not work in TB. It stubbornly uses English layout. I
> have reported the issue here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174708
>
> and
I have updated my Rawhide yesterday and today I have noticed, that KB
layout changes do not work in TB. It stubbornly uses English layout. I
have reported the issue here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2174708
and later tried to downgrade TB to previous version, but that did not
51 matches
Mail list logo
