bradb...@seanet.com wrote:
> I misspelled centos as contos Now fedpkg mockbuild works with the proper
> links:
>
>>ls -l $HOME/.config/mock
> total 8
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 bradbell bradbell 41 Jun 3 19:09 epel-8-x86_64.cfg ->
> /etc/mock/centos-stream+epel-8-x86_64.cfg
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 bradbell
I misspelled centos as contos Now fedpkg mockbuild works with the proper
links:
>ls -l $HOME/.config/mock
total 8
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 bradbell bradbell 41 Jun 3 19:09 epel-8-x86_64.cfg ->
/etc/mock/centos-stream+epel-8-x86_64.cfg
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 bradbell bradbell 41 Jun 3 19:09 epel-9-x86_64.cfg ->
The following Fedora EPEL 9 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-eacf1a60fb
python-flask-restx-1.1.0-1.el9
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-5b5f974a90
sympa-6.2.72-2.el9
0
I both suggestions above and they did not work. It is as if fedpkg is checking
for the file and not accepting a link:
>ls -l $HOME/.config/mock/
total 8
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 bradbell bradbell 41 Jun 3 18:13 epel-8-x86_64.cfg ->
/etc/mock/contos-stream+epel-8-x86_64.cfg
lrwxrwxrwx. 1 bradbell
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
3 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-03b316a546
qemu-2.0.0-5.el7
0 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2023-64b282dfaf
sympa-6.2.72-2.el7
The following builds have been pushed
Hi,
I ran into a build failure for a Python package that dropped setup.py in
the latest update and uses pyproject.toml for metadata and setuptools.
The build failed due to 'error: Installed (but unpackaged) file(s)
found' [1]. However, all the erroneously installed modules should be
Hey all, I'm Daniel Milnes.
By day I'm a CyberSecurity Engineer at LMAX Group, part of the team responsible
for running ~2k Rocky Linux servers, and by night I'm head of Infrastructure
for RACTF, an open-source framework for hosting Cyber Security Capture-The-Flag
events. This means I've got a
Announcing the creation of a new nightly release validation test event
for Fedora 39 Rawhide 20230603.n.1. Please help run some tests for this
nightly compose if you have time. For more information on nightly
release validation testing, see:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki
How far along is this? Possible in the next 5-10 years or so?
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
On Sat, 3 Jun 2023, Brad Bell wrote:
I am getting the error message below in response to a `fedpkg mockbuild`
command. What am I doing wrong ?
fedpkg mockbuild
... snip ...
ERROR: Mock config 'epel-9-x86_64' not found, see errors above.
Here is my system information:
git branch
* epel9
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023, 9:09 AM Matthew Miller mailto:mat...@fedoraproject.org>> wrote:
I think this sentiment is getting ahead of things. This thread _is_ that
effort.
Yes, but. In general, a better approach is to say "we plan on orphaning the packages
in $timeframe".
...
RH, for
On 6/2/23 8:49 AM, Terry Bowling wrote:
I appreciate and am empathetic to all of those carrying the burden of
this and the thousands of other RPM packages. As a users of Fedora +
RPM Fusion + Cinnamon Desktop as my daily laptop driver since 2011, I
love Fedora and am a heavy user of
On Sat, Jun 3, 2023 at 12:03 PM Stephen Smoogen wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 at 11:57, Brad Bell wrote:
>>
>> I am getting the error message below in response to a `fedpkg mockbuild`
>> command. What am I doing
>> wrong ?
>>
>> >fedpkg mockbuild
>> ... snip ...
>> ERROR: Mock config
On Sat, 3 Jun 2023 at 11:57, Brad Bell wrote:
> I am getting the error message below in response to a `fedpkg mockbuild`
> command. What am I doing
> wrong ?
>
> >fedpkg mockbuild
> ... snip ...
> ERROR: Mock config 'epel-9-x86_64' not found, see errors above.
>
>
> Here is my system
I am getting the error message below in response to a `fedpkg mockbuild` command. What am I doing
wrong ?
>fedpkg mockbuild
... snip ...
ERROR: Mock config 'epel-9-x86_64' not found, see errors above.
Here is my system information:
>git branch
* epel9
rawhide
>uname -a
Linux brad-mobile
On Fri, Jun 2, 2023, 9:09 AM Matthew Miller
wrote:
> I think this sentiment is getting ahead of things. This thread _is_ that
effort.
Yes, but. In general, a better approach is to say "we plan on orphaning the
packages in $timeframe". Even if $timeframe is a week, it shifts the
perception to
On Sat, Jun 3 2023 at 09:56:40 AM +0200, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
wrote:
Yes, Fedora is dying. Slow, but imminent. IBM doesn't want to keep it
in
a good condition, so they fired a lot of good engineers. It's very
sad.
I have been using it for years.
I'm not going to defend callous layoffs
On Sat, Jun 3 2023 at 10:26:07 AM -, John Iliopoulos
wrote:
Hello,
While i completely understand why you do this i do think that it is
important for desktop/workstation oriented devices to have some
optional access to Office directly from the image file. Have you
considered shipping
> On 03. 06. 23 13:29, Mattia Verga wrote:
>
> It's not in epel because it is in RHEL.
>
>
> I have no idea. What makes you suspect this problem is related to *Python*
> macros at all? %ctest is defined in /usr/lib/rpm/macros.d/macros.cmake which
> is
> shipped by cmake-rpm-macros, a
On 03. 06. 23 13:29, Mattia Verga wrote:
In the test section of libindi package I use this to run tests:
%ctest --test-dir %_vpath_builddir/test
This translates in Fedora as:
+ /usr/bin/ctest --test-dir redhat-linux-build --output-on-failure
--force-new-ctest-process -j6 --test-dir
In the test section of libindi package I use this to run tests:
%ctest --test-dir %_vpath_builddir/test
This translates in Fedora as:
+ /usr/bin/ctest --test-dir redhat-linux-build --output-on-failure
--force-new-ctest-process -j6 --test-dir redhat-linux-build/test
Internal ctest changing into
Hello,
While i completely understand why you do this i do think that it is important
for desktop/workstation oriented devices to have some optional access to Office
directly from the image file. Have you considered shipping the LibreOffice
flatpak via the ISO much like Fedora Silverblue does
> Am 03.06.2023 um 09:56 schrieb Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
> :
>
> On 03/06/2023 02:46, Leslie Satenstein via devel wrote:
>> No LibreOffice, no continuation with Fedora. LO better be there with F39.
>> Without it, all you have is Firefox. It is not enough to keep Fedora
>> Diehards from
On 03/06/2023 09:51, Samuel Sieb wrote:
Did you read the whole thread? It's not going anywhere. People have
stepped up to maintain it.
LibreOffice is a complex project. It will be very difficult to maintain
it. It's not just a trivial Version+Release bump, no. They will need to
backport
On 03/06/2023 02:46, Leslie Satenstein via devel wrote:
No LibreOffice, no continuation with Fedora. LO better be there with
F39. Without it, all you have is Firefox. It is not enough to keep
Fedora Diehards from jumping to another popular distribution.
Yes, Fedora is dying. Slow, but
> If I understand the announcement correctly, future RHEL will not include
> LibreOffice
> anymore. That’s the reason, why the maintainers have withdrawn.
>
>
> Instead of Flatpak I would prefer to pick up the software directly from the
> project. LO
> provides a rpm. Maybe we have to change
On 6/2/23 19:50, Ralph Bromley wrote:
This is a stupid bonehead idea, libreoffice is just too big to reliably run in
flatpak.
Plus what about java integration, guess the languagetool plugin wont work now
and I will have to use its stupud online version where you havwe to pay to add
words.
Oh
> Am 03.06.2023 um 02:06 schrieb Sandro :
>
> On 02-06-2023 16:09, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Fri, Jun 02, 2023 at 01:55:30AM +0200, Sandro wrote:
>>> However, it surprises me that for a package, that is part of the
>>> deliverables of Fedora releases, no coordination effort was made to
>>>
> Am 03.06.2023 um 05:11 schrieb Ralph Bromley :
>
> Look its not like I have not tried libreoffice as a flat but as of now it
> looks out of place, I can't even see the icons even when I use the default
> adwaita or breeze themes.
> How is this an improvement?
> I wanted to leave ubuntu
29 matches
Mail list logo
