On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 17:07 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
On Fri, Jun 21, 2013 at 12:09:57PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On the other hand, having NetworkManager available all the time enables
things like management tools to use its API to query system status,
instead of guessing it from
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 13:42 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 06/20/2013 08:01 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Mind if I ask why you think this way about NetworkManager? The NM
currently shipping in Fedora 19 has full support for managing static
NICs, as well as bonding, bridging and VLAN
On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 13:17 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
On 06/20/2013 09:13 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
nmcli doesn't work unless NM is running, since it talks to NM to do
stuff, so it would be incompatible with NM setting things up and
quitting.
It could spawn NetworkManager
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 12:13 -0600, Eric Smith wrote:
Does NM in F19 support statically assigning multiple subnets to the
same physical interface, WITHOUT using VLANs? I often need that on
server machines, and wasn't able to figure out any way to do it with
NM on F17, but I haven't yet tried
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 13:59 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com said:
No, it does not support that at this time. Also note that (if I'm
remembering right) NM adds all aliases as secondary IP addresses, not as
':x' style additional devices.
I
On Thu, 2013-06-20 at 14:06 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
Once upon a time, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org said:
Hence, the RFE -- a mode which sets up the above, and then goes away.
I had not seen that mode (or a request for it). That would be nice. In
a perfect world (hah!),
On Sun, 2013-05-19 at 09:59 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 1:10 AM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
On May 16, 2013, at 10:49 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 15:44 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 16, 2013, at 3:36 PM
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 14:02 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 21, 2013, at 1:09 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
But this bug has brought me to a plethora of buggy behavior in the Gnome
Settings Network panel, so maybe the misery was worth it.
*THIS*. *This* kind of thing
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 22:07 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 21.05.2013 22:02, schrieb Chris Murphy:
Maybe someone can explain to me the use case for ONBOOT= where its value
isn't tied
to the current network state. I wasted an inordinate, unreasonable amount
of time
trying to
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 14:33 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 21, 2013, at 2:08 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 14:02 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
1. Connect Automatically may work as designed, but it's a flawed
design. It makes no sense to have an
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 14:18 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-21 at 15:15 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
Anaconda creates ifcfg-en5s0, but sometimes the interface doesn't get
an IP address via DHCP on boot. Sometimes it does. I haven't figured
out why. But if I delete this ifcfg-
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 21:47 -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 5:01 PM, Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 14:57 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 16, 2013, at 2:17 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
OK well this isn't
On Thu, 2013-05-16 at 15:44 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On May 16, 2013, at 3:36 PM, Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com wrote:
Rebooted. I still have the problem. Wired connection is Off on each reboot.
This happens even if I regress to the 3.9.0 kernel that's used on the Live
media,
On Wed, 2013-05-15 at 12:52 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 14.05.13 17:30, Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) wrote:
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 15:51 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
This is not intended to be snarky, but I admit it could sound like it is.
When are long startup times
On Tue, 2013-05-14 at 15:51 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
This is not intended to be snarky, but I admit it could sound like it is.
When are long startup times for services considered to be bugs in their own
right?
[root@f19q ~]# systemd-analyze blame
1min 444ms sm-client.service
On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 09:35 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote:
Heya,
In Fedora 20, we'll be using BlueZ 5.x to manage Bluetooth devices.
Bluez5 uses a D-Bus API that's not compatible with Bluez4[1] and as
such, management applications and a number of libraries and daemons will
need to be
On Mon, 2013-04-29 at 20:59 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
Whether it is possible to sane gsteamer and try to remove gtk?
And gvfs - removing *gnome*.
It appears that out of the entire gvfsd package, only:
/usr/libexec/gvfsd-recent
requires GTK libraries. Everything else is strictly non-GUI.
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 12:10 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:28:56 -0700
John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
$ dmesg
Apr 25 05:56:36 localhost NetworkManager[614]: info modem-manager is now
available
Yeah, modem manager is irksome, although in my case it only
On Fri, 2013-04-26 at 13:56 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2013-04-25 at 12:10 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Thu, 25 Apr 2013 10:28:56 -0700
John Reiser jrei...@bitwagon.com wrote:
$ dmesg
Apr 25 05:56:36 localhost NetworkManager[614]: info modem-manager is
now available
On Fri, 2013-03-08 at 11:30 +0100, Michael Scherer wrote:
Le jeudi 07 mars 2013 à 21:17 -0800, Kenneth Marcy a écrit :
On 3/7/2013 8:50 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
I see all the various desktop envs install the 'dial-up' group, which
has:
packagereq
On Mon, 2013-02-11 at 09:42 +, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
On Saturday 09 of February 2013 11:37:15 Kevin Kofler wrote:
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
In Scope I see KDE's networking layers likely require an update to use
the new API, as will any other direct client of ModemManager. However, the
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 17:28 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Avesh Agarwal (avaga...@redhat.com) said:
Right now it is done using wpa_supplicant provided cli.
Just to clarify a little bit further, wpa_supplicant provided cli
takes care of authentication and tnc's end point assessment. Once
On Thu, 2013-01-31 at 16:41 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
= Features/NetworkManagerBridging =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NetworkManagerBridging
Feature owner(s): Pavel Šimerda psimerda at redhat.com, Dan Williams
dcbw
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 18:29 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:13:37PM -0600, Andrew McNabb wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 06:11:19PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Walk /sys/class/net, filter on type, filter out bridges, filter out
wireless if you want to. sysfs
On Tue, 2013-01-29 at 18:38 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:32:30PM -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
Except then you run into phones or WWAN cards that show up as Ethernet
devices, but aren't really Ethernet but just IP-in-8023-frames because
that was easier to do
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 02:46 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 21.01.13 10:25, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com) wrote:
The glibc maintainers don't seem to be against this idea and I am
willing to put time into design and implementation.
Perhaps I'm misunderstanding what
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 09:48 -0800, John Reiser wrote:
On 01/23/2013 09:27 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Wed, Jan 23, 2013 at 11:24:25AM -0600, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2013-01-23 at 02:46 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Mon, 21.01.13 10:25, Daniel P. Berrange (berra...@redhat.com
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 11:23 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Bruno Wolff III br...@wolff.to wrote:
In some cases you can get DSO linking errors when you don't explicitly link
to those other packages. People building from source might not care, but
this can
On Wed, 2012-12-19 at 11:56 -0500, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 11:53 AM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
It's the other way around. If libfoo 1.0.0 linked with -lbar and -lm,
and then you upgraded to libfoo 1.0.1 which *no longer* links to -lm,
now stuff that links
On Mon, 2012-11-26 at 14:08 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Thu, 2012-11-22 at 17:51 +0100, Nils Philippsen wrote:
Hi,
as nmcli doesn't yet offer all functionality s-c-network-tui had for
configuring networks on the command line, I want to resurrect
system-config-network for the time
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 02:33 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Matthew Miller wrote:
Apparently the new version of polkit brings in javascript. The js package
is 6.5MB. I think anything that uses polkit will depend on it -- can we
remove it from core?
Of course, the real question is why the heck
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 00:45 +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Fri, 09.11.12 11:42, Daniel Drake (d...@laptop.org) wrote:
Hi Bill
I see that initscripts in F18 ships this udev rule:
ACTION==add, SUBSYSTEM==net, PROGRAM=/lib/udev/rename_device,
RESULT==?*,
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 23:16 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 21:47 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
I have a Wifi card that is supposed to be managed by the network
service. The interface's IP addresses, prefixes, routes and all that
get assigned
On Tue, 2012-11-06 at 21:47 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
I have a Wifi card that is supposed to be managed by the network
service. The interface's IP addresses, prefixes, routes and all that get
assigned correctly on boot, but the wireless parameters – mode, ESSID
and channel – do not get
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 21:29 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 09.10.2012 19:19, schrieb Lennart Poettering:
On Tue, 09.10.12 15:19, Tom Hughes (t...@compton.nu) wrote:
On 09/10/12 15:04, Lennart Poettering wrote:
h) It's much shorter to type: journalctl than less
/var/log/messages.
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 15:41 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 9 October 2012 15:24, Lennart Poettering mzerq...@0pointer.de wrote:
On Tue, 09.10.12 16:53, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
If you want audit-like semantics with crashing if we cannot write, then
use something else,
On Tue, 2012-10-09 at 15:57 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
On 9 October 2012 15:50, Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
On Tue, Oct 09, 2012 at 03:41:51PM -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
If you want audit-like semantics with crashing if we cannot write, then
use
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 09:44 +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Hi Miloslav,
On Wednesday 29 August 2012 18:42:44 Miloslav Trmač wrote:
Considering that it's not reasonable to expect that the replacement
will cover 100% of the previous functionality, the old and new
projects will have to live side
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 09:20 +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
On Friday 31 August 2012 02:47:38 Bill Nottingham wrote:
I'm not saying you *can't* do it, but it's also not something to do
lightly.
Totally agreed. But what are really the points of maximum stickiness?
Obviously, configuration files
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 13:23 +0200, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
On 08/30/2012 08:55 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
Olaf Kirch (o...@suse.de) said:
On Wednesday 29 August 2012 21:56:45 Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 08/29/2012 11:58 AM, Olaf Kirch
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 09:20 +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Hi Stephen,
On Wednesday 29 August 2012 19:48:29 Stephen Gallagher wrote:
Olaf, I'm very interested to learn more about wicked. Can you perhaps
itemize the set of features available to wicked (current as well as
in-development) that
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 07:44 +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Hi Adam,
On Thursday 30 August 2012 04:16:23 Adam Williamson wrote:
*** Network Manager is just another daemon created for a task
which historically often did not need any daemons. It's almost as if
the new generation of Unix
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 16:48 +0100, Steven Whitehouse wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if one way to deal with the network configuration issue is to
try and help different configuration systems work with each other,
rather than to try and create one system which does everything. Last
time I looked into
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 15:17 +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
On 08/29/2012 01:58 PM, Olaf Kirch wrote:
Your feedback is very much welcome!
Regards,
Olaf
Why Did You Do This?!
Do we really need yet another network management thing?
On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 09:20 +0200, Olaf Kirch wrote:
On Thursday 30 August 2012 08:55:02 Bill Nottingham wrote:
The systemd people do have some ideas they've already been kicking around
for this already... have you seen it?
To be clear, I'm not really convinced yet that this is
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 21:02 +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 09/07/2012 07:13 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
I'm not sure the right place for this sort of
thing is in the init system.
Well I happen to be sure that the init systemd regardless of which
flavor of the month it is should
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 14:49 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 13:23:37 -0500,
Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
That's NM's heritage, but that's certainly not its focus. We're
actually focusing a *lot* more on enterprise use-cases these days,
including lots
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 16:54 -0400, Gary Gatling wrote:
Hello,
I am working on a package called
VirtualGL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=834127
After contacting the upstream on their mailing list, they seem
obsessed with being able to install their own rprms and my
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 16:46 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 16:38:27 -0500,
Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
'man NetworkManager' is a good place to start here, which leads you to
NetworkManager.conf, which leads you to:
dns=dnsmasq
I knew about that, but I
On Fri, 2012-09-07 at 16:44 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
'man NetworkManager' is a good place to start here, which leads you to
NetworkManager.conf, which leads you to:
dns=dnsmasq
which with 0.9.6 and any options you put into custom configuration
in /etc
On Fri, 2012-08-10 at 20:45 +0400, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
Before F18 is released, can someone, please, take a loot at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=836329 ? Month and a
half have passed already and patch exists.
Nobody really used IPv6 in production when I wrote that piece of
On Fri, 2012-06-22 at 09:46 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Jeu 21 juin 2012 01:09, Dan Williams a écrit :
I spent some time looking at this today. NM already has plugins for
dnsmasq and a long-since-dead one for bind. We can certainly add a
plugin for dnssec-trigger or even unbound
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 19:45 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
I spent some time looking at this today. NM already has plugins for
dnsmasq and a long-since-dead one for bind. We can certainly add a
plugin for dnssec-trigger or even unbound itself as well
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 09:32 -0400, Dan Winship wrote:
On 06/20/2012 07:09 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
(also, an aside: why the heck do resolvconf and dnssec-trigger require
an interface name??? DNS information has nothing do with network
interfaces, despite some DNS info coming from interface
On Thu, 2012-06-21 at 16:39 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Thu, 21.06.12 18:22, Alexey I. Froloff (ra...@raorn.name) wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2012 at 03:39:43PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
Disabling IPv4 should result in socket(AF_INET, ...) returning
EAFNOSUPPORT. Just taking
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 10:19 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 12:05:57 -0400
Simo Sorce s...@redhat.com wrote:
Yes this is all good 'n' nice.
The point is, can we/should we/want we make this the default ?
(And work on integrating NM - unbound automatic configuration ?)
On Wed, 2012-06-20 at 16:24 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Wed, 20 Jun 2012, Simo Sorce wrote:
There are at least 2 situations where it is needed, and they are common
or will be common enough.
The 2 use cases for which a properly configurable and dynamically
changeable caching DNA name
On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 18:21 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
In looking back through some of the meeting minutes I saw that RealHotspot
has been approved for Fedora 18.
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-03-19)
===
On Wed, 2012-03-14 at 20:47 +0100, Lars Seipel wrote:
On Wednesday 14 March 2012 13:36:06 Dan Williams wrote:
Whether we care enough about this regression (if you want to call it
that) versus enabling default IPv6 connectivity I don't know, I tend to
think we suck up the regression
On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 10:07 +, Petr Pisar wrote:
On 2012-03-14, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:52 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Dan Williams
0.9.4 snapshots do not require both methods to complete (with either
success or failure) before saying
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:52 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Dan Williams
0.9.4 snapshots do not require both methods to complete (with either
success or failure) before saying the machine is connected. Thus if
IPv4 completes first, NM will say it's connected, and continue IPv6
On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 09:59 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
On Sat, 10 Mar 2012 07:46:56 -0600
Chris Adams cmad...@hiwaay.net wrote:
DHCPv6 is not the only way to configure dynamic IPv6; my home network is
using SLAAC. IMHO that will probably be more common in home and other
small networks.
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jerry James
Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771130. Could that be
related to the issues discussed in this thread?
Hard to tell, without (preferably debug-level)
On Thu, 2012-03-01 at 10:52 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 1 Mar 2012, Dan Williams wrote:
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 17:20 +0100, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Jerry James
Interesting. I'm seeing kind of the inverse problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771130. Could
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 23:27 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
Can we please address the following bug that is almsot two years old.
This bug causes long delays for people enabling IPV6, and causes
Fedora to not get any connectivity on IPv6 only networks, unless you
disable/reconfigure ip6tables
On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 08:28 -0900, Jef Spaleta wrote:
On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:21 AM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
F15 was the first Linux i saw where reboot did not
work until you typed kill 1 while praying!
Can you point me to a bug report from you or anyone else that has
On Thu, 2012-01-26 at 23:21 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Dan Williams wrote:
People who don't have 3G modems and know they wont in the future have no
need of installing or running MM. Thus I'd like to remove the RPM dep
from NetworkManager, and instead add ModemManager to the default comps
Hi,
It was recently brought to my attention that NM has an RPM dep on
ModemManager. I believe we added it long ago to ensure that users did
not lose 3G modem support when updating from NM 0.7.x (where NM had
internal 3G support) to 0.8.x (where that support was split out into
MM). These days
On Mon, 2011-11-14 at 22:39 +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
On 11/14/2011 06:43 PM, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote:
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 02:43:10PM +0100, Ola Thoresen wrote:
So you say that both
IPV6_AUTOCONF=yes
IPV6ADDR_SECONDARIES=2001:840:0:11::30/64
Shoudl work?
(Have not tested
Hi,
At some point here I'm going to bump libnl to version 3 in rawhide. The
libnl 1.1 we use today is way out of date and we want version 3 for the
enhanced capabilities like bonding, bridging, vlan, etc. This *does*
mean an API break, so packages will need to be updated for libnl3. The
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 12:41 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) said:
At some point here I'm going to bump libnl to version 3 in rawhide. The
libnl 1.1 we use today is way out of date and we want version 3 for the
enhanced capabilities like bonding, bridging, vlan
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 13:05 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Dan Williams (d...@redhat.com) said:
I believe libnl3 *might* be parallel installable; I've had conversations
with tgraf about how to make it so. I'll investigate once the upstream
git repo comes back online. In the past
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 18:08 +, Peter Robinson wrote:
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Adam Jackson a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/8/11 12:09 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
2011/11/8 Richard Hugheshughsi...@gmail.com:
2011/11/7 Michał Piotrowskimkkp...@gmail.com:
Out of curiosity I wanted
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 22:21 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 11/08/2011 06:10 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
Hi,
At some point here I'm going to bump libnl to version 3 in rawhide. The
libnl 1.1 we use today is way out of date and we want version 3 for the
enhanced capabilities like bonding
On Wed, 2011-10-26 at 18:18 +0200, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
Hi,
Today I updated my F16 to latest version. After a while I noticed some
problems with network, I rebooted system and after this my network on
this box doesn't work anymore.
I use NetworkManager and dhcp. During the update
On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 21:22 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le jeudi 20 octobre 2011 à 13:08 -0500, Dan Williams a écrit :
If you architect a system that accounts for networking changing states,
then it works for *everyone*. If you depend on networking always being
there, then it only
On Thu, 2011-10-13 at 09:13 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
udev replaced HAL, along with some additional helpers. udev has a
database too, much like HAL. You can use libudev or libgudev (if you
use glib) to talk to udev
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 19:44 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
I'm the maintainer of a (relatively) simple python utility called
discspan[1] which I'd like to package for Fedora.
It currently relies on HAL via dbus to determine when media is loaded
and its capacity. I'm trying to remove the
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 11:23 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Wed, 21 Sep 2011, Tomas Mraz wrote:
solve a part of the problem how can you even consider removing the
ability for disabling dnssec when implementing and deploying and running
dnssec increases the complexity times hundred and
On Wed, 2011-09-21 at 12:37 +0200, Adam Tkac wrote:
On 09/20/2011 05:19 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2011-09-17 at 14:00 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
Hi developers of NM and Fedora,
We are trying to get DNSSEC validation on the end nodes. One way of doing
that is to run a caching
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 14:26 -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011, Dan Williams wrote:
But I'm not really familiar with unbound. Is it a long-running service?
Yes, It's a fully dnssec validating caching resolver. You start it at boot
and leave it running.
What does its
On Thu, 2011-09-22 at 22:29 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Thu, Sep 22, 2011 at 11:27:41AM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
right. the big problem is not working around a broken network or a network
with an attacker. The problem is false positives due to the pletora of
hotspot mangling
On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 11:50 -0400, Avesh Agarwal wrote:
On 08/26/2011 05:09 AM, Eberhard Schruefer wrote:
On 08/25/2011 13:57 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:00 +0200, Eberhard Schruefer wrote:
Hello,
I need to connect to a site via l2tp/openswan. I can set up
On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 11:00 +0200, Eberhard Schruefer wrote:
Hello,
I need to connect to a site via l2tp/openswan. I can set up openswan and
xl2tpd
manually and this works fine. However, bringing up the connection is not
very
comfortable and it would be much nicer to be able to use the
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 13:43 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Bill McGonigle b...@bfccomputing.com wrote:
On 08/03/2011 01:19 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
The Ubuntu NM maintainer has posted a WIP patch that makes NM say it's
connected immediately if at least one
On Wed, 2011-08-03 at 00:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-08-02 at 17:12 -0400, Bill McGonigle wrote:
On 08/01/2011 07:25 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
It seems like there's SOMETHING which has to happen after
wake before NM even attempts to re-establish a connection, and that's
determine what connection we should be associating with the
link as you describe.
Dan
Nathaniel
On Jul 30, 2011 6:45 PM, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 11:46 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 07/30/2011 10:37 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 30.07.11 10:31
On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 12:25 +0200, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 31.07.2011 12:17, schrieb David Woodhouse:
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 16:37 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
IIRC connman (i.e. NM's competition) can do the ARP magic, too.
I don't think so. ConnMan doesn't remember the last DHCP
On Mon, 2011-08-01 at 12:10 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 19:41 -0400, Nathaniel McCallum wrote:
Dan, that works on wireless networks. On wired networks the ARP
technique determines *which* of the valid leases you should attempt to
restore. So on a wired network you
On Sat, 2011-07-30 at 11:46 -0400, Genes MailLists wrote:
On 07/30/2011 10:37 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Sat, 30.07.11 10:31, Genes MailLists (li...@sapience.com) wrote:
http://cafbit.com/entry/rapid_dhcp_or_how_do
IIRC connman (i.e. NM's competition) can do the ARP magic,
On Fri, 2011-07-29 at 16:12 +0200, Tore Anderson wrote:
* Paul Wouters
Stopping the firewall did not help me on ietf-v6ONLY though. I still got
not DNS entry in /etc/resolv.conf and on top of that my routing seemed to
not have a working default route.
[...]
[paul@thinkpad ~]$ ip
On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 09:40 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 21:23 -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
systemd might be happy if you change it later, but other stuff is not.
The canonical example is X, where the hostname was used as the xauth key
to allow you to actually talk
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 10:21 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Tue, 2011-06-14 at 14:08 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
On Tue, 14.06.11 07:25, Simo Sorce (s...@redhat.com) wrote:
What's the problem of having a specific hostname set up at boot
time ?
The user might want to change
On Thu, 2011-05-19 at 22:10 +0900, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
19.05.2011, 21:12, n2xssvv.g02gfr12930 n2xssvv.g02gfr12...@ntlworld.com:
On 19/05/11 09:55, Misha Shnurapet wrote:
Hi.
I asked this question in NetworkManager mailing list, but everyone there
seems to be busy, so I decided
On Thu, 2011-05-05 at 18:45 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
On 5 May 2011 16:03, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
Aaron Gray (aaronngray.li...@gmail.com) said:
On 2 May 2011 22:13, Dan Williams d...@redhat.com wrote:
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:54 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
Hope no one
On Fri, 2011-04-29 at 19:21 -0400, Chuck Anderson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 12:30:02PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
Looking at the code, the 4-second delay is only used when the device is
actually connected to something. State 3 == DISCONNECTED, state 2 ==
UNAVAILABLE, so it's
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 17:54 +0100, Aaron Gray wrote:
Hope no one minds me writing to the devel list but I got no reply on user
list.
I have got inconsistent eth devices between what Fedora Gnome Desktop
is telling me and what ifconfig is telling me and what 'service
network restart' is
On Wed, 2011-04-27 at 23:01 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 01:58:57PM -0500, Dan Williams wrote:
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 23:06 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 07:10:48PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ben Boeckel wrote:
One thing I liked a lot
On Tue, 2011-04-26 at 09:46 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 16:35 +, Ben Boeckel wrote:
deal with in these cases) than some packets were lost. An option to
persist connections despite something probably not actually existing
would be nice for situations like this.
On Sun, 2011-04-24 at 23:06 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 07:10:48PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Ben Boeckel wrote:
One thing I liked a lot with my ifconfig scripts/wpa_supplicant pairing
is that when wireless is spotty, the network doesn't keep going up and
down.
101 - 200 of 228 matches
Mail list logo
