Hi all,
I'd like to swap these reviews with some other
(not-so-complicated) ones:
Saaghar[1]- A Cross-Platform Persian
Poetry Software
This is a Qt based application, and should not be complicated.
jcal[2] - Unix cal-like
interface to
21, 2011 at 01:45:25PM +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
html style=direction: ltr;
head
meta http-equiv=content-type content=text/html;
charset=UTF-8stylebody
p { margin-bottom: 0cm; margin-top: 0pt; }/style
/head
body style=direction: ltr;
bidimailui-detected
On ۱۱/۱۱/۲۱ 03:06, Jiri Popelka wrote:
I've taken them.
Here is mine (SpliX - Driver for QPDL/SPL2 printers)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=755069
Thanks,
Jiri
Thanks, I took yours.
Hedayat
On 11/21/2011 11:15 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Hi all,
I'd like to swap
Hi,
While it is announced at [1] and also in the pre-release download page,
there is no .jigdo file for F-14 Alpha.
Good luck!
Hedayat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi,
I've tried testing Fedora 14 Beta (RC3, but updated), and soon I come
across this bug[1]. I could discover the initial cause and propose a fix
(which, after reporting to freedesktop bugzilla, I found that is already
fixed in xkbconfig git (but still should be pushed to F14)). Then, I
Hi,
/*Parag N(पराग़) panem...@gmail.com*/ wrote on 10/02/2010 11:59:03 AM
+0350:
Hi,
On Sat, Oct 2, 2010 at 3:52 AM, Hedayat Vatankhahheda...@grad.com wrote:
�Hi,
I've tried testing Fedora 14 Beta (RC3, but updated), and soon I come
across this bug[1]. I could discover the initial cause and
/*Nicolas Mailhot nicolas.mail...@laposte.net*/ wrote on 10/02/2010
10:12:25 AM +0350:
Le samedi 02 octobre 2010 à 01:52 +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah a écrit :
In brief, this bug will cause some keyboard layouts to be broken in F14,
which IMHO should not go in Fedora 14 Final.
I wonder
Hi,
There has been no response from the maintainer since 2009-06-24 as is
clear in [1]. Also, the package has not been updated since then. I
wonder what should I do now (?)
Thanks,
Hedayat
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=507966
--
devel mailing list
On ۱۰/۱۰/۰۲ 08:37, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
On ۱۰/۱۰/۰۲ 03:55, Chen Lei wrote:
2010/10/2 Hedayat Vatankhahheda...@grad.com:
Hi,
There has been no response from the maintainer since 2009-06-24 as is
clear in [1]. Also, the package has not been updated since then. I
wonder what should I do now
/*Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com*/ wrote on 10/03/2010 6:26:50 AM
+0350:
On Sat, 2010-10-02 at 20:45 +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Hi,
Considering the fact that the maintainer is not responsible for a long
time, I'd like to ask if anybody knows how to contact David Zeuthen?!
Festival
Hi,
/*Luya Tshimbalanga l...@fedoraproject.org*/ wrote on 10/15/2010
6:06:10 AM +0350:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 11/10/10 03:41 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
I installed and played with Ubuntu 10.10 over the weekend (in a VM),
and I have to say that their installer is
Hi all,
According to [1], my updated simspark package has been pushed to stable;
but it is not! The package is available in updates-testing. I wonder if
it is expected considering the new updating criteria or it is a bug.
Anyway, it is confusing. What's happening?
Finally a question: this
/*Hedayat Vatankhah hedayat@gmail.com*/ wrote on 11/13/2010
5:28:49 PM +0350:
Hi all,
According to [1], my updated simspark package has been pushed to
stable; but it is not! The package is available in updates-testing. I
wonder if it is expected considering the new updating criteria
/*Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com*/ wrote on 11/12/2010 8:05:54 PM +0350:
Greetings.
Fedora 14 was a pretty relaxing and stable release. I'm thinking that
Fedora 15 may be much more exciting. ;)
Things I know of so far:
* systemd
* gnome3 / gnome-shell default
* removing a bunch of suid stuff
/*Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com*/ wrote on 11/15/2010 8:22:04 PM +0350:
On Sun, 14 Nov 2010 16:59:17 +0330
Hedayat Vatankhahhedayat@gmail.com wrote:
As I've mentioned, this update is a simple rebuild and the current
package in stable repositories is simply unusable as it crashes
/*Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at*/ wrote on 02/22/2011 6:49:00 PM
+0350:
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
Le Lun 21 février 2011 22:27, Hedayat Vatankhah a écrit :
Thanks for the answer. I also thought that it is reasonable, but wanted
to make sure before calling others for it. I just wonder
Hi all,
I have 3 review requests waiting for someone to take over for about 2
months. Unfortunately, currently I cannot offer review swaps, but I
hope some of you will take them :P
These are the review requests:
os-prober - Probes disks on the system for installed operating systems
URL:
Thanks :)
/*lakshminaras2...@gmail.com lakshminaras2...@gmail.com*/ wrote on
04/22/2011 3:13:17 PM +0450:
I have taken starcal.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 3:30 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah
hedayat@gmail.com mailto:hedayat@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all,
I have 3 review requests waiting
Hi Jerry,
/*Jerry James loganje...@gmail.com*/ wrote on 04/28/2011 10:19:39 PM
+0450:
Hi all,
I'd like to swap a couple of reviews. My packages:
openfst: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=681976
This is the next chunk of a voice recognition stack (CMU Sphinx) I've
slowly been
Hi,
It would be nice if Jigdo downloads could be also provided so that
people with previous releases (e.g. Beta release) which have downloaded
(and cached) updates could easily create new installation media without
downloading much (which will be much less than delta isos).
Good luck,
/*Andre Robatino an...@bwh.harvard.edu*/ wrote on 04/30/2010 3:13:26
PM +0450:
On 04/30/2010 06:25 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Well, I'm not going to insist on providing jigdo. However, the situation
in my mind is this one: I've downloaded Fedora 13 Beta DVD iso
previously and installed
Hi all,
There is a bug in Fedora package management since FC4 (except Fedora 8)
that potentially affects ALL of the Fedora installation DVD users
(people who are not annoyed by this bug will probably find other
alternatives more suitable (e.g. Live CD install, Network install or the
new BFO if
On ۱۰/۰۵/۰۸ 06:01, drago01 wrote:
On Sat, May 8, 2010 at 3:18 PM, Hedayat Vatankhahheda...@grad.com wrote:
Hi all,
There is a bug in Fedora package management since FC4 (except Fedora 8)
that potentially affects ALL of the Fedora installation DVD users
(people who are not annoyed by
/*Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com*/ wrote on 05/08/2010 10:51:42 PM
+0450:
On 08/05/10 19:15, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
Please have a look at the last comments of the bug. Most of the
implementation is done, the only missing part is how to mount the CD/DVD
in PackageKit!
On ۱۰/۰۵/۰۹ 11:41, Frank Murphy wrote:
On 09/05/10 07:52, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
--snip--
No, the problem is this: PackageKit does not know how to mount a
removable media.
It doesn't need to.
--snip--
Mount DVD as normal.
your dvd.repo : baseurl:file://path/to/dvd/(repodata)
eg
On ۱۰/۰۵/۰۹ 11:43, Ankur Sinha wrote:
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 11:22 +0430, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Frank Murphyfrankl...@gmail.com wrote on 05/08/2010 10:51:42 PM
+0450:
On 08/05/10 19:15, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
Please have a look at the last comments of the bug
/*Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com*/ wrote on 05/09/2010 4:20:15 PM +0450:
On 09/05/10 12:34, Björn Persson wrote:
Frank Murphy wrote:
That *should not* be default for most users,
as it will end up breaking quite a lot,
if used with other repos. (updates,updates-tesing, 3rd party)
/*Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at*/ wrote on 05/09/2010 9:24:04 PM
+0450:
Frank Murphy wrote:
That *should not* be default for most users,
as it will end up breaking quite a lot,
if used with other repos. (updates,updates-tesing, 3rd party)
as %requires may have changed quite a bit
/*Seth Vidal skvi...@fedoraproject.org*/ wrote on 05/06/2010 11:47:39
PM +0450:
On Thu, 6 May 2010, Hedayat Vatnakhah wrote:
Hi,
Warren Togami war...@togami.com wrote on پنجشنبه ۰۶ مه ۱۰،
۰۲:۱۰:۴۸:On ۱۰/۰۵/۰۶ 02:10, Warren Togami
wrote:
(10/12): samba-3.5.2-60.fc13.x86_64.rpm
On ۱۰/۰۵/۰۹ 10:43, Alexander � wrote:
sön 2010-05-09 klockan 11:22 +0430 skrev Hedayat Vatankhah:
No, the problem is this: PackageKit does not know how to mount a
removable media.
Why do you even need to mount it? Removable media is of course
automatically mounted when you
Hi,
On ۱۰/۰۵/۰۶ 03:34, Christoph � wrote:
Hi all,
this is an off topic question, but since I know that some of you are
familiar with gcc, I am asking it here before signing up somewhere else.
I have to source-compile one language (Modelica) to C++. Since Modelica
has a structural subtype
/*Frank Murphy frankl...@gmail.com*/ wrote on 05/10/2010 5:11:13 PM +0450:
On 10/05/10 13:28, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
PackageKit developers disagree with you. Since they are the ones doing
the work involved, their opinion has more weight. Besides a static repo
file is less flexible than
/*Adam Williamson awill...@redhat.com*/ wrote on 05/10/2010 3:18:06 PM
+0450:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 11:33 +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
Dne 10.5.2010 11:26, drago01 napsal(a):
To have stuff just work.
Go to http://senate.gov/ and ask your congressman to fix it. Otherwise
(for
/*Matthias Clasen mcla...@redhat.com*/ wrote on 05/10/2010 5:59:56 PM
+0450:
On Mon, 2010-05-10 at 17:58 +0430, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Anyway, thinking about the problem with DeviceKit system policies, I
really feel that the current situation is flawed: a process running as
root
/*Mamoru Tasaka mtas...@ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp*/ wrote on 06/04/2010
12:00:50 PM +0450:
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote, at 06/04/2010 03:07 PM +9:00:
Hi,
My packages (rcsslogplayer and rcssmonitor) are being failed because of the
lack of Qt dependencies (QtNetwork requires ssl and crypto libraries
/*Christopher Meng cicku...@gmail.com*/ wrote on Fri, 1 Aug 2014
07:08:52 +0800:
On Jul 31, 2014 7:44 PM, Álvaro Castillo net...@fedoraproject.org
mailto:net...@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Dear Fedora Team,
I pray to God. Could Fedora live have CD/DVD/USB Gparted by default?
Could add
/*Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org*/ wrote on Fri, 08 Aug 2014
19:07:11 -0500:
On Sat, 2014-08-09 at 02:33 +0430, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
GParted provides a number of essential features users might need, some
of which are not provided even by any command line tools in Fedora
Hi!
I noticed that F21 can potentially download repository metadata 3 times:
1. Yum cache 2. DNF cache 3. PackageKit cache! It really hurts to see
how Fedora ignorance towards different kind of users is being increased
as time passes. If Fedora is an international distro, it should try to
/*Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net*/ wrote on Sat, 13 Dec 2014
22:19:25 +0100:
Am 13.12.2014 um 22:10 schrieb Hedayat Vatankhah:
I noticed that F21 can potentially download repository metadata 3 times:
1. Yum cache 2. DNF cache 3. PackageKit cache! It really hurts to see
how Fedora
/*Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com*/ wrote on Tue, 9 Dec 2014 12:28:54
-0500 (EST):
Dear users of YUM and DNF,
I'm writing to you regarding a request for your feedback. I would be very grateful if you could
send me a brief description of how you use YUM or DNF currently or how would you like to
/*Samuel Sieb sam...@sieb.net*/ wrote on Sat, 13 Dec 2014 23:32:23 -0800:
On 12/13/2014 01:10 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Hi!
I noticed that F21 can potentially download repository metadata 3 times:
1. Yum cache 2. DNF cache 3. PackageKit cache! It really hurts to see
I'm not aware
/*Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com*/ wrote on Mon, 15 Dec 2014
09:37:27 +:
On 13 December 2014 at 21:10, Hedayat Vatankhahhedayat@gmail.com wrote:
Surprisingly, PackageKit uses its own separate cache.
Not surprising at all, when you're familiar with how PackageKit works.
/*Matthias Clasen*/ wrote on Mon, 15 Dec 2014 12:38:54 -0500:
On Mon, 2014-12-15 at 18:01 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Robert Marcano wrote:
I don't know why the time to rebuild rpms is important, updates are now
applied at boot time, so rpms can be rebuilt with smaller nice/ionice
before the
/*Chris Murphy li...@colorremedies.com*/ wrote on Tue, 16 Dec 2014
13:09:47 -0700:
Fresh installation of Fedora 21 Workstation, accepting defaults, I
then reboot and notice the following contents of /var/cache, filtering
out things not relevant for this discussion (which also happen to not
/*Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org*/ wrote on Mon, 15 Dec 2014
15:32:09 -0500:
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014, at 02:17 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
and then a
'systemctl mask ...' command to mask dnf makecache timer/service using
sudo/su;
This one should help with that one:
https://github.com/rpm
/*Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com*/ wrote on Wed, 17 Dec 2014
09:14:38 +:
On 17 December 2014 at 00:00, Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org wrote:
This particular setting is
frequently-requested and extremely important for users in the developing
world and users who tether, so I
/*Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com*/ wrote on Sat, 03 Jan 2015
14:57:10 +0100:
On 02/01/15 11:42, Richard Hughes wrote:
That said, my gut feeling is that the balance between simplicity and
functionality is quite different for a novice user and a developer
and that this needs to be
/*Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com*/ wrote on Fri, 2 Jan 2015
10:47:21 +:
On 1 January 2015 at 22:25, Hedayat Vatankhah hedayat@gmail.com wrote:
it's just funny that something like gedit and
Windows notepad can be considered 'applications' but GCC can't!
We're using
/*Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org*/ wrote on Sun, 28 Dec 2014
11:05:00 -0600:
On Sun, Dec 28, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Alec Leamas leamas.a...@gmail.com
wrote:
Possibly. But isn't there quite a difference between the novice
user and the Fedora Workstation target user i. e., developers?
Not
/*Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org*/ wrote on Tue, 23 Dec 2014
12:43:40 -0600:
On Tue, 2014-12-23 at 17:12 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
Are CLI tools welcome in Gnome
Software?
No, we don't consider CLI tools to be applications, and only
applications should be displayed in GNOME
/*Luya Tshimbalanga*/ wrote on Fri, 02 Jan 2015 17:29:14 -0800:
On 02/01/15 01:15 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Probably true, but it already includes fonts and input sources. So,
someone has felt that 'front-end applications only' is too narrow.
Now, where you can draw the line?
I
Hi!
Summary: Try to prevent a package from being updated/installed from
repositories regardless of the package management tool you use. As it
seems, then only way you can do this is to exclude it from the
repositories themselves inside their configuration file in
/etc/yum.repos.d/, because
/*Kevin Fenzi*/ wrote on Sat, 3 Jan 2015 14:09:11 -0700:
On Sat, 3 Jan 2015 15:56:55 -0500
Gary Scarborough gscarboro...@gmail.com wrote:
...
Instead of hiding the CLI from new users, why not simply give them the
option of avoiding it? Instead of only showing gui apps, why not
show all with
/*Luya Tshimbalanga*/ wrote on Fri, 02 Jan 2015 12:25:49 -0800:
On 01/01/15 04:21 PM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Well, I was really surprised that developers are considered a target
audience here. GNOME Software *might* be considered good enough for
normal users, but its far from usable
/*Richard Hughes hughsi...@gmail.com*/ wrote on Fri, 2 Jan 2015
13:48:51 +:
On 2 January 2015 at 11:45, Hedayat Vatankhah hedayat@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, I know. And I say that it might be OK for a GNOME Application, but
doesn't seem to be OK for Fedora application.
There's
Dear all,
I don't know if this has been discussed before, but I didn't find any.
Summary: I have a proposal to make it easier for maintainers to have
multiple versions of the same library in distro (by making it
*naturally* possible) (and with minimal maintenance overhead), and for
/*Ralf Corsepius rc040...@freenet.de*/ wrote on Mon, 16 Feb 2015
17:17:32 +0100:
On 02/16/2015 05:10 PM, Martyn Foster wrote:
On 16 February 2015 at 15:12, Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at
mailto:kevin.kof...@chello.at wrote:
Christopher Meng wrote:
Maintaining several version
/*Michael Catanzaro mcatanz...@gnome.org*/ wrote on Tue, 06 Jan 2015
13:51:24 -0600:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2015 at 1:28 PM, Stephen John Smoogen
smo...@gmail.com wrote:
So you mean that Fedora target developers are either using
dynamic languages, or they develop native software for
/*Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu*/ wrote on Sat, 03 Jan 2015 16:58:32
-0600:
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
...
Suggestion: Please add a single configuration file to configure common
package manager options
I think you answered your own question = modify the .repo files
Thank you!!! Yes, I
/*Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net*/ wrote on Sun, 04 Jan 2015
19:11:01 +0100:
Am 04.01.2015 um 19:02 schrieb Hedayat Vatankhah:
/*Rex Dieter rdie...@math.unl.edu*/ wrote on Sat, 03 Jan 2015 16:58:32
-0600:
Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
...
Suggestion: Please add a single configuration
/*Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net*/ wrote on Sun, 04 Jan 2015
19:19:20 +0100:
Am 04.01.2015 um 19:13 schrieb Hedayat Vatankhah:
...
DNF is using /etc/dnf/dnf.conf which is one reason more to finally
rename it back to YUM when it starts to replace it instead demand
users all over
/*Aleksandar Kurtakov akurt...@redhat.com*/ wrote on Sun, 4 Jan 2015
02:55:17 -0500 (EST):
- Original Message -
From: Hedayat Vatankhah hedayat@gmail.com
To: Development discussions related to Fedora devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Sent: Friday, January 2, 2015 11:15:58 PM
Subject
/*Radek Holy rh...@redhat.com*/ wrote on Mon, 5 Jan 2015 03:03:30
-0500 (EST):
*From: *Hedayat Vatankhah hedayat@gmail.com
*To: *Development discussions related to Fedora
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
/*Bill Nottingham nott...@splat.cc*/ wrote on Wed, 7 Jan 2015 10:56:31
-0500:
Hedayat Vatankhah (hedayat@gmail.com) said:
/*Bill Nottingham nott...@splat.cc*/ wrote on Tue, 6 Jan 2015 11:39:27
-0500:
...
- Even searching for -devel packages implies a target == host build
sensibility
/*Bill Nottingham nott...@splat.cc*/ wrote on Tue, 6 Jan 2015 11:39:27
-0500:
...
- Even searching for -devel packages implies a target == host build
sensibility that is relevant mostly to those developing Fedora, and
not to most of those developers that I run into on a day-to-day basis
/*Kevin Kofler*/ wrote on Wed, 25 Feb 2015 01:31:59 +0100:
Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
= Proposed System Wide Change: Legacy implementations of the Java platform
in Fedora =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LegacyJDKsInFedora
Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek jva...@redhat.com
IMHO, this is not
/*Mikolaj Izdebski mizde...@redhat.com*/ wrote on Wed, 25 Feb 2015
10:07:28 +0100:
On 02/25/2015 06:39 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
However, if there are JAR files which are useful
for a developer, they can have a -legacy version too!
There is no technical reason to suffix anything - you can
/*Gerald B. Cox*/ wrote on Fri, 7 Jul 2017 12:04:23 -0700:
<...>
the process was able to find my installation and mount it under
/mnt/sysimage
Then it says: If you would like to make your system the root
environment, run the command:
chroot /mnt/sysimage
I then get the response:
chroot:
/*Chris Murphy*/ wrote on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 09:28:53 -0600:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 8:19 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
...
"One size fits everyone" approach can be dangerous. It never does, in
fact, fit everyone, and often sacrifices flexibility and
/*Richard Hughes*/ wrote on Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:24:10 +0100:
On 20 July 2017 at 04:10, Kevin Kofler wrote:
It's even required. There is no support for unbundling anything beyond the
runtime at all, nor can runtimes share files without duplicating them.
Sure they can.
/*Colin Walters*/ wrote on Tue, 18 Jul 2017 15:43:12 -0400:
On Tue, Jul 18, 2017, at 02:58 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
But if I've understood correctly, any changes to the base will be discarded
when you update the base image. right?
No; `rpm-ostree install` is persistent, and so are other
/*Adam Williamson*/ wrote on Fri, 23 Jun 2017 12:45:07 -0700:
On Fri, 2017-06-23 at 09:06 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
You have run into the purest form of open source, the "scratch your
own itch" case. You want to be able to do things that cannot be done
today, and nobody else is working on it.
/*Adam Samalik*/ wrote on Fri, 9 Jun 2017 08:50:58 +0200:
On Thu, Jun 8, 2017 at 10:49 PM, Randy Barlow
>
wrote:
On Thu, 2017-06-08 at 22:17 +0200, Adam Samalik wrote:
> You add the package and other people start
Hi!
I'm trying it under F25. First, thanks for working on it! It'd be a
great feature. However:
1. I run it, and it was running for too long (probably 10 minutes!) with
absolutely no log. I found that it is working on a 200M
filelists.xml.gz.part file in DNF cache (which is apparently an
Hi,
/*Ben Williams*/ wrote on Tue, 12 Sep 2017 11:35:08 -0400:
hello
This is an issue i am seeing with new users:
I was at a University installfest this weekend and this was the major
issues for Endusers.
case A) Students are using Fedora on windows in a VM (Vbox in this
case) for a
/*Björn Persson*/ wrote on Mon, 2 Oct 2017 16:28:02 +0200:
Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Today We rely on you as a packager
verifying the sources, and by uploading them directly you are saying
this is really what I intended to send you and I have ensured that it
is good. You would
/*Vít Ondruch*/ wrote on Tue, 3 Oct 2017 08:21:57 +0200:
Dne 2.10.2017 v 22:31 Hedayat Vatankhah napsal(a):
/*Björn Persson*/ wrote on Mon, 2 Oct 2017 16:28:02 +0200:
Dennis Gilmore <den...@ausil.us> wrote:
Today We rely on you as a packager
verifying the sources, and by uploadin
/*Pierre-yves Chibon*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 09:38:39 +0200:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:56:45AM +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Dear all,
Currently, AFAIK, the suggested method to upload new sources for a package
is using 'fedpkg new-sources' which uploads new sources from your local
Dear all,
Currently, AFAIK, the suggested method to upload new sources for a
package is using 'fedpkg new-sources' which uploads new sources from
your local system. I wonder if there is a method to upload new sources
from a URL rather than your local filesystem? It is specially useful for
/*Samuel Rakitničan*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 23:15:25 -:
Here it is:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/srakitnican/default/build/607839/
Still not sure about naming issue, package wants to name files ZeGrapher, I
called the package zegrapher, debian maintainers go a step further
/*Matthew Miller*/ wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2017 09:28:07 -0400:
On Mon, Sep 25, 2017 at 11:38:07PM +, Tim Landscheidt wrote:
If data volume is expensive or difficult for you, you could
look into renting a (virtual) private server and then devel-
oping there via ssh. Offers usually start at
/*Samuel Rakitničan*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 23:15:25 -:
Here it is:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/srakitnican/default/build/607839/
Still not sure about naming issue, package wants to name files ZeGrapher, I
called the package zegrapher, debian maintainers go a step further
Dear all,
I've recently added 2 new packages, but when I tried to add them to
F27/F26 updates, it doesn't recognize them in the "Packages" box and
says: "Unable to find any packages that match the current query". BTW, I
can create the desired update, the only inconvenience is that Bodhi
/*Randy Barlow*/ wrote on Fri, 29 Sep 2017 15:04:07 -0400:
On 09/29/2017 03:54 AM, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
I've recently added 2 new packages, but when I tried to add them to
F27/F26 updates, it doesn't recognize them in the "Packages" box and
says: "Unable to find any pack
/*Richard W.m. Jones*/ wrote on Mon, 25 Sep 2017 10:11:55 +0100:
On Sun, Sep 24, 2017 at 10:56:45AM +0330, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
Dear all,
Currently, AFAIK, the suggested method to upload new sources for a
package is using 'fedpkg new-sources' which uploads new sources from
your local
/*Igor Gnatenko*/ wrote on Fri, 01 Sep 2017 15:19:34 +0200:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On Fri, 2017-09-01 at 16:01 +0300, Marius Vollmer wrote:
Neal Gompa writes:
Implement your AppStream filter at the application level, rather
than
messing with
Hi,
/*Igor Gnatenko*/ wrote on Fri, 01 Sep 2017 19:01:49 +0200:
<..>
Do you still have some critical missing functionality in DNF? And let
us know reasons why would you like to keep YUM available (hopefully
there are no)!
I've not tried 'dnf remove --duplicates' yet, but if it behaves similar
Hi,
/*Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-szmek*/ wrote on Sat, 7 Oct 2017 07:18:59 +:
Two boot-time services provided by the venerable initscripts package:
<...>
- fedora-readonly.service: this is used to mount parts of the filesystem rw
in case the system is using read-only root filesystem. To do
/*Jason L Tibbitts Iii*/ wrote on Tue, 26 Sep 2017 22:49:18 -0500:
"HV" == Hedayat Vatankhah <hedayat@gmail.com> writes:
HV> I'd say to stick with upstream naming, which is the Fedora
HV> way. Changing the names to lower case is a must in Debian, they
HV> simp
Hi,
/*Ville Skyttä*/ wrote on Wed, 25 Oct 2017 18:54:01 +0300:
On Mon, Oct 23, 2017 at 10:24 PM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
Hello,
...again, updated lists below. The following packages are looking for
new maintainers, ping me if you're able to help out. When doing so,
please
Hi,
/*Steve Dickson*/ wrote on Thu, 26 Oct 2017 14:10:49 -0400:
Hello,
On 10/26/2017 09:57 AM, Steve Dickson wrote:
Hello,
In an upcoming release the libnfsdimap library
will be rolled into the nfs-utils package.
Meaning nfs-utils will be install libnfsidmap
instead of the libnfsidmap
Hi,
I've fixed all my packages except simspark & rcssserver3d, which seem to
crash on i686 when generating docs using pdflatex, which will probably
needs a fix in TeXLive.
Regards,
Hedayat
/*Igor Gnatenko*/ wrote on Sun, 18 Feb 2018 18:09:40 +0100:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash:
Dear Peter (which most likely won't read) and all,
I've opened a but more than a year ago about missing grub tool in
Fedora[1],
and I've even emailed Peter directly, but there is no response. Upstream
os-prober
now requires grub2-mount to function, and therefore Fedora os-prober is
On ۱۴۰۱/۳/۴ ۳:۰۷ بعدازظهر, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote:
I am also curious how the Vazirmatn font compares with Noto Naskh
Arabic, and also the old Dejavu coverage?
If you are referring to the coverage of unicode code points, I've no
idea. Although the author claims to support 9 languages, all
On ۱۴۰۱/۳/۵ ۵:۲۹ بعدازظهر, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
Hi,
the Scope can be split into parts: 1. packaging the font,
2. making it the default, 3. fixing integration issues, like with Firefox.
I'd encourage you to do 1. as soon as possible. Until that's done,
it's even hard to evaluate
On ۱۴۰۱/۳/۲ ۹:۰۲ بعدازظهر, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Mon, May 23 2022 at 11:54:30 AM -0400, Ben Cotton
wrote:
Default Persian font will be changed automatically on upgrades.
Good, but how will you achieve this? We finally noticed that noto
fonts don't get installed when upgrading F35 ->
On ۱۴۰۱/۳/۲ ۱۱:۵۵ بعدازظهر, Sebastian Crane wrote:
As something of a typography enthusiast, I'm very much in support of
this. For English, the consistent fonts on Fedora Workstation make a
noticeable and positive effect on the general aesthetic, so anything
that can widen that benefit would be
On ۱۴۰۱/۳/۲ ۱۱:۵۵ بعدازظهر, Sebastian Crane wrote:
...
I did notice that the 'How to Test' section of the proposal was empty;
just as a suggestion, please could we have some screenshots of the
main Persian fonts used in Fedora currently? I'm mostly just curious,
but it might be useful for
On ۱۴۰۱/۵/۳ ۴:۵۴ قبلازظهر, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
On 7/24/22 16:40, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
<...>
Use (Close: rhbz#1438205) instead of (rhbz#1438205)
or Closes: rhbz#1438205, Fix: rhbz#1438205, Fixes: rhbz#1438205
to automatically close the related nug
Thanks for the tip.
O
On ۱۴۰۱/۵/۲ ۸:۳۵ بعدازظهر, Kalev Lember
wrote:
On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 4:41 PM Hedayat Vatankhah
<hedayat@gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi all,
A
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo