On 05/01/2012 07:25 PM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
I've got to be honest here -- I don't like the wording of the
notification. /.../
Pádraig, Jared, Chris:
Thanks for the suggestions, I think these are definitely an improvement
over the original text. I'll reply with in line comments regarding
On 04/28/2012 12:33 AM, Jared K. Smith wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 3:02 PM, Bill Nottingham nott...@redhat.com wrote:
I don't know how proposing and implementing a notification method of doing
the same isn't providing a solution, but you're welcome to your own cross.
Sorry Bill -- I'm
On 04/23/2012 06:22 AM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Sun, 2012-04-22 at 20:53 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
libsmbclient has been now removed from samba4 package (see bug #814451),
but what you have installed is a leftover from the earlier packaging
error. Incrementing the epoch number in the samba 3
On 04/23/2012 03:17 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
I took eog over when it was orphaned last time, since I though I could
work on it some more. I never got around to anything but a couple of
bug reports though and I don't think I'm really going to get around to
it in the future either, so I'll
On 04/22/2012 08:29 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
Hi,
the current samba4 update for fedora 17 (x86_64) is broken because
libsmbclient requires version 4.0.0-41alpha18 of samba4-common package.
I believe the samba 3 package needs an epoch bump to come out of this
cleanly:
On 04/11/2012 05:19 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Apr 09, 2012 at 12:08:13PM +0200, Matej Cepl wrote:
On 8.4.2012 22:50, Tom Lane wrote:
And, as I said, the alternative is that this gets turned off, by me
and probably a very large fraction of other Fedora users.
Without getting into
On 04/06/2012 04:27 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
Suggestions? I'm tempted to pushed this to stable so that broken deps
emails start going out to get people to do the needed rebuilds.
I don't think this is a good idea.
Or perhaps someone in releng can for the needed buildroot overrides?
You
On 04/05/2012 06:23 PM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
On 04/05/2012 05:13 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
Can anyone explain why appending that %{?_isa} notation is necessary?
Shouldn't dependency-tracking tools already know that libgomp is
an arch-dependent binary, and that of course if gcc.x86_64 is
On 03/26/2012 01:57 AM, Oron Peled wrote:
On Sunday, 25 בMarch 2012 20:01:37 Kalev Lember wrote:
For the past 17 months, each rawhide report has had broken dh-make deps.
The package was imported 21 Oct 2010 depending on a non-existing
debhelper package and has been broken ever since
On 03/25/2012 02:44 PM, Fedora Branched Report wrote:
Broken deps for i386
--
[snip]
[dh-make]
dh-make-0.55-4.fc17.noarch requires debhelper
For the past 17 months, each rawhide report has had broken dh-make deps.
The package was
On 03/22/2012 04:24 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
Am Donnerstag, den 22.03.2012, 14:53 +0100 schrieb Michael Schwendt:
On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 13:41:37 +0100, CW (Christoph) wrote:
I was aware of the F17 update not yet being pushed. The funny (?) thing
is that the F17 mails stopped after the update
On 01/30/2012 08:24 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I am getting the following error building paraview with gcc 4.7:
In file included from
/builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-3.12.0/Qt/Core/pqAnimationScene.cxx:57:0:
/builddir/build/BUILD/ParaView-3.12.0/Qt/Core/pqServerManagerSelectionModel.h:75:30:
On 01/22/2012 09:21 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
The first of these looks wrong (under specified) to me. It looks like
dependencies on libgobject-2.0.so.0 and libglib-2.0.so.0 are missing
for some reason. (They are missing from the actual
libguestfs-gobject-1.0.so.0 too, so probably it is
On 10/21/2011 09:37 PM, Alex Lancaster wrote:
There is a branch that was started back in February to port to gio
and away from libgnomemm:
http://icculus.org/pipermail/referencer/2011-February/000534.html
There was a commit to it in August, but looks the mm dep is still there
in the
On 10/12/2011 04:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new grub-efi
subpackage. If you have an EFI install of F16 you will need to have
grub-efi installed or else your system won't
On 10/12/2011 06:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:29 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
I can think of two ways to convince yum to always install grub-efi on
upgrades:
a) have grub2 require grub-efi; or
b) have grub-efi obsolete grub.
Both of the cases are also described
On 10/11/2011 09:32 PM, Thomas Spura wrote:
The main *BIG* difference is, that draft symlinks the extension
*directory* and the script expects a install.rdf file below that.
This means, the symlinking needs to happen one step below that, so that
all files inside of the extension_id folder are
On 09/22/2011 12:05 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/20/2011 01:12 PM, Branched Report wrote:
Compose started at Tue Sep 20 08:15:41 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
This breakage is weird:
hosts3d-1.13-2.fc15.x86_64 requires
On 09/22/2011 12:52 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On 09/22/2011 11:31 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
Depends on how you want to resolve this. If you are going for
resurrecting the packages, then fix them up to build again and submit
new package review requests.
I have a version of libglfw which
On 09/20/2011 09:18 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Sep 20, 2011, at 11:11 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote:
My personal pet-peeve with the current branching policy is that
the mass-branching happens way way too early for packages where
there are no significant new development to be introduced in
On 09/21/2011 12:47 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 22:38:32 +0300,
Kalev Lember kalevlem...@gmail.com wrote:
I would also like to move everybody who has been on the rawhide branch
to Branched at Alpha time, in order to get the maximum amount of testing
for the new
On 09/16/2011 08:49 PM, seth vidal wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-16 at 18:26 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
The current logic where yum wants to install a hundred i686
packages on my x86_64 box when the repos get a bit screwy doesn't
seem to work very well in my opinion.
There are still a largish
On 09/09/2011 07:50 PM, Haïkel Guémar wrote:
Thank you Kalev for the heads-up.
I'm retiring gnochm since there's no reason to keep it around anymore,
upstream vanished for a long time.
Besides retiring the package in Bodhi, don't forget to also 'fedpkg
retire' the package (it removes all the
Hello,
In order to make gnome-python2-extras build in F16+ and to clean up its
broken deps, I had to kill two of its subpackages.
- gnome-python2-gtkhtml2: needs gtkhtml2 to build, which is already
retired in F16+.
- gnome-python2-gtkmozembed: needs xulrunner's gtkmozembed support
which
On 08/31/2011 12:20 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Attached is the output of 'ps afx' on my Fedora 16(-ish) laptop.
Scroll down to the bottom and the subject line of this email will make
more sense.
I can't find anything in Bugzilla about this, and I'm not sure even
what component to assign
On 08/29/2011 02:54 PM, Karel Zak wrote:
I'd like to remove:
ddate - converts Gregorian dates to Discordian dates
command from rawhide (F17). IMHO this crazy command is used by very
very small minority of Fedora users.
Comments?
Please do. This isn't really something that
On 08/23/2011 04:57 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
On 08/23/2011 08:40 AM, Rawhide Report wrote:
Compose started at Tue Aug 23 08:15:54 UTC 2011
Broken deps for x86_64
--
...
cloudfs-0.7-6.fc17.x86_64 requires glusterfs = 0:3.2.1
On 08/12/2011 10:28 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
The reason why the package maintainer gets nagged has been explained
several times: part of the theory behind the current process is that it
is, to some extent, your responsibility as a package maintainer to
ensure your package gets tested. You
On 08/09/2011 07:50 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 16:44:31 +0200, Colin Walters wrote:
Various projects have been adding AM_SILENT_RULES from Automake to
their Makefiles for developer convenience; the goal being that they
see warnings more easily.
It is inconvenient as one
On 07/28/2011 08:48 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
On Tuesday, July 26, 2011 03:24:58 PM Jesse Keating wrote:
I thought there was a hard rule about not having nvrs go backwards, and
if a bad build was put out, it should be fixed with epoch or other such
NVR things to make sure the upgrade path
On 07/18/2011 11:35 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
Hi there,
in accordance with the announced Fedora feature[1][2], we (the Boost
maintainers) plan to rebase Boost to 1.47.0 really soon now. Boost
1.47.0 has been released recently and Denis Arnaud kindly did the
packaging, so it is ready for
On 07/12/2011 11:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
Bruno Wolff III (br...@wolff.to) said:
I'll take this one to keep freetennis, which seems to be a fairly highly
rated game. gdk-pixbuf is FTBFS, but I think I can get it building before
alpha.
This looks like a rather bogus dep, IMO -
On 06/22/2011 03:12 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
xerces-c
I can take xerces-c if its current owner doesn't sign the FPCA. I sent a
personal mail to jrobie yesterday but no reply so far.
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On 06/19/2011 12:48 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
because there are a lot of services in LSB-Mode i filed for everyone a
bugreport - sad to see that most packages are not F15 ready
This is something that should not be attempted in a stable Fedora
release (F15), but instead in rawhide (F16).
On 05/13/2011 03:51 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote:
I'd want to know if makes sense disable dependecy tracking at build
stage, I mean, put in spec file:
./configure --disable-dependency-tracking
Because it speeds build. What do you think?
We already have that in the %configure macro, which you
On 03/22/2011 07:23 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
W dniu 22 marca 2011 11:31 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski
I'll downgrade some packages later and try to figure out what broke quilt.
Unfortunately I can not downgrade packages on freshly installed system.
Yum can only perform a downgrade when it
On 03/15/2011 02:42 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
I'm planning to orphan the hal and hal-info packages in F15 and and
retire them in rawhide.
HAL has been dead upstream for 3 years now, and all development has
moved into udev, and the u* daemons like upower, udisks and urfkill.
The original
On 03/15/2011 02:58 PM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
Does anyone know what the future has in store for pcsc-lite I dont see
the point in writing a systemd service file for it if it's going to be
deprecated.
pcsc-lite isn't going anywhere.
Last week pcsc-lite upstream released 1.7.0, which
On 03/10/2011 12:05 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
Hi,
I've just submitted mono-2.10.1 for building and it's failed giving me
make[8]: Entering directory
`/builddir/build/BUILD/mono-2.10.1/mcs/tools/gacutil'
MCS [basic] gacutil.exe
Inconsistency detected by ld.so: dl-deps.c: 623:
On 03/10/2011 12:35 AM, Kalev Lember wrote:
Hi,
Jonathan Robie and I are planning to update xerces-c from 3.0.1 to 3.1.1
in Rawhide, which includes a soname bump; F-15 will stay on 3.0.1.
The rebuilds are done except for two packages which failed with errors
unrelated to the xerces-c update
Hi,
Jonathan Robie and I are planning to update xerces-c from 3.0.1 to 3.1.1
in Rawhide, which includes a soname bump; F-15 will stay on 3.0.1.
I will handle the rebuilds of affected packages:
blahtexml-0.8-2.fc15
cegui-0.7.5-5.fc15
enigma-1.01-12
frepple-0.8.1-3.fc15
gdal-1.7.3-2.fc15
On 12/04/2010 12:19 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
Related issue I have with the Fedora git repositories is that one cannot
remove any branch once it is created. After I have created in bitlbee
repo two topic branches, only to find out that I cannot remove them
after the merge. I can understand need
On 10/20/2010 03:02 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
The question is (we agreed on KDE SIG meeting yesterday) - should we
update Qt to 4.7 too or build KDE stack with current 4.6 series? As
there are a few Qt packages outside of KDE SIG/Qt maintainers scope,
we'd like to hear any objections against
On 09/26/2010 09:47 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010 20:41:04 +0200, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 20:32:14 +0200, Jan
Kratochviljan.kratoch...@redhat.com wrote:
gcc-4.5.1-4.fc14: PASS
gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14: FAIL
gcc-4.5.1-2.fc14: There was no -2.
On 08/23/2010 03:34 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 6:48 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
I just built Python 3.2a1 into rawhide:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=191382
so the meaning of python3 in rawhide just jumped from Python 3.1 to
Python 3.2
[cut]
with
On 07/14/2010 09:13 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
/etc/systemd/system/default.target → /lib/systemd/system/graphical.target
to boot into the graphical stuff by default. This is the default as we
package it.
Lets say the admin (or Anaconda) has modified the default.target
symlink. What
On 07/07/2010 11:29 PM, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
[rrelyea] pcsc-lite: pcsc-lite-doc-1.6.1-4.fc14.noarch
pcsc-lite-libs-1.6.1-4.fc14.x86_64
Fixed in rawhide.
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 07/02/2010 11:35 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:
Chitlesh GOORAH wrote, at 07/02/2010 04:09 AM +9:00:
Hello there,
I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR
FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me.
Petr Pisar seems to mess with my packages.
On 03/13/2010 03:57 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
Still trying to sort out coordination of our 2 packages by 2 different
maintainers that must be kept in sync. Surprise, one was automatically
pushed to stable due to karma.
Can that feature be selectively disabled?
In Bodhi web UI there is an
On 03/08/2010 11:20 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
Major KDE update was in time of Fedora 9, so it's not an issue today.
And this it the first problem - we should not call major, minor, bugfix
release
because it doesn't mean the same for every each app out in the wild!!!
Yes, it can get
On 03/06/2010 11:35 AM, Paul wrote:
Hi,
I've imported monodevelop-debugger-gdb for f13 and rawhide and have
tried to build it. Koji is going through the setup, but then falling
over on the build. Looking at the logs, it looks like a python
problem...
On 03/07/2010 12:25 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Sat, Mar 6, 2010 at 5:16 PM, Christoph Wickert wrote:
+1, Michał! People who want the latest and greatest have already updated
to F12 months ago anyway, so there is not much use in pushing new
versions to F11.
Why? I don't want to
On 03/07/2010 12:52 AM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
Yet moreover you also have the option of updating bugfixes in
addition, leaving the enhancement updates out.
I really don't think I have that option. It might work in some cases,
but generally it's bound to fail.
A security update in an application
On 03/04/2010 12:07 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
On 3 March 2010 21:45, Tom spot Callawaytcall...@redhat.com wrote:
Here are the list of changes to the Fedora Packaging Guidelines:
I've done some updates, and now rpmlint reports:
argyllcms.spec: W: no-cleaning-of-buildroot %install
On 03/04/2010 12:17 PM, Quentin Armitage wrote:
I cannot do a yum update of openoffice on F-13 RC4 with the
updates-testing repo enabled. There seems to be an inconsistency around
the dep checking, with it wanting both the old and new versions of
openoffice.org-langpack-en. It is attempting to
On 03/04/2010 10:59 PM, Ryan Rix wrote:
The problem is that there _aren't_ bug fixes for these old releases. When 4.x
comes out, upstream pretty much drops development on 4.x-1 except for security
issues which are backported from 4.x.
If upstream really issues security fixes for 4.x-1, then
601 - 656 of 656 matches
Mail list logo
