Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

is the xscreensaver daemon configuration tool. 12.05.2013 13:21, Mamoru TASAKA: Rahul Sundaram wrote, at 05/12/2013 12:59 PM +9:00: On 05/11/2013 11:19 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: xscreensaver-demo, which is for configuring xscreensaver (daemon), requires gtk2. IIRC KDE can use xscreensaver

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

Eugene Pivnev wrote, at 05/12/2013 10:09 PM +9:00: 12.05.2013 13:21, Mamoru TASAKA: It seems that razorqt _really_ wants to launch xscreensaver daemon, so splitting out xscreensaver-demo from xscreensaver-base does not help here. You mean - xscreensaver daemon depends on glade and/or gtk2

RE: Koji doensn't resolve package dependency

Hello: Hallo, I have got an odd issue with koji on building gnustep-base-1.24.4-7.fc19. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=419373 Koji told me, that the requirement gnustep-make = 2.6.4-13 could not been resolved. An research on bodhi told me, that

Re: Some orphaned packages

Hello: Toshio Kuratomi wrote on 08/15/2014 02:01 AM: As some of you may know from flock or following the FPC meeting minutes, I'm taking a break from Fedora. As part of that, I've reassigned most of my packages to others that can care for them. A few packages don't have obvious owners

Re: Results of Boost rebase

Petr Machata wrote on 02/04/2015 03:11 AM: Hi, Most of the mass rebuild finished last week already, but due to FOSDEM and other circumstances (like me leaving the result file on my home NFS out of reach yesterday) I'm only getting to writing this now. A bunch of Boost-related bugs have been

Re: zeitgeist

Michael Schwendt wrote on 02/07/2015 02:08 AM: Somebody please explain to me the zeitgeist package management model that is being applied at Fedora. From all the open bugs in bugzilla, http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/zeitgeist in none of them there is any activity by those people, who have

review swap request

Hello: I want to bring back cairo-dock back to Fedora, which was removed on Feb 2009 from Fedora and need re-review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178911 cairo-dock https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1178912 cairo-dock-plug-ins cairo-dock-plug-ins depends on cairo-dock.

Re: Koji build failure: noarch vs. arch?

Jerry James wrote on 02/14/2015 12:23 AM: On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 9:28 AM, gil punto...@libero.it wrote: as i wrote in my e-mail titled jni libraries fails in koji i have the same problem i haven't done any changes in koji client config I tried the csdp build again this morning to see if

Re: gdk-pixbuf2 package splitting

Hello: Richard Hughes wrote on 03/20/2015 11:51 PM: I've just pushed two new gdk-pixbuf2 builds to rawhide *not* F22. * The first splits out the modules (e.g. the ico, jpeg, gif loaders) to a separate subpackage called gdk-pixbuf2-modules -- which we'll certainly need on workstation but really

RE: Versioning preloader

Hello: I am packaging proxychains-ng[1] which make use of the .so file by its preloader only, and is not for any usable development. Hence, the upstream maintainer does not want[2] to version this .so file. To inhibit the rpmlint's unversioned so file warning, I have currently written a

RE: Hardened builds

Hello: I've got a package that is currently failing to build in Rawhide. It has a home-brewed garbage collector inside, and it appears the GC is confused about which objects are on the stack, and which are on the heap. I want to try building without the hardening flags to see if that has

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F22 tree

Vít Ondruch wrote on 04/28/2015 11:52 PM: Dne 28.4.2015 v 11:35 Kalev Lember napsal(a): On 04/28/2015 10:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 28.4.2015 v 00:45 Kalev Lember napsal(a): rubygem-rugged tdawson I am not maintainer of this, but please do not remove this. Rugged was broken by

Re: Heads up: glibmm/gtkmm now requires -std=c++11

Kalev Lember wrote on 09/23/2015 09:35 AM: Hi, A quick heads up to anybody who might run into cryptic build errors when building apps that use glibmm/gtkmm: Latest glibmm/gtkmm stack in rawhide and F23 now uses C++11 features in header files. This means when building other programs that use

Re: Package name for EPEL7 branch

Hello: Greg Hellings wrote on 01/14/2016 01:30 PM: I'm working with a package (rubygem-minitest) which already exists in the core EL packages on the 4.x series. In order to enable a whole slew of new packages to be created in EPEL7, it will be necessary to package the 5.x series. However, since

Re: openCOLLADA: Help with GCC6 narrowing conversion

Richard Shaw wrote on 02/15/2016 11:34 PM: Can someone point me in the right direction? My package openCOLLADA is FTBFS in rawhide with the following (repeating) error: /builddir/build/BUILD/OpenCOLLADA-3335ac164e68b2512a40914b14c74db260e6ff7d/COLLADABaseUtils/src/COLLADABUURI.cpp:57:2: error:

oniguruma 6 push on rawhide, with soname bump

Hello: I will upgrade oniguruma to 6.0.0. This includes libonig.so soname bump. Packages known to be affected by the above soname bump are: jq-1.5-3.fc25 kitutuki-0.9.6-11.fc24 lua-rex-2.7.2-10.fc23 mfiler3-4.4.9-10.fc24 mfiler4-1.3.1-5.fc24 ochusha-0.6.0.1-0.14.cvs20100817T.fc24.1.4

Re: GRIPE: A package is not FTBFS if the dependencies can't be installed

- 元のメッセージ - > 差出人: "Richard Shaw" > 宛先: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > 送信済み: 2017年2月17日, 金曜日 12:21:07 > 件名: GRIPE: A package is not FTBFS if the dependencies can't be installed > > I received a FTBFS[1] on one of

Re: Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild - gnutls, µhttpd users

- 元のメッセージ - > 差出人: "Neal Gompa" > 宛先: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > 送信済み: 2017年2月15日, 水曜日 12:10:13 > 件名: Re: Fedora 26 Mass Rebuild - gnutls, µhttpd users > > On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 8:20 PM, Adam Williamson >

Request for review swap

Hello, all: I have one review request for a package for LXDE: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409243 lxhotkey Review swap is appreciated. Regards, Mamoru ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: Request for review swap

Till Hofmann wrote on 01/18/2017 09:30 PM: On 18.01.2017 13:09, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Hello, all: I have one review request for a package for LXDE: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409243 lxhotkey Review swap is appreciated. I'll take it. Can you please review librealsense: https

oniguruma 6.1.1 push on rawhide, with soname bump

Hello: I will upgrade oniguruma to 6.1.1. This includes libonig.so soname bump. Packages known to be affected by the above soname bump are: jq-0:1.5-4.fc25.x86_64 kitutuki-0:0.9.6-12.fc25.x86_64 lua-rex-0:2.7.2-12.fc26.x86_64 mfiler3-0:4.4.9-11.fc25.x86_64 mfiler4-0:1.3.1-6.fc25.x86_64

Re: new gemspec behavior in rawhide

Dusty Mabe wrote on 11/27/2016 01:35 AM: Hey all, In my vagrant-sshfs rpm i call `gem spec` here [0]. In rawhide vs f25 I get differing outputs. Basically in rawhide I get a bunch of `.freeze` added to my strings like: s.authors = ["Dusty Mabe".freeze] See the full diff at [1]. This is

Re: Creating an new update is failing

> On 11/30/2016 07:10 PM, Patrick マルタインアンドレアス Uiterwijk wrote: > > Hi, > > > >> Hello, > >> > >> I'm trying to create a new update and > >> I'm getting this error: > >> > >> Builds : Unable to create update. Parent instance is not bound to a > >> Session; lazy load > >> operation of attribute

Re: fedpkg push warning

Brad Bell wrote on 03/18/2017 07:25 PM: What does the waring below mean ? cppad>fedpkg push Total 0 (delta 0), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/cffi/model.py:526: UserWarning: 'git_checkout_notify_t' has no values explicitly defined; next version will refuse to

Re: ImageMagick Unresponsive Maintainer process - hubbitus (Pavel Alexeev)

Kevin Fenzi wrote on 08/01/2017 04:13 AM: ok, I rebuilt the following ones. The ones with F next to them failed to build: F rubygem-rmagick-2.16.0-3.fc26.src.rpm Fixed on rawhide. Regards, Mamoru ___ devel mailing list --

Re: fedpkg new-sources broken?

Hello: Fabio Valentini wrote on 07/14/2017 06:04 PM: Right now, I can't build updates or new packages, because "fedpkg new-sources" is getting stuck (for more than 15 minutes) without error message (other than the bodhi deprecation warning) and it doesn't do anything until I kill it ... I

Re: RFC: Disable cairo-gl backend in F27

Hello: Adam Jackson wrote on 07/06/2017 01:48 AM: Apologies that this is just after the system-wide change deadline (thanks for putting that on a holiday btw), but I hadn't had a chance to dig into this before now and I think it's fairly low impact. Cairo's OpenGL backend is not especially

Re: heads up: poppler soname bump

Adam Williamson wrote on 08/05/2017 05:00 AM: On Wed, 2017-08-02 at 13:19 +0200, David Tardon wrote: Hi, I will build a new release of poppler this week, which includes soname bump. I will take care of rebuilding the affected packages: boomaga calligra cups-filters evas-generic-loaders

Re: Koji: List of recent builds for a particular user

Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 05/13/2017 07:39 PM: I can list my most recent builds here: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=458 but, it's very slow (I assume it's doing some complex database query) and it only shows 10 builds at a time. Is there a way to show more builds, and

Re: Unhelpful message about noarch packages differing between arches...

Richard Shaw wrote on 05/13/2017 09:22 PM: Ok, I was just doing a simple rebuilt of root as OCE was updated to a new version in rawhide... The F26 rebuild worked fine but on rawhide I'm getting: BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different architectures:

Re: Is it a bug in DNF or a fault by maintainer?

Christopher Meng wrote on 11/17/2017 10:59 PM: Hi all, As mostly described in the bug[1], I encountered upgrade path issue from 26 to rawhide, which has been here for a long time preventing a complete update without manual exclusion. DNF in my computer says: # dnf update catfish* 1>/dev/null

Re: scratch build of python-kivy fails on rawhide

Martin Gansser wrote on 05/27/2018 01:24 AM: when trying to build python-kivy on rawhide it fails: koji build --scratch rawhide ../SRPMS/python-kivy-1.10.0-1.fc28.src.rpm https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=27203394=DEFAULT=build.log=-4000 have somebody a idea ? If you want

Re: scratch build of python-kivy fails on rawhide

Martin Gansser wrote on 05/28/2018 05:14 PM: you mean this: # needed fonts BuildRequires: dejavu-sans-fonts BuildRequires: google-roboto-fonts BuildRequires: google-roboto-mono-fonts Requires: dejavu-sans-fonts Requires: google-roboto-fonts Requires:

Re: -z defs linker flag activated in Fedora rawhide

Florian Weimer wrote on 01/23/2018 12:24 AM: In some cases (such as when a DSO is loaded as a plugin and is expected to bind to symbols in the main executable), undefined symbols are expected.  In this case, you can add     %undefine _strict_symbol_defs_build to the RPM spec file to disable

Re: Mass Rebuild for Fedora 28

Dennis Gilmore wrote on 02/13/2018 08:06 AM: Hi All, We have now completed the automated part of the Fedora 28 mass rebuild, The details for the scheduled mass rebuild for Fedora 28 can be found here[1]. The failure page for the rebuilds can be found here[3] and the full list of packages that

Re: vdr-live build fails for rawhide

Martin Gansser wrote on 02/14/2018 05:19 PM: when building vdr-live for rawhide it fails [1] for ppc64le and ppc64 when adding "-Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess" to the build flags, then it fails [2] for s390x. %build make CFLAGS="%{optflags} -fPIC" CXXFLAGS="%{optflags} -fPIC

Re: vdr-live build fails for rawhide

Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 02/14/2018 08:21 PM: Martin Gansser wrote on 02/14/2018 05:19 PM: when building vdr-live for rawhide it fails [1] for ppc64le and ppc64 when adding "-Wsizeof-pointer-memaccess" to the build flags, then it fails [2] for s390x. %build make CFLAGS="%{

Re: Koji build: cannot find spec file

Jerry James wrote on 02/18/2018 09:48 AM: This is the second of two attempts to build sympy this evening, both of which failed the same way: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25124365 According to mock_output.log, the spec file can't be found. What is going on? Reported to

Re: Proposal: Reduce *-devel packages dependencies on other unneeded *-devel packages

Igor Gnatenko wrote on 08/13/2018 06:13 PM: On Mon, Aug 13, 2018 at 11:03 AM Dominique Martinet < dominique.marti...@cea.fr> wrote: Igor Gnatenko wrote on Sun, Aug 12, 2018 at 10:46:34PM +0200: I've submitted

Re: Unresponsive maintainer

Hello, alick9...@gmail.com wrote on 01/20/2018 12:59 PM: Hi All, As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers, I am posting here to see if anyone know how to contact Christoph Wickert (cwickert). The bug report is at

Re: Frequently broken Rawhide/Branched composes

Vít Ondruch wrote on 03/01/2018 06:44 PM: Dne 1.3.2018 v 03:19 Kevin Kofler napsal(a): Fabio Valentini wrote: AFAICT, those "broken deps in rawhide" mails are only sent if there is a compose, and during the past weeks, there have been few of those ... so breakage is sometimes allowed to sit

Re: FreeCAD: undefined reference to `Py::ifPyErrorThrowCxxException()'

Richard Shaw wrote on 04/14/2018 04:38 AM: I've posted to upstreams mailing list but have not as of yet gotten a response. I've run into the following error trying to build the latest version of FreeCAD which requires python-pycxx but Rawhide now has 7.0.3 and the bundled version appears to be

Re: FreeCAD: undefined reference to `Py::ifPyErrorThrowCxxException()'

Richard Shaw wrote on 04/16/2018 10:09 PM: Mea culpa... I was getting cross-eyed on that... Got that fixed but not being a C++ guy I'm not sure what the next problem is but perhaps pyCXX changed things between 6.2.8 and 7.0+ Now I'm getting: While I may not find out the solution, would you

Re: FreeCAD: undefined reference to `Py::ifPyErrorThrowCxxException()'

Richard Shaw wrote on 04/16/2018 02:56 AM: If you look closely you notice it was including in the linking :) /usr/src/CXX/cxx_extensions.cxx.o Thanks, Richard Well, you also need /usr/src/CXX/Python2/cxx_exceptions.cxx (note: cxx_"exceptions".cxx, what you are saying is

oniguruma 6.8.1 will hit rawhide and F-28 with soname bump

Hello, all: I am going to update oniguruma to 6.8.1 on rawhide and F-28. Compared to 6.7.1, two symbols are removed (although I don't think these symbols are used by other packages) and so this will cause soname bump. I will rebuild all affected packages below: jq-0:1.5-11.fc28.x86_64

Re: Need assistance to build openvdb for both Blender and LuxRender

Luya Tshimbalanga wrote on 03/02/2018 03:00 PM: Hello team, openvdb currently failed for some odd reasons (https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=25408808) on both Rawhide and F28 in order to rebuild for boost 1.66. Looking for tail result from build.log, it seems the mockbuild

Re: No Xfce LIve iso in RC 1.2

Thomas Woerner wrote on 2018/10/26 21:23: Hello, there is no Xfce live iso in RC-1.2: https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/29_RC-1.2/Spins/x86_64/iso/ It has been available in beta-1.5:

Re: Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting

Ben Cotton wrote on 2019/03/27 23:54: Reminder: the Go/No-Go meeting for the Fedora 30 Beta release will be held TOMORROW, 2019-03-28 at 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1. For more information, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Go_No_Go_Meeting View the meeting on Fedocal at:

Re: Broken dependency for devscripts in f29

Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote on 2019/02/24 21:22: Am Sonntag, den 24.02.2019, 10:39 +0100 schrieb Dridi Boukelmoune: Hi, Somehow this slipped through the cracks: Dependencies resolved. Problem: cannot install the best update candidate for package devscripts-2.18.4-1.fc29.x86_64 -

Re: /usr/bin/ld is broken in rawhide

Todd Zullinger wrote on 2019/02/27 14:00: Orion Poplawski wrote: With current koji buildroot I end up with: + ls -l /usr/bin/ld /usr/bin/ld.bfd /usr/bin/ld.gold /usr/bin/ldd --w---. 1 root root 3814880 Feb 27 04:00 /usr/bin/ld -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 1841608 Feb 26 15:02 /usr/bin/ld.bfd

Re: apiextractor FTBFS troubleshooting

John Reiser wrote on 2019/02/26 13:18:     That test 'testvoidarg' succeeds for me (normal termination, no SIGSEGV) on Fedora 28 and Fedora 29. Yes, it only seems to affect f30/Rawhide with GCC 9 (though I'm not sure it's the culprit).     The traceback says:  > 41   

Re: apiextractor FTBFS troubleshooting

Richard Shaw wrote on 2019/02/27 2:23: On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:17 AM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: So... I guess Qt "foreach" behavior changed with gcc9.. Is there any chance this will change or magically get fixed if qt is rebuilt with gcc 9? Thanks, Richard Well, foreach or

Re: apiextractor FTBFS troubleshooting

Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2019/02/27 2:29: Richard Shaw wrote on 2019/02/27 2:23: On Tue, Feb 26, 2019 at 11:17 AM Mamoru TASAKA wrote: So... I guess Qt "foreach" behavior changed with gcc9.. Is there any chance this will change or magically get fixed if qt is rebuilt with gcc

Re: What pulls in weak dependencies?

Vít Ondruch wrote on 2019/03/09 8:03: Hi, Running `dnf update`, it tries to install: Installing weak dependencies:  mkpasswd    x86_64 5.4.1-3.fc31 rawhide 39 k Trying to query for weak dependencies, nothing requires it: $ sudo dnf repoquery

Re: Downloading modularized packages from Koji

Marcin Zajączkowski wrote on 2019/02/17 6:55: Hi, After some packages (such as Fish [1]) are released to Fedora modular repository I would like to download them from Koji and play with them (to provide feedback) not having to wait until a request to move to the testing repository is accepted.

Re: Help needed for FTBFS in rawhide because of libraries order

Peng Wu wrote on 2019/02/11 14:12: Thanks for the investigation, I just back port the patch for Fedora rawhide now. Peng On Mon, Feb 4, 2019 at 10:32 PM Parag Nemade wrote: I think this commit https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/pango/commit/d0cb6be7431d1a3c711bd45bcf05b34601604037 will revert

Re: undefined symbol: shm_open (ppc64le and aarch64)

Tom Callaway wrote on 2019/02/07 3:39: One of my packages failed the mass rebuild, but only on ppc64le and aarch64. The error they both hit is this: Error: package or namespace load failed for 'BiocParallel' in dyn.load(file, DLLpath = DLLpath, ...): unable to load shared object

Re: Removal of glibc-langpacks-all -> 1.0?kB

Richard Hughes wrote on 2019/02/02 17:11: Hi all, One of my package builds (fwupd) in F30 is failing in the unit tests, with this failure comparing the expected output of a to_string() function: - Size: 1.0 kB + Size: 1.0?kB I assume it's due to the removal

Re: Removal of glibc-langpacks-all -> 1.0?kB

Hi: Florian Weimer wrote on 2019/02/02 20:37: * Mamoru TASAKA: Richard Hughes wrote on 2019/02/02 17:11: Hi all, One of my package builds (fwupd) in F30 is failing in the unit tests, with this failure comparing the expected output of a to_string() function: - Size: 1.0 kB

Re: Help needed for FTBFS in rawhide because of libraries order

Guido Aulisi wrote on 2019/02/03 20:31: Hi, I'm trying to debug a FTBFS in rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32412101 Apparently it fails because of library ordering, but it works in f29. g_object_unref is defined in gobject-2.0 and it gets surely added by the

Re: Help needed for FTBFS in rawhide because of libraries order

Guido Aulisi wrote on 2019/02/04 22:23: Il giorno lun 4 feb 2019 alle ore 13:14 Mamoru TASAKA ha scritto: Guido Aulisi wrote on 2019/02/03 20:31: Hi, I'm trying to debug a FTBFS in rawhide: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=32412101 Apparently it fails because of library

Re: [Test-Announce] Fedora 31 Beta Freeze

Mohan Boddu wrote on 2019/08/27 9:55: Hi all, Today is also the Beta freeze[4]. This means that only packages which fix accepted blocker or freeze exception bugs[5][6] will be marked as 'stable' and included in the Beta composes. Other builds will remain in updates- testing until the Beta

Re: Unexpected libldb soname bump resulting in Fedora 31 live breakage

Mamoru TASAKA wrote on 2019/08/27 22:07: So it seems that all of a sudden libldb was upgraded to 2.0.5 on rawhide and F-31 yesterday which includes soname bump: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1364218 F-31 libldb build is the below (the above is F-32) https

Unexpected libldb soname bump resulting in Fedora 31 live breakage

So it seems that all of a sudden libldb was upgraded to 2.0.5 on rawhide and F-31 yesterday which includes soname bump: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1364218 and as a result _all_ F-31 live image of Fedora-31-20190827.n.0 failed to be created due to sssd dependency

Re: Proven packager help request: DCMTK (and dependent packages) require update in F29/F30

Ankur Sinha wrote on 2019/09/13 23:07: Hello, A CVE[1] in dcmtk was fixed in 3.6.4 which is in F31+. F29 and F30 are still at 3.6.2 however, and need updating. This includes a soname bump ([2] vs [3]), though, so dependent packages will also need to be rebuilt and pushed as updates all at once.

Re: Proven packager help request: DCMTK (and dependent packages) require update in F29/F30

Ankur Sinha wrote on 2019/09/14 2:58: On Fri, Sep 13, 2019 23:20:50 +0900, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: Ankur Sinha wrote on 2019/09/13 23:07: Well, actually some google search result is that the actual fix seems https://github.com/commontk/DCMTK/commit/40917614e and the tracker is https

Re: gnome-subtitles (mono) dependency on libenchant.so.1 not picked up automatically

Julian Sikorski wrote on 2019/09/29 16:02: Hi list, a bug was recently filed against gnome-subtitles [1] stating that libenchant.so.1 dependency is missing. While I could easily fix this with explicit Requires, my concern is why wasnt't this depencency picked up automatically in the first

Re: koji builds failing with "GenericError: Build already in progress (task …)"

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on 2019/09/29 22:02: I have seen this a few times lately. When a build is started for rawhide, and in succession builds for other branches, they fail. Example: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37938969 (build target: rawhide)

Re: List of Python 2 packages to be removed mid-November

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2019/10/30 0:24: Dear maintainers, here is a list of packages that (transitively, at build or run time) require Python 2 and have not yet got a FESCo exception to do so. If you were bcced on this e-mail, it affects one or more of your packages. mtasaka   comix     (→

Re: What's up with GStreamer 0.10 in F31?

Michael Schwendt wrote on 2019/11/05 21:17: On Wed, 25 Sep 2019 10:45:45 +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: On 9/24/19 14:50, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 9:04 am, Tom Callaway wrote: or know of some reason it shouldn't be brought back Well this looks like gstreamer 0.10. I'm

Re: Coq uninstallable - requires antlr4-python3-runtime = 1:4.7.2-4.fc32?

Richard W.M. Jones wrote on 2019/12/06 19:22: On Thu, Dec 05, 2019 at 04:12:23PM -0700, Jerry James wrote: Hi Richard, On Thu, Dec 5, 2019 at 3:56 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: Just built coq in a side tag for OCaml 4.09. However it can't install for the next build: DEBUG util.py:596:

Re: liblognorm unresponsive maintainer

Jiří Vymazal wrote on 2019/10/16 22:05: I have opened BZ ticket [1] for unresponsive maintainer mdarade (CC'd). Does anyone know how to contact him? (outside of his email, already tried that some time before) Thanks [1]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762227 By the way, not

Re: %systemd_postun scriptlets need service files as an argument

Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote on 2019/10/22 14:46: On Tue, Oct 22, 2019 at 05:18:06AM +, Globe Trotter via devel wrote: Hi, Bugzilla is reporting the following error for the slim package: %systemd_postun scriptlets need service files as an argument I looked online a bit and could not

libetpan 1.9.4 pushed on rawhide, changing to pkgconfig style

Hello, all: I've pushed libetpan-1.9.4-1.fc32 into rawhide (after I de-orphaned this package). There is no soname change compared to the previous libetpan-1.9.3-2.fc31, so there will be no dependency breakage due to this change. However libetpan-devel now changed the previous "libetpan-config"

Re: Fedora 31 Final Freeze

Sérgio Basto wrote on 2019/10/10 3:06: Hi, Some minutes before started "Final Freeze" we send some packages to stable on bodhi [1], but bodhi didn't push then ... . I.e After final freeze announce could we have the last bodhi push ? I my point of view is not fair as a developer , having to

Re: Possible gcc/s390x bug (was Re: Mass rebuild status)

Dave Love wrote on 2020/02/06 1:07: I assume this -- currently breaking procenv, as that uses -Werror -- has the same cause, as it shows up under the same circumstances: In function 'strncat', inlined from 'appendn' at string-util.c:111:2, inlined from 'appendn' at

No GCC 10 for Fedora 32? Deadline is 2019/12/31

Hello, all: So I again looked at https://fedorapeople.org/groups/schedule/f-32/f-32-key-tasks.html and proposal submission deadline for changes requiring mass rebuild is due today (2019/12/31). If I am correct we have not seen any proposal for gcc10 on Fedora 32 yet. If "today" means

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

Peter Robinson wrote on 2020/01/06 20:17: On Mon, Jan 6, 2020 at 10:35 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: Dear maintainers. Based on the latest fail to build from source policy, the following packages will be retired from Fedora 32 approximately one week before branching (February 2020). Policy:

Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG

Well, as just I saw "xscreensaver" word here: Ty Young wrote on 2020/05/14 20:33: On 5/13/20 4:58 PM, Solomon Peachy wrote: On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 04:04:50PM -0500, Ty Young wrote: Anyway, I'm just asking that Fedora not repeat what Debian did. While I find it to be a bit paranoid, I

Re: kpmcore soname bump in Rawhide, F33, F32

Mattia Verga via devel wrote on 2020/10/17 19:05: Hello all, I've been warned by kpmcore maintainer about a soon-to-be-disclosed CVE, so I would like to upgrade kpmcore to 4.2.0 in all Fedora active releases. This will involve a soname bump, I will rebuild all the affected packages I'm aware

Re: LXQT: FTBFS Requires

Евгений Пивнев wrote on 2020/08/07 20:07: 1. libsysstat and libqtxdg required by LXQT only (?) 2. they are incompilable now in f33 (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864053 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1864039

Re: aobook - reviving review request?

Andy Mender wrote on 2020/08/12 4:49: Hello all :) I was just going through the swath of "needinfo cancelled" emails and a certain package piqued my interest: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1289070 Just wanted to clarify, if I'm interested in this package, the closed bug report

Re: Buildroot overrides in branched pre updates-testing activation?

Fabio Valentini wrote on 2020/08/16 23:24: Hi everybody, I've just noticed that bodhi allows users to create buildroot overrides for F33 for no good reason (updates-testing is not even active yet and updates to to stable directly). There's 41 (!) active overrides for F33:

Re: error: static assertion failed: comparison object must be invocable as const

Martin Gansser wrote on 2020/12/19 21:03: Hi, marsshooter-0.7.6 fails on rawhide with this error message [1]: /builddir/build/BUILD/M.A.R.S.-marsshooter-0.7.6/src/Hud/TabStats.cpp:68:140: required from here /usr/include/c++/11/bits/stl_tree.h:785:15: error: static assertion failed:

Re: Rawhide build failure on strange archs

Steve Dickson wrote on 2020/11/08 5:26: Hello, I'm getting a build failure on the armv7hl arch and the i686 arch, which do not make much sense. The build is [1] and only those arche are complaining about an sprintf() statement. The rest of the arches are fine with the statment... %99.9 of

Re: nfs-utils: compiler error tracking strlen on Rawhide armv7hl and i686

John Reiser wrote on 2020/11/09 13:21: If you want help then please supply the complete source code.  I could not locate the downloadable source for    [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=55125502 even after following several links. Replying to this instead of the

Re: Where is python3.9-debuginfo?

Orion Poplawski wrote on 2020/10/21 11:19: What am I doing wrong?  This is on my rawhide VM. $ sudo dnf --enablerepo=*-debuginfo install python3.9-debuginfo Last metadata expiration check: 0:06:06 ago on Tue 20 Oct 2020 08:08:20 PM MDT. No match for argument: python3.9-debuginfo Error: Unable

Re: error: 'deletions_type' has not been declared

Martin Gansser wrote on 2021/01/19 18:34: Hi, when compiling on Fedora 33 vdr-live [1] with the new tntnet-3.0.0 and cxxtools-3.0.0 I get the following error messages: CC pages/ menu.o CC pages/ recordings.o recordings.ecpp: In member function 'virtual unsigned int

Re: New dwz silently segfaulting

Florian Weimer wrote on 2021/01/22 22:42: * Mamoru TASAKA: It looks like new dwz-0.13-6.fc34 is silently segfaulting when rebuilding some srpm, but it does not prevent whole rpmbuild process from stopping. This might be: dwz crashes on DWARF5 line table with zero files <ht

New dwz silently segfaulting

Hello: It looks like new dwz-0.13-6.fc34 is silently segfaulting when rebuilding some srpm, but it does not prevent whole rpmbuild process from stopping. Some random example: * vorbis-tools-1.4.2-1.fc34 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1672461 x86_64 build log:

Re: protobuf 3.14 update coming to rawhide

Adrian Reber wrote on 2021/01/14 21:48: On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 10:18:37AM +0100, Adrian Reber wrote: I prepared a protobuf update for rawhide to 3.14. It requires a rebuild of all dependencies and of the 54 dependencies currently only 3 fail to rebuild in COPR:

Re: Fedora rawhide compose report: 20210113.n.0 changes

Fedora Rawhide Report wrote on 2021/01/13 20:49: OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20210112.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20210113.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:1 Dropped images: 5 Added packages: 11 Dropped packages:4 Upgraded packages: 159 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added

Re: fatal error: drm.h: No such file or directory

Martin Gansser wrote on 2021/04/26 17:37: Hi, when compiling [1] vdr-mpv on fc34, i get this error message: /usr/include/xf86drmMode.h:43:10: fatal error: drm.h: No such file or directory I already opened a buzilla ticket [2] but still no response. I can be solve this error by changing line

Re: Where'd my package builds go?

Greg Hellings wrote on 2021/04/29 14:46: So I built my package a few times for F34 in the Rawhide cycle (e.g. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-90a4c6ba11) It was rebuilt successfully by releng for F34 (e.g. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1695213)

Re: minizp soname bump from 2.5 to 3.0

Miro Hrončok wrote on 2021/02/09 20:40: On 09. 02. 21 11:42, Patrik Novotny wrote: There will be a soname bump from libminizip.so.2.5 to libminizip.so.3.0. Change will be build in a side-tag f34-build-side-37055. The following packages fail to build even without the upgraded minizip:

Re: Stale provenpackagers to be removed from group

Ben Cotton wrote on 2021/02/11 0:44: In accordance with the new FESCo policy[1] the following provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a lack of builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you believe you

Re: F35 Change proposal: RPM 4.17 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Hello: Miro Hrončok wrote on 2021/04/01 6:45: On 31. 03. 21 21:52, Ben Cotton wrote: * Strict checking for unpackaged content in builds > ... * Many existing packages will fail to build due to the stricter buildroot content checking. Fixing this in the packaging is always backwards

Re: Orphaned my Ruby packages (Jekyll + dependencies)

Fabio Valentini wrote on 2021/02/14 4:29: Hi everybody, With a heavy heart, I have orphaned all my Ruby packages today. - rubygem-kramdown-parser-gfm (kramdown support for GitHub-flavored markdown) - rubygem-kramdown-syntax-coderay (coderay syntax highlighting support) - rubygem-rouge (jekyll

Help Needed: freetype <=> harfbuzz dependency loop affecting 5 Live Spins creation failure

Hello, all: Now I've decided to write to devel@ mailing list to ask for help. Currently, 5 Live spins: * Fedora-Astronomy_KDE-Live-34-20210221.n.0 https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=62419350 * Fedora-Scientific_KDE-Live-34-20210221.n.0

Re: Unable to install using Fedora-Everything-netinst-x86_64-34-20210213.n.0.iso

Ian Laurie wrote on 2021/02/14 11:44: Tried KDE. Part way through the installation got the following error: "The following error occurred while installing the payload. This is a fatal error and installation will be aborted. DNF error:Error in POSTIN scriptlet in rpm package

<    1   2   3   4   >