Re: docker-compose & selinux

On 10/28/2016 02:58 PM, Daniel J Walsh wrote: > What AVC's are you seeing? Plenty of AVC messages in the form: type=AVC msg=audit(1477853452.023:1338): avc: denied { setattr } for pid=23456 comm="chown" name="app_model.MYD" dev="dm-0" ino=10879938 scontext=system_u:system_r:container_t:s0:c140,

docker-compose & selinux

I use docker-compose extensively for local development. On F24 all I had to do to make it play well with selinux was something like this: sudo chcon -Rt svirt_sandbox_file_t project_folder After updating to F25 this doesn't work anymore. Did something changed on selinux policies (besides that lab

Re: Orphaning git-cola

On 05/05/2016 07:23 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Hi, > > I am hereby orphaning the git-cola package. (I will be pushing the buttons > in pkgdb right after sending this message.) I simply do not have the time to > keep up with the upstream releases of this package anymore. (It is already 3 > releas

Re: GPG2 as default /usr/bin/gpg

On February 17, 2016 6:04:04 PM GMT+02:00, Richard Hughes wrote: >On 17 February 2016 at 15:51, Tomas Mraz wrote: >> The problem is that now the keystores are incompatible and it creates >> big confusion to the users when they see some key in gnupg-1 and do >not >> see it in gnupg-2 and the ot

Re: FedRTC.org SIP and XMPP service - help needed

On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:19 AM, Daniel Pocock wrote: Fedora Talk was based on Asterisk. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/Asterisk Asterisk has lots of great features (voicemail, queues, etc) but it is mainly for voice, it emphasizes SIP and at the time it was also quite bad with I

Quick Review Request (owncloud-client)

Hi, I'd appreciate a quick* review on owncloud-client, so we can push the new version: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1202805 (*) It's an existing package that got renamed upstream, so it should fairly easy to be reviewed. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http

Re: Firefox addon signing

On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 6:30 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: I'm sure those that need to know, know, but for those that haven't heard[1] Mozilla's official Firefox build will enforce addons to contain a Mozilla signature without any runtime option to disable the check. Initially this prevents

Re: firefox/vimeo

On 01/13/2015 03:38 PM, Martin Stransky wrote: > Please file a bug for that at bugzilla.redhat.com Thanks for looking into this. I opened the bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1181719 > On 01/12/2015 08:59 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: >> I noticed that I'm unab

firefox/vimeo

I noticed that I'm unable to watch Vimeo videos with Firefox without Flash plugin. Same is not true if I use the Firefox build from upstream. Do we disable something on our build that may be responsible for such behavior? Anyone else has the same problem? I even enabled h264 codec (although I know

Re: F21 downloads repository metadata in 3 places!

>Upon doing a yum >upgrade, but rejecting the actual upgrade: > >[root@localhost cache]# du -sh * >94M dnf >446M PackageKit >137M yum Is it considered safe to uninstall yum on F21 and keep only dnf for cli package management? -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.f

Re: Firefox webrtc support in F21?

On 12/15/2014 10:14 AM, Martin Stransky wrote: > There's also a good page about it: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/OpenH264 If h264 is not mandatory for Hello to operate, we could enable it by default by changing the loop:throttled option. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signat

Is ARM productized?

Having some hard time to discover the ARM F21 image at the new website. Is the link somewhere and I completely missed it? I found the ARM images directly from the ftp http://alt.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/releases/21/Images/armhfp/ But as a general question is ARM productized? Would it ma

Re: Other download options

Speaking of F21 downloads, how is that the fedoraproject.org redirects to getfedora.org? Is this something permanent? signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Co

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/23/2014 06:50 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 4:17 AM, Nikos Roussos > wrote: >> On 11/18/2014 08:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Nikos Roussos >>> wrote: >>>> On 11/16/2014 08:24 PM, Chr

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/19/2014 12:34 AM, Lars Seipel wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 11:15:33AM +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: >>> No, actually we don't. We promote websites because we honestly think >>> they're useful, not because we're paid to do so. >> >> Th

Re: Enable tapping by default

On 11/18/2014 11:09 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jiri Eischmann wrote: >> If you're talking about Workstation, then you should probably propose it >> to their working group on the desktop mailing list. The working groups >> are supposed to do such decisions now. >> If you're talking about one of other

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/18/2014 07:21 PM, drago01 wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 6:14 PM, Nikos Roussos > wrote: >> On November 18, 2014 7:08:47 PM EET, Benjamin Kreuter >> wrote: >>> On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 15:12 +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: >>> >>>> This is a

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On November 18, 2014 7:08:47 PM EET, Benjamin Kreuter wrote: >On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 15:12 +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: > >> This is a moral judgment, so it's irrelevant for making a policy >> decision (from Fedora's point of view). Money or not, we need a >> c

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/18/2014 02:55 PM, Benjamin Kreuter wrote: > On Tue, 2014-11-18 at 11:15 +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: >>>> I'm talking about the "advertisement" part. Some people seem to be >>>> bothered by this alone. Tiles feature indeed promotes some website

Re: Enable tapping by default

On 11/18/2014 11:29 AM, Les Howell wrote: > On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 15:50 +0100, Björn Persson wrote: >> drago01 wrote: >>> Things are not black and white there is a "disable touchpad while typing" >>> option which would solve your problem while not making the impression that >>> something is brok

Re: Enable tapping by default

On 11/18/2014 06:55 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 12:16:26AM +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: >> On 11/18/2014 12:12 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: >>> On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:27:53PM +0300, Mustafa Muhammad wrote: >>>> Hi, I am testing Fedora 21 beta a

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/18/2014 08:24 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 3:54 PM, Nikos Roussos > wrote: >> On 11/16/2014 08:24 PM, Christopher wrote: >>> On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Mustafa Muhammad >>> mailto:mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com>> >>>

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

>> I'm talking about the "advertisement" part. Some people seem to be >> bothered by this alone. Tiles feature indeed promotes some websites, but >> we already do that. > > No, actually we don't. We promote websites because we honestly think > they're useful, not because we're paid to do so. That

Re: Enable tapping by default

On 11/18/2014 12:12 AM, Peter Hutterer wrote: > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 02:27:53PM +0300, Mustafa Muhammad wrote: >> Hi, I am testing Fedora 21 beta and -like all previous versions- click >> by tapping is off by default. >> Several bug reports concerning this were closed as NOTABUG, but >> tapping

Re: Enable tapping by default

On 11/17/2014 01:49 PM, Björn Persson wrote: > Mustafa Muhammad wrote: >> Hi, I am testing Fedora 21 beta and -like all previous versions- click >> by tapping is off by default. >> Several bug reports concerning this were closed as NOTABUG, but >> tapping is useful for us (people who use it), I do

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/17/2014 11:47 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Mon, 2014-11-17 at 11:37 +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: >> I don't consider my IP address a call to home. [...] Even Gnome checks my >> IP's location to fix my timezone. > > Not by default, you have to enable this expl

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

> > This doesn't seem relevant to this discussion, unless Fedora browsers > > are automatically, and without the user's explicit knowledge or > > permission, navigating to Google's search engine, which (AFAICT) they > > are not. > > Same happens with these tiles. No data is sen

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On 11/16/2014 08:24 PM, Christopher wrote: > On Sun, Nov 16, 2014 at 6:46 AM, Mustafa Muhammad > mailto:mustafaa.alhamda...@gmail.com>> > wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 15, 2014 at 4:25 PM, Lars Seipel > wrote: > > So Mozilla has recently gone live with its adver

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

On November 15, 2014 5:51:28 PM EET, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >On Sat, 2014-11-15 at 15:06 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> IMHO, we should consider dropping Firefox from Fedora entirely > >Showing ads does not make Firefox nonfree. The only reason we should >completely remove Firefox from Fedora is

Re: Mozilla enabled ads in Firefox and they're active in Fedora

> What does the community think of it? Is it okay for our flagship > applications to carry ads and report tracking data? If I search 'twitter' on Gnome Shell I'm prompted with twitter.com. So whatever decision we make for ads let's make sure we are consistent. signature.asc Description: OpenPG

Re: Orphaning Packages / Looking for Maintainers

On 09/27/2014 07:13 PM, Sebastian Dziallas wrote: > * python-oauth I can take this signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/c

Re: future contributions and package updates jmarrero

Hi Joseph, On Wed, 2014-06-25 at 22:22 -0400, Joseph Marrero wrote: > Hello, > My FAS is : jmarrero > I can not update any of my packages for the time being, will know If I can > continue contributing in about a month. I can pass the ownership to who ever > wants to maintain the packages I curre

Re: The Forgotten "F": A Tale of Fedora's Foundations

On Tue, 2014-04-22 at 06:46 -0400, Christian Schaller wrote: > - Original Message - > > From: "Nikos Roussos" > > > There is also a third group, somewhere in between, who believe that's ok > > to ship Free Software that connects and interops with pr

Re: The Forgotten "F": A Tale of Fedora's Foundations

On Mon, 2014-04-21 at 08:36 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > The language in this Foundation is sometimes dangerously unclear. For > example, it pretty much explicitly forbids the use of non-free > components in the creation of Fedora (sorry, folks: you can't use > Photoshop to create your package

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 17:39 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le Jeu 13 février 2014 15:47, Nikos Roussos a écrit : > > On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >> Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit : > >> > >> > The "N

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 10:23 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 16:47:38 +0200, > Nikos Roussos wrote: > >On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > >> Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit : > >> > >&g

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On February 13, 2014 6:04:01 PM EET, "Richard W.M. Jones" wrote: >On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 03:36:00PM +0100, Kai Engert wrote: >> Question (2) >> >> Is the Fedora community willing to accept Mozilla's desire to show >> advertisements in Firefox? > >Sub-question (2b): > >Why do we care about usin

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Thu, 2014-02-13 at 15:28 +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le Mer 12 février 2014 17:20, Nikos Roussos a écrit : > > > The "New Tab" feature will provide quick access to popular sites in the > > users location, without any collection of personal data (except of

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 10:32 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 18:25:48 +0200, > Nikos Roussos wrote: > >On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:58 +0100, H. Guémar wrote: > >> My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature > >> by

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:58 +0100, H. Guémar wrote: > My *personal* opinion is that we should disable this kind of feature > by default. On a side note, why not disable also Google as the default searchbox engine and replace it with a non-profit one? (I'm not stating my opinion here, just trying

Re: advertisement in packaged software (e.g. Firefox)

On Wed, 2014-02-12 at 16:47 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: > On 02/12/2014 04:31 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: > >>> > >>> Are we allowed to ship software in Fedora that dynamically loads > >>> advertisements from the web and shows them to users? > >> > >> I think "allowed" is probably the wrong term to

Re: Fedora.next in 2014 -- Big Picture and Themes

Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >On 25.01.2014 17:35, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Sat, 2014-01-25 at 11:20 +0100, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: >> >>> Debian, who has a similar stance on >>> non-free Software, does a way better job in that area than Fedora >does. >> Well, not really - they don't have a 's

Re: The official way to upgrade F18 to F19

Stephen Gallagher wrote: >On 05/29/2013 08:48 AM, Dario Lesca wrote: >> What is the official way to upgrade F18 to F19 (for now beta)? I >> would do some test.. Thanks >> > >http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/FedUp#How_Can_I_Upgrade_My_System_with_FedUp.3F Is there any plan currently for a GUI fron

Review Request: webkit-sharp

Hi, I need a review for webkit-sharp: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=928330 this package was wrongly deprecated: http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/webkit-sharp.git/tree/dead.package since it's a dependency for sparkleshare -- Nikos Roussos comzeradd @ Freenode -- devel ma

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

On Mon, 2013-01-28 at 00:10 -0800, Dan Mashal wrote: > > > On Monday, January 28, 2013, Nikos Roussos wrote: > > On Sun, 2013-01-27 at 14:53 +, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > The Gnome 3 interface is substantially different that the >

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Cinnamon as Default Desktop

ere is no way to know that. So I see no real reason to change our default desktop. Even if we consider Gnome 3 as a "research" (which I don't), Fedora is known to adopt innovative technologies. -- Nikos Roussos comzeradd @ freenode.net -- devel mailing list

Fosdem Cross-Distro devroom

Just an update about Fosdem. The dealing for talk submissions at the Cross Distro Devroom got extended until the end of the year [1]. I have already submitted a talk [2], but I think it's the only Fedora related. So anyone interested on doing a presentation, now it's the time to propose it :

Re: forked library

On Fri, 2012-11-30 at 20:16 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 09:07:34PM +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I maintain IDJC [1], which depends on libshout. The latest version > > though depends on libshout-idjc a fork of the original

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

Tom Lane wrote: >Simon Lukasik writes: >> Currently, each Fedora release is kept alive for 13(+/-) months. >There >> were dozens of threads about shortening or prolonging period -- but I >am >> not sure if something like the following has been ever discussed: > >> Each N-th Fedora release -- wh

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

Adam Williamson wrote: >On Sat, 2012-11-03 at 09:37 -0200, Henrique Junior wrote: > >> The guys behind openSUSE created a good approach with Tumbleweed. By >> adding this repo users can opt-in to the (semi)rolling model. >> Tumbleweed is more like a pool where updated, stable, non disruptive >>

Re: Rolling release model philosophy (was Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID)))

On Fri, 2012-11-02 at 13:22 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > I disagree with that. Fedora releases had some small regression > > introduced via updates from time but is is *very* usable as a stable > > operating system. > > I disagree. It's usable by the kind of people who use Fedora. Who like >

Re: 3D printing in Fedora

On Mon, 2012-10-29 at 18:59 +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > I am currently working on adding this software to Fedora: > https://github.com/hroncok/SPECS/ This is great! I would try to help on that. We have a Makerbot and soon a RepRap at the local Hackerspace we can use for testing, and an Ultimaker

Re: Any progress in Software Center in Fedora effort?

On Mon, 2012-10-08 at 16:49 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 10/08/2012 10:49 AM, Jiri Eischmann wrote: > > Reindl Harald píše v Ne 07. 10. 2012 v 20:02 +0200: > >> Am 07.10.2012 19:55, schrieb drago01: > >>> Maybe maybe not. The point is that a fancy software shop would result > >>> into this "o

Re: Any progress in Software Center in Fedora effort?

drago01 wrote: >A user ultimately don't care about packages but about applications. >Other distritors are moving in this direction while we fall behind. >We should lead here like we do in other areas. +1 I still haven't understand what it takes to get this started. Besides of course from havin

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

Przemek Klosowski wrote: >On 10/03/2012 02:23 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote: >> As a result of FESCO ticket 952*, Lubomir Rintel's 200+ packages are >> in need of new maintainers. Under normal circumstances we'd simply >> orphan them all, but given the large number we want to handle this in >> a more or

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

I would also like to take this one: skyviewer -- Program to display HEALPix-based skymaps in FITS files (but just the Fedora branches) FAS: comzeradd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Packages in need of new maintainers

On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 13:23 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote: > Please reply to the list with any requests for ownership changes, and > I'll complete them on a first-come, first-served basis. I can take this: openclipart -- Open Clip Art Library fas: comzeradd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedor

Re: twolame - legal

On Thu, 2012-08-16 at 09:47 -0400, Tom Callaway wrote: > On 08/16/2012 05:27 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > > I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a > > legal reason for that? > > > > twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not

twolame - legal

I happened to notice that twolame is currently on rpmfusion. Is there a legal reason for that? twolame is an MP2 (MPEG-1 Audio Layer II) encoder (not mp3), which seems to be a free (as free of patents) codec. There was a similar discussion on Debian and they concluded that it's ok to have it on th

Re: How can we make F17 be able to boot on Macs (with or without reFit)

Some feedback from a succefull installation of F17 TC4 on a Macbook Air 13" (Model number A1369). Unfortunately the TC5 didn't boot. For TC4 we had to change label grub option to LIVE in order to boot. Is this a typo? Anaconda worked just fine and installation was completed succefully. Only thing

Re: GPT

On Apr 23, 2012 1:12 AM, "Chris Murphy" wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2012, at 2:55 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > > I already have a GPT partition (from my previous installation), but > > Anaconda complains that my boot partition should be of type msdos. The > > only way

Re: GPT

On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 8:20 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Apr 22, 2012, at 11:04 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > > It's a lenovo thinkpad (edge). I remember a bug about some thinkpad models > having problem with gpt, but it would seem to me as an extreme action if all > lenovo mod

Re: GPT

On Apr 22, 2012 6:35 PM, "Chris Murphy" wrote: > > On Apr 22, 2012, at 8:17 AM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > >> I just tried to do a fresh installation with the F17 Beta Installation DVD (x86_64). On the partitions stage I chose to use all space, discarding all preexisting part

GPT

I just tried to do a fresh installation with the F17 Beta Installation DVD (x86_64). On the partitions stage I chose to use all space, discarding all preexisting partitions, but it creates an msdos partition table instead of gpt. Is something changed on the default anaconda configuration since F16

Re: ARM as a primary architecture

On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 4:04 PM, Nicolas Mailhot < nicolas.mail...@laposte.net> wrote: > > Le Jeu 22 mars 2012 14:11, Przemek Klosowski a écrit : > > On 03/22/2012 02:31 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> Tom Lane wrote: > >>> That opinion is flat out ridiculous. Or maybe it makes sense if you > >>> th

Re: RFC: Primary architecture promotion requirements

1531109 with some interesting charts -- Nikos Roussos <http://autoverse.net> -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: /usr/share/applications weird error on koji

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: > On 03/19/2012 02:32 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: > >> On 03/19/2012 12:50 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> I'm trying to build a pa

Re: /usr/share/applications weird error on koji

On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 2:09 PM, Alec Leamas wrote: > On 03/19/2012 12:50 PM, Nikos Roussos wrote: > > Hi, > > I'm trying to build a package. It's an update on > SparkleShare<https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/sparkleshare>package. > I buil

/usr/share/applications weird error on koji

8835 Any help appreciated -- Nikos Roussos <http://autoverse.net> -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic

Here is a weird example of how Fedora currenty handles some permission procedures. I created a standard user account (no admin rights) and I'm trying to install a package. When I press apply I'm prompted to enter a password. Since I have no admin rights I would expect to be asked for the root passw

Re: Torvalds:requiring root password for mundane things is moronic

On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 3:56 PM, Chris Evich wrote: > On 02/29/2012 07:46 AM, Mark Bidewell wrote: > >> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Emanuel Rietveld** >> wrote: >> >> On 02/29/2012 01:15 PM, drago01 wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, Feb 29, 2012 at 1:02 PM, Neal Becker wrote: I think

Re: Review Swap

Hi Pavel, Ok :-) On Feb 5, 2012 8:16 PM, "Pavel Alexeev" wrote: > Hello, Nikos. > > I'm ready swap to httpd-itk package - > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598860 > > 04.02.2012 00:42, Nikos Roussos wrote: > > I'd like

Review Swap

I'd like a review about sparkleshare package: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=787293 Does somebody like to swap reviews? Thanks in advance -- Nikos Roussos about <http://autoverse.net/> -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.

Re: review swap: chromaprint - Library implementing the AcoustID fingerprinting

://olea.org/tmp/chromaprint-rpms/chromaprint-0.5-2.fc15.src.rpm > > I can do it. Here is mine for review: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754698 -- Nikos Roussos about <http://autoverse.net/> | linkedin<http://gr.linkedin.com/in/comzeradd> -- deve