Re: Fedora Elections - Voting is now open!

2024-05-20 Thread Sandro
On 20-05-2024 19:47, Sandro wrote: On 20-05-2024 19:42, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 20. 05. 24 16:37, Aoife Moloney wrote: Hi Folks, After _much_ troubleshooting and some wonderful folks working with me to help resolve the issues that littered the elections today, I am pleased to say all issues

Re: Fedora Elections - Voting is now open!

2024-05-20 Thread Sandro
aware. What's not clear is how or why that has happened. Either way, the link will be updated again soon. After that we'll know better. An update will go out once the new link is active. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.or

Re: Fedora Elections - Voting is now open!

2024-05-20 Thread Sandro
an expiration date when creating the link. The default is two hours. No worries. You'll get your badge. But we need to fix that link (again). -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: Fedora Elections - Voting is now open!

2024-05-20 Thread Sandro
Dawson (tdawson) interview. It seems Troy Dawson has not filled in first and last name in FAS, which is were the information is coming from. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an e

Re: Fedora Elections - Voting is now open!

2024-05-20 Thread Sandro
to investigate as far as I'm aware. The link in the voting app is not a claim link. It points to the badge's landing page. [1] https://pagure.io/fedora-badges -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email

Re: Fedora Elections - Voting is now open!

2024-05-20 Thread Sandro
k is fixed. If not, the badge will be awarded to you another way. Thanks for voting! After all, casting your vote is what's important. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email t

Re: rich deps result in packages being uninstalled from buildroot

2024-05-18 Thread Sandro
-determinism` and `add-determinism-nopython` require `rpm-build` would also achieve `rpm-build` being protected from removal as a workaround. If either package requires it there should only be one way forward, if my understanding of the issue is correct. -- Sandro

Re: HEADS UP: gdal-3.9.0 coming to rawhide

2024-05-15 Thread Sandro Mani
format, I'll try to investigate further - python-rasterio: Test failures, possibly also related to GDAL, I'll also try to investigate further Sandro On 13.05.24 14:32, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'll be building gdal-3.9.0 for rawhide shortly, which carries a soname bump. I'll be submitting

HEADS UP: gdal-3.9.0 coming to rawhide

2024-05-13 Thread Sandro Mani
   PDAL    ncl    vfrnav    python-rasterio    vtk    paraview    kealib    OpenSceneGraph    cloudcompare    grass    mapnik    opencv    mingw-opencv    osgearth    qgis    gazebo I expect this to be done within two or three days. Thanks Sandro

Re: feedback about adding obsoletes/provides

2024-05-08 Thread Sandro
only needed if you want users to be able to upgrade by switching packages. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Review request: python-libgravatar

2024-05-07 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi pgadmin4 grew a dependency on python-libgravatar, which I've posted for review here: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2279493 Happy to review in exchange. Thanks Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: how to do minor bump using %autorelease?

2024-04-27 Thread Sandro
On 27-04-2024 23:51, Sandro wrote: On 27-04-2024 22:41, Julian Sikorski wrote: I need to rebuild mame on F40 only for qt-6.7. On rawhide, mame-0.265-1.fc41 is already built against it so I only need to build mame-0.265-1.fc40.1. Can it be done using %autorelease? Make an empty commit: git

Re: how to do minor bump using %autorelease?

2024-04-27 Thread Sandro
-empty -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https

Re: Idea: pynose as drop-in replacement for nose

2024-04-25 Thread Sandro
On 11-04-2024 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11. 04. 24 11:55, Sandro wrote: While I ponder those thoughts some more, moving forward in either direction, the next step would be writing a change proposal? I'd start by: Packaging pynose without hacks (only making it Conflict with nose

Re: Idea: pynose as drop-in replacement for nose

2024-04-11 Thread Sandro
On 11-04-2024 15:30, Sandro wrote: I see "# Package doesn't provide any tests" in the %check section. That certainly feels a bit dodgy. This successor of a test framework decided to ditch all of the tests it used to have? That is certainly a red flag. More like a chicken and egg st

Re: Idea: pynose as drop-in replacement for nose

2024-04-11 Thread Sandro
/seleniumbase/SeleniumBase -- Sandro -- ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code

Re: Idea: pynose as drop-in replacement for nose

2024-04-11 Thread Sandro
On 11-04-2024 15:17, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11. 04. 24 15:05, Sandro wrote: On 11-04-2024 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11. 04. 24 11:55, Sandro wrote: While I ponder those thoughts some more, moving forward in either direction, the next step would be writing a change proposal? I'd start

Re: Idea: pynose as drop-in replacement for nose

2024-04-11 Thread Sandro
On 11-04-2024 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 11. 04. 24 11:55, Sandro wrote: While I ponder those thoughts some more, moving forward in either direction, the next step would be writing a change proposal? I'd start by: Packaging pynose without hacks (only making it Conflict with nose

Re: Idea: pynose as drop-in replacement for nose

2024-04-11 Thread Sandro
On 10-04-2024 17:50, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 10. 04. 24 17:30, Sandro wrote: On 10-04-2024 12:04, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 09. 04. 24 19:30, Sandro wrote: Therefore, I'm thinking of introducing pynose as a drop in replacement of deprecated nose. Pynose uses the same namespace as nose

Re: Idea: pynose as drop-in replacement for nose

2024-04-10 Thread Sandro
On 10-04-2024 12:04, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 09. 04. 24 19:30, Sandro wrote: Therefore, I'm thinking of introducing pynose as a drop in replacement of deprecated nose. Pynose uses the same namespace as nose, but provides python3dist(pynose). Thus adding Provides: for nose would make it a drop

Re: Idea: pynose as drop-in replacement for nose

2024-04-10 Thread Sandro
updated version of nose". Not a successor that needs adaptation, but basically a continuation. Time will tell. [1] Ik know that adds up to 16. One package sneaked its way onto the list, though it works fine with pynose. -- Sandro -- ___ pytho

Idea: pynose as drop-in replacement for nose

2024-04-09 Thread Sandro
/coprs/gui1ty/nose Cheers, -- Sandro FAS: gui1ty Matrix:Penguinpee Elsewhere: [Pp]enguinpee -- ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora

[EPEL-devel] Re: EPEL9 updates obsoleted

2024-04-08 Thread Sandro
On 07-04-2024 19:04, Antonio T. sagitter wrote: Can this update be re-activated or i have to rebuild everything? https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2024-c154b725ab Have you tried re-submitting the side tag to Bodhi? -- ___ epel-devel

Re: %pyproject_buildrequires -r/-x: Attempt to read runtime dependencies from pyproject.toml?

2024-04-06 Thread Sandro
it makes sense enabling -p, e.g. meson-python. -- Sandro -- ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org

Re: F41 Change Proposal: Pytest 8 (self-contained)

2024-04-06 Thread Sandro
for thought. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-04-03 Thread Sandro
On 03-04-2024 18:35, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: I took botan as a penance for my sins in the previous thread  haha  הַלְּלוּ־יָהּ  Thanks! -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Reminder: F40 final freeze starts next week (2024-04-02)

2024-04-02 Thread Sandro
On 26-03-2024 22:15, Adam Williamson wrote: On Tue, 2024-03-26 at 21:34 +0100, Sandro wrote: On 26-03-2024 16:25, Kevin Fenzi wrote: So, please take this time to do any last minute testing and bugfixing and make sure any packages you expect to be in the final f40 base repositories are pushed

Planning to orphan freeimage

2024-04-02 Thread Sandro Mani
uot; https://github.com/gazebosim/gazebo-classic, which points to https://github.com/gazebosim/gz-sim as the "latest version", which does not appear to require freeimage) imv: freeimage is an optional dependency ogre: freeimage is an optional dependency photoqt: freeimage is an optional depend

Re: xz backdoor

2024-04-01 Thread Sandro
e having to put "contents may be hot" on a coffee cup ... -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedorap

Re: xz backdoor

2024-03-31 Thread Sandro
seems to be unchanged. Is the update you mean already online Michael? I clarified what's wrong with Justin in a DM on Matrix. He was on the same garden path as I was regarding "Beta release" vs. "Final release". There will be another update to the article. -- Sandro -- ___

Re: xz backdoor

2024-03-31 Thread Sandro
On 31-03-2024 00:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote: On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 11:12:02PM +0100, Sandro wrote: From what I understood, F40 Beta, the official Beta release, available from the website as of March 26, has updates-testing disabled by default. That Nope. was confirmed by several people

Re: xz backdoor

2024-03-30 Thread Sandro
On 30-03-2024 22:10, Christopher Klooz wrote: On 30/03/2024 20.08, Sandro wrote: On 30-03-2024 13:26, Christopher Klooz wrote: I don't know how the assumption came up that F40 is only affected if users opted in for testing, but that interpretation already ended up in the Fedora Magazine

Re: xz backdoor

2024-03-30 Thread Sandro
that 5.6.x never made to F40 stable is correct[1] and therefore users not having updates-testing enabled could not have installed 5.6.x without expressly enabling it. [1] https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/?search=xz-5.6 -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing

Re: Reminder: F40 final freeze starts next week (2024-04-02)

2024-03-26 Thread Sandro
) karma ... -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: Monday, 25 March 2024 (today) at 13:00 UTC

2024-03-25 Thread Sandro
, -- Sandro FAS: gui1ty Matrix:Penguinpee Elsewhere: [Pp]enguinpee -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Re: QGIS rebuild needed after GRASS GIS update

2024-03-19 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi Markus I'm happy to help coordinating the grass update. Note however that: - If the update does not carry ABI changes (and hence soname bumps), a rebuild of QGIS is not needed - If The update does carry a soname bump, it should be avoided in stable releases Sandro On 19.03.24 13:44

Re: Heads-up: Updating libunibreak to 6.1 in rawhide and F40

2024-03-18 Thread Sandro
On 10-03-2024 18:10, Sandro wrote: On 03-03-2024 21:42, Sandro wrote: I plan to update libunibreak to version 6.1 in rawhide and F40 in about a week. This update comes with an soname bump. The following packages depend on libunibreak: fedrq wrsrc -Xs libunibreak -F name coolreader fbreader

Re: Announcement: Retiring zlib and minizip-compat from Rawhide

2024-03-14 Thread Sandro
/keepassxc/c/3ec631d9175e82d9d8320374037e3d78bf7e190d?branch=rawhide Fingers crossed and thanks for your work on KeePassXC. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: Heads-up: Updating libunibreak to 6.1 in rawhide and F40

2024-03-11 Thread Sandro
On 10-03-2024 18:10, Sandro wrote: On 03-03-2024 21:42, Sandro wrote: I plan to update libunibreak to version 6.1 in rawhide and F40 in about a week. This update comes with an soname bump. The following packages depend on libunibreak: fedrq wrsrc -Xs libunibreak -F name coolreader fbreader

Re: Heads-up: Updating libunibreak to 6.1 in rawhide and F40

2024-03-10 Thread Sandro
On 03-03-2024 21:42, Sandro wrote: I plan to update libunibreak to version 6.1 in rawhide and F40 in about a week. This update comes with an soname bump. The following packages depend on libunibreak: fedrq wrsrc -Xs libunibreak -F name coolreader fbreader krita naev I ran a smoke test

Review requests: mingw-directxmath, python-jsonformatter

2024-03-08 Thread Sandro Mani
(required for pgadmin4 8.4) Both are very simple packages. Happy to review in exchange. Thanks Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Re: [Fedora-legal-list] Trivy for licenses

2024-03-04 Thread Sandro
ble down the road. But for the moment, I don't see how others can help driving this forward. A proven packager could merge the PR. But I don't know how eclipseo, who's a proven packager, would feel about that. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- de

Heads-up: Updating libunibreak to 6.1 in rawhide and F40

2024-03-03 Thread Sandro
/gui1ty/libunibreak_6/builds/ Cheers, -- Sandro FAS: gui1ty Matrix:Penguinpee Elsewhere: [Pp]enguinpee -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Re: Orphaning raptor

2024-02-20 Thread Sandro
to be dead in the water. The domain of the upstream URL has gone. That was also used for the sources and the package hasn't seen an update for almost five years. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: zuul-config-generator - add your packages to Zuul CI seamlessly

2024-02-06 Thread Sandro
On 06-02-2024 14:43, Cristian Le via devel wrote: Are you using IRC? The IRC bridge is dead I think around that time. You might have to use a proper matrix client in this case. I joined the Matrix room (https://matrix.to/#/#fedora-ci:fedora.im). We are active even yesterday. Then I somehow

Re: zuul-config-generator - add your packages to Zuul CI seamlessly

2024-02-06 Thread Sandro
On 06-02-2024 14:27, Ondrej Mosnáček wrote: On Tue, 6 Feb 2024 at 14:18, Sandro wrote: On 06-02-2024 10:32, Karolina Surma wrote: Please note, if you want to add hundreds of packages at once, coordinate with the Zuul folks -- they know best how much it can handle. Do you happen to have

Re: zuul-config-generator - add your packages to Zuul CI seamlessly

2024-02-06 Thread Sandro
On 06-02-2024 14:27, Cristian Le via devel wrote: Can join the #fedora-ci:fedoraproject.org matrix group. I did. Not much activity there though. The last message (before mine) dates back to July 25, 2023. Thanks for the pointer nonetheless. -- Sandro

Re: zuul-config-generator - add your packages to Zuul CI seamlessly

2024-02-06 Thread Sandro
packages) that I'd like them to look into, but so far I have been unable to figure out where to report that or whom to contact. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: Fw: [Bug 2066129] mingw-libgsf-1_14_52 is available

2024-02-06 Thread Sandro Mani
native had a successful build with mingw packages. At this point I guess it'll need retiring on both rawhide and f39 Correct, I missed that. Geg, Sandro, can you retire the mingw-libgsf package? I've retired the package, but not sure if it worked 100% as I'm not listed as package admin. Sandro

Re: mingw packaging: equivalent of %cmake_build, %cmake_install macros?

2024-01-30 Thread Sandro Mani
On 29.01.24 10:38 PM, Eric Smith wrote: On Mon, Jan 29, 2024, 02:32 Sandro Mani wrote: For mingw, the most common approach is %build %mingw_cmake %mingw_make_build %install %mingw_make_install # Don't forget this one |%mingw_debug_install_post| Thank you

Re: poppler soname bump in Rawhide soon

2024-01-30 Thread Sandro
-qtwebengine rubygem-activestorage rubygem-asciidoctor-pdf rubygem-poppler scribus setzer tellico texmaker texstudio texworks tikzit tracker-miners tumbler vfrnav vips weston xournal xournalpp xreader yacreader zathura-pdf-poppler -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing

Re: Looking for new maintainer for boswars

2024-01-30 Thread Sandro
On 30-01-2024 13:33, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi Sandro, On 1/30/24 12:48, Sandro wrote: On 30-01-2024 10:41, Hans de Goede wrote: I used to do a lot of gaming related Fedora packaging and I still maintain over 200 pkgs, but I really don't have much time for Fedora package maintainership anymore

Re: Looking for new maintainer for boswars

2024-01-30 Thread Sandro
the package build again. I'll submit a PR. There also is one ABRT bug when can be closed when updating to the new release since the backtrace will be invalid for the new version. Ack. Cheers, -- Sandro FAS: gui1ty Matrix:Penguinpee Elsewhere: [Pp]enguinpee

Re: Heads-up: abseil-cpp 20240116.0 coming to F40/Rawhide

2024-01-29 Thread Sandro
On 29-01-2024 11:16, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: Hello, Ben. On Sunday, 28 January 2024 at 19:43, Ben Beasley wrote: In one week, 2024-02-04, or slightly later, I plan to update abseil-cpp from 20230802.1 to 20230116.0 (Abseil LTS branch, Jan 2024)[1] in side tags for Correct me if

Re: mingw packaging: equivalent of %cmake_build, %cmake_install macros?

2024-01-29 Thread Sandro Mani
l_post| See also [1] for an example. Hope this helps Sandro [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/proj/blob/rawhide/f/proj.spec [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/mingw-filesystem/blob/rawhide/f/macros.mingw64 On 29.01.24 10:13 AM, Eric Smith wrote: I'm trying to add mingw build support to

Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: Monday, 29 January 2024 (today) at 13:00 UTC

2024-01-29 Thread Sandro
, -- Sandro FAS: gui1ty Matrix:Penguinpee Elsewhere: [Pp]enguinpee -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US

Re: HEADS UP: update to tesseract-5.3.4

2024-01-28 Thread Sandro Mani
On 28.01.24 10:48 AM, Sandro Mani wrote: On 28.01.24 4:21 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 23:20 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: I'll be updating to tesseract-5.3.4 in rawhide shortly, which carries a soname bump (despite it being a minor version, unfortunately upstream versions

Re: HEADS UP: update to tesseract-5.3.4

2024-01-28 Thread Sandro Mani
On 28.01.24 4:21 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: On Sat, 2024-01-27 at 23:20 +0100, Sandro Mani wrote: I'll be updating to tesseract-5.3.4 in rawhide shortly, which carries a soname bump (despite it being a minor version, unfortunately upstream versions the SO with the package version). I'll

HEADS UP: update to tesseract-5.3.4

2024-01-27 Thread Sandro Mani
R-tesseract skanpage zathura-pdf-mupdf Thanks Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code

Re: List of long term FTBFS packages to be retired in February

2024-01-25 Thread Sandro
] for you. [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/yaksa/pull-request/1 -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Re: Fedora Linux 37 is EOL

2024-01-15 Thread Sandro
On 15-01-2024 09:52, Vít Ondruch wrote: Any update? This ticket is still open: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2235331 I believe the script is chugging along. I've seen a few more bugs being closed the last couple of days. -- Sandro

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2024-01-15 Thread Sandro
fedrq wrsrc -i -X -F source | \ fedrq wrsrc -i -X -F source | \ fedrq wrsrc -i -X -F source to arrive at plotnine. I have yet to find a simple way of producing an output akin to the dashboard graph for showing the chain of dependencies between two packages. I'm open to sugg

License correction for python-elephant

2024-01-09 Thread Sandro
The license for python-elephant has been converted to SPDX and corrected to: BSD-3-Clause AND MIT It used to be just 'BSD'. Cheers, -- Sandro FAS: gui1ty IRC: Penguinpee Elsewhere: [Pp]enguinpee -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel

Re: Fedora Linux 37 is EOL

2024-01-08 Thread Sandro
doing a mass update, I could imagine. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code

Review Request: mingw-python-blinker

2024-01-06 Thread Sandro Mani
Hi I'd appreciate a review of mingw-python-blinker [1] which is a new dependency of mingw-python-flask-3.0.0. Happy to review in exchange. Thanks Sandro [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2257095 -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel

Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2024-01-05 Thread Sandro Mani
On 05.01.24 17:57, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Sun, Dec 17, 2023 at 04:44:36PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

2024-01-05 Thread Sandro
On 05-01-2024 01:50, Priscila Gutierres wrote: I would like to apologize if it seems that I’m being rude asking for a review in this thread. It's perfectly fine asking for a review. But that should go into its own mail to the list or, preferably, to <${package}-maintainers@fp.o>. Currently,

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

2024-01-04 Thread Sandro
packager in the current situation, since the sole maintainer is unresponsive. No offense, but you are kinda hijacking this thread. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

2024-01-02 Thread Sandro
on Tue 02 Jan 2024 20:57:02. cvise-0:2.8.0-1.fc39.x86_64 python3-bluepyopt-0:1.14.3-1.fc39.x86_64 python3-bluepyopt-0:1.14.6-5.fc39.x86_64 I use `fedrq` these days. $ fedrq wr -s python3-pebble cvise-2.9.0-1.fc40.src python-bluepyopt-1.14.6-5.fc40.src -- Sandro

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-31 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 23:41, Sandro wrote: Thanks for sparring! Whatever the outcome, I'll report here and on discussion. As promised, here is the outcome of a lengthy investigation. While I was on the right track right from the start, I failed to recognize (something about moving parts, some trees

Orphaned python-compressed-rtf and python-red-black-tree-mod

2023-12-31 Thread Sandro
://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/gui1ty/extract-msg/ Cheers, -- Sandro FAS: gui1ty IRC: Penguinpee Elsewhere: [Pp]enguinpee -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-28 Thread Sandro
On 12/28/23 00:47, Sandro wrote: On 12/28/23 00:04, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 12/27/23 08:20, Sandro wrote: I added `level` and `num-devices` to all entries in mdadm.conf and rebooted. It didn't change anything. Manual assembly still freezes the system as well. You need to also update

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/28/23 00:04, Samuel Sieb wrote: On 12/27/23 08:20, Sandro wrote: I added `level` and `num-devices` to all entries in mdadm.conf and rebooted. It didn't change anything. Manual assembly still freezes the system as well. You need to also update the initramfs using dracut or the modified

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 22:48, pgnd wrote: without seeing all the details, unfound superblocks aren't good. But isn't the information `mdadm --examine` prints coming from the superblock stored on the device? The magic number, that this command reports, matches what was expected (a92b4efc). I can access

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 17:36, Sandro wrote: I'll try with a F39 live ISO as well. If nothing else, it could confirm the issue to be with/in F39. I did that. Right after boot only one of the arrays was assembled. In /proc/mdstat is was listed as "active (auto-read-only)" and the compone

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 17:28, pgnd wrote: WAG? https://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=wild%20ass%20guess ;) I should have guessed... I added `level` and `num-devices` to all entries in mdadm.conf and rebooted. It didn't change anything. Manual assembly still freezes the system as well.

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 17:03, pgnd wrote: also make sure your drivers are in the initrd lsinitrd | grep -Ei "kernel/drivers/md/raid" -rw-r--r-- 1 root root10228 Nov 15 19:00 usr/lib/modules/6.6.8-200.fc39.x86_64/kernel/drivers/md/raid0.ko.xz -rw-r--r-- 1 root root35376 Nov 15

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 17:10, pgnd wrote: If it works, I'd still wonder why md54 comes up fine. That entry is also missing `level` and `num-devices`. 1st WAG ? WAG? /dev/md/54 is 'just' raid1, without an atypical spare It's not. It's a raid5 without any spare just like md5. Only difference

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 16:47, pgnd wrote: i explicitly add the level= num-devices i've had issues long ago with mis-assembly that that cured. whether it's STILL a problem, i don't know; all my array spec contain contain these, and don't cause harm. it's now SOP here. i'd at least

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 15:14, pgnd wrote: what's the output of: mdadm -Es cat /etc/mdadm.conf # mdadm -Es ARRAY /dev/md/5 metadata=1.1 UUID=39295d93:e5a75797:b72287f3:51563755 name=urras.penguinpee.nl:5 ARRAY /dev/md/1 metadata=1.1 UUID=4a2c44b5:25f2a6c9:0e7f6cae:37a8a9cc

Re: Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
On 12/27/23 15:05, Sandro wrote: I could you use some help with ${SUBJECT}. I posted the details in discussion [1], but have yet to receive a response. I thought maybe folks on the list may have an idea. I'm kinda lost as to where this is going wrong. Feel free to reply either on discussion

Troubleshooting MD RAID assembly not working after upgrade to F39

2023-12-27 Thread Sandro
can get. Thank you, -- Sandro FAS: gui1ty IRC: Penguinpee Elsewhere: [Pp]enguinpee -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

HEADS UP: upgrade to shapelib-1.6.0

2023-12-23 Thread Sandro Mani
Hello I'll be updating to shapelib-1.6.0 in the coming days, which carries a soname bump from libshp.so.2 to libshp.so.4, rebuilding the following dependent packages: cloudcompare cyrus-imapd gdl gpsbabel marble plplot xastir Thanks and happy holidays Sandro

Re: armadillo soname bump to version 12

2023-12-22 Thread Sandro Mani
| - nothing provides libarmadillo.so.10()(64bit) needed by gdal-libs-3.8.2-1.fc40.x86_64 Seen while trying to rebuild mapserver with unchanged sources. There is gdal-3.8.2-2.fc40 which is correctly built against libarmadillo.so.12 Sandro

Re: Planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 + review request for podofo-compat for legacy 0.9.x library

2023-12-18 Thread Sandro Mani
On 17.12.23 17:44, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Tue, Aug 15, 2023 at 11:56:56PM +0200, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I'm planning to update to podofo-0.10.1 in rawhide. I did a series of test builds here [1], according to which scribus, vfrnav and pdfsign currently do not support podofo-0.10

[Heads up]: biosig4c++ 2.5.2 coming to rawhide

2023-12-12 Thread Sandro
In one week (2023-12-19) or a little later I will update biosig4c++ to version 2.5.2 in rawhide. This will bring an soname bump. However, there are no consuming packages, making this a self contained change. Cheers, -- Sandro FAS: gui1ty IRC: Penguinpee Elsewhere: [Pp]enguinpee

Re: python packaging assistance sought for xgboost

2023-12-08 Thread Sandro
. What do you have in build/BUILDROOT/*/usr/lib64/python3.12/site-packages/ inside your mock changeroot? -- Sandro -- ___ python-devel mailing list -- python-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-devel-le

Re: Unretiring keepass

2023-11-23 Thread Sandro
not depend on Mono. There's also a client for mobile called KeePassDX [3]. [1] https://keepassxc.org/ [2] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/keepassxc [3] https://www.keepassdx.com/ -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Inactive packages removed from packager group

2023-11-18 Thread Sandro
erested in or depend on. -- Sandro -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ Li

Re: HEADS UP: gdal-3.8.0 coming to rawhide

2023-11-16 Thread Sandro Mani
This is now done, there are two unrelated failures: - gazebo: graphviz 9.x incompatibility - vfrnav: broken build dependencies (nothing provides libsundials_sunlinsolklu.so.4.6.1()(64bit) needed by octave-6:8.4.0-1.fc40.x86_64 from build) Sandro On 15.11.23 11:42, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi

HEADS UP: gdal-3.8.0 coming to rawhide

2023-11-15 Thread Sandro Mani
  kealib   OpenSceneGraph   cloudcompare   grass   mapnik   opencv   mingw-opencv   osgearth   qgis   gazebo Thanks Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code

Re: Didn't get an email about a new merge request on a package

2023-11-08 Thread Sandro
keep ahead in the enduring race?  -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List

Re: HEADS UP: broken dependencies due to gdal-3.6.2-7.fc37

2023-11-07 Thread Sandro Mani
On 07.11.23 12:17, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi Due to an unfortunate oversight of an incorrect branch merge a couple of months ago, a recently backported security fix caused an unwanted gdal soname bump in F37, due to an update from the 3.5.x series to the 3.6.x series. I'm preparing a gdal

HEADS UP: broken dependencies due to gdal-3.6.2-7.fc37

2023-11-07 Thread Sandro Mani
this, please don't rebuild any dependencies in the meantime, as the new package will bring back the previous soname. Apologies for the troubles. Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: Wrong branch built into side tags, what to do?

2023-11-06 Thread Sandro
. But can you not just untag the builds from the side tag they don't belong in? koji untag-build Then rebuild into the correct side tag. That step may require that you bump the release. I'm not entirely sure. -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel

Re: Heads up: libunibreak 5.1 update coming to rawhide

2023-11-02 Thread Sandro
r rebuilding against the updated libunibreak and dropping support for i686. -- Sandro ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproje

Heads up: libunibreak 5.1 update coming to rawhide

2023-11-01 Thread Sandro
fbreader and naev (PRs submitted and maintainers in Cc) in the side tag to ensure a smooth update. If you prefer, you can also grant me commit rights and I will take care of rebuilding myself. [1] https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/gui1ty/libunibreak/builds/ Cheers, -- Sandro FAS: gui1ty IRC

Re: PEP-668, cmake FindPython Python_SITEARCH and rpm_prefix

2023-10-25 Thread Sandro Mani
On 25.10.23 02:20, Neal Gompa wrote: On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 5:18 PM Sandro Mani wrote: Hi Since some time, Fedora's cmake FindPython will return Python_SITEARCH=/usr/local/lib64/pythonX.Y/site-packages, which results in possible failure to find python libraries below the system site

PEP-668, cmake FindPython Python_SITEARCH and rpm_prefix

2023-10-24 Thread Sandro Mani
ay to handle the issue, whether Fedoras FindPython needs fixing, or whether there already is a cleaner solution? Thanks Sandro [1] https://github.com/qgis/QGIS/pull/55039/files ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Upgrades of Sundials and PETSc

2023-10-21 Thread Sandro
the same result with a oneliner: $ fedrq wr -s petsc* bout++-5.0.0-11.fc40.src dolfin-2019.1.0.post0-47.fc40.src freefem++-4.13-6.fc40.src getdp-3.5.0-9.fc40.src python-steps-3.6.0-30.fc39.src sundials-6.6.1-3.fc40.src [1] https://fedrq.gtmx.me

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >