Sparc test machine

I'd like to port UpTools package to sparc architecture. By chance is some test sparc machine there running Fedora? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list

X11 lockups the system

I've reported a X11 bug system, I'm using KDE on F15, if you suffers the same problem, it could be great take a look at https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726982 Sorry if it's duplicated -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blog

Power and brightness issue

eters/policy default performance [powersave] any ideas? TIA -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: X11 lockups the system

2011/7/31 Rajeesh K Nambiar : > On Sun, Jul 31, 2011 at 11:54 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: >> I've reported a X11 bug system, I'm using KDE on F15, if you suffers >> the same problem, it could be great take a look at >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=726

Re: Power and brightness issue

2011/8/2 Adam Williamson > On Sun, 2011-07-31 at 15:37 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > I've read > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bugs/Common#Laptop_screen_dims_when_switching_to_battery_power_or_idle_mode_but_never_brightens_again > > > > My system suffers the same

Compiler as Require

Hi Is it OK include a compiler (eg gcc-c++) for a "-devel" subpackage? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject

Fix of License tag in UpTools

I will fix the license of UpTools package, it was mistagged as "BSD" but is "BSD with attribution". -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fed

rpmlint complains about "BSD with attribution"

Hi, I'd want to notify that rmplint warns about "BSD with attribution", I mean it hasn't the complete list of valid licenses of http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing#SoftwareLicenses. Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http:/

Re: rpmlint complains about "BSD with attribution"

2011/9/19 Jason L Tibbitts III : >>>>>> "SB" == Sergio Belkin writes: > > SB> I'd want to notify that rmplint warns about "BSD with > SB> attribution", > > Please file a bug against rpmlint. OK, I will do it:) > >  

About Feature enhancement Updates Policy

ith foo 5.5 c. Submit foo 6.0 only for rawhide. What is the right option? Sorry if I did 2 questions at once. Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@list

Re: About Feature enhancement Updates Policy

2011/9/25 Kevin Fenzi : > On Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:19:45 -0300 > Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I've read  the examples about updates allowed and I've read in >> examples section: >> >> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#E

Re: libmysqlclient soname version bumped by upstream

11.fc16.i686 requires libmysqlclient.so.16 Please resolve this as soon as possible." Has this has to do with the topic of this thread? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: libmysqlclient soname version bumped by upstream

2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová : > On 03/23/2011 12:46 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: >> 2011/3/23 Marcela Mašláňová : >>> On 03/22/2011 11:22 PM, Tom Lane wrote: >>>> I wrote: >>>>> The ticket is here: >>>>> https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/tic

Re: mass rebuild of mysql packages in F-15

I can rebuilt the rawhide branch >> too > > The F-15 and rawhide rebuilds are finished now with some failures > > collectd > gmyth > grass (f15 only) > gstreamer-plugins-bad-free > mapserver (f15 only) > pure-ftpd > ser > snort > zoneminder (Jason knows abo

Re: mass rebuild of mysql packages in F-15

> FWIW I meant FWIU :) -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: mass rebuild of mysql packages in F-15

2011/3/24 Tom Lane : > Sergio Belkin writes: >> FWIW Should We not my dependant package the rest of packages because >> have been already rebuilt? > > If you have a package that uses libmysqlclient.so, and it's not already > listed in "koji list-tagged dist-f1

Re: disabling -Werror on a autotools based build

ding -Werror by themselves are poorly designed. > Just to learn: Ralf, Why do you say that? :-) -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Different spec for el5

nd el6 but does make sense increase EVR only for it? 2. If I create a modified spec for el5, should I increase the EVR? Can a package have a different EVR of el6 and fedora ones? Or can an el5 package has the same EVR that el6 and fedora ones but different content? Thanks in advance! -- -- Serg

Re: Packages with libtool archives

.e. blindly rejecting packages which carry *.la's would be wrong. > > Ralf > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch M

Re: Different spec for el5

2011/4/2 Ville Skyttä : > On 04/02/2011 05:02 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: >> Hi fedora community, >> >> I maintain ftop package. I've made fedora and el6 packages. Taking >> account different requirements for epel5 packages, now I'd want to >> make an el e

Re: Interlinux waiting list

Sorry... Did I miss something? -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Changelog entries on older package

roject.org/wiki/Packaging/NamingGuidelines#Minor_release_bumps_for_old_branches that I should add set something as 1%{?dist}.1 on Release to make older that epel6 package. Should I add the same for the changelog entry on epel5 package? I mean: * Tue Mar 01 2011 Sergio Belkin - 1%{?dist}.1 ? Th

Re: Changelog entries on older package

2011/5/10 Kevin Fenzi : > On Tue, 10 May 2011 09:59:12 -0300 > Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Let's say that you make a RPM for fedora, and then you want to make >> for epel5. Should I keep the fedora entries on changelog? > > I usually do, yes

Disable Dependency tracking

Hi, I'd want to know if makes sense disable dependecy tracking at build stage, I mean, put in spec file: ./configure --disable-dependency-tracking Because it speeds build. What do you think? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV

Re: Disable Dependency tracking

2011/5/13 Kalev Lember : > On 05/13/2011 03:51 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: >> I'd want to know if makes sense disable dependecy tracking at build >> stage, I mean, put in spec file: >> >> ./configure --disable-dependency-tracking >> >> Because it speeds b

License fix in UpTools

Hi, There was an error in License tag in UpTools package it was wrongly mislabeled as "BSD with advertisement", it was replaced by "BSD with attribution". Fixed on 8.5.4-15 and newer releases. Greets. -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http:/

More than one version of a package

4. fedpkg update Is that right? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: More than one version of a package

2011/5/16 Kevin Fenzi : > On Mon, 16 May 2011 18:11:15 -0300 > Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> Hi, >> Let's say I have package X 1.0 I'd want to upload an srpm of X 1.1 and >> make build a newer version of X but > > For rawhide/master? Hmmm, yes, is it n

How to undo a build

and do it again? Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Anaconda won't detect partitions

26 09:23:14 localhost program: Running... udevadm settle --timeout=300 May 26 09:23:14 localhost program: Running... modprobe scsi_wait_scan May 26 09:23:14 localhost program: Running... rmmod scsi_wait_scan May 26 09:23:15 localhost program: Running... udevadm settle --timeout=300 Thanks in advan

Re: Anaconda won't detect partitions

2011/5/26 Kevin Kofler : > Sergio Belkin wrote: >> May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath >> device: dm-0 >> May 26 09:23:14 localhost storage: MultipathTopology: found singlepath >> device: dm-1 > > Try booting the instal

GTK apps loog ugly

n-everything Can be this considered a bug? -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: GTK apps loog ugly

fonts hand been affected. Fonts on Firefox looked terrible, I had to set hintstyle to none in ~/.fonts.conf HTH -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Revoking and deleting in Bodhi Web

think? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Revoking and deleting in Bodhi Web

2011/6/1 Rex Dieter > Sergio Belkin wrote: > > > What does it occur when an update is revoked and is deleted? > > I've done an updated version of package, made a build and when I write > > the name in Package field I've found a bit odd that new build doesn'

[no subject]

uot;UpTools" | #define VERSION "8.5.4" | /* end confdefs.h. */ | | int | { | | ; | return 0; | } configure:3705: error: in `/tmp/UpTools-8.5.4': configure:3707: error: C compiler cannot create executables The same script doesn't fail on F14. Do you have any idea?

Re: Different behaviour on gcc 4.6?

Sorry, I was typing on a netbook :P and the mail it was sent without subject -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Different behaviour on gcc 4.6?

2011/6/10 Kevin Kofler : > Sergio Belkin wrote: >> | int >> | { >> | >> |; >> |return 0; >> | } > > This is not a valid C program. Maybe GCC 4.5 accepted this junk?! GCC 4.6 is > right to error on it. > >        Kevin Kofler > > --

Re:

2011/6/11 Miloslav Trmač : > Hello, > On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 2:06 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: >> ./configure LDFLAGS="-no-install" > >> configure:3659: gcc   -no-install conftest.c  >&5 >> gcc: error: unrecognized option '-no-install' > &g

Question about commiting the sources

thing that I misunderstood? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Question about commiting the sources

2012/3/16 Jon Ciesla : > On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:33 AM, Jan Synacek wrote: >> On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote: >>> Perhaps and stupid question: >>> >>> After upload new-sources to repo, it outputs: >>> Uploaded and added to .gitignore:

Re: Question about commiting the sources

2012/3/16 Bryn M. Reeves : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 03/16/2012 02:33 PM, Jan Synacek wrote: >> On 03/16/12 at 11:16am, Sergio Belkin wrote: >>> Perhaps and stupid question: >>> >>> After upload new-sources to repo, it

About mtune=atom

Hi, I've read on http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:RPMMacros#Build_flags_macros_and_variables that mtune=atom. Just because I'm curious, why? :) Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified

About build system used on fedora packages

advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

About build system used on fedora packages (now with some statistics)

spanish, all sugesstion are welcome :) HTH -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Orphaning some packages

drea, AFAIK, this page is what you are looking for: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages#Claiming_Ownership_of_an_Orphaned_Package_Procedure HTH -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -

Package SCM admin requests

Hi Fedora devel community :) I've made yesterday a Package SCM admin request and I haven't received a notification yet. I'm not in a hurry but on earlier requests I had receive answer after a few hours: The ticket is: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=683684 TIA -- -

Re: Package SCM admin requests

2011/3/17 Jason L Tibbitts III > > >>>>> "SB" == Sergio Belkin writes: > > SB> I've made yesterday a Package SCM admin request and I haven't > SB> received a notification yet. > > Well, you made your request just after I had proc

Problem with bluetooth in Fedora 22

Bus: USB BD Address: 0C:84:DC:02:4D:40 ACL MTU: 1022:8 SCO MTU: 183:5 UP RUNNING PSCAN ISCAN RX bytes:1262 acl:0 sco:0 events:79 errors:0 TX bytes:3290 acl:0 sco:0 commands:79 errors:0 Any idea? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://w

Re: Problem with bluetooth in Fedora 22

38]: Unable to get io data for Object Push: getpeername: Transport ...107) Hint: Some lines were ellipsized, use -l to show in full. Your comments will be appreaciated! 2015-07-10 9:20 GMT-03:00 Sergio Belkin : > Hi community, > > > Bluetooth does not work in Fedora 22: > > [

Samba as AD DC

Hi, Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain Controller? I mean is that page current: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Samba4#Current_status ? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org

Re: Samba as AD DC

Thanks! 2014-09-07 14:58 GMT-03:00 Simo Sorce : > On Sun, 2014-09-07 at 01:12 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Is (Samba) Fedora 20 still not capable of being Active Directory Domain > > Controller? > > > > I mean is that page current: >

Fedora 22 Dispplay with stripes

i915 Module: i915 Version drivers: filename: /lib/modules/4.0.1-300.fc22.x86_64/kernel/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915.ko.xz xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.99.917-6.20150211.fc22.x86_64 Thaanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing

Re: Fedora 22 Dispplay with stripes

2015-05-12 12:16 GMT-03:00 Samuel Sieb : > On 05/12/2015 07:29 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> I'm trying Fedora 22 and shows randomly stripes, my info: >> >> It didn't do this with F21? Can you describe the effect more or take a > picture? I have some we

Re: Fedora 22 Dispplay with stripes

2015-05-12 12:27 GMT-03:00 Sergio Belkin : > > 2015-05-12 12:16 GMT-03:00 Samuel Sieb : >> >> On 05/12/2015 07:29 AM, Sergio Belkin wrote: >>> >>> I'm trying Fedora 22 and shows randomly stripes, my info: >>> >> It didn't do this with

Re: Fedora 22 Dispplay with stripes

2015-05-27 13:16 GMT-03:00 Ralf Corsepius : > On 05/27/2015 05:27 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > Video card: >>>>> >>>>> Slot: 00:02.0 >>>>> Class: VGA compatible controller >>>>> Vendor: Intel Corporation >>>>&g

Intel driver pain

transcoder A FIFO underrun [vie may 29 07:01:23 2015] i915 :00:02.0: fb0: inteldrmfb frame buffer device Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org

Re: Intel driver pain

o symptoms. I > just get the error at every startup, but the system functions normally > Thanks > Kendell clark > > > drago01 wrote: > > On Fri, May 29, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Sergio Belkin > > wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> Could you tell me if anyone

Re: Intel driver pain

2015-06-16 11:30 GMT-03:00 Reindl Harald : > > > Am 16.06.2015 um 16:14 schrieb Sergio Belkin: > >> Well, >> >> I was not crazy: >> >> >> http://fedoramagazine.org/solution-graphics-issues-intel-graphics-chipsets-fedora-22/ >> > > well,

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

find kate, gedit and the like better options. If you don't like a modal editor, propose a better option not a mediocre one. For example, micro is a non-modal editor but more powerful that nano. If has no real benefit, please could you reconsider it and let the community give his voice? Tha

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

itor. But please, again, most end users prefer to use a gui editor. Is not about that a newcomer has to know **what** is KWrite/Kate/Gedit/etc, it's about that choices are of easy access through KDE/GNOME/MATE/XFce/etc graphical environments. -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

> That's been there for years, so I think the "stuck in vim" meme is > outdated. > > I agree is a funny meme, but even unreal. Sift+zz is not hard that Ctrl-o. Perhaps vim needs a footer such as nano :) -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Cer

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

years use Debian because of the default editor change? A newbie generally does know nothing about vi/vim, cron, git, etc... -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

El vie., 26 jun. 2020 a las 9:29, Jonathan Wakely (< jwak...@fedoraproject.org>) escribió: > On 26/06/20 09:22 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > >Really do we believe that setting nano as a default editor will attract > new > >users to Linux? How many end users in last years u

Is allowed in certain cases to override default Fedora compiler flags?

ears later. If the developer does not use entered formats by the user, the exploit disappear, doesn't it? So the question is: in this case I can override the Fedora compiler flags? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org ___

Re: Is allowed in certain cases to override default Fedora compiler flags?

El jue., 2 jul. 2020 a las 13:30, Vitaly Zaitsev via devel (< devel@lists.fedoraproject.org>) escribió: > On 01.07.2020 22:47, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > So the question is: in this case I can override the Fedora compiler > flags? > > Don't do this, please. Yo

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > At https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwapOnZRAM#Why_systemd_zram-

Re: Enable EarlyOOM on Fedora KDE - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

ignal > to the process with the largest oom_score. > > For more information, see the earlyoom man page. > > -- > Ben Cotton > He / Him / His > Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream > Red Hat > TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis > _______

Re: Enable EarlyOOM on Fedora KDE - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

> > My suggestion is to stop the 'complaining for the sake of complaining' > phase of the feature. And move to the "when I do X Y Z, this other app > is killed off - how to tweak this?" And then does the tweak represent > covering an edge case? Or is it good enough to be the new default? > > Nice,

Re: Enable EarlyOOM on Fedora KDE - Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal

El sáb., 11 jul. 2020 a las 16:39, Benjamin Berg () escribió: > On Sat, 2020-07-11 at 14:31 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > My only question is if measuring memory pressure is a better indication. > > If nohang-desktop uses PSI, isn't it a more proper solution? > > The

Anyone using Tiled windows on Plasma out there ?

What is the better option to to get tiled windows in Plasma? I've tried a few kwin scripts with no luck, for example: - Grid-Tiling - Krohnkite - Tiling Extension The best I've tried so far is the last one, but can be too unstable... What is your experience about it? -- -- Sergio B

Re: Anyone using Tiled windows on Plasma out there ?

El mar., 14 jul. 2020 a las 17:06, Robert-André Mauchin () escribió: > On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 19:42:17 CEST Sergio Belkin wrote: > > What is the better option to to get tiled windows in Plasma? > > > > I've tried a few kwin scripts with no luck, for exam

Re: Anyone using Tiled windows on Plasma out there ?

El mar., 14 jul. 2020 a las 17:06, Robert-André Mauchin () escribió: > On Tuesday, 14 July 2020 19:42:17 CEST Sergio Belkin wrote: > > I've never heard about Krohnkite, nor Tiling Extension? Where is it > available? > > > Krohnkite is available here https://github.c

Re: Anyone using Tiled windows on Plasma out there ?

El mar., 14 jul. 2020 a las 18:17, John Florian () escribió: > On 2020-07-14 13:42, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > What is the better option to to get tiled windows in Plasma? > > I've tried a few kwin scripts with no luck, for example: > > - Grid-Tiling > - Krohnkite >

Re: Anyone using Tiled windows on Plasma out there ?

gt; happy in the WM serving me rather than the other way around. :-) > > > John Florian > LoL I have set "focus follows mouse" Actually what I find most useful is an hybrid approach. I mean, tiled windows, but sometimes I need to focus on only one windows and to maximize i

Re: Anyone using Tiled windows on Plasma out there ?

El jue., 16 jul. 2020 a las 15:14, John Florian () escribió: > On 2020-07-16 13:59, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > > > El jue., 16 jul. 2020 a las 12:22, John Florian () > escribió: > >> In any case, the few hassles I encounter are so much less time demanding >>

Re: vim has lost it's damn mind

ists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > ht

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: swap on zram

El lun., 6 jul. 2020 a las 18:15, Samuel Sieb () escribió: > On 7/6/20 1:48 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > At > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SwapOnZRAM#Why_systemd_zram-generator.3F > > it says: > > > > "Do not create swap partition/LV

Question mainline kernel on Fedora

Hi folks I've found that Fedora provides mainline kernel to download. Is mainline a release candidate? I wonder if use that version is somewhat risky... What do you think? Correct me if I am wrong. Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV

Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora

2012/3/23 Michal Schmidt : > Dne 23.3.2012 16:24, Sergio Belkin napsal(a): > >> I've found that Fedora provides mainline kernel to download. Is >> mainline a release candidate? I wonder if use that version is somewhat >> risky... > > > What exactly are you ta

Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora

2012/3/23 Adam Williamson : > On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: >> Dne 23.3.2012 17:23, Sergio Belkin napsal(a): >> > Sorry I explained it bad, I'm talking about that latest release >> > available of kernel  for f16 is kernel-3.3.0-4.fc16.

Re: Question mainline kernel on Fedora

2012/3/23 Reindl Harald : > > Am 23.03.2012 19:00, schrieb Konstantin Ryabitsev: >> On Fri, 2012-03-23 at 17:46 +0100, Michal Schmidt wrote: >>> http://kernel.org/faq/#stablekernels >> >> I'm pretty sure that FAQ entry is a bit outdated by now, too. Basically, >> if it came from linux-stable.git an

Torque support in openmpi package

version - Build against libtorque But I think that torque support was removed somewhen I've found this too: http://www.mailinglistarchive.com/html/torqueus...@supercluster.org/2009-12/msg00167.html Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk

Re: Fwd: Broken upgrade path(s) detected for: yaml-cpp

com/2010/06/01/fedora-package-maintainers-want-test-results/ is that right? I've run: autoqa-optin UpTools F-15 Tell me if I'm wrong TIA -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

FSF address fix and timestamps

think? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin  http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: FSF address fix and timestamps

2012/6/20 Michael Schwendt : > On Wed, 20 Jun 2012 13:59:26 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> Hi Fedora community, >> >> I know that I can fix the new address of sources files with sed >> (http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging_tricks#Wrong_FSF_address).  I >>

How long can a package be in pending status?

Hi, Just I am somewhat surprised that I submitted package cdw for testing and still is in status (I remember in previous updates that in a few hours it went to testing) . It's not a reproach, only a question, if something is wrong... Thanks in advance... -- -- Sergio Belkin

Re: How long can a package be in pending status?

2012/6/24 Michael Schwendt : > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:09:34 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Just I am somewhat surprised that I submitted package cdw for testing >> and still is in status In Pending status I meant :) (I remember in previous updates tha

Re: How long can a package be in pending status?

2012/6/25 Dennis Gilmore : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 18:49:54 -0300 > Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> 2012/6/24 Michael Schwendt : >> > On Sun, 24 Jun 2012 14:09:34 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: >> > >> >&g

NetworkManager "forget" user network configurations: bug or feature?

settings and not "happily" send them to trash. But what do you think? What is the rationale of saving user configurations in the /etc directory? What do you think? -- Sergio Belkin Certificado Linux LPIC-2 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedorap

Re: NetworkManager "forget" user network configurations: bug or feature?

2014-03-25 16:20 GMT-03:00 Adam Williamson : > On Tue, 2014-03-25 at 16:19 -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > Hi Fedora folks, > > > > Since NetworkManager I suffer the same issue, release after release, ok, > > it's not a Fedora issue > > > > If I pre

Re: NetworkManager "forget" user network configurations: bug or feature?

El 26/03/14 12:45, Stephen John Smoogen escribió: On 25 March 2014 13:53, Sergio Belkin <mailto:seb...@gmail.com>> wrote: Adam, I've found that by default when I create a user, the checkbox in NetworkManager that says "All users may connect to this

kdenlive and ffmpeg

er did not produce proper pts, making some up. And I have to send a signal to term the process... The Screen grab works fine... any ideas? Thanks in advance -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject

Half-OT: Secure boot and thirdy party kernel modules

he virtualbox kernel module, or should I recompile the entire kernel and sign it? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fe

Re: Half-OT: Secure boot and thirdy party kernel modules

tion acts as > a barrier because it does not provide access to "real" ring 0 on the host. > It sounds reasonable, but it doesn't really match Microsoft's wording I > quoted above (from a public blog post). > > > -- > Florian Weimer / Red Hat Product Security > -- > dev

Cannot install Fedora 23 from iso file

edhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1284187 In the mean time, please could you tell me that if a grub2 misconfiguration in 40_custom file? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedo

Re: Cannot install Fedora 23 from iso file

Well, I think that I've found the solution: the problem was that iso fiile was in the very root partition, because of that, Liveinst refused to unmount it. I've verified moving iso file to another partition and this error went away. HTH 2015-11-21 15:53 GMT-03:00 Sergio Belkin : &

About /dev/console!

Hi, What is used /dev/console! file for (note exclamation mark) ? Thanks in advance! -- -- Sergio Belkin http://www.sergiobelkin.com Watch More TV http://sebelk.blogspot.com LPIC-2 Certified - http://www.lpi.org -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https

Re: About /dev/console!

2013/4/27 Nico Kadel-Garcia > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Sergio Belkin wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> What is used /dev/console! file for (note exclamation mark) ? >> >> Thanks in advance! >> >> > > It's documented, type "man consol

Re: About /dev/console!

2013/4/27 Richard W.M. Jones > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 06:56:03PM -0300, Sergio Belkin wrote: > > 2013/4/27 Nico Kadel-Garcia > > > On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 1:14 PM, Sergio Belkin > wrote: > > >> What is used /dev/console! file for (note exclamation mark) ?

  1   2   >