Re: Suggestion to end support for legacy 1024-bit RSA root CAs in Fedora stable

On 08/19/2016 09:54 AM, Kai Engert wrote: > On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 09:45 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> However, pre-release Fedora is different from released Fedoras in that the >> updates-testing repo is enabled by default on them. This means that if you >> push >>

Re: Suggestion to end support for legacy 1024-bit RSA root CAs in Fedora stable

On 08/19/2016 09:20 AM, Kai Engert wrote: > On Fri, 2016-08-19 at 09:01 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> With my FESCo hat on, I'd be in favor of landing this in updates-testing >> immediately. Then folks who install the Alpha will get it in their first >> update >

Re: Suggestion to end support for legacy 1024-bit RSA root CAs in Fedora stable

On 08/19/2016 08:54 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 08/19/2016 02:38 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On 08/19/2016 08:29 AM, Kai Engert wrote: >>> On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 22:29 -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>>> Beta sounds a bit late to be introducing such a change

Re: Suggestion to end support for legacy 1024-bit RSA root CAs in Fedora stable

On 08/19/2016 08:46 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 8:38 AM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: >> On 08/19/2016 08:29 AM, Kai Engert wrote: >>> On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 22:29 -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >>>> Beta sounds a bit late to be intro

Re: Suggestion to end support for legacy 1024-bit RSA root CAs in Fedora stable

On 08/19/2016 08:29 AM, Kai Engert wrote: > On Thu, 2016-08-18 at 22:29 -0400, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: >> Beta sounds a bit late to be introducing such a change unilaterally. >> Should this not be going through FESCo at this point? > > Then I suggest that we make the change immediately for Fedora

Re: Kernel 4.7 rebase plans

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 08/15/2016 11:52 AM, Justin Forbes wrote: | As a follow up, we are aware that the nvidia driver does not currently work | with the 4.7 kernel. Nvidia is aware, and given their history of monthly | releases, I expect they will have a working release

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-08-12)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-08-12) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 16:01:05 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-08-12/fesco

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-08-12)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at ~ http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: ~ date -d '20

Re: Introduction and help with comps.xml

On 08/10/2016 10:38 AM, Geoffrey Marr wrote: > Hi everyone, > > My name is Geoff Marr and I am recently new (May) to Fedora. I have several > years of Linux experience before that, starting with Mandrake Linux 9 back in > '03. I also have a background in electronics engineering and since I have >

Re: Orphaned packages seeking new point of contact

> On Jul 29, 2016, at 7:34 PM, Athmane Madjoudj > wrote: > > Hi, > >> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> libuv (el6) >> libuv (epel7) >> libuv (f23) >> libuv (f24) >> libuv (f25) >> libuv (master) > > I took libuv since I have a pkg that depends on it. > > @sgallagh: Yo

Re: F25 Self Contained Change: Node.js 6.x

On 07/22/2016 12:40 PM, Sérgio Basto wrote: > Can you built it on copr for F24 and F23 ? I'd like to try it > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/nodejs-sig/nodejs-lts/ Note: this is just libuv and the nodejs interpreter. Since it's a compatibility-breaking upgrade, no guarantees tha

Initiating non-responsive maintainer process for T.C. Hollingsworth

For a long time, T.C. did excellent work maintaining the Node.js stack and pushing for real JavaScript guidelines in Fedora. Unfortunately, he has been unreachable for over a year now. The most recent activity I can find for him anywhere on the Internet is Mar 2015 (here on the devel list). I very

Re: jQuery

On 07/21/2016 09:02 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Hi, > > Is there chance that somebody more familiar with JS than me would update > jQuery in Fedora? It would be nice to have jQuery 3.x as well. Or should > I do the update myself? > > I am asking since I need to update rubygem-jquery-rails, which req

Retiring python-slimit in Rawhide

Upstream is dead (website is gone), it hasn't seen a release in over three years and nothing in Fedora relies on it anymore. signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproj

Re: notion of base or minimal image

On 07/19/2016 07:32 AM, Nikos Mavrogiannopoulos wrote: > Hi, > Is there some notion or definition of a Fedora minimal or base image? > I couldn't find some documentation on that. I would like to modify some > script which a package on the critical path depends on, from bash to > perl and I would l

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-07-15)

On 07/16/2016 05:33 AM, Björn Persson wrote: > Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: >> On 07/15/2016 05:19 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> >>>* AGREED: FESCo approves KillUserProcess=yes by default with the >>> steps sgallagh has proposed in the ticket (+7, 0, 0) (jwb, >>> 17:04:58) >> >> "Tier 1 packages

Re: F25 System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default

On 07/07/2016 08:13 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: KillUserProcesses=yes by default = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KillUserProcesses_by_default > > Change owner(s): > * Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek Copying my response from https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/

Re: F25 change update: new storaged just landed in Rawhide

On 07/14/2016 04:56 AM, Tomáš Smetana wrote: > On Wed, 13 Jul 2016 08:43:33 -0500 > Michael Catanzaro wrote: > >> On Wed, 2016-07-13 at 11:43 +0200, Tomáš Smetana wrote: >>> Hello, >>> Just a heads-up: I have just build the 2.6.2 version of storaged >>> that should >>> replace udisks2 in Fedora

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-06-17)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-06-17) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 16:01:03 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-06-17/fes

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-06-17)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '20

Re: i686 failures

On 06/16/2016 03:16 PM, Christopher wrote: > I'm trying to revive rpms/hadoop, but am running into some failures[1] on i686 > in koji that I cannot reproduce locally in x86_64. The thing is... I don't > really have any good 32-bit environment to test this locally. Hadoop isn't > really suitable for

Re: Why GUI software update tool is broken for me

On 06/15/2016 03:46 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > I don't understand the technical reason for the 1st reboot. The > substantial risk for updates is the user environment. If that's killed > off even multi-user.target is far less risk to do updates in. But I > don't see why system-update.target can't be

Re: Why GUI software update tool is broken for me

On 06/15/2016 02:36 PM, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 11:15 AM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: >> On 06/15/2016 01:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: >>> On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 12:31 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>>> Of course, this comes with its own

Re: Why GUI software update tool is broken for me

On 06/15/2016 12:31 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > The justification for restarting both before and after installation exists and > it does make some sense in certain circumstances. > > Basically, the problem is that any number of things can change in the state of > th

Re: Why GUI software update tool is broken for me

On 06/15/2016 01:09 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 12:31 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> Of course, this comes with its own headaches, since of course if you >> are using >> an encrypted drive, you need to enter your password twice: once to >> s

Re: Why GUI software update tool is broken for me

On 06/15/2016 12:41 PM, Russell Doty wrote: > Note that the original poster says that he runs dnf -update from the > command line because it allows him to do what he wants. > > Based on the information discussed in this thread, shouldn't dnf also > force a reboot before updates? > > We have an ob

Re: Why GUI software update tool is broken for me

On 06/15/2016 12:27 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > One thing that might make this less annoying to people would be ability > to schedule the reboot for some off hours time (2am or something) and > also ability (for gnome at least) to restore apps/windows/session > again on login. > Scheduling the rebo

Re: Why GUI software update tool is broken for me

On 06/15/2016 11:39 AM, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Wednesday, June 15, 2016 17:29:02 Miroslav Suchý wrote: >> Dne 15.6.2016 v 10:14 Ade napsal(a): >>> Why is this? Well some time ago the behaviour of the tool changed and now >>> the only way to proceed is to click in "Restart and Install" and this is

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

On 06/02/2016 11:36 AM, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > On 06/02/2016 03:13 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> I don't think we need to change Fedora 24 for this. Unless I misunderstood, >> this >> systemd change has not been pushed to Fedora 24 (nor proposed for it).

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

On 06/02/2016 11:01 AM, Ray Strode wrote: > Hi, > > On Wed, Jun 1, 2016 at 10:58 AM, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> Leaking session processes have been a perennial problem that >> we have been battling forever (gconf, ibus, pulseaudio, the list goes >> on...). And they are causing actual problems, fro

Re: systemd 230 change - KillUserProcesses defaults to yes

On 06/01/2016 02:19 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 05/27/2016 12:45 PM, Christopher wrote: >> >> It seems to me that what's happening is that systemd is now enforcing this >> "login session" perspective... metaphorically speaking, gluing the >> transparent >> overlay onto the map (but don't wor

Re: F25 Self Contained Change: Replace UDisks2 by Storaged

On 05/13/2016 03:34 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: On Fri, 2016-05-13 at 13:01 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: CCing the desktop list, but please keep replies on the Fedora devel list. At today's FESCo meeting[1], we raised several questions that we would like to have answered about this c

Re: F25 Self Contained Change: Replace UDisks2 by Storaged

On 04/14/2016 10:50 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: = Proposed Self Contained Change: Replace UDisks2 by Storaged = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Replace_UDisks2_by_Storaged Change owner(s): * Peter Hatina * Tomáš Smetana Storaged extends UDisks2 API by exporting several enterprise features (in

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-05-13)

=== #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-05-13) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 16:06:22 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-05-13/fesco.2016-05-13-16.06.log.html . Meeting summary

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-05-13)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '20

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

On 05/12/2016 07:46 PM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 5:29 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> On 05/12/2016 07:14 AM, Parag Nemade wrote: >>> >>> I will suggest /etc/package.repos.d that way we can be more neutral in >>> having repos directory using various different packaging formats. >>

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Use /etc/distro.repos.d as default reposdir

On 05/12/2016 11:52 AM, Mike Chambers wrote: > On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 13:57 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> /etc/repos.d is less typing. > > +1 > > Or better yet, just /etc/repos? > The .d suffix is a meaningful distinction. It denotes a drop-in directory (where anything placed in it is mea

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-05-06)

yer (jwb) - F23/F24 Dennis Gilmore (dgilmore) - F23/F24 Haïkel Guémar (hguemar) - F23/F24 Stephen Gallagher (sgallagh) - F23/F24 signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-05-06)

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 16:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-05-06 16:00 UTC' Links to all tickets below c

Re: Policy change on emulators

On 05/04/2016 05:20 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote: > > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 8:55 PM, Tom Callaway > wrote: > > Some emulators (applications which emulate another platform) are not > permitted for inclusion in Fedora. These rules will help you determine >

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

On 05/02/2016 03:35 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: The reason for not having mass rebuild during F25 development cycle is very tight schedule for F25 and we would like to avoid slips in F25 as much as possible. That is the main motivation here. >>> In other words sacrificing quality for m

Re: No mass rebuild in Fedora 25

On 05/02/2016 09:12 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 05/02/2016 02:16 PM, Jan Kurik wrote: > >> The reason for not having mass rebuild during F25 development cycle is >> very tight schedule for F25 and we would like to avoid slips in F25 as >> much as possible. That is the main motivation here. > In

RE: Plans for Node.js 6.x

Sent from my Galaxy Tab® S2 Original message From: drago01 Date: 5/1/2016 12:00 PM (GMT-05:00) To: Development discussions related to Fedora Subject: Re: Plans for Node.js 6.x On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 4:00 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > OK folks, it's Bad Decis

[Testing Needed] Node.js downgraded to 4.x LTS in Fedora 24

As previously discussed on the fedora-devel list, the Node.js SIG has elected to downgrade Node.js to the 4.x long-term-support branch rather than ship with the 5.x new-feature branch due to its support lifecycle ending this summer. I have just bumped epoch and built the new 4.x package in Fedora

Re: Plans for Node.js 6.x

On 04/27/2016 02:20 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 09:18:44AM -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> From https://github.com/nodejs/LTS#lts_schedule it looks like non-LTS >> branches >> are maintained for about 9 months, while LTS releases are maintai

Re: Plans for Node.js 6.x

On 04/27/2016 10:00 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:54 AM, Stephen John Smoogen > wrote: >> On 26 April 2016 at 22:00, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> OK folks, it's Bad Decision Time. >>> >> >>> I realize this is inopportune, but

Re: Plans for Node.js 6.x

On 04/27/2016 09:25 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 9:18 AM, Stephen Gallagher > wrote: >> On 04/27/2016 09:04 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: >>> On 27/04/16 13:59, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> >>>> Would it be possible to try a nodejs 6.x build of ever

Re: Plans for Node.js 6.x

On 04/27/2016 09:10 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 1:54 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Denise Dumas wrote: >>> Sounds like a job for rhscl :-) >> >> Maybe? >> >> Having nodejs in an SCL (or eventually module) would certainly help >> with versioning

Re: Plans for Node.js 6.x

On 04/27/2016 09:04 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 27/04/16 13:59, Neal Gompa wrote: > >> Would it be possible to try a nodejs 6.x build of everything in a >> side-tag or something? My understanding (based on the changelog) is >> that things should generally work, as while the ABI broke, most of the >

Re: Plans for Node.js 6.x

On 04/27/2016 09:07 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: As for Option 1)? I think someone with more knowledge of the individual modules in Fedora (Tom Hughes? Jared Smith?) would need to figure out how many modules would be broken if we downgraded. If it's sufficiently small, I sup

Re: Plans for Node.js 6.x

On 04/27/2016 08:59 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 8:54 AM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2016 at 7:38 AM, Denise Dumas wrote: >>> Sounds like a job for rhscl :-) >> >> Maybe? >> >> Having nodejs in an SCL (or eventually module) would certainly help >> with versioning issu

Re: Plans for Node.js 6.x

On 04/27/2016 04:19 AM, Tom Hughes wrote: > On 27/04/16 03:00, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> As for Option 1)? I think someone with more knowledge of the individual >> modules >> in Fedora (Tom Hughes? Jared Smith?) would need to figure out how many >> mo

Plans for Node.js 6.x

OK folks, it's Bad Decision Time. Today, Node.js 6.0 was released. This is a significant ABI-breaking release, which means there is no guarantee that existing modules will work with it at all.[1] Better still, Node.js 5.x is only going to be supported until sometime this summer, because they're

Re: Fedora 24 Beta blocker bug status mail

On 04/18/2016 05:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > 3. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262556 - anaconda - MODIFIED >AttributeError: 'NoneType' object has no attribute 'get_data' (when >wifi scan run and AP which does not broadcast SSID is in range) > > This ought to be fixed in

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-04-08)

On 04/08/2016 12:30 AM, Parag Nemade wrote: > Hi, >Please note that I feel only one ticket is there in this week that > need discussion. If any other existing open ticket need to be > discussed then we can discuss that in the meeting but I am adding only > one new ticket on the Agenda of this m

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On 04/06/2016 04:49 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote: >> "PP" == Petr Pisar writes: > > PP> This changes meaning regarding to F25. Previous text banned rich > PP> strong dependencies in F24 only. This current text extends the ban > PP> to all Fedoras. > > PP> Is that intentional? > > It's cur

Re: comps advice needed for systemd-{udev,container}

On 04/04/2016 04:28 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > On Mon, 2016-04-04 at 16:20 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> All that said, for F24 I think @standard is probably the right place >> for >> systemd-udev. But I think comps needs to be completely rethought in >> F

Re: two identical package

On 04/04/2016 03:30 PM, Ilia Gradina wrote: > Hi all, in Fedora have two packages: > 1. https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rubygem-connection-pool > and > 2. https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/rubygem-connection_pool How delete > my > file in Fedora: > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/pack

Re: comps advice needed for systemd-{udev,container}

On 04/04/2016 12:10 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to move two systemd subpackages from the the @core group, > but I don't know where to move them to. > > systemd-udev must be installed on "real hardware", so it must be > part of Workstation, Server, Cloud, and any spin

Re: No Rich boolean deps in Requires/Recommends for f24

On 04/01/2016 02:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > Greetings. > > Recently FPC oked the use of rich boolean deps. However, we have run > into an issue where the tools used to push updates are not able to > correctly handle these new dependencies. > > At today's FESCo meeting we decided to ask maintain

Re: Node.js 5.9.0 coming to Rawhide next week

On 03/23/2016 09:49 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > Next week, I plan to upgrade Node.js from the 4.x LTS branch to the 5.x stable > branch in Rawhide. This upgrade does break backwards-compatibility and thus > will > need re-testing of modules. Also, all native NPMs (those that ar

Node.js 5.9.0 coming to Rawhide next week

Next week, I plan to upgrade Node.js from the 4.x LTS branch to the 5.x stable branch in Rawhide. This upgrade does break backwards-compatibility and thus will need re-testing of modules. Also, all native NPMs (those that are built with architecture-specific packages rather than noarch) will need t

Re: F24 broken dependencies

On 03/22/2016 08:16 AM, Jan Synacek wrote: > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 12:46 PM, José Matos wrote: >> On Tuesday, March 22, 2016 12:13:47 PM WET Jan Synacek wrote: >>> Currently, it's not possible to update from F23 to F24 because of >>> broken dependencies. >>> >>> # dnf update --releasever=24 --be

Best practices for splitting off a directory to a new partition

During a recent Fedora Server SIG meeting where we were discussing the default filesystem layout (if you just let Anaconda automatically create partitions), there was a lot of talk about how certain directories such as /var/log or /var/www/html, etc. are often split off into their own partitions at

Re: Self Introduction: Jun Aruga

On 03/08/2016 09:05 AM, Jun Aruga wrote: > Hi, Fedora developers! > > My name is Jun Aruga. > I live in Brno, Czech Republic, working in Red Hat. > > I mainly have lived in open source world over than 10 years. > I worked as a Software Engineer in Japan for a long time, and in Singapore > for 3

Re: glibc in Fedora rawhide now split by langpacks.

On 03/05/2016 07:13 PM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: > On Sunday, 28 February 2016 at 23:31, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> >>> On Feb 28, 2016, at 5:08 PM, Lars Seipel wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Stephen Gall

Re: Please update Rygel in F23 ?

On 03/03/2016 04:59 PM, linux guy wrote: > I'm not sure this is the right venue to ask, but... could someone build the > latest version of Rygel and put it in the repos ? Currently the repos have > 0.28.2-1. I think the latest available from git is 0.29.2. > > I need it because I helped troub

Re: [HELP NEEDED] LUA expert to help convert fedora-release %post scripts

On 03/03/2016 02:39 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> I'm attaching the current fedora-release.spec and convert-to-edition bash >> script >> for perusal. > > I'm attaching a lightly tested Lua conversion. I'

Re: [HELP NEEDED] LUA expert to help convert fedora-release %post scripts

On 03/03/2016 10:55 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Stephen Gallagher: > >> On 03/03/2016 10:22 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: >>> On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>> >>>> So what I am looking for is someone who is fluent in LUA to help me co

Re: [HELP NEEDED] LUA expert to help convert fedora-release %post scripts

On 03/03/2016 10:22 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 03/03/2016 04:00 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > >> So what I am looking for is someone who is fluent in LUA to help me convert >> these scripts over so that they can run entirely under the built-in LUA >> interpreter o

[HELP NEEDED] LUA expert to help convert fedora-release %post scripts

md/system-preset/ %{_prefix}/lib/systemd/system-preset/85-display-manager.preset %{_prefix}/lib/systemd/system-preset/90-default.preset %{_prefix}/lib/systemd/system-preset/99-default-disable.preset /usr/sbin/convert-to-edition %files cloud %{!?_licensedir:%global license %%doc} %license LICENSE

Re: glibc in Fedora rawhide now split by langpacks.

> On Feb 28, 2016, at 5:08 PM, Lars Seipel wrote: > >> On Fri, Feb 26, 2016 at 08:56:27AM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> Yeah, I think the best approach would be to have all the langpacks offer a >> virtual Provides: glibc-langpack and have the main package Require

Re: glibc in Fedora rawhide now split by langpacks.

On 02/26/2016 08:39 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 26.2.2016 v 11:20 Carlos O'Donell napsal(a): >> No languages are available by default, we did this because otherwise >> you keep carrying forward locales that you can't remove. > > For this reasons we have weak dependencies. I guess that: > Rec

Re: three questions: f24 branch, python3 default, where to put /etc/rsyslog.d/gluster.conf.example

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/24/2016 10:41 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said: >>> Yeah, this is because the Samba and FreeIPA packages didn't quite >>> finish their python 3 conversion in time. By F25, we should be able to >>> avoid ship

Orphaning python-django-haystack and python-django-pipeline in Fedora

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I no longer need these packages in Fedora (they were there to support Review Board which is now only in EPEL due to Django incompatibilities), so I've orphaned them. I will continue to maintain them on EPEL 7. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: Gn

Re: three questions: f24 branch, python3 default, where to put /etc/rsyslog.d/gluster.conf.example

On 02/24/2016 09:58 AM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote: On 02/24/2016 09:45 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On 02/24/2016 09:30 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: 1) usually after the branch I build new packages for rawhide (i.e. $branch+1). But atm in the master branch, a `fedpkg build` gives me Could

Re: three questions: f24 branch, python3 default, where to put /etc/rsyslog.d/gluster.conf.example

On 02/24/2016 09:30 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: 1) usually after the branch I build new packages for rawhide (i.e. $branch+1). But atm in the master branch, a `fedpkg build` gives me Could not execute build: Package glusterfs-3.7.8-1.fc24 has already been built Am I just too early? Or is the

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2016-02-12)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2016-02-12) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 17:00:19 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2016-02-12/fesco.2

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-02-12)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2016-

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: System Python

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/08/2016 12:45 PM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Mon, 2016-02-08 at 17:21 +0100, Petr Viktorin wrote: >> Part of the change is defining the exact subset. The idea is that it >> should be small, to keep cloud images small for apps that don't use >>

Re: Intent to orphan shorewall

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/08/2016 08:31 AM, Raphael Groner wrote: > You should not orphan packages in rawhide, not cause of "not used any > more". Check upstream for activity and users. What about future security > patches? To retire shorewall is obviously a bad idea. I w

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-02-05)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 FESCo meeting did not have quorum this week. All discussion items are postponed to the next meeting. -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iEYEARECAAYFAla0190ACgkQeiVVYja6o6P4TwCcD8HHknY2rMDEU3JRwiXiBpU6 54IAoIly7kzVZFfRc/7Anx+emqn85GN2 =LO+

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-02-05)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. NOTE: due to DevConf.cz, we may not have quorum and these may be discussed next week instead. To convert UTC to yo

Re: PATH contains at build time

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/03/2016 09:35 AM, Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2016-02-02, Florian Weimer wrote: >> May packages assume that /usr/sbin is on PATH when they are built? >> >> If you need a program which is currently only in /usr/sbin, should a >> package use an absol

Re: Unannounced soname bump: libpsl

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 02/01/2016 10:02 PM, John Dulaney wrote: > >> >> This is the hazard of using %{_libdir}/*.so.* in %files. Is there any >> reason why such a syntax should NOT be formally discouraged in the >> packaging gui

Re: F24 System Wide Change: LiveUserCreator as Primary Downloadable

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/27/2016 08:40 AM, Martin Bříza wrote: > On Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:35:56 +0100, Josh Boyer > wrote: > >> On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 8:30 AM, Jan Kurik wrote: >>> The correct name for this Change is "LiveUSBCreator as Primary >>> Downloadable" instea

Re: nss_myhostname as default in Fedora

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/22/2016 01:06 PM, Florian Weimer wrote: > On 01/21/2016 11:18 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > >> PS - There is some other discussion around "mymachines" which seems much >> more problematic. I'd like to just focus on myhostname for now. The >> gl

Re: Embedding javascript in binary

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/20/2016 10:18 AM, Sander Hoentjen wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently packaging dnsdist[1][2]. This is a binary that has a > httpserver built-in, and the html, css and js files embedded in the > binary. The javascript files are jquery and a few othe

Re: F24 side tag deadline

> On Jan 18, 2016, at 6:58 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > Hi All, > > With the mass rebuild for f24 coming up, all side tags need to be completed > and merged back into f24 by the end of Business on Tuesday January 26th. > The Node.js work is nearly done. We made a lot of progress on Friday

Re: Packages that remove the egg-info

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/14/2016 02:25 PM, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote: > During a Package Review I was doing on a python package, Kevin > Kofler joined the conversation to point out that was wrong to > suggest that the python packages should remove the egg-info > p

Re: is there a reason for starting zookeeper.service in background?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/11/2016 08:06 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > hi, > > in fedora's zookeeper service < > /usr/lib/systemd/system/zookeeper.service we have the following > line > > ExecStart=/usr/bin/zkServer.sh start zoo.cfg > > why not > > ExecStart=/usr/bin/zkS

Re: Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2016-01-08)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/08/2016 11:03 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the > FESCo meeting Friday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://

Re: ca-legacy

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 01/06/2016 11:23 AM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > Hi, > > Is any important software (e.g. openssl, gnutls, glib-networking, > Qt) in Fedora still relying on our legacy 1024-bit root RSA > certificates? > > I believe Fedora is currently the only dist

[INPUT REQUESTED] Fedora Policy on generated code

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Please keep responses on the devel@ list. CCed to the Council list for visibility and discussion of how this fits with our "Freedom" foundation. == Premise == Some upstream distribute tarballs that include code and content that has been generated at

Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-12-09)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 === #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2015-12-09) === Meeting started by sgallagh at 18:00:29 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2015-12-09/fesco.2

Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-12-09)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '20

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Node.js 4.2

h rubygem-therubyracer, if we can convince it >>> to run with recent v8 or what else have to be done? The same >>> applies for MongoDB if I am not mistaken. >> Stephen Gallagher built nodejs 4.2.2 in the side tag last night, >> but using a bundled v8 so it shouldn'

Re: Some analysis on the size of the minimal and Server installs of Fedora 23

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/25/2015 07:00 AM, Peter Robinson wrote: >> I think in my ideal world, we would have Cockpit become capable >> of interacting with PackageKit so that it could install whatever >> portions of the system the admin wanted to manage on demand, >> rath

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Systemd package split

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/19/2015 09:04 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 10:28:25PM +, Richard W.M. Jones > wrote: >> On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 05:32:02PM +0100, Jan Kurik wrote: >>> * systemd-udev.rpm will consist of systemd-udevd, udeva

Re: F24 System Wide Change: Systemd file triggers

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 11/19/2015 08:00 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > On Wed, Nov 18, 2015 at 09:43:17PM -0600, Jason L Tibbitts III > wrote: >>> "ZJ" == Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek >>> writes: >> >> ZJ> Sure I'm happy to coordinate. I wrote up the Ch

<    5   6   7   8   9   10   11   12   13   14   >