Re: Intention to take over orphaned packages: php-aws-sdk3, php-ralouphie-getallheaders, php-guzzlehttp-guzzle6

> On 04/24/2024 4:21 PM CEST Remi Collet wrote: > > I can probably help for PHP reviews Thank you, appreciated! > Notice: > > - php-ralouphie-getallheaders: this is a compat layer providing a > missing function in PHP < 7.3 for php-fpm users > > Please check you really still need it ;)

Re: Intention to take over orphaned packages: php-aws-sdk3, php-ralouphie-getallheaders, php-guzzlehttp-guzzle6

Le 24/04/2024 à 11:41, domi...@wombacher.cc a écrit : I'm not in the packager group yet and looking for a Sponsor to completed the onboarding process. Afterwards I want to become the maintainer of the orphaned packages php-aws-sdk3 [1], php-ralouphie-getallheaders [2] and php-guzzlehttp

Intention to take over orphaned packages: php-aws-sdk3, php-ralouphie-getallheaders, php-guzzlehttp-guzzle6

Hi everyone, I'm not in the packager group yet and looking for a Sponsor to completed the onboarding process. Afterwards I want to become the maintainer of the orphaned packages php-aws-sdk3 [1], php-ralouphie-getallheaders [2] and php-guzzlehttp-guzzle6 [3]. My main motivation is to keep

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Michel Lind venit, vidit, dixit 2024-04-12 21:59:42: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 07:59:46AM -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote: > > Regarding libteam, the author of the package is the maintainer, email in > > bugzilla is different than the one on the project. I wonder if Jiro just > > missed

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainersStatus Change

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 07:59:46AM -0700, Carlos Rodriguez-Fernandez wrote: > Regarding libteam, the author of the package is the maintainer, email in > bugzilla is different than the one on the project. I wonder if Jiro just > missed the notification that his package is failing to build in F40. >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 09:09:31AM -0500, Maxwell G wrote: > Report started at 2024-04-12 13:04:40 UTC > libteam orphan 0 weeks > ago > > The following packages require above mentioned packages: > Depending on: libteam (56), status change:

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainersStatus Change container-workflow-tool

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainersStatus Change

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Hi, sorry for the late response, have been a bit busy recently... Yes, we should remove botan (1) from Fedora - that has also been a request by upstream. The point is, I want to keep monotone, and it needs a bit of work to switch it over to botan2. There exists a branch that should have the

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

https://botan.randombit.net/handbook/support.html#branch-support-status can be referenced in the retirement commit: Branch First Release End of Active Development End of Life Botan 1.8 2008-12-08 2010-08-31 2016-02-13 Botan 1.10 2011-06-20 2012-07-10 2018-12-31 (Though 1.11.x also

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Thu, Apr 4, 2024 at 12:51 AM Sandro wrote: > On 03-04-2024 18:35, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > I took botan [...] > I guess that was a bad idea - so I have re-orphaned it after some detailed discussions with @penguinpee in #devel. He also helped to decouple monotone from ikiwiki in

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 03-04-2024 18:35, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: I took botan as a penance for my sins in the previous thread  haha  הַלְּלוּ־יָהּ  Thanks! -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

I took botan as a penance for my sins in the previous thread ;-) haha  -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 27. 03. 24 16:03, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:46 PM Miro Hrončok > wrote: On 25. 03. 24 7:48, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > Also botan got orphaned despite the FTI going away >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:46 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 25. 03. 24 7:48, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: > > Also botan got orphaned despite the FTI going away > > [1] ;-( > > Could it be un-orphaned back? > > > [1] Seems FTI failed to close the

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 25. 03. 24 7:48, Jens-Ulrik Petersen wrote: Also botan got orphaned despite the FTI going away [1] ;-( Could it be un-orphaned back? Yes, by clicking the *Take* button. [1] Seems FTI failed to close the bug fixed on 2024-03-07 It

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Also botan got orphaned despite the FTI going away [1] ;-( Could it be un-orphaned back? I really don't need another package, but if no one is willing to pick it up, I can sit on it to prevent breaking monotone and ikiwiki, and above... >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 12:22 AM Maxwell G wrote: > botan orphan 0 weeks > ago Is botan1 still considered safe? Perhaps the python which causes the FTI apparently could be removed? Of course we have botan2 (but not botan3) in Fedora... (I

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

(NOTE: Some packages in this report were already retired in distgit but still show up in the orphaned packages list due to https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12028) Report started at 2024-03-21 16:05:32 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 2024-03-21 09:22, Maxwell G wrote: gnome-shell-extension-freon orphan 2 weeks ago I've picked this up. Cheers Davide -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

(NOTE: Some packages in this report were already retired in distgit but still show up in the orphaned packages list due to https://pagure.io/releng/issue/12028) Report started at 2024-03-21 16:05:32 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 13 Feb 2024, at 03:11, Maxwell G wrote: > >Package (co)maintainers Status > Change > > 3proxy orphan 0 weeks > ago

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Am 21.02.24 um 18:50 schrieb Maxwell G: Report started at 2024-02-21 17:04:45 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at 5:50 PM Maxwell G wrote: > > Report started at 2024-02-21 17:04:45 UTC > > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

in the left column on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ Full report available at: https://a.gtmx.me/orphans/orphans.txt grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. For human readable dependency chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

in the left column on https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ Full report available at: https://a.gtmx.me/orphans/orphans.txt grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. For human readable dependency chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainersStatus Change

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers -- ___ devel-announce mailing list -- devel-announce@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

ble at: > https://a.gtmx.me/orphans/orphans.txt > grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. > > For human readable dependency chains, > see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ > For all orphaned packages, > see https://packager-dashboard.fedorapro

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

I want to retake fbf-mukti-fonts and uniol-fonts of which i am the upstream developer. I have lost my membership in packager group and I could not log in the pkg maintenance systtem  On Monday, 25 December, 2023 at 05:10:57 pm IST, Neal Gompa wrote: On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 6:34 AM

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

git Pagure, e.g. look left at here: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rubygem-rails-deprecated_sanitizer These days, I am not sure if orphaned packages are the right start. They could be, but generally, it is good to start with package which is close to your heart, something you use. Vít I

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Hello James, I started some months ago as a maintainer and I have been learning since then. One important thing I've learned is to ask if "this package should be kept or should it be retired?" If you want to start to contribute, you can send PRs bumping or fixing opened bugs first, and I can

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Hi All, I am not sponsored into the packager group yet, but I would like to begin by maintaining a package that is on this list as "orphaned" however, it is very difficult to understand which package(s) might be suitable for a newcomer like me. Any help, advice, or suggested package would be

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 15-01-2024 18:11, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 15. 01. 24 16:46, Maxwell G wrote:   Report started at 2024-01-15 15:04:52 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 15. 01. 24 16:46, Maxwell G wrote: Report started at 2024-01-15 15:04:52 UTC The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Dec 25, 2023 at 6:34 AM Ondrej Mosnáček wrote: > > On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 19:39, Priscila Gutierres wrote: > > > > virtme-ng makes testing a new kernel and developing new modules A LOT > > easier. > > > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones > > wrote: > >> > >> On Mon,

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, 18 Dec 2023 at 19:39, Priscila Gutierres wrote: > > virtme-ng makes testing a new kernel and developing new modules A LOT easier. > > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: >> >> On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: >> > virtme

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

virtme-ng makes testing a new kernel and developing new modules A LOT easier. On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 10:27 AM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > virtmeorphan 4 > weeks ago > > I

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 11:20:22AM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote: > virtmeorphan 4 weeks ago I have no special knowledge of this package, but I did read the article below a few weeks ago about virtme-ng. In particular virtme-ng uses virtiofs

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

I took ghc-X11-xft and vala-language-server for now (would welcome comaintainers). Jens -- ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct:

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Co-maintainers welcome! What's your FAS? :D On Mon, Nov 20, 2023 at 9:39 AM Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Mon, 20 Nov 2023 10:48:58 +0100 > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > Request package ownership via the *Take* button in he left column on > > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/ > > >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 20.11.2023 06:21, Neil Hanlon wrote: On 20.11.2023 12:37, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Monday, 20 November 2023 at 10:48, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 20.11.2023 12:37, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote: On Monday, 20 November 2023 at 10:48, Miro Hrončok wrote: The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure that the package should be retired,

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Monday, 20 November 2023 at 10:48, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 11/8/23 07:28, Cristian Delgado wrote: > Hi Benson, > I've made the pull request, thanks for your feedback. > Welcome. Merged it. It is helpful to do a few mock reviews https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/package-maintainers/How_to_Get_Sponsored_into_the_Packager_Group/#commenting > Also

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Nov 6, 2023 at 7:32 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > llvm12orphan, petersen, sergesanspaille > 4 weeks ago > llvm13jistone, orphan, petersen, sergesanspaille > 4 weeks ago > I took these as usual. At least llvm12 is still

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Hi Benson, I've made the pull request, thanks for your feedback. Also i've also raised an issue at package sponsors, hoping someone could sponsor me, I'll try to contact them through matrix and IRC Thanks again Cristian Delgado "You can't improve until you make mistakes" On Tue, 7 Nov 2023 at

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 11/7/23 08:21, Cristian Delgado wrote: > Hi, everyone > > I want to take over python-gpiozero,but I'm not a packager at the > moment, i'm really eager to contribute to the community. > > I update the package, to the latest version upstream, here you can find > the spec file Welcome. Have

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

ependency chain. > > For human readable dependency chains, > see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ > For all orphaned packages, > see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan > > Package (co)maintainers Status > Chang

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Re: Looking for a volunteer to automate the orphaned packages process

On Thu, 2023-10-19 at 18:43 +0200, Frantisek Zatloukal wrote: > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 6:24 PM Adam Williamson > wrote: > > > I'm not sure I have time to take this, but glancing over it, I have a > > suggestion on how to further automate the release stuff. > > > > You can use Bodhi release

Re: Looking for a volunteer to automate the orphaned packages process

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 6:24 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > I'm not sure I have time to take this, but glancing over it, I have a > suggestion on how to further automate the release stuff. > > You can use Bodhi release date to determine the extant EPEL releases > and the current Branched release.

Re: Looking for a volunteer to automate the orphaned packages process

On Thu, 2023-10-19 at 11:06 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello folks, > > you might know I run a script that generates > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.json > > The script is located at >

Re: Looking for a volunteer to automate the orphaned packages process

On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 11:06 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Hello folks, > > you might know I run a script that generates > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.json > > The script is located at >

Re: Looking for a volunteer to automate the orphaned packages process

On Thu, 2023-10-19 at 11:06 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > Hello folks, > > you might know I run a script that generates > > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.json > > The script is located at >

Re: Looking for a volunteer to automate the orphaned packages process

2023-10-19T09:06:53Z Miro Hrončok : you might know I run a script that generates https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.json The script is located at https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans.py I try to monitor

Re: Looking for a volunteer to automate the orphaned packages process

On 19-10-2023 11:06, Miro Hrončok wrote: I can provide all the details about the operation if you want to become the reaper's apprentice. A reaper by the name of Churchyard! ⚰️  ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe

Looking for a volunteer to automate the orphaned packages process

Hello folks, you might know I run a script that generates https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.txt https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans.json The script is located at https://pagure.io/releng/blob/main/f/scripts/find_unblocked_orphans.py I try to monitor the output and whenever

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Ouch. I swear, I wanted to check if you're still interested in maintaining RBTools. Just slipped my mind when I saw that the packages are in process of being dropped from f39 :( I can add you as an admin when the unretirement is processed. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 4:48 PM Jonathan Wright via devel

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Shoot those were mine. I didn't mean to let them orphan :( On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 6:39 PM Aleksei Bavshin wrote: > On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:00 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > RBTools orphan 2 > weeks ago > > python-pydiffx

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 5:00 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > RBTools orphan 2 weeks ago > python-pydiffxorphan 2 weeks ago Somehow I missed the retirement of these two packages (can we have nice 'will be

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 25-09-2023 14:00, Miro Hrončok wrote: neuro-sig: python-textdistance, python-qstylizer, python-whatthepatch, python-pyls-spyder I've adopted all of these. They are all part of the spyder dependency stack. I'll look into them and fix what needs fixing as soon as I can. -- Sandro

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 25-09-2023 14:00, Miro Hrončok wrote: python-sklearn-genetic-opt I'm taking this one on behalf of neuro-sig and get it fixed asap. I just ran a quick scratch build locally. It shouldn't be too hard. python-whatthepatch This is part of the Spyder dependency stack, so I'm taking that as

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Now that this is solved, we do have Electrum for f39 and rawhide. But unfortunately, without updating protobuf, newer versions won't be possible. I tried just patching the version check to relax it to protobuf 3.19 and it won't work. Also note that in 4.4.x, it doesn't say 3.12 in

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Since the python-qdarkstyle package is needed for the Spyder IDE, I ended up claiming it and fixing it. The main change is that I dropped the dependency on PySide2, since PySide2 is still broken on Python 3.12. Now that python-qdarkstyle is installable on F39/F40 again, I was able to build

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 at 05:10:55PM +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason: >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

the dependency chain. For human readable dependency chains, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

gt; grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. > > For human readable dependency chains, > see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ > For all orphaned packages, > see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan > > Package

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

--- Original Message --- On Thursday, September 7th, 2023 at 12:47, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > Looks good. > > One nitpick: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2023-ce1971f63f > > You named the update "low". I suggest you edit the update and remove the name > entirely.

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

It looks like the Electrum build is currently blocked not by protobuf, but by the failure of python-qdarkstyle to rebuild for Python 3.12[1][2]. That dependency is also currently orphaned. Grepping through the Electrum source, I see:     Electrum-4.3.4/contrib/requirements/requirements.txt    

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 06. 09. 23 9:02, Christiano Anderson wrote: --- Original Message --- On Tuesday, September 5th, 2023 at 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: I pushed the change only to rawhide branch, should I do the same for f39? Yes please. But also build the package for both rawhide and Fedora 39 to

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Unfortunately, it is worse than this: Electrum FTI in F39. A newer Electrum version would fix that, but F39 still has no new enough protobuf. Is there any other solution here than saying packaging Electrum for Fedora 39 is just not possible and remove the package in F39, then reintroduce it

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

--- Original Message --- On Wednesday, September 6th, 2023 at 09:21, František Šumšal wrote: > > Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status": > > "error", "errors": [{"location": "body", "name": "builds", "description": > > "Update for

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 9/6/23 09:02, Christiano Anderson wrote: --- Original Message --- On Tuesday, September 5th, 2023 at 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: I got an error while running fedpkg update Could not execute update: Could not generate update request: {"status": "error", "errors": [{"location":

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

--- Original Message --- On Tuesday, September 5th, 2023 at 13:54, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > I pushed the change only to rawhide branch, should I do the same for f39? > > > Yes please. But also build the package for both rawhide and Fedora 39 to make > it installable: > >

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

g/rpms/ > > Full report available at: > https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2023-08-21.txt > grep it for your FAS username and follow the dependency chain. > > For human readable dependency chains, > see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ > For all orphaned packages, > see http

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 04. 09. 23 19:41, Christiano Anderson wrote: I pushed the change only to rawhide branch, should I do the same for f39? Yes please. But also build the package for both rawhide and Fedora 39 to make it installable: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220282 On Fedora 39, you need

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

dy > adopted other recently orphaned packages needed by Spyder and intent to > fix and update them as needed in order to keep Spyder around. > > Btw, you'll find a PR for python-autopep8, which will fix the FTBFS/FTI > bugs and allow me to fix a dependent package. Sure, the neu

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Interested parties have been grappling with the problem of getting protobuf updated to v4 (22.x, 23.x, etc.), but the number of impacted packages is tremendous and there are not enough people with time to work on it, so progress has been slow. The following PR represents the state of that

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

adopted other recently orphaned packages needed by Spyder and intent to fix and update them as needed in order to keep Spyder around. Btw, you'll find a PR for python-autopep8, which will fix the FTBFS/FTI bugs and allow me to fix a dependent package. The issue RHBZ 2155014 has been fixed

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On 9/4/23 17:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: botan2    orphan, thm  0 weeks ago It currently both FTI and FTBFS, but the latter one seems to be easily fixable with a patch already committed to the upstream, which in turn fixes the FTI. I'll prep the

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Am 04.09.23 um 17:10 schrieb Miro Hrončok: electrum  js, orphan   0 weeks ago Electrum isn't orphaned, but cannot be updated because protobuf is not being updated. Newer versions require at least protobuf 3.20. I contacted the protobuf maintainer

Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/ For all orphaned packages, see https://packager-dashboard.fedoraproject.org/orphan Package (co)maintainers Status Change

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

--- Original Message --- On Monday, September 4th, 2023 at 17:10, Miro Hrončok wrote: > The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they > are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure > that the package should be retired, please do so

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 17:36:15 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 04. 09. 23 17:30, Ankur Sinha wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 04, 2023 17:10:55 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > python-mne-bids neuro-sig, orphan0 > > > weeks ago > > > > This is a neuro-sig package, so I've

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >