Hi!
Side tag was merged, java-11-openjdk now should be system JDK.
Don't hesitate to reach me if you encounter some misbehaving!
J.
On 7/11/20 10:24 AM, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> Hello!
>
> toatal packages: 610
> passed: 427
> failed: 176
>
> From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr
On Tue, Jul 21, 2020 at 11:25 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> >>
> >> Any update? Any thoughts on when you want to merge the f33-java11 side tag
> >> back into rawhide?
>
> done
> >>
> >
> > BTW There are some packages, e.g. built by ant with no sauce/target level
> > specified at all, that are
> > bui
>>
>> Any update? Any thoughts on when you want to merge the f33-java11 side tag
>> back into rawhide?
done
>>
>
> BTW There are some packages, e.g. built by ant with no sauce/target level
> specified at all, that are
> built with Java 11-level bytecode.
>
> This is bad because if there is a d
On Mon, Jul 20, 2020 at 2:24 PM Mat Booth wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 09:34, Christian Heimes wrote:
> >
> > > Hello!
> > >
> > > toatal packages: 610
> > > passed: 427
> > > failed: 176
> > >
> > > From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now
> > > are thus fail
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 09:34, Christian Heimes wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > toatal packages: 610
> > passed: 427
> > failed: 176
> >
> > From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are
> > thus failing
> > from two
> > reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch fai
Hi!
Sorry., I had missed your email. Lets continue the discussion in the ticket
https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2449 you had risen.
In the mass rebuilds, I was working with packages with selected java
dependencies or packaes I know about tat had to be included. dogtag pki have
likely only transi
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 11:19, Dan Horák wrote:
>
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:42:45 +0200
> Iñaki Ucar wrote:
>
> > Could someone with superpowers cancel the following task for me?
> > Thanks.
>
> done, it has already failed on i686
Yeah, that's why I wanted to cancel it. The task was launched witho
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 10:42:45 +0200
Iñaki Ucar wrote:
> Could someone with superpowers cancel the following task for me?
> Thanks.
done, it has already failed on i686
Dan
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47330918
>
> On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 09:44, Fabio Val
Could someone with superpowers cancel the following task for me? Thanks.
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47330918
On Fri, 17 Jul 2020 at 09:44, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:55 PM Mat Booth wrote:
> > Any update? Any thoughts on when you want to merge
> Hello!
>
> toatal packages: 610
> passed: 427
> failed: 176
>
> From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are
> thus failing
> from two
> reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this to
> FTBF bugs for
> those 29
> pacakges,
>
>
> In
On Wed, Jul 15, 2020 at 5:55 PM Mat Booth wrote:
> Any update? Any thoughts on when you want to merge the f33-java11 side tag
> back into rawhide?
I second this, please don't wait two weeks [0] for merging the side
tag, it's only going to cause merge conflict problems with packages
that get rebu
On Wed, 15 Jul 2020 at 16:54, Mat Booth wrote:
>
> On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:14, Jiri Vanek wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g.
plexus-velocity failed with this:
> > >
> > > DEBUG util.py:621: Errors during downloading metadata for repositor
On Mon, 13 Jul 2020 at 19:14, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> >
> > A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g.
plexus-velocity failed with this:
> >
> > DEBUG util.py:621: Errors during downloading metadata for repository
'build':
> > DEBUG util.py:621:- Curl error (18): Transf
>
> A cursory glance shows that some failed with network problems. E.g.
> plexus-velocity failed with this:
>
> DEBUG util.py:621: Errors during downloading metadata for repository 'build':
> DEBUG util.py:621: - Curl error (18): Transferred a partial file for
> http://kojipkgs-cache01.s390.
Hello!
toatal packages: 610
passed: 427
failed: 176
From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are
thus failing from two
reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this to
FTBF bugs for those 29
pacakges,
In Monday, or as other duties allo
On Sat, 11 Jul 2020 at 09:24, Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> toatal packages: 610
> passed: 427
> failed: 176
>
> From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now
are thus failing from two
> reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this
to FTBF b
On Sat, Jul 11, 2020 at 10:26 AM Jiri Vanek wrote:
>
> Hello!
>
> toatal packages: 610
> passed: 427
> failed: 176
>
> From the failures, there is 29 which passed in the copr before, and now are
> thus failing from two
> reasons - unrelated change, or non-intel64-arch failure. I will put this to
17 matches
Mail list logo