On 12 April 2010 19:13, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
That's because of the exim. Do a 'yum install ssmtp' then a 'yum
remove exim' and most of that problem goes away. the auto depsolving
for '/usr/bin/sendmail' get exim by default because its the shortest
name and comes first.
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:11 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 12 April 2010 19:13, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
That's because of the exim. Do a 'yum install ssmtp' then a 'yum
remove exim' and most of that problem goes away. the auto depsolving
for '/usr/bin/sendmail'
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 10:27 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://build.laptop.org/10.2.0/os119
Compressed image size: 678.36mb (+0.01mb since build 118)
Description of changes in this build:
* kernel: allow negotiation of 5/10/15/30fps
Hi,
I updated my XO-1.5s to 119 yesterday and was surprised to see
that the screen rotation button still doesn't seem to
work. Looking through the mailing-lists I didn't find any
discussion about this topic which kinda surprised me.
The openchrome driver hasn't previously had
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9350 (xrandr screen rotation support) is
still being worked. We did try with software frame buffer rotation
enabled, but it did not perform well.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
___
Devel mailing list
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 1:27 AM, James Cameron qu...@laptop.org wrote:
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/9350 (xrandr screen rotation support) is
still being worked. We did try with software frame buffer rotation
enabled, but it did not perform well.
--
James Cameron
http://quozl.linux.org.au/
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 17:57 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
Finally, I guess you have thought of it, but by the
time 10.2 will be out F11 repositories will be down
and thus the builds totally frozen software-wise.
I think it would have been better to rebase on F12 6 months ago.
Now it's
Hey Chris,
On Fri, Apr 9, 2010 at 9:27 PM, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/F11_for_1.5
http://build.laptop.org/10.2.0/os119
Compressed image size: 678.36mb (+0.01mb since build 118)
Description of changes in this build:
* kernel: allow negotiation of
On 12 April 2010 14:51, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got some more time and have finally had a chance to look at these
further. From an initial looks it looks like your getting exim due to
the cronie deps on /usr/bin/sendmail. If you add an explicit 'ssmtp'
into the .ks that
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 12 April 2010 14:51, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got some more time and have finally had a chance to look at these
further. From an initial looks it looks like your getting exim due to
the cronie deps
On 04/12/2010 02:10 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Which burnin package are you referring to? olpc-runin-tests-0.9.15-1.noarch?
I don't have the XO near me to test but 'yum remove perl' will give
you the answer.
The runin scripts are all bash. Not sure why perl would be a
dependency. Perhaps
smith wrote:
On 04/12/2010 02:10 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
Which burnin package are you referring to?
olpc-runin-tests-0.9.15-1.noarch?
I don't have the XO near me to test but 'yum remove perl' will give
you the answer.
The runin scripts are all bash. Not sure why
On 04/12/2010 02:34 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
perl? I created them on the XO so anything that I used should have
already been installed.
Except for where I specified extra stuff I needed. :) like lm_sensors
which requires perl.
So I need to find a way to read the CPU temp without lm_sensors
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
On 04/12/2010 02:34 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
perl? I created them on the XO so anything that I used should have
already been installed.
Except for where I specified extra stuff I needed. :) like lm_sensors which
On 12 April 2010 15:45, Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org wrote:
Except for where I specified extra stuff I needed. :) like lm_sensors
which requires perl.
So I need to find a way to read the CPU temp without lm_sensors or we
somehow need to break lm_sensors use of perl.
It's really easy
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 11:10 AM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 7:09 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 12 April 2010 14:51, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I've got some more time and have finally had a chance to look at these
further.
On 04/12/2010 02:51 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
find /sys -name '*cputemp*'
/sys/devices/platform/via_cputemp.0
Awesome! I'll change my scripts and remove that dependency.
Thanks.
--
Richard A. Smith rich...@laptop.org
One Laptop per Child
___
Devel
--- On Mon, 4/12/10, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
From: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
Subject: Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119
To: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
Cc: Devel devel@lists.laptop.org, Fedora OLPC
fedora-olpc-l...@redhat.com
Date: Monday, April 12
'yum remove perl' will give you the answer.
Gentlemen - on some of my XO-1s I've installed perl onto my permanent
SD card, rather than having it occupy jffs2. By doing so, I've saved
about 33 MB of space in jffs2.
Is that a large enough savings (given a 4000 MB XO-1.5) to be worth
spending
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:52 PM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
'yum remove perl' will give you the answer.
Gentlemen - on some of my XO-1s I've installed perl onto my permanent
SD card, rather than having it occupy jffs2. By doing so, I've saved
about 33 MB of space in jffs2.
Is
Hi,
Gentlemen - on some of my XO-1s I've installed perl onto my
permanent SD card, rather than having it occupy jffs2. By
doing so, I've saved about 33 MB of space in jffs2.
Is that a large enough savings (given a 4000 MB XO-1.5) to be
worth spending this much discussion
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 8:40 PM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Mon, 4/12/10, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
From: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
Subject: Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119
To: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
Cc: Devel devel
Gentlemen - on some of my XO-1s I've installed perl onto my
permanent SD card, rather than having it occupy jffs2. By
doing so, I've saved about 33 MB of space in jffs2.
Is that a large enough savings (given a 4000 MB XO-1.5) to be
worth spending this much discussion on ?
Yes,
--- On Mon, 4/12/10, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org, Devel
devel@lists.laptop.org, Fedora OLPC fedora-olpc-l
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
In the longer term its likely that it will be. The libraries in CentOS
5 are too old. The problem is that RHEL-6 isn't out yet, nor is there
At least this XS guy is hopefuly that RHEL-6 will appear soon and XS
0.7 or
It will then be OK for a while until Sugar needs a newer version of a
library
I think there is an elephant in the living room to which too little
attention is being paid. Consider Peru - they have a lot of XO-1
systems, on which it is unlikely that the newest version of Sugar will
ever be
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
It will then be OK for a while until Sugar needs a newer version of a
library
I think there is an elephant in the living room to which too little
attention is being paid. Consider Peru - they have a lot of XO-1
systems,
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:34 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 12 April 2010 15:10, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have the XO near me to test but 'yum remove perl' will give
you the answer.
On XO-1.5 running something very close to 10.2.0 build 119, it wants
to
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 2:04 PM, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:04 PM, Mikus Grinbergs mi...@bga.com wrote:
It will then be OK for a while until Sugar needs a newer version of a
library
I think there is an elephant in the living room to which too little
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Daniel Drake d...@laptop.org wrote:
On 12 April 2010 15:10, Peter Robinson pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't have the XO near me to test but 'yum remove perl' will give
you the answer.
On XO-1.5 running something very close to 10.2.0 build 119, it wants
to
Believe me I'll be one of the first poeple adding the sugar packages
to EL-6 branches and testing them but its not necessarily the golden
path that some people think. In the short term of the first 12 months
it will be fine, 18 months to 2.5 years it won't seem as good.
I am not seeing where
Hi,
There's not much point discussing it at the moment as RHEL-6
isn't out yet
This is my feeling too -- I agree that RHEL and CentOS 6 will be a
more attractive base than any of their previous releases have been,
and we'll want to consider them then. Not much more to say until we
know
I guess something was left out from the Speak-14 installation in this build.
Launching gives the following warning
Cannot find cached 0sugar-launch implementation
Tries for some more time and then dies.
Was fine in os116.
--- On Fri, 4/9/10, Chris Ball c...@laptop.org wrote:
From: Chris Ball
Unfortunately Record.activity is not really working yet. Filed #1931 with
sugarlabs.
Also GIMP is freezing the XO-1.5 as soon as you open an image. Both in Gnome
and launched from Sugar. Hard reboot is the only way out.
Should not be included in the build till shorted out.
ntpdate is missing
On Sat, 2010-04-10 at 01:47 -0700, Yioryos Asprobounitis wrote:
Unfortunately Record.activity is not really working yet. Filed #1931 with
sugarlabs.
Is this on the XO-1.5, or also on the XO-1? I tested Record v65
yesterday on os129py and it was perfect.
ntpdate is missing from the builds.
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 1:47 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote:
Unfortunately Record.activity is not really working yet. Filed #1931 with
sugarlabs.
Also GIMP is freezing the XO-1.5 as soon as you open an image. Both in Gnome
and launched from Sugar. Hard reboot is the only
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 07:12:18AM -0700, Jon Nettleton wrote:
This bug has been located and will be fixed in the next rpm of
openchrome. I will post a link to an updated rpm also.
BTW, is there a chance to get your updated versions of openChrome on a
Debian system somehow? Some git repo I
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 8:18 AM, Sascha Silbe
sascha-ml-ui-sugar-olpc-de...@silbe.org wrote:
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 07:12:18AM -0700, Jon Nettleton wrote:
This bug has been located and will be fixed in the next rpm of
openchrome. I will post a link to an updated rpm also.
BTW, is there a
Finally, I guess you have thought of it, but by the
time 10.2 will be out F11 repositories will be down
and thus the builds totally frozen software-wise.
I think it would have been better to rebase on F12 6 months ago.
Now it's way too close to the release date :-(
I recommended F-12 which
Hi,
Do you know of any place that has the Fedora 9 rpms? People are
looking for them to add new apps functions and hacks on
Sugar-0.82 machines but there are nowhere to be found. If F9
repos were still available, F11 builds might not even be needed
for the XO-1.
I just
On Sat, Apr 10, 2010 at 11:40 AM, Yioryos Asprobounitis
mavrot...@yahoo.com wrote:
--- On Sat, 4/10/10, Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org wrote:
From: Bernie Innocenti ber...@codewiz.org
Subject: Re: New XO-1.5 10.2.0 build 119
To: Yioryos Asprobounitis mavrot...@yahoo.com
Cc: Fedora
41 matches
Mail list logo
