Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:48:32PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Trac default milestone is currently 8.2. Is that a good idea? We are
>>>
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:53:26PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Also I'm not convinced "not specified" as default component is a good
>>> idea, unless we have someone taking care
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 08:21:23PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> Because I'm not confident someone will regularly take care of
>> assigning the not-specified tickets, and I don't want lose useful
>> bug reports because of that. I've been reading all the coming in
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 08:21:23PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> Because I'm not confident someone will regularly take care of assigning
> the not-specified tickets, and I don't want lose useful bug reports
> because of that. I've been reading all the coming in tickets in the last
> fe
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:53:26PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Also I'm not convinced "not specified" as default component is a good
>>> idea, unless we have someone taking care
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:53:26PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Also I'm not convinced "not specified" as default component is a good
>> idea, unless we have someone taking care of triaging that component.
>
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm don't feel strongly either way but it's clearly important to Marco.
> My concern is that we have a lot of unresponsive module maintainers.
The only way to get around the unresponsive maintainers problems is to
get othe
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:48:32PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Trac default milestone is currently 8.2. Is that a good idea? We are
>> trying to punt down the Sugar 8.2 bugs, bu
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also I'm not convinced "not specified" as default component is a good
> idea, unless we have someone taking care of triaging that component.
Can we go back to require the submitter to provide a component? In
many ca
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trac default milestone is currently 8.2. Is that a good idea? We are
> trying to punt down the Sugar 8.2 bugs, but with these default the
> list keep growing. I'd prefer to go through the list
Also I'm not convinced "not specified" as default component is a good
idea, unless we have someone taking care of triaging that component.
Marco
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trac default milestone is currently 8.2.
Trac default milestone is currently 8.2. Is that a good idea? We are
trying to punt down the Sugar 8.2 bugs, but with these default the
list keep growing. I'd prefer to go through the list of unassigned
bugs every few days and make 8.2 only those that really needs to be...
12 matches
Mail list logo
