Hello,
I managed to track it down to this change in joyride 2421:
-libxml2.i386 0:2.6.32-3.fc9
+libxml2.i386 0:2.7.1-1.fc9
I cannot say without debugging it further if it's gcompris or libxml2
fault. I added Bruno in cc, which might know better.
More info and a trace in the ticket:
http://dev.
On Fri, Sep 26, 2008 at 3:30 AM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yup, we were getting several reports that kids accidentally pressed
> keys while at the Home screen (which auto-focuses the search field.)..
Did we actually get reports from kids about this?
There is a bug which causes key
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:37 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My
> feeling is that metacity will be hard to upstream patches to, and it
> would be more work to get working 'right', since it's pretty much
> designed *not* to be extensible.
I tend to think metacity upstream might t
761 and 762 have been released shortly after your mail. If you want to
get in a new cerebro, you need to open a ticket, set his action to
"Approve for release" and provide a changelog. This must be documented
somewhere on the wiki but I can't find it right now.
Marco
On Tue, Sep 23, 2008 at 3:18
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 2:05 PM, Build Announcer v2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2462
>
> Changes in build 2462 from build: 2458
>
> Size delta: 0.13M
>
> -sugar 0.82.7-1.olpc3
> +sugar 0.82.8-1.olpc3
> -sugar-toolkit 0.82.8-2.olpc3
> +suga
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 4:02 AM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 19 Sep 2008, at 22:50, C. Scott Ananian wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:01 PM, Gary C Martin
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> However, any hints would be much appreciated as to what this last
>>> remaining setup.
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:26 AM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Scratch that, I lied... I hope the freedesktop spec is flexible enough
>> to implement our kind of UI feedback.
>
> I read the spec, it seemed sane. Proof will be in the implementation,
> though, of course.
Yeah... Re
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:10 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> And, of course, I
>>> wanted to switch sugar to using the standard X activity startup
On Sat, Sep 20, 2008 at 1:10 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> And, of course, I
>> wanted to switch sugar to using the standard X activity startup
>> notification mechanism, and the standard desktop notification
>> mechanism.
>
> I&#
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 10:37 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The main changes required, I think, would actually be to the shell
> code to make it happy running on a root window. There's some
> reparenting magic that's done to make that work right;
I'm not sure what you mean exa
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:43 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, if there's only one window, and it's "stretchable", then your
> decision is easy.
> If it requests a fixed size, then you should probably decorate and
> float all the windows. I could also see floating all fixed s
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 9:26 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think you are confusing the role of the Window Manager. When I run
> sugar under metacity, I don't *want* my activities to be full screen.
> When I use a windowing wm, I expect them to be in (decorated) windows.
Yeah
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:28 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | I just thought of a worst problem with the FULLSCREEN approach.
> | FULLSCREEN windows are always on the top of NORMAL windows.
>
> Why is this a problem? When do we need an Activity to be visible,
> full-screen,
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:55 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Bobby Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Are we set on moving to metacity? I remember murmurs of using xmonad,
>> as well as another wm I can't
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:30 PM, Bobby Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Are we set on moving to metacity? I remember murmurs of using xmonad,
> as well as another wm I can't remember the name of. Are these
> stacking/hinting problems common to all window mangers, or just
> metacity?
They are
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Let's keep thinking about this. For example, I wonder what Metacity does
> to a window that is both _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN and
> _NET_WM_STATE_BELOW? Does it stack it below the Frame, if the Frame is
> _NET_WM_
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I should keep both in my activity.info for backwards compatibility with
> early builds?
This was change *long* time ago. I suspect your activity would not
work for other reasons if run with such an old Sugar.
Marco
___
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 4:01 AM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm showing my age here, but is bundle_id a replacement for
> service_name? Seem to be identical.
Yeah, service_name is deprecated but they are basically the same
thing. bundlebuilder should probably warn about it.
Marco
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 12:13 AM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> | On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
> | <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> |>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:54 PM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 05:13:35PM -0300, Gabriel Eirea wrote:
>>Second issue: a very simple question, what does
>>$SUGAR_ACTIVITY_ROOT/data mean? and how can I put the configuration
>>files there when I pack the bundle?
>
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:34 PM, Benjamin M. Schwartz
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In summary, I believe we can safely move to a lightly patched Metacity
> while tagging our windows purely according to the EWMH.
That would mean to make Sugar impossible to use on a standard distribution.
Marco
__
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:02 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some of our activities have a separate fullscreen mode. Take a look at
> the two screenshots of record:
>
> Fullscreen:
> http://dev.laptop.org/~sayamindu/sugar_metacity/Captura%20de%20pantalla_1.png
> Normal:
> htt
On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 10:07 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>a) applications like firefox will need to be modified so that they set
>the _NET_WM_WINDOW_TYPE_APPLICATION hint (ideally we would like to run
>the applications unmodified).
The idea would be that applications would j
I tried to move several tickets on it from blocking to blocked by, but
it looks like I confused trac. It started backtracing and now each of
the dependent bugs has stale information. Can someone with trac foo
fix it up? Or should we just recreate the tracker? This sucks mainly
because it breaks rep
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:47 PM, James Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've 703 and 2311 available to compare. Here's a few things I found.
>
> --
>
> A test to compare available memory by eliminating buffer cache.
>
> Method: boot, wait for UI to be stable, switch to text console, echo 3 >
>
On Sun, Sep 14, 2008 at 6:42 AM, James Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recall someone noticed that the animated activity icon was redrawing
> the whole screen. I think it got fixed. Since it got fixed, I haven't
> seen as many OOMs during olpc-update.
It was not fixed.
http://dev.laptop.
Intentional?
Marco
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 8:09 AM, Build Announcer v2 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://xs-dev.laptop.org/~cscott/olpc/streams/joyride/build2413
>
> Changes in build 2413 from build: 2412
>
> Size delta: -70.91M
>
> -olpc-library-core 1-26
>
> --
> This mail was automatical
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:29 AM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I was hoping to see the numbers go the other way with the
> rainbow fork trick sharing more module code between Activities. Could
> be worse I guess – I should also test opening N instances of the same
> Activity and
On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 4:29 AM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, news is not great on the Activity front...
>
> SUMMARY: 759 vs 711 each Activity instance in 759 consumes an average
> of 1Mb more memory than the same Activity running in 711, with
> Write-57 reportedly taking signif
numpy will still work fine for activities.
Marco
On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 10:52 PM, Mikus Grinbergs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Remove numpy usage from the shell
>
> I have not been following this thread - but:
>
> There were several Activities (not just Measure) which used
> 'numeric'. Then 'nu
A couple of low risk fixes which could save ~6 mb at startup:
Remove numpy usage from the shell
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8372
(has patch)
gst usage in the shell wastes 2.6mb
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/8375
Marco
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists
Hello,
the deadline for the Help activity content was yesterday.
http://dev.laptop.org/ticket/7526#comment:9
Is it available? If not, what should we do?
Marco
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Sat, Sep 6, 2008 at 3:30 AM, S Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> the sugar team released another stable Sucrose release 0.82.1 [1].
>
> Will this be in OLPC release 8.2.0,
Yup, it will. It's already in the latest 8.2 build.
> or does the name 0.82.1 imply it's
> for
On Thu, Sep 4, 2008 at 2:27 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Friends,
>
> As we wind down toward the end of the 8.2.0 release cycle (and begin to
> tighten our change control), we must make a few tweaks to the Trac
> ticket workflow. I have written up the new workflow in great detail
According to the schedule we are freezing today:
http://wiki.laptop.org/go/8.2.0#Schedule
But Michael mentioned there might be delays yesterday...
Please announce the freeze when it is in effect, until then I guess
I'll keep approving things to go in the 8.2 as usual.
Marco
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:54 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'll do a trac search
> for bugs assigned to "add to build" and milestone "8.2.0" before I
> make a stable build.
For Sugar we normally we have multiple fixed tickets which maps to the
same package. Should we give you an
On Sat, Aug 30, 2008 at 3:52 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 29, 2008 at 5:55 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What do we need to do to get packages on the stable 8.2 branch?
>
> That's a good question. I as
Martin Langhoff wrote:
> We've had a few attempts to share Write (
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Write ) with the Wellington test crowd, and
> there are a number of cases that don't seem to work well, but I'm not
> sure what the state of things is, and what is expected to work. The
> Wiki page doesn'
What do we need to do to get packages on the stable 8.2 branch?
Thanks.
Marco
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@lists.laptop.org
http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 7:15 PM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Eben,
>
> On 27 Aug 2008, at 15:52, Eben Eliason wrote:
>
>> It's not really an issue of speed. The launcher in current joyrides
>> has a half-dozen serious behavioral bugs. I worked with Marco to
>> create a patch for
Greg Smith wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> Reading the "Blocks?" bugs this morning: http://dev.laptop.org/report/29
>
> I noticed that we can get a lot of them off the list if we can close
> or defer 8090.
>
> Where are we with activity launching? Is it good enough and we have
> the main issues ironed out
Douglas Bagnall wrote:
> In the course of making an activity server for the XS, I have looked
> at the activity.info files of 114 bundles from
> http://wiki.laptop.org/go/Activities. One (Berkeley Logo) turned out
> not to be a bundle at all, and otherwise the tags I found were:
>
> name
On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 10:58 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes indeed - in that case, it does work (I removed
> /etc/olpc-security). I also noticed that before I removed
> olpc-security, I had to set the font manually, now I don't need to do
> this. (Some interaction problems
C. Scott Ananian wrote:
> Michael and I have been working on creating an acceptable 8.2 test
> candidate. There have been 8.2-753, 8.2-754, 8.2-755, and 8.2-756
> builds, but none of them have (so far) made it through initial QA here
> at 1cc. In particular, we tried to turn of X shared memory in
Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:49 PM, Khaled Hosny <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 10:45:11PM +0530, Sayamindu Dasgupta wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>> It looks like Write is unable to handle Composed dead characters, at
>>> least for the Amharic key
On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 3:09 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:16 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Cerebro is running there for some reason (I've seen it in another bug
>> report already). I can&
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:47 PM, James Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also tried using ps_mem.py to compare memory used by processes, but
> the method that ps_mem.py uses has changed as a result of kernel change.
>
> http://dev.laptop.org/~quozl/2008-08-22-ps-mem/ has the samples that I
> t
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:47 PM, James Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've 703 and 2311 available to compare. Here's a few things I found.
>
> --
>
> A test to compare available memory by eliminating buffer cache.
>
> Method: boot, wait for UI to be stable, switch to text console, echo 3 >
>
On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 1:47 PM, James Cameron <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I also tried using ps_mem.py to compare memory used by processes, but
> the method that ps_mem.py uses has changed as a result of kernel change.
>
> http://dev.laptop.org/~quozl/2008-08-22-ps-mem/ has the samples that I
> t
Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
> Greg Smith wrote:
>> Also, Kim and I (sometimes with Michael and Jim) read 50 - 75 bugs a
>> day and either push them out or mark them blockers. We started at id
>> 7500 and hope to catch the tip of the spear by Friday or before.
>>
Greg Smith wrote:
> Also, Kim and I (sometimes with Michael and Jim) read 50 - 75 bugs a day
> and either push them out or mark them blockers. We started at id 7500
> and hope to catch the tip of the spear by Friday or before.
>
Let me just note that processes are much more likely to be used
Neil Graham wrote:
> Sorry if this post irritates some of you. I'm not usually a mailing list
> ranter, but the olpc project is something that I think is really quite
> important for the world.
>
It doesn't irritate me but... it doesn't even tell me what you don't
like about the UI :(
Ma
Is this on the XO? Have a look to /home/olpc/.xsession-sample. Debug
logs are off by default.
Marco
2008/8/5 victor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I used to be able to write to the logs using
>
> self.logger = sugar.logger.logging.getLogger()
> self.logger.debug("hey")
>
> But now none of the messages ap
Brian Harvey wrote:
> I'm trying to build a static wxWidgets library on the XO (for use with
> the ucblogo project), and it works, except that certain shared libraries
> are (at least on my XO) missing aliases that exist on my office Linux PC.
> For example, I have a file named
> /usr/lib/lib
On Fri, Aug 1, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Alex Levenson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In the Terminal Activity, from any directory. Usually from the activity's
> directory, but it works from anywhere (I've tried).
Do you have the same problem with other activities? If so please open
a ticket about this.
Ma
Alex Levenson wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm writing a physics problem solving game: http://wiki.laptop.org/go/X2o
>
> It runs fine when I launch it from the command line (Terminal Activity
> as user olpc) via sugar-launch. It works regardless of the current
> working directory.
>
> But, it hangs when I
Victor Lazzarini wrote:
> Now, another bit of info I can't find in Walter's minimalist draft
> for the updated
> Sugar is how access newly created activities, which I have put in the
> ~/Activities together with the rest.
>
> The 'list' view only gives me the installed activities, which is no use
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 08:21:23PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> Because I'm not confident someone will regularly take care of
>> assigning the not-specified tickets, and I don't want lose useful
>> bug reports because of that. I&#x
Michael Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 06:53:26PM +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Also I'm not convinced "not specified" as default component is a good
On Thu, Jul 31, 2008 at 7:06 PM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm don't feel strongly either way but it's clearly important to Marco.
> My concern is that we have a lot of unresponsive module maintainers.
The only way to get around the unresponsive maintainers problems is to
get othe
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:52 AM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also I'm not convinced "not specified" as default component is a good
> idea, unless we have someone taking care of triaging that component.
Can we go back to require the submitter to p
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trac default milestone is currently 8.2. Is that a good idea? We are
> trying to punt down the Sugar 8.2 bugs, but with these default the
> list keep growing. I'd prefer to go through the list
Also I'm not convinced "not specified" as default component is a good
idea, unless we have someone taking care of triaging that component.
Marco
On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 11:38 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Trac default milestone is currently 8.2.
Trac default milestone is currently 8.2. Is that a good idea? We are
trying to punt down the Sugar 8.2 bugs, but with these default the
list keep growing. I'd prefer to go through the list of unassigned
bugs every few days and make 8.2 only those that really needs to be...
Marco
__
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 11:33 AM, Simon Schampijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Martin Dengler wrote:
> Sure, some guidance is needed. I hope we have done a decent job to guide you
> to the
> places to provide your great fixes :)
>
> for example:
> http://dev.laptop.org/git?p=sugar;a=commit;h=4030
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 6:56 AM, Polychronis Ypodimatopoulos
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On the other hand, circumventing the
> layers altogether has not been an option either as it would brake
> "backwards compatibility" with existing activities (Sugar is a two-year
> old experimental project an
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 7:56 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [2]: I consider web-browsers and Unix shells to be "fluent translators"
> for the programmers who I expect to be hacking on Sugar as opposed to
> the dbus-introspection tools which currently seem to me to be like
> "novice
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 3:14 AM, Martin Langhoff
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Michael's analysis is useful inasmuch we can read it going forward. As
> Michael, I wasn't here 2 years ago, but I have been on the ground on
> many projects under tight deadlines. It's not helpful to pontificate
> on the
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 2:46 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I disagree because I think that the approach we have taken has made it
> much harder for others to help us. For a project like Sugar, this
> ultimately results is less software of less quality in the same
> timeframe. At le
On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 1:49 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After mild provocation, Marco and Tomeu asked me to publish some of my
> reactions to sugar's architecture, design, and implementation. Here are
> a few initial comments.
>
> 1) Sugar could better hold contributors if it (a
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 6:22 PM, Korakurider <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2008 at 12:06 AM, Simon Schampijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> The new Sucrose 0.81.5 Development Release is out!
>>
>> This is Release Candidate 1. Now we have one more release to go before code
>> freeze
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:36 PM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 12:03 AM, Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 20:25 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>>> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Jim Ge
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In general, gnome is moving away from Bonobo/Orbit toward dbus based
> messaging.
Yeah, there is no plan yet (that I know of) to replace GConf with
something dbus based though :(
Marco
__
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:59 PM, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 13:28 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
>> The bonobo-activation-server likes to chew up 40mb (of RAM), for doing
>> almost nothing.
>
> ORBit doesn't appear to depend on any bonobo components. And we've
> succe
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 7:03 PM, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 19:00 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> > I guess GConf2-dbus provides an equivalent interface to the GConf2
>> > package and hence is a drop-in replacement.
>>
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 6:56 PM, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 19:54 +0200, Marco Pesenti Gritti wrote:
>> In update.1 we shipped the DBus version of gnome-vfs2 (Nokia patches)
>> which didn't bring ORBit in. I'm not sure if that
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Bert Freudenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks for not answering,
Hmm? Both Tomeu and me answered.
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-July/016914.html
http://lists.laptop.org/pipermail/devel/2008-July/016951.html
> and not updating the API doc,
T
Tomeu Vizoso wrote:
> I think that Freedesktop people are moving to a D-Bus based protocol,
> but don't the status of it.
>
It's actually just GNOME for now... but I'm keeping an eye on it and
will add support for that protocol as soon as it's agreed/implemented.
Marco
__
On Fri, Jul 18, 2008 at 2:53 AM, Gary C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just out of interest, where is the code that raises the AP network
> authentication name/pass request? That feels like a pretty close
> template fit to such a critical warning.
sugar/src/hardware/keydialog.py
Marco
__
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:00 PM, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I recently modified OLPC-3 xulrunner to remove dependencies on libgnome
> and gnomevfs2. Once Dennis has had a chance to review my work to remove
> libgnome deps from other packages too, a huge dependency chain
> (including
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have a priority request from "the field" to not lose any saved data.
>
> I believe we already do that except in the case of a "crash" or "freeze"
> of activities (no crashes is another request :-). Is that right?
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:48 PM, Daniel Drake <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-07-16 at 13:44 -0400, Jim Gettys wrote:
>> Daniel,
>>
>> It is quiet possible we'll want to pick up gnomevfs2 as a basic library
>> in a future release (think about the OLPCfs method of accessing the
>> journal)
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Jim Gettys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel,
>
> It is quiet possible we'll want to pick up gnomevfs2 as a basic library
> in a future release (think about the OLPCfs method of accessing the
> journal). We didn't want the old gnomevfs library since that pulled i
We will also need to enable pyxpcom in the fedora firefox for Browse to work.
Marco
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 6:43 PM, Greg Dekoenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So today I had a meeting with Christopher Aillon, the maintainer of all
> things Mozilla in Fedora, and it helped greatly to shape
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:42 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The goal from the beginning has been to minimize cost-of-entry to
> develop applications for our platform. Requiring that people set up
> bugzilla in order to receive bug reports is a high bar! Requiring
> that they h
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:36 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 5:35 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> What an email
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:35 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What an email does do is allow, for instance, the Log activity to actually
>> be useful in practice, since the
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 11:30 PM, Eben Eliason <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What an email does do is allow, for instance, the Log activity to actually
> be useful in practice, since the "send log" button can send the log to the
> people who might actually look at it and make any necessary changes t
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 10:49 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I'd strongly prefer that they *not* do so. First off, it's
> pointless to do so, since the web page is a lot easier to spam-spider
> than the activity bundle. But fundamentally, I want to be able to use
> semi-aut
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> RE: Marco's comments.
>
> GS - Thanks! Can you start adding the names of all activities that we
> know should/will work to the Release notes too?
I can add the Fructose ones, where are the release notes? :)
> How does someon
On Mon, Jul 14, 2008 at 6:32 PM, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Also, there's nothing saying that this has to be a particular person's
> email address. It could be a list, or a mailinator account, or pass
> through an anonymizer or something else.
I suppose some activity authors mi
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 8:31 PM, Marco Pesenti Gritti
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> b) Do you agree that it's a good idea to start maintaining both a
>> development and a release buildstream now? Would you prefer to wait
>> for a few more days? If so, why?
>
>
On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 9:37 AM, Sayamindu Dasgupta <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think I answered this.
>
> * sugar-base
> * sugar-toolkit
> * sugar
> * chat-activity
> * web-activity
> * read-activity
> * log-activity
> * write-activity
> * calculate-activity
> * terminal-activity
> * pippy-act
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sugar slowness & redraws
> - Sugar feels really slow both because it is and because we're seeing lots of
>intermediate states (redraws, overlapping icons, ...)
I assume you mean this regressed compared to Update.1. Ca
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 6:45 PM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> What do you mean with "positive report"?
>
> The same statement that a tag like 'joyride-2153:+' means: someone
> specifically retested an issue on a build known to contain the
> package(s) you want to ship and could not r
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 12:56 AM, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I understand that we do not have backward compatibility in 8.2.0 as it
> currently stands.
For Glucose we are supposed to be backward compatible with Update.1.
ABI breaks should be reported as bugs.
> Can we bound the test
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 1:43 PM, Morgan Collett
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 00:56, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Hi Guys,
>>
>> We should definitely have backward compatibility for activities!
>
> In my opinion, there should be compatibility from one release to t
On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 6:39 PM, Bobby Powers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 7/12/08, Morgan Collett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Sat, Jul 12, 2008 at 00:56, Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi Guys,
>> >
>> > We should definitely have backward compatibility for activities!
>>
>>
On Sun, Jul 13, 2008 at 6:11 AM, Michael Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dennis recently made us an 8.2 release build stream. For the time being,
> you're
> all doing a great job providing good fixes, so Dennis will automatically merge
> changes from joyride into the 8.2 stream as soon as he se
On 7/7/08, C. Scott Ananian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 7, 2008 at 4:56 PM, Walter Bender <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>> I'll be presumptuous and speak on behalf of "upstream." Sugar
>> developers are cognizant of the needs of OLPC and will go out of their
>> way to make sure that th
101 - 200 of 450 matches
Mail list logo
