On fim 12.des 2013 20:00, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:44:09PM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
On 12/12/2013 06:02 PM, Phil Knirsch wrote:
- Review latest WGs planing and PRD state and impacts on Base
It's the other way around as in the WG's have to be in alignment
On 12/12/2013 09:00 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 06:50:31PM +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Now, to figure our how the build chains for these packages look like
i've cobbled together a (really bad) hack using python and
repoclosure that basically takes a set of packages as an
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 04:45:22PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 12.12.2013 14:42, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Thu, Dec 12, 2013 at 01:23:12PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 10.12.2013 14:20, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 02:52:27PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
Compose started at Fri Dec 13 07:15:03 UTC 2013
Broken deps for armhfp
--
[avro]
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-mapreduce
avro-mapred-1.7.5-1.fc20.noarch requires hadoop-client
[blueman]
Dne 12.12.2013 18:50, Phil Knirsch napsal(a):
Initiate build requires cleanup for base related packages in Fedora
working with maintainers and the community. The goal is to reduce the
number of self-hosting packages required for Base from currently over
2000 packages.
Just a few (probably
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Thu, 12 Dec 2013 04:05:55 -0600
Dennis Gilmore den...@ausil.us escribió:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Final RC1 images have been uploaded to EC2 and are available at
ami-3b361952 : us-east-1 image for i386
Kevin Kofler kevin.kof...@chello.at writes:
Simone Caronni wrote:
http://www.mail-archive.com/bacula-users@lists.sourceforge.net/msg57308.html
Hmmm, that guy is painting a somewhat different picture of the situation of
the 2 projects than your Change page. In particular, he claims the
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:20:50 +0100,
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
* It might be interesting to have some script, which tries to audit
BR, e.g. it removes all BR first and then adds them back as they are
required. This could reveal some BR which are actually not needed
anymore,
On 12/13/2013 12:20 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 12.12.2013 18:50, Phil Knirsch napsal(a):
Initiate build requires cleanup for base related packages in Fedora
working with maintainers and the community. The goal is to reduce the
number of self-hosting packages required for Base from currently
On 12/13/2013 02:31 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:20:50 +0100,
Vít Ondruch vondr...@redhat.com wrote:
* It might be interesting to have some script, which tries to audit
BR, e.g. it removes all BR first and then adds them back as they are
required. This could reveal
sorry for half off-topic but are there any plans to
have EPEL pakcages for RHEL7 public-beta or even
still available and i am too stupid to find them?
the base repo is missing a lot of things like
* htop
* lynis
* rkhunter
* phpMyAdmin
* php-pecl-mailparse
* php-pecl-geoip
*
You can check epel-devel list, we just discussed something there.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
2013/12/13 Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net
sorry for half off-topic but are there any plans to
have EPEL pakcages for RHEL7 public-beta or even
still available and i am too stupid to find them?
the base repo is missing a lot of things like
* htop
* lynis
* rkhunter
* phpMyAdmin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/13/2013 08:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
sorry for half off-topic but are there any plans to have EPEL
pakcages for RHEL7 public-beta or even still available and i am too
stupid to find them?
the base repo is missing a lot of things like *
Am 13.12.2013 14:52, schrieb Stephen Gallagher:
On 12/13/2013 08:49 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
sorry for half off-topic but are there any plans to have EPEL
pakcages for RHEL7 public-beta or even still available and i am too
stupid to find them?
the base repo is missing a lot of things like
Dne 13.12.2013 14:41, Phil Knirsch napsal(a):
On 12/13/2013 12:20 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
Dne 12.12.2013 18:50, Phil Knirsch napsal(a):
Initiate build requires cleanup for base related packages in Fedora
working with maintainers and the community. The goal is to reduce the
number of
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Phil Knirsch pknir...@redhat.com wrote:
Famous last words: Can't be that hard to write a script that compares 2
builds that they provide the have the same provides and requires and
filelists. :)
Try /usr/bin/rpmdiff first...
--
devel mailing list
Hi,
Is there any netinstall image for this RC1?
2013/12/12 Andre Robatino robat...@fedoraproject.org
NOTE: The 32-bit Install DVD is over its size limit.
As per the Fedora 20 schedule [1], Fedora 20 Final Release Candidate 1
(RC1) is now available for testing. Content information, including
should this not be also available as torrent?
http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/
currently only the Beta
i would like to help with my bandwidth and my beta-tracker is obsolete now
Am 12.12.2013 08:10, schrieb Andre Robatino:
NOTE: The 32-bit Install DVD is over its size limit.
As per the
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 05:47:38AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to
files in the release tree
http://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/alt/stage/20-RC1/Images/i386/Fedora-Images-i386-20-AMI
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 1:49 PM, Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
sorry for half off-topic but are there any plans to
have EPEL pakcages for RHEL7 public-beta or even
still available and i am too stupid to find them?
It's completely off-topic for this lists, there's an epel-devel
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:36:37 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
should this not be also available as torrent?
http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/
currently only the Beta
i would like to help with my bandwidth and my beta-tracker is
obsolete now
TC (test compose) and RC's
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 08:26:41AM +, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
The base end's up being broken compromises between the working
groups ( in other words keeping things the same as they are now ),
which is why I designed the FedoraOS ( which is just different
approach to the layer/rings
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 12:20:50PM +0100, Vít Ondruch wrote:
* It might be interesting to have some script, which tries to audit
BR, e.g. it removes all BR first and then adds them back as they are
required. This could reveal some BR which are actually not needed
anymore, but are listed among
Am 13.12.2013 16:47, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Fri, 13 Dec 2013 16:36:37 +0100
Reindl Harald h.rei...@thelounge.net wrote:
http://torrent.fedoraproject.org/
currently only the Beta
i would like to help with my bandwidth
TC (test compose) and RC's (Release Candidates) are not mirrored or
Today we continued the discussion about the BR cleanup work and moved
over to how we could do the same for docs as well (which seemed to
contribute a lot to the BR chain).
Meeting ended Fri Dec 13 16:07:27 2013 UTC. Information about MeetBot at
http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot .
Minutes:
Hi everyone, I'm Stephen Herr (sherr).
I noticed that the koan package is orphaned in Fedora and that it has
one or two fairly important bugs. I'm a developer on the Satellite /
Spacewalk projects and I've been packaging / maintaining koan for over a
year with them, so I figured I could
The following Fedora EPEL 5 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
600
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5630/bugzilla-3.2.10-5.el5
115
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11276/ssmtp-2.61-21.el5
91
The following Fedora EPEL 6 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
600
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2012-5620/bugzilla-3.4.14-2.el6
115
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2013-11274/ssmtp-2.61-21.el6
57
On 12/13/2013 12:49 PM, Stephen Herr wrote:
Hi everyone, I'm Stephen Herr (sherr).
I noticed that the koan package is orphaned in Fedora and that it has one or
two fairly important bugs. I'm a developer on the Satellite / Spacewalk
projects and I've been packaging / maintaining koan for over a
Hi, folks. I wanted to draw the attention of anyone who used Fedora 20
pre-release (Alpha, Beta, or TC/RC for Alpha, Beta or Final) to this
issue:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_F20_bugs#.2Froot_permissions_incorrect_on_pre-release_installations
Briefly, if you did use F20 pre-release -
On Fri, 2013-12-13 at 14:45 +0100, Phil Knirsch wrote:
Famous last words: Can't be that hard to write a script that compares 2
builds that they provide the have the same provides and requires and
filelists. :)
That's still not really enough; that metadata doesn't express anything
*close* to
Invariably when adding a patch to a spec, often I forget some detail,
whether it be adding the %patchN macro to %prep or `git add`ing the
patch. It would seem I'm not alone, either. A Google search for e.g.
site:https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/scm-commits/ really
apply patch returns
Hi
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 8:42 PM, T.C. Hollingsworth wrote:
To prevent this from happening in the future, I wrote a little git
pre-commit hook to help out, which I figured I'd share with you all:
http://patches.fedorapeople.org/patchcheck.py
Would it be possible to hook it up with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
El Fri, 13 Dec 2013 10:46:16 -0500
Matthew Miller mat...@fedoraproject.org escribió:
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 05:47:38AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
additionally if your looking to the AMI's they have been added to
files in the release tree
I maintain two package, OpenImageIO and OpenColorIO, which can optionally
depend on each other. During the review process I intentionally decided
that it was more important for OpenImageIO to depend on OpenColorIO as it
uses the latter for color management.
OpenColorIO is not a library, but a
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 10:05:05PM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
Note, these are the GA images.
Hey Dennis, will the images going to mirrors be these or the ones
with the extra RC1.1 dot, like
Fedora-x86_64-20-20131211.1-sda.qcow2?
The Images in RC1 and RC1.1 are exactly the same. the
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
On Thu, 12 Dec 2013 18:36:48 -0700
T.C. Hollingsworth tchollingswo...@gmail.com wrote:
Any chance an automatic build could be tacked on the end of that?
Seems like it would be pretty easy to add to your wiki script and
would
On Fri, Dec 13, 2013 at 9:42 AM, Kevin Fenzi ke...@scrye.com wrote:
I wouldn't think so no. I would say all epel7 packages MUST use
systemd units. I don't know the state of the systemd rpm macros in
rhel7, we would need to figure that out. Hopefully they are all there.
+1000 from me. Won't be
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the F-20 tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
commit 3fc296bbb35e8a86ef246cdf252dd61d4942cc85
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Fri Dec 13 12:34:54 2013 +0100
Typo
slic3r.spec |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/slic3r.spec b/slic3r.spec
index a8bcf98..6bf999b 100644
--- a/slic3r.spec
commit 2c2167afba306b789c92d53110126adbee8cf62c
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Fri Dec 13 13:12:59 2013 +0100
Bundle admesh via FPC 368
slic3r.spec |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
---
diff --git a/slic3r.spec b/slic3r.spec
index 6bf999b..54bc3a6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032056
--- Comment #6 from Miro Hrončok mhron...@redhat.com ---
Temporary bundling exception was granted.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
Summary of changes:
00db753... Slic3r 1.0.0RC1 (*)
c38570f... Sources for previous commit (*)
3fc296b... Typo (*)
2c2167a... Bundle admesh via FPC 368 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032056
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
slic3r-1.0.0-0.1.RC1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/slic3r-1.0.0-0.1.RC1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-Data-OptList:
de3f747d6b802ded363cf434a96dab8f Data-OptList-0.109.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 5e4c3c1b4014d08612768aeff6f5947f52058dc7
Author: Paul Howarth p...@city-fan.org
Date: Fri Dec 13 16:09:28 2013 +
Update to 0.109
- New upstream release 0.109
- Update bugtracker and repo links
perl-Data-OptList.spec | 10 ++
sources|
The lightweight tag 'perl-Data-OptList-0.109-1.fc21' was created pointing to:
5e4c3c1... Update to 0.109
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit ea2fed3bbe33d57c935abb99a0c934ee34061d24
Author: Miro Hrončok m...@hroncok.cz
Date: Fri Dec 13 17:48:27 2013 +0100
Backported several bugfixes
slic3r-1543.patch | 104 +++
slic3r-1545.patch | 116
Summary of changes:
ea2fed3... Backported several bugfixes (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032056
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
slic3r-1.0.0-0.2.RC1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/slic3r-1.0.0-0.2.RC1.fc20
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043085
Bug ID: 1043085
Summary: perl-CPAN-Mini-1.111015 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-CPAN-Mini
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043086
Bug ID: 1043086
Summary: perl-ExtUtils-CChecker-0.09 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-ExtUtils-CChecker
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1021855
Upstream Release Monitoring upstream-release-monitor...@fedoraproject.org
changed:
What|Removed |Added
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035690
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-File-Fetch-0.46-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031267
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-DB_File-1.831-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035761
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Net-STOMP-Client-2.2-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032571
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-Net-Twitter-4.01000-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031270
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-PPIx-Regexp-0.035-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1038513
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1033018
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-local-lib-1.008010-4.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034106
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Syntax-Keyword-Junction-0.003007-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20
stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this
bug report.
--
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030907
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Archive-Extract-0.70-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1034098
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-CGI-3.64-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031266
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-CPAN-Mini-1.111014-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1037520
--- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Date-Manip-6.42-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1035760
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Config-Validator-1.1-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032181
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS-3.18-292.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032089
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-HTTP-Tiny-0.034-4.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1031988
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Coro-6.33-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032568
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Math-MatrixReal-2.10-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1032056
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030920
--- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Text-CSV_XS-1.02-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable
repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug
report.
--
You are
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=977266
Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-ExtUtils-Typemaps-Defa
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1030921
--- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-Tk-Pod-0.9942-1.fc20 has been pushed to the Fedora 20 stable repository.
If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-ExtUtils-CChecker:
2c7b30a367fc67851be44f9b4c98b652 ExtUtils-CChecker-0.09.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
commit 884ae5802d33d061ec92c31a96761c204d95d278
Author: Christopher Meng i...@cicku.me
Date: Sat Dec 14 12:26:10 2013 +0800
Update to 0.09
.gitignore |1 +
perl-ExtUtils-CChecker.spec | 14 +-
sources |2 +-
3 files changed, 11
Summary of changes:
884ae58... Update to 0.09 (*)
(*) This commit already existed in another branch; no separate mail sent
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1043086
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System upda...@fedoraproject.org ---
perl-ExtUtils-CChecker-0.09-1.fc20 has been submitted as an update for Fedora
20.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-ExtUtils-CChecker-0.09-1.fc20
--
You are
perl-Language-Expr has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On i386:
perl-Language-Expr-0.19-4.fc19.noarch requires
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.16.2)
On armhfp:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47603
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47603/0001-Ticket-47603-should-not-modify-pre-op-entry-during-c.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47313
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47313/0001-Ticket-47313-Indexed-search-with-filter-containing-a.2.patch
Description: commit fae006821bd6e524c0f7f8d5f023f4fe5e160ef0 introduced
a bug, which occurs when a filter includes NOT and one of
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47627
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47627/0001-Ticket-47627-Fix-replication-logging.patch
--
Mark Reynolds
389 Development Team
Red Hat, Inc
mreyno...@redhat.com
--
389-devel mailing list
389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
84 matches
Mail list logo
