Re: Packages FTBFS with Python 3.6

On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 02:33:29PM -0700, Pete Zaitcev wrote: > On Wed, 21 Dec 2016 00:18:47 +0100 > Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > I've attached the list of failed packages (failed.txt). You can search > > python-ceilometerclient > python-keystoneclient > python-manilaclient >

Best practices for getting CFLAGS/LDFLAGS etc.

The final values of CFLAGS/LDFLAGS/… are set (as shell variables) by the %configure macro. There is no other immediately obvious way to get those definitions. This means that if you can't use %configure for some reason, you are out of luck. In this situation, this still works: %global

Re: Best practices for getting CFLAGS/LDFLAGS etc.

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 10:56 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > The final values of CFLAGS/LDFLAGS/… are set (as shell variables) by the > %configure macro. There is no other immediately obvious way to get those > definitions. This means that if you can't use %configure for some

Re: Koji builders' specs

On Monday, January 2, 2017 11:24:35 AM CET Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Dne 20.12.2016 v 16:03 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a): > > The only thing I was able to find is version of mock in the log output. > > Hmm, that is nice idea. Plugin for Mock which will print: > * number of CPU > * RAM + swap > *

Re: Best practices for getting CFLAGS/LDFLAGS etc.

On Monday, January 2, 2017 10:56:10 AM CET Florian Weimer wrote: > The final values of CFLAGS/LDFLAGS/… are set (as shell variables) by the > %configure macro. There is no other immediately obvious way to get > those definitions. This means that if you can't use %configure for some > reason,

Re: Koji builders' specs

Dne 20.12.2016 v 16:03 Pavel Raiskup napsal(a): > The only thing I was able to find is version of mock in the log output. Hmm, that is nice idea. Plugin for Mock which will print: * number of CPU * RAM + swap * storage size available I will try to work on that. -- Miroslav Suchy, RHCA Red

Re: Strange koji failures

On 2016-12-24, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:30:12 + (UTC) > Petr Pisar wrote: >> No. This is a generic problem that the ExclusiveArch hack as >> documents in packaging guidelines (i.e. noarch package with >> ExclusiveArch including noarch)

Re: `best=1` in new Mock

Dne 1.1.2017 v 23:47 Till Maas napsal(a): > AFAIK in Rawhide only one version is available for each package, > therefore I suspect this does not have a real impact on Rawhide. I have to take into account thirdparty repos (Copr, private repos...), where things are not so straight. However I am

Are partial upgrades expected to work in rawhide?

We received a bug report that generated RPM dependencies are too coarse in rawhide (#1409557). The bug report is correct at a technical level. But I assumed that it was not a problem because partial upgrades are in rawhide are not supported—it's always all-or-nothing. Comments? Thanks,

Re: debugging mutter/wayland, fixme

> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_debug_Wayland_problems > > "Debugging mutter > > You can debug mutter (used in gnome-shell) by setting its environment > variables. These need to be set prior to run gnome-shell, so if you > want to log into GNOME from GDM, you need to create a wrapper

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20170102.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20170101.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20170102.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:2 Dropped images: 4 Added packages: 1 Dropped packages:0 Upgraded packages: 47 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 99.38 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Koji builders' specs

On Monday, January 2, 2017 11:00:44 AM CET Kamil Dudka wrote: > > Note this test was just changed upstream to use locks instead of volatiles, > > which significantly improved performance on a 40 core NUMA system at least: > > http://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=gnulib.git;a=commitdiff;h=480d374

Re: Are partial upgrades expected to work in rawhide?

On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > We received a bug report that generated RPM dependencies are too coarse in > rawhide (#1409557). > > The bug report is correct at a technical level. But I assumed that it was > not a problem because partial upgrades are in rawhide

Re: Orphaning python-sphinx-theme-better

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > I've orphaned python-sphinx-theme-better. It was briefly used by > python-pillow for its documentation in the past, but that's not the case > anymore and python-sphinx-theme-better hasn't seen any activity upstream

Re: Orphaning python-sphinx-theme-better

On 02.01.2017 21:28, Igor Gnatenko wrote: On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: Hi I've orphaned python-sphinx-theme-better. It was briefly used by python-pillow for its documentation in the past, but that's not the case anymore and

Orphaning python-sphinx-theme-better

Hi I've orphaned python-sphinx-theme-better. It was briefly used by python-pillow for its documentation in the past, but that's not the case anymore and python-sphinx-theme-better hasn't seen any activity upstream since 2013. As far as I can tell [1] no other package in fedora requires it.

Re: Are partial upgrades expected to work in rawhide?

> On 01/02/2017 05:22 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: > The bug is in the user-supplied container build scripts. Recommended > practice is to run “dnf update” (or “yum update”) as part of the build > process. Could you provide some link where it is recommended? Because most of pages say exactly

Re: Koji builders' specs

On Sunday, December 25, 2016 13:13:31 Pádraig Brady wrote: > On 22/12/16 13:13, Pádraig Brady wrote: > > On 21/12/16 16:04, Dan Horák wrote: > >> On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 16:03:49 +0100 > >> > >> Pavel Raiskup wrote: > >>> Hi all, > >>> > >>> where is documented what system/hw

Re: Are partial upgrades expected to work in rawhide?

On 01/02/2017 05:22 PM, Lukas Slebodnik wrote: I know it is not a high critical issue and therefore I suggested (in BZ) to to automatically rebuild docker base image for such change in glibc in rawhide. It would not fix the problem but it would reduce potential bugs. And in future we might

Re: Interpreting FAF reports

Hi Sérgio, It depends on what is your goal. Do you want to fix the crash? You can log in to FAF and check if there is a contact email or a comment. If there is not additional information, you can just wait until some opens a Bugzilla bug report. Do you want to get rid of the

Re: Interpreting FAF reports

On 01/02/2017 07:26 PM, jfi...@fedoraproject.org wrote: Isn't this related to no free disk space? I've seen some strange mmap related crashes when a process mmaped a sparse file and disk ran out of free space. This can only happen with writes. This one is a read, if I pieced the available

Re: Review swaps

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 7:09 PM, Sandro Mani wrote: > Hi > > For the upgrade to python-pillow-4.0.0, I need these two packages reviewed: Appreciate that! > > - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409647 - libimagequant - > Palette quantization library > -

Review swaps

Hi For the upgrade to python-pillow-4.0.0, I need these two packages reviewed: - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409647 - libimagequant - Palette quantization library - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409648 - python-olefile - Python package to parse, read and write

Packages owned by epienbro

Given the sad news of the passing of Erik van Pienbroek, I suppose at this stage his packages should be orphaned. I've had a look at what packages he's marked as point of contact in pkgdb [1], in particular the following are packages without comaintainers: mingw-webkitgtk mingw-gtkhtml3

Re: Interpreting FAF reports

Isn't this related to no free disk space? I've seen some strange mmap related crashes when a process mmaped a sparse file and disk ran out of free space. Anyway, please do let me know what additional information would help you to resolve the issue. Please bare in mind that FAF report must

Re: Are partial upgrades expected to work in rawhide?

On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > We received a bug report that generated RPM dependencies are too > coarse in rawhide (#1409557). > > The bug report is correct at a technical level. But I assumed that > it was not a problem because partial upgrades are in rawhide

Re: Are partial upgrades expected to work in rawhide?

On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 09:37:01AM -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > We received a bug report that generated RPM dependencies are too > > coarse in rawhide (#1409557). > > > > The bug report is correct at a technical level. But I

Reviews Weekly

Start Date: 2016-12-26 10:08:01.813272 End Date: 2017-01-02 10:08:01.813272 Neal Gompa : 14 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409400 parzip https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409386 python-uvloop

[POC-change] Fedora packages point of contact updates

Change in package status over the last 168 hours 1 packages were orphaned clipit [master, el6, f25, epel7, f24] was orphaned by comzeradd A lightweight, fully featured GTK+ clipboard manager

Re: Koji builders' specs

On Monday, January 2, 2017 2:40:34 PM CET Pavel Raiskup wrote: > Also, the question is whether it isn't really glibc bug, because > schedulers non-ppc64le architectures look to be more "fair" regardless > the default. Sorry, not really -- at least i686 (build cross-compiled from x86_64 probably)

Re: Koji builders' specs

Dne 2.1.2017 v 11:24 Miroslav Suchý napsal(a): > Hmm, that is nice idea. Plugin for Mock which will print: > * number of CPU > * RAM + swap > * storage size available > > I will try to work on that. Done. You can expect it in next version of Mock:

Re: Strange koji failures

On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 13:59:25 + (UTC) Petr Pisar wrote: > On 2016-12-24, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On Fri, 23 Dec 2016 10:30:12 + (UTC) > > Petr Pisar wrote: > >> No. This is a generic problem that the ExclusiveArch hack as > >>

Re: Are partial upgrades expected to work in rawhide?

> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > I think officially, we don't "support" anything but all-or-nothing > upgrades in *all* branches. That is, if you cherry-pick an update from > updates (or even updates-testing) and it also needs some other package > to be

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes - KDE wallet kinit

On 12/11/2016 05:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > * koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos > authentication > instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: > > kinit your-fas-accountn...@fedoraaproject.org > > to get a valid kerberos TGT and be able to authenticate

Re: Packagers - Flag day 2016 Important changes - KDE wallet kinit

On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 11:27 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote: > On 12/11/2016 05:34 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> * koji and the source lookaside were changed to use kerberos >> authentication >> instead of ssl certificates. All maintainers will need to: >> >> kinit

Re: Best practices for getting CFLAGS/LDFLAGS etc.

On Mon, 02 Jan 2017 15:10:26 +0100, Pavel Raiskup wrote: > > > > %global %_configure : > > %configure > > > > As a result, %configure tries to run “:” instead of “./configure”, which > > is a NOP, and only the shell variable initialization remains. > > > > Is this the recommend way to

Re: Interpreting FAF reports

Hi, > > Is there a way to discover who is submitting these crash reports and > what they are trying to do? Unfortunately, there is no full report (e.g. bugzilla) created via ABRT yet, so there is no way to discover who is submitting these crash reports. FAF reports are created from uReports

Fedora Rawhide-20170102.n.0 compose check report

-20170102- appeared since previous compose Mount /run/media/test/Fedora-WS-Live-Rawhide-20170101- disappeared since previous compose System load changed from 0.86 to 0.70 Previous test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/53362#downloads Current test data: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org

Re: Interpreting FAF reports

On Thu, 29 Dec 2016 14:52:29 +, Sérgio Basto wrote: > BTW  > I received ABRT report for package mlt has reached 100 occurrences  > Packages: mlt > Function: QObject::disconnect(QObject const*, char const*, QObject > const*, char const*) > First occurrence: 2016-12-17 > Type: core > Count: 

Re: Strange koji failures

On 12/24/2016 06:03 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Packager can override channel manually when needed. When submitting >> build, you can choose which channel to use. For example, when you want >> the build to be ran on x86_64 you can select "livecd" channel [2], >> which contains only x86_64 hosts. In

Re: Are partial upgrades expected to work in rawhide?

> On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > This is rawhide, if it breaks, people should keep the pieces. > We shouldn't > change what we do with symbol versions just because of it. > It has nothing to do with rawhide. It is a best practice how to use map

[Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity WG

Dear all, You are kindly invited to the meeting: Modularity WG on 2017-01-03 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net The meeting will be about: Meeting for the Modularity Working Group. More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki

Re: Are partial upgrades expected to work in rawhide?

On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 09:37 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > We received a bug report that generated RPM dependencies are too > > coarse in rawhide (#1409557). > > > > The bug report is correct at a technical level. But I assumed

Re: Are partial upgrades expected to work in rawhide?

On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 20:43 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2017-01-02 at 09:37 -0500, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Mon, Jan 02, 2017 at 02:29:47PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote: > > > We received a bug report that generated RPM dependencies are too > > > coarse in rawhide (#1409557). > > >

ppisar pushed to perl-Module-Install-DOAPChangeSets (master). "Import"

From babf3267ccdb235f0fc8f9dfc4bcd6603e9df043 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 08:57:07 +0100 Subject: Import --- .gitignore | 1 +

ppisar pushed to perl-Module-Install-DOAPChangeSets (master). "Fix flaws found at review"

From 5ccaa1d472019e885af0af0103bb8014311554ec Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 08:59:22 +0100 Subject: Fix flaws found at review --- perl-Module-Install-DOAPChangeSets.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1

ppisar pushed to perl-Math-BigInt (master). "1.999807 bump"

From 72dc3e2e3ea09f3c0b6af8e6203fb2997a07e3c0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:05:36 +0100 Subject: 1.999807 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-Math-BigInt.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files

ppisar pushed to perl-Term-Table (master). "0.005 bump"

From 1b903259d4c270aff267f4bd1cf03e1309fdd35a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:55:20 +0100 Subject: 0.005 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Term-Table.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files

[Bug 1409151] perl-DB_File-1.840 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409151 --- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DB_File-1.840-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-db1c7828e5 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1409156] perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ-0.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409156 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |MODIFIED

ppisar pushed to perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ (f25). "0.04 bump"

From 97c97b8022e394b74901e48740f1aada0ac46ae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:38:09 +0100 Subject: 0.04 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ.spec | 24 +++- sources

ppisar pushed to perl-threads (f25). "2.12 bump"

From d56f9e5b67a53b6b526277afe31b7b8563d5b24d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 13:26:21 +0100 Subject: 2.12 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-threads.spec | 6 +- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

[Bug 1409342] perl-threads-2.12 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409342 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

Re: Getting error "Try #1 for call None (multiCall) failed: syntax error: line 1" while running locally abicheck task

Hi Martin, On Mon, Jan 2, 2017 at 7:10 PM, Martin Krizek wrote: > - Original Message - >> From: "Sinny Kumari" >> To: "Fedora QA Development" >> Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 1:15:43 PM >> Subject: Getting error

[Bug 1409151] perl-DB_File-1.840 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409151 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-DB_File (master). "1.840 bump"

From 7f4fc43ee5fdc5d8d22aeb9c061c16b4a0895e34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:18:48 +0100 Subject: 1.840 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-DB_File.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

ppisar pushed to perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ (master). "0.04 bump"

From 97c97b8022e394b74901e48740f1aada0ac46ae3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:38:09 +0100 Subject: 0.04 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ.spec | 24 +++- sources

Broken dependencies: perl-Alien-ROOT

perl-Alien-ROOT has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On aarch64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core On ppc64le: perl-Alien-ROOT-5.34.36.1-2.fc26.noarch requires root-core

ppisar uploaded Ham-Reference-QRZ-0.04.tar.gz for perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ

0784b313df54f0b9bc114b3cf81d8ea70d53219ba7fe6ad183be8b375e38cd45ca81e10f91e9741f73df11d54843b0de986dd9d797a8664d9b4e30e199c1534a Ham-Reference-QRZ-0.04.tar.gz

ppisar uploaded threads-2.12.tar.gz for perl-threads

9ebaaf65c49dc35c19d067433c52d6981c27769bc5b6fff74b34b3501ecd69b85108c8c362b22bc251fecaa420fa47e494736cb3c721c18751a3d688108128ae threads-2.12.tar.gz

ppisar uploaded threads-shared-1.54.tar.gz for perl-threads-shared

a51b6be7ad2b86a8bba81a9d960bacd2f9b5583f11b96f1f889a7b90ec84949815a880f1949b153196815d1cb63469dba64715c87045723e8dde96ff72913f5a threads-shared-1.54.tar.gz

Broken dependencies: perl-OpenOffice-UNO

perl-OpenOffice-UNO has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On armhfp: perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-20.fc25.armv7hl requires libuno_cppu.so.3 perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-20.fc25.armv7hl requires libuno_cppu.so.3(LIBO_UDK_4.4) perl-OpenOffice-UNO-0.07-20.fc25.armv7hl

Broken dependencies: perl-ZeroMQ

perl-ZeroMQ has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZeroMQ-0.23-13.fc25.ppc64le requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.3()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.3 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ3-1.19-5.fc25.ppc64le requires

Broken dependencies: perl-Data-Alias

perl-Data-Alias has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires libperl.so.5.22()(64bit) perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.x86_64 requires perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.22.1) On armhfp: perl-Data-Alias-1.20-2.fc24.armv7hl requires

Broken dependencies: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2

perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2 has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree: On x86_64: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.x86_64 requires libzmq.so.1()(64bit) On armhfp: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.armv7hl requires libzmq.so.1 On ppc64le: perl-ZMQ-LibZMQ2-1.09-9.fc25.ppc64le requires

Re: Enabling "new koji build" Taskotron checks on scratch builds

- Original Message - > From: "Jeremy Cline" > To: qa-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 8:07:55 PM > Subject: Enabling "new koji build" Taskotron checks on scratch builds > > Hi everyone, > > I recently started maintaining

ppisar pushed to perl-DB_File (f25). "1.840 bump"

From 7f4fc43ee5fdc5d8d22aeb9c061c16b4a0895e34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:18:48 +0100 Subject: 1.840 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-DB_File.spec | 7 +-- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

ppisar pushed to perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ (f24). "Mandatory Perl build-requires added "

From 1cf77e0eda73ee70a00bd79d5c75a6b62cdc5336 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Fri, 24 Jun 2016 09:51:15 +0200 Subject: Mandatory Perl build-requires added ---

ppisar pushed to perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ (f24). "0.04 bump"

From cd9de473ef63d544083705fba16fd808aedbaa8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 12:38:09 +0100 Subject: 0.04 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ.spec | 24 +++- sources

ppisar pushed to perl-threads-shared (f25). "1.54 bump"

From 5bf50e5b5066a0d7497ed8a8f20567c28bd9bd0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 13:15:20 +0100 Subject: 1.54 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-threads-shared.spec | 8 ++-- sources | 2 +-

[Bug 1409275] perl-threads-shared-1.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409275 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-threads-shared-1.54-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-c9f60482a4 -- You are receiving this

ppisar pushed to perl-threads-shared (master). "1.54 bump"

From 5bf50e5b5066a0d7497ed8a8f20567c28bd9bd0a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 13:15:20 +0100 Subject: 1.54 bump --- .gitignore | 1 + perl-threads-shared.spec | 8 ++-- sources | 2 +-

[Bug 1409275] perl-threads-shared-1.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409275 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED Fixed In

[Bug 1408515] perl-Math-BigInt-1.999807 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408515 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

[Bug 1392467] perl-Alien-ROOT not available on AArch64 because root is not there

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1392467 Bug 1392467 depends on bug 1376324, which changed state. Bug 1376324 Summary: root is not built for aarch64 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376324 What|Removed |Added

ppisar uploaded Term-Table-0.005.tar.gz for perl-Term-Table

d219971a636a2404c903f5fc25db9973deae21a6e9e48bdee22428bc1b9ca2525cde827dc0f2039bc56a26d994566614eabb7765c9387f9fac5e856a9407a53a Term-Table-0.005.tar.gz

[Bug 1408956] perl-Term-Table-0.005 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408956 Petr Pisar changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed In

ppisar pushed to perl-DB_File (f24). "1.840 bump"

From e9e9937c9b965b6e3d6fbaa094754a1c8bba7e44 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 11:18:48 +0100 Subject: 1.840 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-DB_File.spec | 5 - sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6

[Bug 1409151] perl-DB_File-1.840 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409151 --- Comment #3 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DB_File-1.840-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-0f3481f83c -- You are receiving this mail

ppisar set the monitor flag of perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ to nobuild

ppisar set the monitor flag of perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ to nobuild ___ perl-devel mailing list -- perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to perl-devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

[Bug 1409156] perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ-0.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409156 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ-0.04-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-56e3152041 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1409156] perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ-0.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409156 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ-0.04-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-2dbd12b2e0 -- You are receiving

ppisar pushed to perl-threads (master). "2.12 bump"

From d56f9e5b67a53b6b526277afe31b7b8563d5b24d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Petr=20P=C3=ADsa=C5=99?= Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 13:26:21 +0100 Subject: 2.12 bump --- .gitignore| 1 + perl-threads.spec | 6 +- sources | 2 +- 3 files changed, 7

ppisar uploaded DB_File-1.840.tar.gz for perl-DB_File

c9af4382a6759fcf2ad4982d922d5be3bf026927bd103204c9c38666e6a26afc06ee5456a567c396806d0ca3762af146b60c10998b17343a3bfd47bda4ec3fe2 DB_File-1.840.tar.gz

Re: Getting error "Try #1 for call None (multiCall) failed: syntax error: line 1" while running locally abicheck task

- Original Message - > From: "Sinny Kumari" > To: "Fedora QA Development" > Sent: Tuesday, December 20, 2016 1:15:43 PM > Subject: Getting error "Try #1 for call None (multiCall) failed: syntax > error: line 1" while running locally

[Bug 1408456] perl-B-Debug-1.24 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1408456 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

jplesnik uploaded Nmap-Parser-1.33.tar.gz for perl-Nmap-Parser

8c33aa48b391294e9f45f527548c2beea6417434ef233e87255c2ce5c4245e6bb07aa8fe39ef5fa9dfa163268548afea3839b383edffe3979dadb3d61b526070 Nmap-Parser-1.33.tar.gz

[Bug 1409635] perl-Nmap-Parser-1.33 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409635 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED Fixed

pghmcfc pushed to perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma (master). "Rebuild for xz-5.2.3"

From 08969027b69bae10512c3cd8db40b7100fe5afd1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Paul Howarth Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 20:15:10 + Subject: Rebuild for xz-5.2.3 --- perl-Compress-Raw-Lzma.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

orion pushed to perl-Device-SerialPort (master). "Cleanup spec"

From c85e436a1608be3418f9e74e5b931ff56430dab7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Orion Poplawski Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2017 13:37:25 -0700 Subject: Cleanup spec --- perl-Device-SerialPort.spec | 11 --- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git

[Bug 1409151] perl-DB_File-1.840 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409151 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1409156] perl-Ham-Reference-QRZ-0.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1409156 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

orion pushed to perl-Device-SerialPort (epel7). "Check in the 1.00301 source"

From e62d2e2589b15d952da4a8f7f711b83a7659203d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Orion Poplawski Date: Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:20:11 + Subject: Check in the 1.00301 source --- .cvsignore | 2 +- sources| 2 +- 2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git

orion pushed to perl-Device-SerialPort (epel7). "Perl mass rebuild"

From 54b825dc078ce356860b8a798a39a221522c0aee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: =?UTF-8?q?Marcela=20Ma=C5=A1l=C3=A1=C5=88ov=C3=A1?= Date: Fri, 17 Jun 2011 15:28:38 +0200 Subject: Perl mass rebuild --- perl-Device-SerialPort.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1

orion pushed to perl-Device-SerialPort (epel7). "dist-git conversion"

From 4f93bc981d9a85131b3eb86a855a04d291a87152 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Fedora Release Engineering Date: Thu, 29 Jul 2010 06:31:05 + Subject: dist-git conversion --- .cvsignore | 1 - .gitignore | 1 + Makefile | 21 - 3 files

orion pushed to perl-Device-SerialPort (epel7). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild"

From 866604f02f2d84352b14200373c8029ca0ac2f63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dennis Gilmore Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 07:32:04 -0600 Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_17_Mass_Rebuild --- perl-Device-SerialPort.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4

orion pushed to perl-Device-SerialPort (epel7). "new perl"

From 8c4bcdd4d40d6f62ee91da911a83502b282a99eb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Tom Callaway Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2008 22:12:36 + Subject: new perl --- perl-Device-SerialPort.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

orion pushed to perl-Device-SerialPort (epel7). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild"

From 2a93c0c1655d306457b7e087d8c73d1731c1b8de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jesse Keating Date: Sun, 26 Jul 2009 05:44:21 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_12_Mass_Rebuild --- perl-Device-SerialPort.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4

orion pushed to perl-Device-SerialPort (epel7). "- Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild"

From 666fd388821a62364f6f486aabc1fc397d02a986 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jesse Keating Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:18:51 + Subject: - Rebuilt for https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_11_Mass_Rebuild --- perl-Device-SerialPort.spec | 5 - 1 file changed, 4

  1   2   3   >