Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On 4 April 2018 at 22:06, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 04/04/2018 01:35 PM, James Hogarth wrote: >> On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 21:28 Adam Williamson, >> wrote: >> >>> This rather begs the question of whether there are any modules which >>> only work *with python

Re: [DONE] Mass package change (python2- binary package renaming)

On Sun, 2017-08-20 at 20:49 +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > On Sun, 2017-08-20 at 18:49 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 05:09:04PM +0100, Sérgio Basto wrote: > > > On Sun, 2017-08-20 at 14:46 +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > > > wrote: > > > > On Sun, Aug 20,

Re: Web assets in Fedora

Interesting read thanks, I was looking to package myetherwallet( https://github.com/kvhnuke/etherwallet) as my first package in the official repo. At first I though it will be easy because it's "only html files" no binary, library etc... Oh I was so wrong... To be honest I'm stuck at trying to

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 4 April 2018 at 11:01, David Sommerseth wrote: > On 03/04/18 21:00, Christian Glombek wrote: >> I should probably add that the actual updater program has not been shipped >> in the rpms thus far. Although I'm not sure how this affects major updates, >> it is leading to

Re: [Help Needed] Fedora Server's Mission and Goals

I'm going to extend this by a week and cancel tomorrow's Server SIG meeting. People have been very distracted with dealing with Beta blockers and we've extended this request to a wider audience (it got picked up by certain news sources). Let's give it a little more time to percolate. If you have

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 03/04/18 21:00, Christian Glombek wrote: > I should probably add that the actual updater program has not been shipped in > the rpms thus far. Although I'm not sure how this affects major updates, it > is leading to problems elsewhere (i.e. people have to uninstall some apps on > v13 and

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 4 April 2018 at 08:38, Benson Muite wrote: > >> >> So, I don't think we can update the package from 10 to 13, thus breaking >> all user installations. >> >> I see 2 possible way >> >> The classical one >> >> - create nextcloud11, nextcloud12 and nextcloud13 packages

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On 04/02/2018 10:25 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: I don't know if there is a way to know this right now, other than waiting up to 6 hours. Bodhi does actually have a UI to submit waivers (to avoid the CLI and the confusing data hunting), but it needs an auth token configured to allow it to talk to

Re: Practical use of fedabipkgdiff

On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Sinny Kumari wrote: > As far as I am aware, right now fedabipkgdiff tool doesn't support ABI > comparison against scratch build. I see this feature as a nice addition. > > One option is to download scratch build rpms locally and use

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

2018-04-03 13:11 GMT-06:00 Stephen Gallagher : > > > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:01 PM Christian Glombek > wrote: > >> I should probably add that the actual updater program has not been >> shipped in the rpms thus far. Although I'm not sure how this

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

Another thought on this topic: It's probably a lot of work to maintain OwnCloud and NextCloud, and it sounds like a lot of people have moved to NextCloud or intend to in the future. Would it help if we went ahead and retired OwnCloud so we could focus on just one of the two to reduce the burden?

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 16:27 Randy Barlow, wrote: > Another thought on this topic: > > It's probably a lot of work to maintain OwnCloud and NextCloud, and it > sounds like a lot of people have moved to NextCloud or intend to in the > future. Would it help if we went

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 16:51 William Moreno, wrote: > > > 2018-04-04 9:43 GMT-06:00 Randy Barlow : > >> On 04/04/2018 11:37 AM, William Moreno wrote: >> > A well documented setp can help users to move from OC to NC. >> >> James

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 4 April 2018 at 14:48, William Moreno wrote: > > > 2018-04-03 13:11 GMT-06:00 Stephen Gallagher : >> >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:01 PM Christian Glombek >> wrote: >>> >>> I should probably add that the

Local test VMs (was: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud)

James Hogarth wrote: > […] > FIrst thing when I fired up my test harness was that F28 has changed, > and thus broken, kickstart for the user option compared to a standard > minimal that worked going back to F22 and EL7 so that had to be > debugged and fixed ... done >

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 15:59 Reindl Harald, wrote: > > > Am 04.04.2018 um 16:51 schrieb James Hogarth: > > Last bit to debug before I can start testing an update of OC and NC is > > why my automated setup explodes with: > > > > PHP Fatal error: Declaration of > >

Re: Fedora Notifications app is incomprehensible

On 04/03/2018 07:49 PM, Chuck Anderson wrote: > Is there a training video to explain how to use Fedora Notifications? > It is utterly incomprehensible and uses "cute" phrases like "Party > Perished" and "tabula rasa" that fail to help the user understand how > to use it. Unfortunately I don't

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 16:37 Stephen Gallagher, wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:34 AM James Hogarth > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 15:59 Reindl Harald, wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> Am 04.04.2018 um 16:51 schrieb James

Re: Practical use of fedabipkgdiff

On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 07:47 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 2:01 PM, Sinny Kumari > wrote: > > As far as I am aware, right now fedabipkgdiff tool doesn't support > > ABI > > comparison against scratch build. I see this feature as a nice > > addition. > > > >

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 04/03/2018 07:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 15:25 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: >> One question comes to mind though - won't this be a problem in the >> future too? How can we guarantee that users can keep upgrading to 14, >> 15, 16, etc. since Fedora doesn't keep

Re: Unacceptable size increase to ALL live images in F28: Noto CJK Fonts

Akira TAGOH wrote: > of course if we can go ahead without any workaround on this, that would be > better though. FYI, the plan of the KDE SIG is to simply bump the target size of the image yet again. I do not like that approach, but I am not the one who decides (anymore – I used to de-facto

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

Il 04/04/2018 17:26, Randy Barlow ha scritto: Another thought on this topic: It's probably a lot of work to maintain OwnCloud and NextCloud, and it sounds like a lot of people have moved to NextCloud or intend to in the future. Would it help if we went ahead and retired OwnCloud so we could

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 04/04/2018 06:08 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > How about emailing me and asking what you can do to help? > > I've really had no help on this (outside of Shawn and Remi getting > dependencies packaged on occasion) since I took this over from AdamW > way back. > > There's always lots of noise

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

2018-04-04 8:51 GMT-06:00 James Hogarth : > On 4 April 2018 at 14:48, William Moreno > wrote: > > > > > > 2018-04-03 13:11 GMT-06:00 Stephen Gallagher : > >> > >> > >> > >> On Tue, Apr 3, 2018 at 3:01 PM Christian

Re: Local test VMs

On 04/04/2018 05:11 PM, Tim Landscheidt wrote: > > BTW, it would be very nice if there was (maintained) docu- > mentation on how to generate Fedora VMs and for example use > Ansible to configure complex interactive test setups. > James's article >

Re: Local test VMs (was: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud)

On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 16:11 Tim Landscheidt, wrote: > James Hogarth wrote: > > > […] > > > FIrst thing when I fired up my test harness was that F28 has changed, > > and thus broken, kickstart for the user option compared to a standard > > minimal

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 04/04/2018 09:48 AM, William Moreno wrote: > +1 should be a nice changes for the F29 release.  Since OwnCloud is completely broken on F28 right now (not sure about NextCloud, but it might be as well), it could be nice to do for F28 as well. ___ devel

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:34 AM James Hogarth wrote: > > > On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 15:59 Reindl Harald, wrote: > >> >> >> Am 04.04.2018 um 16:51 schrieb James Hogarth: >> > Last bit to debug before I can start testing an update of OC and NC is >> >

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On 04/04/2018 09:15 AM, Michael Cronenworth wrote: > It is now Wednesday. Could this be implemented now? Infra is still in a freeze (we will probably lift it sometime today). I can't personally take care of the ticket because I don't have access to create the necessary token. I also suspect the

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 04/04/2018 11:37 AM, William Moreno wrote: > A well documented setp can help users to move from OC to NC. James actually wrote a nice blog post about migration: https://www.hogarthuk.com/?q=node/17 ___ devel mailing list --

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

2018-04-04 9:43 GMT-06:00 Randy Barlow : > On 04/04/2018 11:37 AM, William Moreno wrote: > > A well documented setp can help users to move from OC to NC. > > James actually wrote a nice blog post about migration: > > https://www.hogarthuk.com/?q=node/17 > > James are

[Bug 1560768] perl-Authen-SCRAM-0.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560768 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Authen-SCRAM-0.009-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1560548] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560548 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.25-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On 04/04/2018 09:21 AM, James Hogarth wrote: ...snip... > Can we please get some consistency here? > > I noted today that firewalld has dropped python2-firewall but of course > ansible isn't switching to py3 for the controller (and therefore local) > until F29 and not all python modules are py3

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On 04/04/2018 10:46 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 04/04/2018 09:21 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > ...snip... > >> Can we please get some consistency here? >> >> I noted today that firewalld has dropped python2-firewall but of course >> ansible isn't switching to py3 for the controller (and therefore

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:05 PM James Hogarth wrote: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 16:37 Stephen Gallagher, wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:34 AM James Hogarth >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 15:59 Reindl

Fedora 28 compose report: 20180404.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-28-20180403.n.0 NEW: Fedora-28-20180404.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:4 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 9 Dropped packages:1 Upgraded packages: 42 Downgraded packages: 0 Size of added packages: 841.58 KiB Size of dropped packages:326.34 KiB

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 12:59 PM Reindl Harald wrote: > > > Am 04.04.2018 um 17:36 schrieb Stephen Gallagher: > > Hopefully this will become easier once we get the PHP maintainers to > > move over to building Fedora Modules. Then we can decouple the PHP > > updates from

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Mon, 26 Mar 2018, 10:59 Petr Viktorin, wrote: > On 03/24/18 15:28, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Petr Viktorin wrote: > >> As with any orphaning, that leaves two options: > >> - someone else agrees now to take over in 2020 (keeping in mind this is > >> a security-critical

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 04/04/2018 07:51 AM, James Hogarth wrote: ...snip... > Today I've spent time between $realwork getting my ansible plays > updated to handle F28 (thanks for dropping python2-* early guys!) and > have been in contact with lorbus (thanks for stepping up). Note that if you mean ansible dropping

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 04/04/2018 01:59 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: The short version is that Modules *are* distribution packages. They're just distribution packages that allow you to pick which major release stream you want to stay on. We also have a distribution-level defaults setup that allows you to pick one

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 11:07 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > On 04/03/2018 07:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 15:25 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote: > > > One question comes to mind though - won't this be a problem in the > > > future too? How can we guarantee that users can keep

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 17:55 +0200, Mattia Verga wrote: > Il 04/04/2018 17:26, Randy Barlow ha scritto: > > Another thought on this topic: > > > > It's probably a lot of work to maintain OwnCloud and NextCloud, and it > > sounds like a lot of people have moved to NextCloud or intend to in the > >

Re: What to do when test gating in bodhi fails (no test results found)?

On 04/04/2018 10:39 AM, Randy Barlow wrote: Infra is still in a freeze (we will probably lift it sometime today). I can't personally take care of the ticket because I don't have access to create the necessary token. I also suspect the admins will be too busy to do this this week, because they

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:36 PM Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 04/04/2018 01:59 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > The short version is that Modules *are* distribution packages. They're > > just distribution packages that allow you to pick which major release > > stream

Web assets in Fedora

Hello, I've written a blog post about web assets in Fedora. Do you bundle third-party libraries/frameworks like jQuery, Bootstrap or Patternfly into your project and commit them to the git repository? There is a much better solution how to do it. If you are interested, please read the article

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 11:15 +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > On 4 April 2018 at 11:01, David Sommerseth wrote: > > On 03/04/18 21:00, Christian Glombek wrote: > > > I should probably add that the actual updater program has not been > > > shipped in the rpms thus far. Although I'm

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 10:51 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On 04/04/2018 10:46 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 04/04/2018 09:21 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > > ...snip... > > > > > Can we please get some consistency here? > > > > > > I noted today that firewalld has dropped python2-firewall but of

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 20:26 Adam Williamson, wrote: > On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 11:15 +0100, James Hogarth wrote: > > On 4 April 2018 at 11:01, David Sommerseth wrote: > > > On 03/04/18 21:00, Christian Glombek wrote: > > > > I should probably add that

Re: Fedora Notifications app is incomprehensible

Chuck Anderson wrote: > Is there a training video to explain how to use Fedora Notifications? > It is utterly incomprehensible and uses "cute" phrases like "Party > Perished" and "tabula rasa" that fail to help the user understand how > to use it. "tabula rasa" (literally "wiped table") is Latin

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 18:52 Kevin Fenzi, wrote: > On 04/04/2018 10:46 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 04/04/2018 09:21 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > > ...snip... > > > >> Can we please get some consistency here? > >> > >> I noted today that firewalld has dropped python2-firewall

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 18:39 Kevin Fenzi, wrote: > On 04/04/2018 07:51 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > ...snip... > > Today I've spent time between $realwork getting my ansible plays > > updated to handle F28 (thanks for dropping python2-* early guys!) and > > have been in contact with

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 21:28 Adam Williamson, wrote: > On Wed, 2018-04-04 at 10:51 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > On 04/04/2018 10:46 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > On 04/04/2018 09:21 AM, James Hogarth wrote: > > > > > > ...snip... > > > > > > > Can we please get some

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 19:54 Stephen Gallagher, wrote: > > > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 2:36 PM Przemek Klosowski < > przemek.klosow...@nist.gov> wrote: > >> On 04/04/2018 01:59 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> > The short version is that Modules *are* distribution packages. They're

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 4:53 PM James Hogarth wrote: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 19:54 Stephen Gallagher, wrote: > >> >> On F28 >> `dnf install php:8/server` (Assuming there's a profile called "server" >> with the packages one would need to use PHP in a

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

Adam Williamson (adamw...@fedoraproject.org) said: > This rather begs the question of whether there are any modules which > only work *with python 2*, though... Given 1500+ modules, all of which can have their own python library dependencies, the safe answer is 'yes'. We're working to solve

Fedora 28-20180404.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 1/137 (x86_64), 3/23 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 217078 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso install_default URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/217078 ID: 217079 Test: i386 Workstation-boot-iso memory_check URL:

Re: Intent to orphan Python 2

On 04/04/2018 01:35 PM, James Hogarth wrote: > On Wed, 4 Apr 2018, 21:28 Adam Williamson, > wrote: > >> This rather begs the question of whether there are any modules which >> only work *with python 2*, though... The answer is (at least based on what I know from

Re: Web assets in Fedora

On 04/04/2018 03:08 PM, Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > Do you bundle third-party libraries/frameworks like jQuery, Bootstrap or > Patternfly into your project and commit them to the git repository? /me raises his hand > There is a much better solution how to do it. If you are interested, > please read

Fedora-Atomic 27-20180404.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Passed openQA tests: 2/2 (x86_64) -- Mail generated by check-compose: https://pagure.io/fedora-qa/check-compose ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

So, I don't think we can update the package from 10 to 13, thus breaking all user installations. I see 2 possible way The classical one - create nextcloud11, nextcloud12 and nextcloud13 packages and also future versions, older can be removed when EOLed by upstream (so nextcloud +

Re: DNF dependencies and --allowerasing

On 2018-04-03, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > Recently, upgrading pymol was blocked because of version incompatiblity > with pymol-wxpython: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563269 > > The previous version is 1.8.6 and both packages are closely coupled so

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Tue, 2018-04-03 at 19:00 +, Christian Glombek wrote: > And how many people actually still run NC v10? FWIW, I have a nextcloud 10 setup on a Fedora 27 server. I have no problems with major version updates within a Fedora release, but my expectation was that Fedora was keeping it updated.

Re: Libravatar shutting down on 2018-09-01

On 4 April 2018 at 22:16, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2018 at 11:37 AM, Eduard Lucena > wrote: >> I was reseraching a little bit and I found that this project is made in >> python with Django. Is it possible that we can take this project and

Fedora 28 Beta Release Announcement

Fedora 28 Beta Released --- We're excited to announce the release of Fedora 28 Beta. A short list of highlights: * Modular Repository for Fedora Server * The Workstation edition of Fedora 28 Beta features GNOME 3.28. * 64-bit Arm (Aarch64) now a primary architecture for

[Bug 1563433] perl-DateTime-Locale-1.18 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563433 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Depends On||1563611

[Bug 1563663] New: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2-0.36 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563663 Bug ID: 1563663 Summary: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2-0.36 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Net-Amazon-EC2 Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1563679] New: perl-Sys-Virt-4.2.0 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563679 Bug ID: 1563679 Summary: perl-Sys-Virt-4.2.0 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Sys-Virt Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1561803] perl-DBD-SQLite-1.58 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561803 --- Comment #4 from Fedora Update System --- perl-DBD-SQLite-1.58-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1561800] perl-Config-Model-Tester-3.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561800 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Config-Model-Tester-3.004-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1561806] perl-HTTP-Message-6.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561806 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-Message-6.16-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1561814] perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.14 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561814 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Perl-Tidy-Sweetened-1.14-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

Re: Libravatar shutting down on 2018-09-01

I was reseraching a little bit and I found that this project is made in python with Django. Is it possible that we can take this project and do an implementation of our own? The current implementation [1] is: - Debian - Postgres - Django - Python stack And the stats (infrastructure

[Bug 1558427] Useless dependency on perl(Path::Iter) prevents from bootstrapping Perl packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558427 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA

[Bug 1558427] Useless dependency on perl(Path::Iter) prevents from bootstrapping Perl packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558427 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-File-Copy-Recursive-0.

[Bug 1560548] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560548 --- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.25-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1561806] perl-HTTP-Message-6.16 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1561806 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-HTTP-Message-6.16-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1560548] perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1560548 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Test-PostgreSQL-1.25-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1558427] Useless dependency on perl(Path::Iter) prevents from bootstrapping Perl packages

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558427 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Fixed In Version|perl-File-Copy-Recursive-0.

[Bug 1563430] perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.080 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563430 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1563431] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.080 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563431 Fedora Update System changed: What|Removed |Added Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA

[Bug 1563229] perl-PAR-Packer-1.043 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563229 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1563021] perl-Config-Model-Tester-3.005 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563021 Bug 1563021 depends on bug 1563160, which changed state. Bug 1563160 Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Log-Log4perl - Test log4perl https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563160 What|Removed |Added

[Bug 1563430] perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.080 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563430 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

[Bug 1563430] perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.080 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563430 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Compress-Raw-Bzip2-2.080-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-cf37d5d255 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1563431] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.080 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563431 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED

[Bug 1563431] perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.080 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563431 --- Comment #1 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Compress-Raw-Zlib-2.080-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-2a7f8069b7 -- You are receiving

[Bug 1563021] perl-Config-Model-Tester-3.005 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1563021 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed