Re: heads up: mock's fedora-29-x configs

On 2.5.2018 10:05, Miroslav Suchý wrote: I just released new `mock-core-configs` and there is a new feature. ... This will give you a choice to target rawhide using "rawhide" string or using the number. Thank You! This is so much easier when scripting things. -- Miro Hrončok -- Phone:

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

I fully support such major version bumps during one fedora release. Maybe there could be prepared nextcloud 11 and nextcloud 12 packages in several weeks steps, not fully functional, just upgrading database to have consistent upgrade path to version 13 then. Since nextcloud 10 is not working

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

Randy, it is the same with nextcloud. Marek ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org

heads up: mock's fedora-29-x configs

I just released new `mock-core-configs` and there is a new feature. It contains: $ ls -l /etc/mock ... lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root mock26 May 2 09:13 fedora-29-aarch64.cfg -> fedora-rawhide-aarch64.cfg lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root mock25 May 2 09:13 fedora-29-armhfp.cfg -> fedora-rawhide-armhfp.cfg

Re: Fedora 28 is officially here!

On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 6:01 PM, John Dennis wrote: > On 05/01/2018 10:00 AM, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> It's almost Mother's Day, and that means it's time for Fedora 28, >> which is officially released today. >> > > FWIW, there is a broken link to the install documentation. >

Re: Fedora 28 is officially here! also available for secondary architectures

>> It's almost Mother's Day, and that means it's time for Fedora 28, >> which is officially released today. >> >> Congratulations to everyone who contributed to this amazingly >> smooth and polished release. You all are awesome. >> >> Read the official announcement at: >> >> *

Re: libicu upgrade to 61.1 with soname bump in rawhide/F29

On 02/05/18 02:49 +0100, Pete Walter wrote: 01.05.2018, 19:05, "Jonathan Wakely" : On 26/04/18 19:49 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote: Hi, I'm upgrading libicu to 61.1 for rawhide, which as usual comes with a soname bump. I requested a side target f29-icu for the builds,

Fedora 28 is officially here! also available for secondary architectures

On 01/05/2018 16:00, Matthew Miller wrote: It's almost Mother's Day, and that means it's time for Fedora 28, which is officially released today. Congratulations to everyone who contributed to this amazingly smooth and polished release. You all are awesome. Read the official announcement at:

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

Neal Gompa writes: > And there's still the fun restriction of XFS not being able to shrink. But note that even ext4 can't shrink while being mounted. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:36 AM Marius Vollmer wrote: > Neal Gompa writes: > > And there's still the fun restriction of XFS not being able to shrink. > But note that even ext4 can't shrink while being mounted. But it can shrink when it's not.

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

On Mon, 2018-04-30 at 18:16 +, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:14 PM Jason L Tibbitts III > wrote: > > > > > > > > "CW" == Colin Walters writes: > > CW> I'd say it makes sense to revisit the default here globally in > > CW> Anaconda. > >

Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

Hi! I'd like to propose putting the ~/.local/bin in front of the /usr/bin on the PATH. Currently /usr/bin has priority over ~/.local/bin, which causes a [bug] where the old system-installed executable written in Python (from /usr/bin) is launched, but it finds new Python sources (installed

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

On 5/2/18 7:15 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:36 AM Marius Vollmer > wrote: > >> Neal Gompa writes: > >>> And there's still the fun restriction of XFS not being able to shrink. > >> But note that even ext4 can't shrink while

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 6:24 AM Tomas Orsava wrote: > Hi! > I'd like to propose putting the ~/.local/bin in front of the /usr/bin on > the PATH. > > Currently /usr/bin has priority over ~/.local/bin, which causes a [bug] > where the old system-installed executable written in

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 05/02/2018 03:30 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 6:24 AM Tomas Orsava > wrote: Hi! I'd like to propose putting the ~/.local/bin in front of the /usr/bin on the PATH. Currently /usr/bin has priority

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 05/02/2018 03:23 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote: Hi! I'd like to propose putting the ~/.local/bin in front of the /usr/bin on the PATH. Currently /usr/bin has priority over ~/.local/bin, which causes a [bug] where the old system-installed executable written in Python (from /usr/bin) is launched,

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 05/02/2018 04:23 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote: Hi! I'd like to propose putting the ~/.local/bin in front of the /usr/bin on the PATH. Currently /usr/bin has priority over ~/.local/bin, which causes a [bug] where the old system-installed executable written in Python (from /usr/bin) is launched,

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

On 05/02/2018 08:25 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: I've always seen the need for shrink as an indicator that someone had poor planning along the way, or insufficient tools for provisioning to start with. Sure, there are exceptions, but in general who needs shrink on a regular basis? The point isn't

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 2.5.2018 15:30, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Does anyone see a reason not to prioritize ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin? Yes, if a user's account is compromised (or any service running as them), it's REALLY easy to drop faked tools into a user-private directory and override critical system

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 2.5.2018 15:39, Panu Matilainen wrote> Not quite what you're asking, but actually not having a hidden directory as a part of default PATH in the first place seems like a rather good idea to me... It's already there. And it is XDG complaint. The question here is about order (what takes

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 6:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 2.5.2018 15:30, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > Does anyone see a reason not to prioritize ~/.local/bin over > /usr/bin? > > > > > > Yes, if a user's account is compromised (or any service running as > > them), it's

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

- Original Message - > From: "Miro Hrončok" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , "Panu Matilainen" > > Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 3:45:55 PM > Subject: Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 01:46:34PM +, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 6:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > On 2.5.2018 15:30, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > Does anyone see a reason not to prioritize ~/.local/bin over > > /usr/bin? > > > > > > > > >

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

On 5/2/18 8:42 AM, Ian Pilcher wrote: > On 05/02/2018 08:25 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> I've always seen the need for shrink as an indicator that someone had >> poor planning along the way, or insufficient tools for provisioning to >> start with.  Sure, there are exceptions, but in general who

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 2.5.2018 15:53, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote: - Original Message - From: "Miro Hrončok" To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" , "Panu Matilainen" Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 3:45:55 PM Subject: Re:

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 10:35:28AM -0400, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Tomas Orsava" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > , "David Kaspar" , > > "Kamil Dudka"

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Mi, 02.05.18 10:47, Paul Wouters (p...@nohats.ca) wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2018, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > > > It's already there. And it is XDG complaint. The question here is about > > > > order (what takes priority). > > > > > > Can you point me to the XDG specification that requires

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

- Original Message - > From: "Tomas Orsava" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > , "David Kaspar" , > "Kamil Dudka" , "Miro Hrončok" , > "Petr Viktorin"

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

Dne 2.5.2018 v 16:35 Siteshwar Vashisht napsal(a): > > - Original Message - >> From: "Tomas Orsava" >> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" >> , "David Kaspar" , >> "Kamil Dudka" ,

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Wed, 2 May 2018, Vít Ondruch wrote: User explicitly installed SW into his home directory. Why (s)he needs to override the $PATH in addition to make the SW work? Can you account for all your ~/.??* entries in your home dir? I have several of which I have no clue what it is or why it got

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

- Original Message - > From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > Cc: "Kamil Dudka" > Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:49:18 PM > Subject: Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

Le 2018-05-02 16:53, Paul Wouters a écrit : So I don't think your "User explicitly installed SW into his home directory" is true, and it is especially not true if software can make use of knowing ~/.bin will be there for it to quietly drop some things in. The XDG spec and its insistence on

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

Le 2018-05-02 15:25, Eric Sandeen a écrit : On 5/2/18 7:15 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: But it can shrink when it's not. This is incredibly important for being able to deal with resizing both / and /home at the same time, or even trying to make space for multi-booting (typically with Windows but

Re: Serious problem with SATA LPM in F28 on Lenovo 50 series laptops

On 29/04/18 17:34, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 29-04-18 11:09, Christian Dersch wrote: I managed to install F28 (fresh install of KDE spin) on the second disc of my T450s. I cannot reproduce the issue by changing screen brightness there with min_power and also the med_power_with_dipm default.

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 05/02/2018 03:23 PM, Tomas Orsava wrote: Hi! I'd like to propose putting the ~/.local/bin in front of the /usr/bin on the PATH. Currently /usr/bin has priority over ~/.local/bin, which causes a [bug] where the old system-installed executable written in Python (from /usr/bin) is launched,

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 09:53:48AM -0400, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Miro Hrončok" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > , "Panu Matilainen" > > > > Sent:

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 2 May 2018 at 12:11, Marek Greško wrote: > Randy, it is the same with nextcloud. > To keep people up to date ... I figured I'd do owncloud first as that looked a simple single version jump ... There was much pain that ensued trying to maintain the unbundling of the PHP

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

On 05/02/2018 08:56 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: Given that it is exception activity, dump/mks/restore is also a less convenient but more robust solution to the problem. I'm sitting in a hotel room with a laptop. What do I backup *to*? If you're putting your years-old root or home filesystem at

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

- Original Message - > From: "Vít Ondruch" > To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:46:12 PM > Subject: Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH > > > > Dne 2.5.2018 v 16:35 Siteshwar Vashisht napsal(a): > > > > -

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 05/02/2018 05:52 PM, James Hogarth wrote: On 2 May 2018 at 12:11, Marek Greško wrote: Randy, it is the same with nextcloud. To keep people up to date ... I figured I'd do owncloud first as that looked a simple single version jump ... There was much pain that

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

Dne 2.5.2018 v 16:57 Siteshwar Vashisht napsal(a): > > - Original Message - >> From: "Vít Ondruch" >> To: devel@lists.fedoraproject.org >> Sent: Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:46:12 PM >> Subject: Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH >> >> >> >> Dne

Re: Serious problem with SATA LPM in F28 on Lenovo 50 series laptops

Hi, On 05/01/2018 10:40 AM, Lorenzo Dalrio wrote: Hi, i run fedora 28 on a t450 since it was promoted to beta working with it 8-10 hours per day without any issue. System Information Manufacturer: LENOVO Product Name: 20BUS003IX Version: ThinkPad T450 # cat

Re: Serious problem with SATA LPM in F28 on Lenovo 50 series laptops

Hi, On 05/02/2018 04:33 PM, Christian Dersch wrote: On 29/04/18 17:34, Hans de Goede wrote: Hi, On 29-04-18 11:09, Christian Dersch wrote: I managed to install F28 (fresh install of KDE spin) on the second disc of my T450s. I cannot reproduce the issue by changing screen brightness there

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Wed, 2 May 2018, Lennart Poettering wrote: I presume you mean "~/.local" rather than "~/local"? I don't. As my argument goes, hidden directories containing binaries in your path are a bad idea. And it was a bad idea 15 years ago. Note that my home directory seems to only contain

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Wednesday, May 2, 2018 3:46:34 PM CEST Stephen Gallagher wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 6:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > > On 2.5.2018 15:30, Stephen Gallagher wrote: > > > Does anyone see a reason not to prioritize ~/.local/bin over > > > > /usr/bin? > > > > > Yes, if

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 11:10:05AM -0400, Siteshwar Vashisht wrote: > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Daniel P. Berrangé" > > To: "Development discussions related to Fedora" > > > > Cc: "Kamil Dudka" > > Sent:

Fedora rawhide compose report: 20180502.n.0 changes

OLD: Fedora-Rawhide-20180430.n.0 NEW: Fedora-Rawhide-20180502.n.0 = SUMMARY = Added images:0 Dropped images: 2 Added packages: 33 Dropped packages:8 Upgraded packages: 178 Downgraded packages: 1 Size of added packages: 15.51 MiB Size of dropped packages

Re: Serious problem with SATA LPM in F28 on Lenovo 50 series laptops

Hans, can't this be affected also by different disk vendors (drive vendor in Lenovo laptop can vary even in same model) and different firmware of disks? Also, drive FW is upgradeable in Lenovo laptops. On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:39 PM, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi, > > > On

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Mi, 02.05.18 09:53, Siteshwar Vashisht (svashi...@redhat.com) wrote: > > On 2.5.2018 15:39, Panu Matilainen wrote> Not quite what you're asking, > > but actually not having a hidden directory > > > as a part of default PATH in the first place seems like a rather good > > > idea to me... > > >

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 2 May 2018 at 10:47, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2018, Lennart Poettering wrote: > It's already there. And it is XDG complaint. The question here is about order (what takes priority). >>> >>> >>> Can you point me to the XDG specification that requires it ? It

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

Looking at Nextcloud releases, it seems that they do a major release once a year. It should be possible to catch up with the upstream even if there is a single update per Fedora release. Update to Nextcloud 11 in Fedora 27, 12 in current Fedora 28 and then in Fedora 29 cath up with upstream.

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2018-05-03 16:00 UTC)

 Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2018-05-03 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net.  Local time information (via. uitime): = Day: Thursday == 2018-05-03 09:00 PDT US/Pacific 2018-05-03

Fedora Rawhide-20180502.n.0 compose check report

No missing expected images. Failed openQA tests: 42/137 (x86_64), 14/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm) ID: 232625 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso support_server URL: https://openqa.fedoraproject.org/tests/232625 ID: 232631 Test: x86_64 Server-dvd-iso server_role_deploy_domain_controller URL:

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:34:51 PM CEST Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > The issue is where they do not know they have installed software to > their home directory. Sure but still better than if they did not know they had installed software outside of their home directory, at least from

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Wed, 2 May 2018, Kamil Dudka wrote: On Wednesday, May 2, 2018 3:46:34 PM CEST Stephen Gallagher wrote: On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 6:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: On 2.5.2018 15:30, Stephen Gallagher wrote: Does anyone see a reason not to prioritize ~/.local/bin over

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 2 May 2018 at 10:08, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Wednesday, May 2, 2018 3:46:34 PM CEST Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 6:44 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: >> > On 2.5.2018 15:30, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> > > Does anyone see a reason not

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Wed, 2 May 2018, Lennart Poettering wrote: It's already there. And it is XDG complaint. The question here is about order (what takes priority). Can you point me to the XDG specification that requires it ? It was mentioned by Lenart on the bug, but he later clarified his comment[1]. So

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 12:22:48PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > On Wed, 2 May 2018, Lennart Poettering wrote: > > > I presume you mean "~/.local" rather than "~/local"? > > I don't. As my argument goes, hidden directories containing binaries > in your path are a bad idea. And it was a bad idea

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Mi, 02.05.18 17:44, Nicolas Mailhot (nicolas.mail...@laposte.net) wrote: > Le 2018-05-02 16:53, Paul Wouters a écrit : > > > So I don't think your "User explicitly installed SW into his home > > directory" is true, and it is especially not true if software can > > make use of knowing ~/.bin

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 04:04:11PM +0100, Naheem Zaffar wrote: > Looking at Nextcloud releases, it seems that they do a major release once a > year. > > It should be possible to catch up with the upstream even if there is a > single update per Fedora release. > > Update to Nextcloud 11 in Fedora

Re: Status of OwnCloud/NextCloud

On 05/02/2018 07:18 PM, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 04:04:11PM +0100, Naheem Zaffar wrote: >> Looking at Nextcloud releases, it seems that they do a major release once a >> year. >> >> It should be possible to catch up with the upstream even if there is a >> single update per

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:25:58 PM CEST Iain Rae wrote: > if they've got sudo privs to install software in the system area as root > then any malicious program is going to emulate su/sudo in which case > you're rooted in both scenarios. In order to emulate su/sudo, the binary needs to have

Fwd: Tomcat Package Major Version Update

Hi all, This is a day late, but the tomcat package provided by rawhide has been updated to Tomcat 9.0! This may break some package dependencies because the servlet API package changed (new version). Sorry that I didn't provide a heads up. I have been working with the FreeIPA folks because they

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 02/05/18 18:05, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:34:51 PM CEST Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > >> This leads to the problem outlined in >> https://xkcd.com/1200/ where the user account is more precious than >> having root. > Wait. If you have full root access, you have

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 7:07 AM, Martin Kolman wrote: > On Mon, 2018-04-30 at 18:16 +, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Mon, Apr 30, 2018 at 2:14 PM Jason L Tibbitts III >> wrote: >> >> > > > > > > "CW" == Colin Walters writes: >> > CW> I'd

Re: Prioritizing ~/.local/bin over /usr/bin on the PATH

On 02/05/18 17:50, Kamil Dudka wrote: > On Wednesday, May 2, 2018 4:25:58 PM CEST Iain Rae wrote: >> if they've got sudo privs to install software in the system area as root >> then any malicious program is going to emulate su/sudo in which case >> you're rooted in both scenarios. > In order

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 5/2/18 7:15 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:36 AM Marius Vollmer >> wrote: >> >>> Neal Gompa writes: >> And there's still the fun restriction of XFS

Schedule for Friday's FESCo Meeting (2018-05-04)

The following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo meeting Friday at 15:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto or run: date -d '2018-05-04 15:00 UTC' Links to all issues

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: > On 5/2/18 7:15 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: >> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:36 AM Marius Vollmer >> wrote: >> >>> Neal Gompa writes: >> And there's still the fun restriction of XFS

Re: I would like to propose that we turn on XFS Reflink in Fedora 29 by default

On 2 May 2018 at 18:49, Chris Murphy wrote: > On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Eric Sandeen wrote: >> On 5/2/18 7:15 AM, Neal Gompa wrote: >>> On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:36 AM Marius Vollmer >>> wrote: >>> Neal Gompa

[Bug 1571788] perl-Menlo-1.9019 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571788 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1572199] perl-App-cpm-0.973 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572199 Bug 1572199 depends on bug 1572183, which changed state. Bug 1572183 Summary: Review Request: perl-Menlo-Legacy - Legacy internal and client support for Menlo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572183 What|Removed

[Bug 1571788] perl-Menlo-1.9019 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1571788 Bug 1571788 depends on bug 1572183, which changed state. Bug 1572183 Summary: Review Request: perl-Menlo-Legacy - Legacy internal and client support for Menlo https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572183 What|Removed

[Bug 1570266] perl-Digest-SHA3-1.04 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570266 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1570218] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570218 --- Comment #6 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.56-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1572199] perl-App-cpm-0.974 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572199 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED Fixed

[Bug 1567564] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567564 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.56-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1570218] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570218 --- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.56-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1567564] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.54 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1567564 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.56-1.fc27 has been pushed to the Fedora 27 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You

[Bug 1570218] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570218 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.56-1.fc26 has been pushed to the Fedora 26 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- You are

[Bug 1570874] Installing perl-PAR-Packer causes perl DOWNGRADE

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570874 --- Comment #7 from Fedora Update System --- perl-PAR-Packer-1.041-4.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-f175983479 -- You are receiving this mail

[Bug 1570218] perl-CPAN-Perl-Releases-3.56 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1570218 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ON_QA |CLOSED

[Bug 1572818] perl-File-ConfigDir-0.021 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1572818 Jitka Plesnikova changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |CLOSED

[Bug 1574092] New: perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90118 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574092 Bug ID: 1574092 Summary: perl-Catalyst-Runtime-5.90118 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Catalyst-Runtime Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1574107] New: perl-Mojolicious-7.77 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574107 Bug ID: 1574107 Summary: perl-Mojolicious-7.77 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Mojolicious Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1574061] New: perl-MooX-File-ConfigDir-0.007 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574061 Bug ID: 1574061 Summary: perl-MooX-File-ConfigDir-0.007 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MooX-File-ConfigDir Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1574117] New: perl-System-Info-0.058 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574117 Bug ID: 1574117 Summary: perl-System-Info-0.058 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-System-Info Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1574110] New: perl-MooX-ConfigFromFile-0.009 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574110 Bug ID: 1574110 Summary: perl-MooX-ConfigFromFile-0.009 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-MooX-ConfigFromFile Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1574129] New: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier-0.25 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574129 Bug ID: 1574129 Summary: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier-0.25 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-JavaScript-Beautifier Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1574136] New: perl-Statistics-Descriptive-3.0613 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574136 Bug ID: 1574136 Summary: perl-Statistics-Descriptive-3.0613 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Statistics-Descriptive Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[EPEL-devel] Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : EPEL Steering Committee

I did not ask for an agenda and did not have one set up. Because there was no agenda, there will be no meeting this week. On 1 May 2018 at 14:00, wrote: > Dear all, > > You are kindly invited to the meeting: >EPEL Steering Committee on 2018-05-02 from 18:00:00 to

[Bug 1574013] New: perl-Carton-v1.0.31 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574013 Bug ID: 1574013 Summary: perl-Carton-v1.0.31 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Carton Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1574025] New: perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.02 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574025 Bug ID: 1574025 Summary: perl-BibTeX-Parser-1.02 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-BibTeX-Parser Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1574102] New: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.30 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574102 Bug ID: 1574102 Summary: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA-0.30 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-Crypt-OpenSSL-RSA Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged

[Bug 1574126] New: perl-File-HomeDir-1.004 is available

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1574126 Bug ID: 1574126 Summary: perl-File-HomeDir-1.004 is available Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: perl-File-HomeDir Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged Assignee:

[Bug 1568834] Missing BuildRequires: kde-filesystem in perl-Qt.spec

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1568834 --- Comment #17 from Fedora Update System --- perl-Qt-4.14.3-14.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-17c6197d94 -- You are receiving this mail