Dear all,
You are kindly invited to the meeting:
Modularity WG (weekly) on 2018-12-18 from 15:00:00 to 16:00:00 UTC
At fedora-meetin...@irc.freenode.net
The meeting will be about:
Meeting of the Modularity Working Group.
More information available at: [Modularity Working Group wiki
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:13:54AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> On 12/17/18 8:34 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > I'm guessing OP is trying to accesshttps://discussion.fedoraproject.org/,
>
> I was unaware of this new service. Are we dropping the mailing lists?
>
> > more
> >
On Monday, December 17, 2018 2:35:58 PM EST Adam Williamson wrote:
> This wasn't a devel@ discussion at all. It was a Silverblue group
> discussion. There are all sorts of Fedora-related discussions that
> don't happen on devel@ (they happen on desktop@, or test@, or xfce@, or
> kde@, or server@,
I've already filed a ticket for python-dropbox.
On 12/17/18 2:02 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know
> for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 01:52:18PM -0800, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On 12/17/18 1:43 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> > I'm not sure if this is a local problem or a problem with kojihub [nor
> > how to find out - as usual it's a non-actionable error message ...] but:
> >
> > $ fedpkg build
> > Kerberos
On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 21:43 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> $ fedpkg build
> Kerberos authentication fails: unable to obtain a session
> Could not execute build: Could not login to
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/kojihub
I can confirm this problem - I am currently unable to kick off a Bodhi
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 at 12:42, John Harris wrote:
>
> On Monday, December 17, 2018 12:39:57 PM EST Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
> > discussion.fedoraproject.org could be self hosted, isn't it?
>
> It is not self hosted, but hosted by the company that develops Discourse, for
> some reason.
>
The
On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 14:46 -0500, John Harris wrote:
> On Monday, December 17, 2018 2:35:58 PM EST Adam Williamson wrote:
> > This wasn't a devel@ discussion at all. It was a Silverblue group
> > discussion. There are all sorts of Fedora-related discussions that
> > don't happen on devel@ (they
On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 17:59 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote:
>
> I guess even fewer people follow the council-discuss ML than are on the
> discord instance.
Accuracy note: it's not [Discord](https://discordapp.com/). It's
[Discourse](https://www.discourse.org/). Similar names, somewhat
similar
On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 20:24 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 10:13:54AM -0600, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > On 12/17/18 8:34 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
> > > I'm guessing OP is trying to accesshttps://discussion.fedoraproject.org/,
> >
> > I was unaware of this new service.
Voting is still open until 23:59 UTC on 20 December for the Fedora 29
election cycle. You can vote in the Elections app[1]. Interviews with
candidates are available on the Fedora Community Blog[2], with links
available in the Elections app. If you would like the shiny new I
Voted badge, please
On Mon, 2018-12-17 at 13:20 -0500, John Harris wrote:
> On Monday, December 17, 2018 12:57:56 PM EST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > The reason is that discourse and other many other tools people 'want'
> > are not light weight 'oh just throw a server up and have your thing in
> > 2 minutes and
On 17. 12. 18 13:24, Martin Gansser wrote:
Hi,
fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -rn
../SRPMS/Cadence-1.0.0-0.1.20180827git4a5f5b4.fc29.src.rpm
fails with this error:
RPM build errors:
BUILDSTDERR: File not found:
> On 17. 12. 18 13:24, Martin Gansser wrote:
>
> this line in the spec:
>
> %config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/X11/Xsession.d/61cadence-session-inject
>
> Remove it and see what file is missing. Maybe it's just a typo.
the line in the specfile is correct.
If i use the following makefile patch,
On 17. 12. 18 22:02, Gwyn Ciesla wrote:
I've already filed a ticket for python-dropbox.
About that: I don't filter the "already filed" packages out now when
sending the e-mails, but I plan to filter them once retiring.
As long as the ticket has reasonable name, I will see it and not retire
I'm not sure if this is a local problem or a problem with kojihub [nor
how to find out - as usual it's a non-actionable error message ...] but:
$ fedpkg build
Kerberos authentication fails: unable to obtain a session
Could not execute build: Could not login to
On 12/17/18 1:43 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'm not sure if this is a local problem or a problem with kojihub [nor
> how to find out - as usual it's a non-actionable error message ...] but:
>
> $ fedpkg build
> Kerberos authentication fails: unable to obtain a session
> Could not execute
discussion.fedoraproject.org could be self hosted, isn't it?
About github, there is a lot of fedora stuff there, imho that should be a
bigger and deeper different discussion.
Anderson, Charles R On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:14:18PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:01 PM
On Monday, December 17, 2018 12:57:56 PM EST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> The reason is that discourse and other many other tools people 'want'
> are not light weight 'oh just throw a server up and have your thing in
> 2 minutes and never look at it again'. They are tools which you need a
> lot
On 12/12/2018 2:20 PM, Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RemoveObsoleteScriptlets
== Summary ==
Remove scriptlets which are not needed anymore (ldconfig,
gtk-update-icon-cache, etc.).
*snip*
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
Installed F30 RPMs on F28/EL6/EL7 might not
On Monday, December 17, 2018 2:34:21 PM EST Adam Williamson wrote:
> updating it is part of hosting it responsibly.
To be clear, I was just stating that updating it was annoying, not that it
shouldn't be done.
--
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity
https://splentity.com/
signature.asc
Description:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
I'll need to learn myself some python to be able to work with the code, but I'm
willing to take over blueman.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of
On Monday, December 17, 2018 12:39:57 PM EST Julen Landa Alustiza wrote:
> discussion.fedoraproject.org could be self hosted, isn't it?
It is not self hosted, but hosted by the company that develops Discourse, for
some reason.
--
John M. Harris, Jr.
Splentity
https://splentity.com/
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 at 13:21, John Harris wrote:
>
> On Monday, December 17, 2018 12:57:56 PM EST Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> > The reason is that discourse and other many other tools people 'want'
> > are not light weight 'oh just throw a server up and have your thing in
> > 2 minutes and
Hi Miro,
I can pick opencity and python-power from this long list and will file tickets
to unorphan both packages. There's a new release from upstream for opencity and
python-power development is quite active on GitHub.
Regards, Raphael
___
devel
On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 at 11:37, Tom Hughes wrote:
>
> On 17/12/2018 16:18, John Harris wrote:
> > On Monday, December 17, 2018 11:13:54 AM EST Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> >> Are we dropping the mailing lists?
> >
> > Nope, but some teams like CommOps and Silverblue have dropped mailing lists
> >
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, 17:53 Stephen John Smoogen On Mon, 17 Dec 2018 at 11:37, Tom Hughes wrote:
> >
> > On 17/12/2018 16:18, John Harris wrote:
> > > On Monday, December 17, 2018 11:13:54 AM EST Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > >> Are we dropping the mailing lists?
> > >
> > > Nope, but some
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:01 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Important announcements (and RFCs) like this should really be done somewhere
> where the most people will see it (probably the devel ML?)
>
It was also published to the Community Blog[1], which also
automatically posts to Fedora Planet.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:14:18PM -0500, Ben Cotton wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 17, 2018 at 12:01 PM Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > Important announcements (and RFCs) like this should really be done
> > somewhere where the most people will see it (probably the devel ML?)
> >
> It was also published to the
Hi,
fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -rn
../SRPMS/Cadence-1.0.0-0.1.20180827git4a5f5b4.fc29.src.rpm
fails with this error:
RPM build errors:
BUILDSTDERR: File not found:
On 12/14/18 10:20 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
On Fri, Dec 14, 2018 at 3:09 PM Igor Gnatenko
wrote:
That makes sense that we can do something like this from DNF code..
However, it would be kinda hard to do any dependency resolution
checks..
Although we already have one which is
Hello,
I would like to vote in this discussion, because I strongly disagree with
Fedora related stuff moving out from Pagure (that Fedora owns and controls)
to GitHub, which is proprietary (because controlled by Microsoft).
The fact that I cannot log into the discussion nor create a new account
GitHub operates independantly i don't see a reason for your worry.
On Mon, Dec 17, 2018, 7:27 PM Lukas Ruzicka Hello,
>
> I would like to vote in this discussion, because I strongly disagree with
> Fedora related stuff moving out from Pagure (that Fedora owns and controls)
> to GitHub, which is
Hi,
as discussed in another thread, bouml has actually license issues to comply
with Fedora guidelines, especially bouml-doc in its recent version. There was a
modification at upstream to the license model, they closed some parts and we
fail to distribute it properly with Fedora. Sorry if you
* Florian Weimer [17/12/2018 15:06] :
>
> Which service are you trying to use? What is the exact error message?
I'm guessing OP is trying to access https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/,
more specifically
* Lukas Ruzicka:
> The fact that I cannot log into the discussion nor create a new
> account because the limit for my IP address has been reached. I want
> to say that I do not have any account there and never created one, so
> I think this goes to a Red Hat IP as a whole and not my personal
>
Sometimes, there does not have to be a reason. It is my beliefs. I rather
prefer a pure Fedora solution (be it a little bit tougher to use) then a
polished 3rd site solution.
I also have some of my projects on Github, but everything related to
Fedora, I host on Pagure. I feel honoured to be part
> What message do you imagine it would send if we left Pagure, a platform
built on
i just stated something harmlessly,i don't support moving away from pagure
or anything Foss.
Not happy about the fact that IBM would be acquiring red hat.
I am really sorry if i may have said the wrong thing.Never
On 12/17/18 8:34 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
I'm guessing OP is trying to accesshttps://discussion.fedoraproject.org/,
I was unaware of this new service. Are we dropping the mailing lists?
more
On Monday, December 17, 2018 11:13:54 AM EST Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Are we dropping the mailing lists?
Nope, but some teams like CommOps and Silverblue have dropped mailing lists in
favor of that. It is currently unknown if they'll move back to mailing lists
in the near future. To my
On 12/16/18 12:16 AM, Leigh Scott wrote:
>> On 12/14/18 8:50 AM, Martin Kolman wrote:
>
>> So, if this was abrt email related, you could file an issue or PR at
>> https://github.com/abrt/abrt/ and add the affected package(s) to the
>> abrt blacklist...
>>
>> kevin
>
> So your cool with me adding
On 17/12/2018 16:18, John Harris wrote:
On Monday, December 17, 2018 11:13:54 AM EST Michael Cronenworth wrote:
Are we dropping the mailing lists?
Nope, but some teams like CommOps and Silverblue have dropped mailing lists in
favor of that. It is currently unknown if they'll move back to
Dne 13. 12. 18 v 15:41 Florian Weimer napsal(a):
> * Richard Shaw:
>
>> I've never had this problem before but for the last week or so I frequently
>> get the following
>> at some point before the build completes:
>>
>> Could not execute build: ('Connection aborted.',
>>
Orion Poplawski writes:
> With the help of the very useful libSegFault I was able to generate a
> backtrace in COPR with:
>
> export LD_PRELOAD=/usr/lib64/libSegFault.so
> export SEGFAULT_SIGNALS=ill
>
> which pointed to the libpsm2 library. I've filed
>
* Florian Weimer:
> * Lukas Ruzicka:
>
>> The fact that I cannot log into the discussion nor create a new
>> account because the limit for my IP address has been reached. I want
>> to say that I do not have any account there and never created one, so
>> I think this goes to a Red Hat IP as a
On Monday, December 17, 2018 9:11:30 AM EST Manas Mangaonkar wrote:
> GitHub operates independantly i don't see a reason for your worry.
Setting aside the fact that GitHub is under the Microsoft umbrella now, GitHub
is a proprietary platform. The first of our Four Foundations is Freedom. What
As of version 2.1.0, the upstream project for python-inflect is licensed under
the MIT license. The license was previously AGPL version 3 or newer. Since the
MIT license is the more permissive of the two and is more certainly GPL
compatible, this should have no ill effect on dependent packages.
Planned Outage - Fix Raid - 2018-12-18 18:00 UTC
There will be an outage starting at 2018-12-18 18:00 UTC,
which will last approximately 1 hours.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Infrastructure/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2018-012-18 18:00UTC'
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2018/12/18/report-389-ds-base-1.4.0.20-20181218git07b367e.fc29.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1456817
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ON_QA
--- Comment #8 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1473368
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Fixed In
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1656894
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|CLOSED
Fixed In
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_remove_a_package_at_end_of_life
Note: If
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646734
Tomas Borcin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1660194
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646738
Tomas Borcin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1660195
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646730
Tomas Borcin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1660190
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646734
Tomas Borcin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1660191
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646751
Tomas Borcin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1660193
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646738
Tomas Borcin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1660192
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1646751
Tomas Borcin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends On||1660196
--
You are receiving this
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1655011
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-threads-shared-1.59-1. |perl-threads-shared-1.59-1.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659953
Bug ID: 1659953
Summary: Upgrade perl-Config-Model to 2.131
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Config-Model
Assignee: david.hanneq...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659956
Bug ID: 1659956
Summary: Upgrade perl-Coro to 6.54
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Coro
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659954
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||emman...@seyman.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659955
Bug ID: 1659955
Summary: Upgrade perl-Config-Perl-V to 0.31
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Config-Perl-V
Assignee: ppi...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659954
Bug ID: 1659954
Summary: Upgrade perl-Config-Model to 2.015
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Config-Model
Assignee: david.hanneq...@gmail.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659958
Bug ID: 1659958
Summary: Upgrade perl-HTML-FormFu to 2.07
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-HTML-FormFu
Assignee: emman...@seyman.fr
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659967
Bug ID: 1659967
Summary: Upgrade perlbrew to 0.85
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perlbrew
Assignee: jples...@redhat.com
Reporter:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659956
--- Comment #1 from Carl George ---
Jitka, you're already an admin on that package, you should be able to do this
yourself. I don't see a reason not to make the change, but if you want to
allow for comments from others you can submit the
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1659967
Jitka Plesnikova changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|CLOSED
Fixed In Version|
71 matches
Mail list logo
