On 05.08.2020 04:35, J. Scheurich wrote:
> Are you sure, that boost1.73 should be part of fedora 33 ?
It is already part of Fedora 33.
> It lloks like boost.173 would require a future verson of gcc/g++
No. Everything works as required.
--
Sincerely,
Vitaly Zaitsev (vit...@easycoding.org)
On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 06:26:37PM +, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 07:05:45PM +0200, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > That's possible (the paths could be hardcoded in the systemd unit
> > file), but is it a good idea to force the users to use the new system?
> > If
* Richard W. M. Jones:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 01:48:45PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
>> When ocamlopt is used with binutils 2.35 to link an executable, we now
>> get warnings that look like this:
>>
>> /usr/bin/ld: tests/test_topsort.o: warning: relocation in read-only
>> section `.text'
>>
Dne 04. 08. 20 v 21:38 Michael Catanzaro napsal(a):
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 10:31 am, Chris Murphy
> wrote:
>> Should we go back to the old workaround for F33? Madness for one more
>> release? And then drop the madness once there's a dnf solution?
>
> We could, but we have installed so many
On 8/5/20 10:07 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
> On Wednesday, 05 August 2020 at 07:44, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I would like to announce sane-airscan project [1] will be shipped in the
>> official Fedora repositories from Fedora 32 [2].
>>
>> sane-airscan implements a
On Tuesday, August 4, 2020 10:38:29 AM MST Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:40 AM Martin Langhoff
> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Are there options for remote-wipe features for Fedora (or RHEL for that
> > matter)?
>
> >
> >
> > Ideally something integrated into the early boot process, as
On Wednesday, 05 August 2020 at 07:44, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to announce sane-airscan project [1] will be shipped in the
> official Fedora repositories from Fedora 32 [2].
>
> sane-airscan implements a backend for Microsoft WSD and ESCL (usually
> called AirScan,
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 09:54:14AM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Richard W. M. Jones:
>
> > On Tue, Aug 04, 2020 at 01:48:45PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> >> When ocamlopt is used with binutils 2.35 to link an executable, we now
> >> get warnings that look like this:
> >>
> >> /usr/bin/ld:
* J. Scheurich:
> It lloks like boost.173 would require a future verson of gcc/g++
Why do you think that?
According to Boost upstream, anything later than GCC 8 is untested, but
I don't think this is actually true.
Thanks,
Florian
___
devel mailing
On Tuesday, August 4, 2020 1:45:52 AM MST Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Yesterday, I have updated my Rawhide and wondered why `dnf autoremove`
> would want to remove earlyoom just to discover that soft dependency in
> earlyoom was dropped [1] and hence nothing requires earlyoom and DNF is
> free to remove
Dne 04. 08. 20 v 20:58 Vitaly Zaitsev via devel napsal(a):
> On 04.08.2020 16:45, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>> I think the "don't use autoremove" is better suggestion ATM, because I
>> don't really want to keep earlyoom on the system in case there is
>> systemd-oomd or whatever should be the successor.
So, I'm getting one of these messages every couple of hours and I'd
really rather not. Who do I need to talk to about it?
FWIW - It seems to fail because of missing deps:
DEBUG util.py:621: No matching package to install: 'cmake(Qt5)'
DEBUG util.py:621: No matching package to install:
W dniu 29.06.2020 o 20:30, Tom Callaway pisze:
> I just built lua 5.4.0 in Rawhide. As with previous major updates of
> lua, the package also includes a copy of the lua 5.3 libraries so that
> rawhide does not just become broken reps. If you depend on lua, please
> rebuild your packages in rawhide
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 5:38 PM Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
wrote:
>
> Hi, Stephen.
>
> On Wednesday, 05 August 2020 at 21:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > FESCo has requested that I submit the module policy once more to the
> > Fedora development list for discussion. Feedback is welcome.
>
>
I'm really uncomfortable about the amount of crossp-posting, so I'm
limiting this to devel@ (I receive it) and test@ (obvious to me why
relevant).
Kamil Paral writes:
> Adam writes:
> > Arguably the environment from which they logged in is not
> > "working as expected" if you can't then log
Hi,
Now that ppc64 is gone, s390x is the only big-endian architecture
left. Bugs around endianness are not usually difficult to fix, _if_ I
can debug it and see where exactly the problem is. However, this
requires a tedious guess-a-patch, try a scratch build, check the
result, rinse and repeat.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 6:17 PM James Cassell
wrote:
>
> As general feedback, the footnotes make it hard to read the rendered version
> of the document, forcing me to scroll up and down.
>
Well, the idea is that the footnotes are additional information
providing justification for the policy.
On Wed, Aug 05, 2020 at 11:26:34PM -0400, Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that ppc64 is gone, s390x is the only big-endian architecture
> left. Bugs around endianness are not usually difficult to fix, _if_ I
> can debug it and see where exactly the problem is. However, this
>
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the
FESCo meeting Wednesday at 14:00UTC in #fedora-meeting-2 on
irc.freenode.net.
To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
or run:
date -d '2020-08-05 14:00 UTC'
Links to all issues to
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:07 PM Adam Williamson
wrote:
> There's a sort of technical argument to be made that this is covered by
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_33_Beta_Release_Criteria#desktop-shutdown-reboot-logout
> .
> That says "Shutting down, logging out and rebooting must work
Hello,
I need a package review for rig, looking for a review swap.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1861440
- jake / turboturtle
--
Jake Hunsaker
RHCA Cloud Specialist
Senior Software Engineer
___
devel mailing list --
Zdenek Dohnal píše v St 05. 08. 2020 v 07:44 +0200:
> Hi all,
>
> I would like to announce sane-airscan project [1] will be shipped in
> the
> official Fedora repositories from Fedora 32 [2].
>
> sane-airscan implements a backend for Microsoft WSD and ESCL (usually
> called AirScan, originating
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 7:53 AM Lukáš Hrázký wrote:
>
> Hi Neal, all,
>
> On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 07:42 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:32 AM Till Hofmann
> > wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have a number of packages that are FTBFS due to
> > >
Hi Neal, all,
On Tue, 2020-08-04 at 07:42 -0400, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 7:32 AM Till Hofmann
> wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a number of packages that are FTBFS due to
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds.
> >
> > None of my
Hey everyone,
At Nest with Fedora the CPE team will be presenting a Year in Review. As
part of that we want to hold a Community Q and this is a general call for
any questions that you might like to have answered by the CPE Leadership
team in that call? We can curate the top questions (with thanks
Hi, Stephen.
On Wednesday, 05 August 2020 at 21:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> FESCo has requested that I submit the module policy once more to the
> Fedora development list for discussion. Feedback is welcome.
[...]
> * The default stream of a module *MUST NOT* change to a different
> stream
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 7:12 PM Kamil Paral wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:57 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
>>
>> After discussing this with FESCo last week, this is submitted at a F33
>> change since it's largely a paperwork exercise at this point.
>>
>>
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 8:57 PM Ben Cotton wrote:
> After discussing this with FESCo last week, this is submitted at a F33
> change since it's largely a paperwork exercise at this point.
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IoTEditionPromotion
>
> = Promote IoT to an Edition =
>
> ==
On Mon, Aug 03, 2020 at 02:36:40PM -0400, Alex Scheel wrote:
> Hey list,
>
>
> How do Fedora rawhide images get respun? Every time filesystem updates,
They are rebuild in every rawhide nightly compose.
Here's the one from last night/this morning:
Hi,
I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
when doing this I hit
https://github.com/espressomd/espresso/issues/3396, which prevents us
from compiling espresso with -lto, so I set _lto_cflags to %{nil},
which works for the build with openmpi, but gets ignored for the
On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 12:45 -0600, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
> when doing this I hit
> https://github.com/espressomd/espresso/issues/3396, which prevents us
> from compiling espresso with -lto, so I set _lto_cflags to
FESCo has requested that I submit the module policy once more to the
Fedora development list for discussion. Feedback is welcome.
Plainext (asciidoc) below, much more readable HTML at
https://sgallagh.fedorapeople.org/docs/modularity/modularity/policies/
= Policies Regarding Modules in Fedora,
On 8/5/20 8:45 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
> when doing this I hit
> https://github.com/espressomd/espresso/issues/3396, which prevents us
> from compiling espresso with -lto, so I set _lto_cflags to %{nil},
> which
On 8/5/20 8:30 AM, Jiří Eischmann wrote:
Zdenek Dohnal píše v St 05. 08. 2020 v 07:44 +0200:
Hi all,
I would like to announce sane-airscan project [1] will be shipped in
the
official Fedora repositories from Fedora 32 [2].
sane-airscan implements a backend for Microsoft WSD and ESCL (usually
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 12:54 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 12:45 -0600, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
> > when doing this I hit
> > https://github.com/espressomd/espresso/issues/3396, which prevents
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 9:41 PM Christoph Junghans wrote:
>
> On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 12:54 PM Jeff Law wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 12:45 -0600, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
> > > when doing this I
On 05/08/20 04:35 +0200, J. Scheurich wrote:
Am 05.08.20 um 01:52 schrieb Ben Cotton:
Here are some upcoming deadlines and milestones for the Fedora 33
development cycle:
Are you sure, that boost1.73 should be part of fedora 33 ?
It lloks like boost.173 would require a future verson of
On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 21:56 +0200, David Schwörer wrote:
> On 8/5/20 8:45 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
> > when doing this I hit
> > https://github.com/espressomd/espresso/issues/3396, which prevents us
> >
As general feedback, the footnotes make it hard to read the rendered version of
the document, forcing me to scroll up and down.
More comments below.
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020, at 3:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> * If a stream of a module has build-time-only components, all such
> components
On Wed, Aug 5, 2020 at 2:21 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-08-05 at 21:56 +0200, David Schwörer wrote:
> > On 8/5/20 8:45 PM, Christoph Junghans wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I am trying to rebuild espresso to adapt to the recent cmake changes,
> > > when doing this I hit
> > >
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1517572
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jorti...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=169
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jorti...@redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851872
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|jorti...@redhat.com
The following Fedora EPEL 8 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-0d4ceeda8e
java-latest-openjdk-14.0.2.12-1.rolling.el8
12 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2020-cf43d780cc
chromium-84.0.4147.89-1.el8
I originally reported this issue at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862703 but was asked to re-report
it here:
I was using whatcanidoforfedora.org to see what areas I could contribute to. I
selected "Validate Releases" and it took me to the QA wiki:
https://fedorapeople.org/groups/389ds/ci/nightly/2020/08/06/report-389-ds-base-1.4.4.4-20200805gitd268928.fc32.x86_64.html
___
389-devel mailing list -- 389-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858951
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Fixed In Version|perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0 |perl-ExtUtils-HasCompiler-0
The following Fedora EPEL 7 Security updates need testing:
Age URL
722 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2018-3c9292b62d
condor-8.6.11-1.el7
462 https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-EPEL-2019-bc0182548b
bubblewrap-0.3.3-2.el7
171
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866359
Fedora Update System changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|MODIFIED|ON_QA
--- Comment #3 from
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866359
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|MODIFIED
Fixed In Version|
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866359
--- Comment #2 from Fedora Update System ---
FEDORA-2020-c52fc7e6fd has been submitted as an update to Fedora 32.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c52fc7e6fd
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855962
Dave Miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||justd...@bugzilla.org
--- Comment #1
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866359
Petr Pisar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Hi,
I am having troubles build rpy in Fedora 33 and I am running out of ideas.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpy
An example of a failure is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48721928
The problem says:
error: attempt to use unversioned python, define %__python
On 05. 08. 20 12:49, José Abílio Matos wrote:
Hi,
I am having troubles build rpy in Fedora 33 and I am running out of ideas.
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rpy
An example of a failure is here:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=48721928
The problem says:
error:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832729
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|p...@city-fan.org
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1866359
Bug ID: 1866359
Summary: perl-Filter-1.60 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Filter
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1855962
Emmanuel Seyman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Link ID||Mozilla Foundation 1657496
--
On Wednesday, 5 August 2020 12.14.58 WEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Hey José Abílio o/
Hi Miro, :-)
thank you for pointing me in the right direction.
> This is https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/PythonMacroError
>
> And in the spec:
>
> # export PYTHONPATH=%{buildroot}%{python_sitearch}
>
Dear all,
I'm attempting to package binaryen for Fedora (and EPEL7+)[1]. Unlike
Debian[2], I want to run its testsuite in %check. The testsuite uses
nodejs to run some of the optional tests, but it needs a newer nodejs
than the EOL'd version 6 that is in EPEL7 repo. I'd like to have the
same
60 matches
Mail list logo
